戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 R 11.79 [4.30-37.98], p<0.0001 for recurrent abdominal pain).
2 e than a month started complaining of severe abdominal pain.
3 ea is a common symptom in youth with chronic abdominal pain.
4 h CP present with recurrent or chronic upper abdominal pain.
5 or diagnosing ACNES in patients with chronic abdominal pain.
6 re gastrointestinal bleeding and episodes of abdominal pain.
7 ly included bowel obstruction, bleeding, and abdominal pain.
8  experienced erythema, wheezing, nausea, and abdominal pain.
9  pneumonia developed with generalized, acute abdominal pain.
10 pinal G-CSF as a target for treating chronic abdominal pain.
11 or the physician's in the screening of acute abdominal pain.
12 most common presentation in the Px group was abdominal pain.
13       These processes might link stress with abdominal pain.
14 of KOR agonists for the treatment of chronic abdominal pain.
15 n who presented with a sudden - onset severe abdominal pain.
16 cument acute appendicitis or other causes of abdominal pain.
17 disease generally represented by right lower abdominal pain.
18 dely associated with symptoms of fatigue and abdominal pain.
19 ry from asymptomatic abdominal mass to acute abdominal pain.
20 ented to our emergency department with acute abdominal pain.
21 domen was performed to evaluate the cause of abdominal pain.
22 year-old postmenopausal woman presented with abdominal pain.
23 ith the most common presenting symptom being abdominal pain.
24 e most common side effects were vomiting and abdominal pain.
25 ecause it can rule out other causes of acute abdominal pain.
26 itted to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain.
27 gesics, and one in five suffered from severe abdominal pain.
28 ent episodes of carpopedal spasms and crampy abdominal pains.
29 symptomatic irritable bowel syndrome/chronic abdominal pain, 1.0 million (95% CI, 0.8-1.2) visits for
30 ion), biliary tract disease ($10.3 billion), abdominal pain ($10.2 billion), and inflammatory bowel d
31 mon serious adverse event in both groups was abdominal pain (11 [4%] in the imatinib group, 14 [4%] i
32 aminotransferase concentration (12; 4%), and abdominal pain (11; 3%).
33 ophosphataemia (19 [6%]), anaemia (17 [5%]), abdominal pain (13; 4%), and elevated lipase level (15;
34    During follow-up, 70 of 450 patients with abdominal pain (15%), 53 of 387 with chest pain and/or d
35 ]), depression (124 [17%] of 713 responses), abdominal pain (178 [22%]), and ocular disorders (142 [1
36 ausea/vomiting 7.8% (95% CI, 7.1%-8.5%), and abdominal pain 2.7% (95% CI, 2.0%-3.4%).
37 [13%] of 156 patients in the placebo group), abdominal pain (20 [13%] vs 12 [8%]), diarrhoea (16 [10%
38 ; one [1%] grade >=3), diarrhoea (23 [32%]), abdominal pain (20 [27%]; two [3%] grade >=3), decreased
39 ents with monogenic Crohn's disease, 35% had abdominal pain, 24% had nonbloody loose stool, 18% had v
40 ecisions changed in 116 of 457 patients with abdominal pain (25%), 72 of 387 with chest pain and/or d
41 uropathy (33 [22%]), dry eye (32 [22%]), and abdominal pain (30 [20%]).
42  symptoms, including vomiting (26/58 [45%]), abdominal pain (31/58 [53%]), and diarrhea (30/58 [52%])
43  clinical adverse events were fatigue (55%), abdominal pain (34%), and nausea (19%).
44  health care contact after RYGB surgery were abdominal pain (489 [34.2%]), fatigue (488 [34.1%]), and
45 , constipation (7.4% and 8.6% vs. 2.5%), and abdominal pain (5.8% and 7.2% vs. 4.1%).
46             The percentage of responders for abdominal pain (50.6% vs 42.2%; P = .018) was significan
47 iagnosis changed in 235 of 460 patients with abdominal pain (51%), 163 of 387 with chest pain and/or
48      Adults were more likely to present with abdominal pain (71.8% vs 40.7%; P < .001) and children w
49 oms in CD were tiredness/fatigue (80.6%) and abdominal pain (80.4%) while passage of blood with bowel
50  complications [PEF 28 (25.2%), NV 4 (3.6%), abdominal pain 9 (8.1%), infection 7 (6.3 %), AHD 13 (11
51 RCP pancreatitis (PEP), defined by new upper-abdominal pain, a lipase level more than 3-fold the uppe
52 , use of pain modulators, moderate to severe abdominal pain, a severe gastroesophageal reflex, and mo
53 nflammation of the urinary or genital tract, abdominal pain, abdominal mass, obstructive uropathy, in
54 evening) for the past 10 days and left flank abdominal pain, accompanied by sweating and fatigue.
55 s characterized by such clinical features as abdominal pain, acute pancreatitis, eruptive xanthomas,
56 as with clinical manifestations ranging from abdominal pain, acute pancreatitis, exocrine and/or endo
57       Risk of persisting need for insulin or abdominal pain after having had two versus one asparagin
58            Consecutive patients admitted for abdominal pain after RYGB and undergoing CT and surgical
59 ys be remembered in patients presenting with abdominal pain after stent insertion.
60 thms and the WHO vaginal discharge and lower abdominal pain algorithms with gold standard testing.
61 y presented to our emergency department with abdominal pain alongside elevated inflammatory markers a
62 inal bleeding accompanied by the episodes of abdominal pain - an ectopic pancreas located in the ileu
63 ing three cases was iron deficiency anaemia, abdominal pain and acute intestinal obstruction, respect
64   The trial included adults with IBS-D, mean abdominal pain and bloating scores of 3 or more, and loo
65 n presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain and bloody diarrhoea.
66 mmunosuppressed patients with fever, chills, abdominal pain and cholestasis with progressive jaundice
67             We measured improvement in worst abdominal pain and composite pain score using the Pain F
68                  We studied 11 patients with abdominal pain and diarrhea caused by early-onset protei
69 ur center with the chief complaint of severe abdominal pain and diarrhea for 2 years that had worsene
70 s associated with gastrointestinal symptoms (abdominal pain and diarrhea) and musculoskeletal symptom
71 a multitude of symptoms, including vomiting, abdominal pain and diarrhea.
72 BD) tend to avoid dairy products to minimize abdominal pain and diarrhea.
73 should be considered in a patient with upper abdominal pain and elevated amylase in the context of an
74     Symptoms (stools type, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and flatulence) were assessed by a self-a
75    One day following discharge from hospital abdominal pain and frequent non-bloody diarrhea recurred
76                We included 401 patients with abdominal pain and gallstones (assumed eligible for chol
77                     Patients >=18 years with abdominal pain and gallstones were included at five surg
78 low pandisaccharidase may be correlated with abdominal pain and have a unique frequency of GI symptom
79 epartment with complaints of breathlessness, abdominal pain and hematuria for the last 6 months.
80 who presented with 1 week history of diffuse abdominal pain and high grade fever, associated with vom
81  who had a composite response of decrease in abdominal pain and improvement in stool consistency on t
82                           She presented with abdominal pain and inflammatory syndrome revealing a col
83 hronic pancreatitis often results in chronic abdominal pain and is most commonly caused by excessive
84 8-year-old female patient with complaints of abdominal pain and jaundice.
85 several gastrointestinal conditions, such as abdominal pain and motility-related disorders.
86     In an oral food challenge test, she felt abdominal pain and nausea only after eating fruit, along
87         The patient complained of cramp-like abdominal pain and nausea.
88 at may be marked by debilitating symptoms of abdominal pain and obstruction.
89  patient presented with complaints of severe abdominal pain and palpable pulsatile abdominal mass loc
90 -D and IBS-M, respectively, with decrease of abdominal pain and resolution of "diarrhea".
91 ove other gastrointestinal symptoms, such as abdominal pain and satiety.
92  to 18 years) with unclear chronic/recurrent abdominal pain and suspected FM/LM.
93 plication observed was nonspecific transient abdominal pain and transient hypotension.
94     However, the patient began to experience abdominal pain and vomiting after ingestion of egg appro
95 ncy Department with complaints of epigastric abdominal pain and vomiting.
96 ith jejunal diverticulitis accompanying with abdominal pain and vomiting.
97  symptoms of obstructive jaundice, including abdominal pain and yellowing of the skin.
98 r body areas, endometriosis can cause severe abdominal pain and/or infertility.
99 d female presented with diarrhoea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and bloating.
100 nt with the classic symptoms of weight loss, abdominal pain, and bloody diarrhea, many present with n
101 with trichinellosis, characterized by fever, abdominal pain, and diarrhea, along with eosinophilia ra
102 mon adverse events included nasopharyngitis, abdominal pain, and diarrhea.
103   Demographic characteristics, risk factors, abdominal pain, and disease burden.
104 al abdominal discomfort, abdominal bloating, abdominal pain, and flatulence on a scale of 1-6.
105 g self-limiting conditions including nausea, abdominal pain, and FMT-related diarrhea.
106 ons in pancreatic enzymes, re-admissions for abdominal pain, and incidentalomas.
107 included fever duration, diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and leukocytopenia.
108       Adverse events included mild diarrhea, abdominal pain, and nausea.
109  the study period, 288 (8.5%) presented with abdominal pain, and of these 199 (69%) patients were enr
110                                  Hemorrhage, abdominal pain, and perforation were the most common cau
111 ptom scores (fullness, distention, bloating, abdominal pain, and sickness) in CD participants compare
112 rent fever, fatigue, elevated liver enzymes, abdominal pain, and significant weight loss.
113 luding colonic (ie, perforation, hemorrhage, abdominal pain), anesthesia-associated (ie, pneumonia, i
114  conditions in patients with IBD are chronic abdominal pain, anxiety, and depression.
115 tal bleeding [RB], stool frequency [SF]; CD: abdominal pain [AP], liquid stools [LS]) and outcome dur
116 ms, including diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, and abdominal pain, as well as liver enzyme abnormalities, h
117 revalence of diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain, as well as liver function tests abnormal
118 ointestinal disorder with symptoms including abdominal pain associated with a change in stool form or
119 e paradoxical development of or increases in abdominal pain associated with continuous or increasing
120 contributes to visceral hypersensitivity and abdominal pain associated with many gastrointestinal dis
121        For failure to achieve improvement in abdominal pain at 4-12 weeks, tricyclic antidepressants
122 ars of age and younger presenting with acute abdominal pain at a tertiary care institution from Janua
123 HAE-FXII) is associated with skin swellings, abdominal pain attacks, and the risk of asphyxiation due
124 after a single 250 mg dose (one subject) and abdominal pain, back pain, and eczema after multiple dos
125 y, no differences were found for severity of abdominal pain, bloating and flatulence, and QoL score b
126 ic emptying and vomiting, as well as nausea, abdominal pain, bloating, and early satiety compared wit
127 ble bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterized by abdominal pain, bloating, and erratic bowel habits.
128 ylobacter infection [grade 3]; recurrence of abdominal pain, bloating, diarrhoea, and urinary tract i
129        Secondary end points included nausea, abdominal pain, bloating, early satiety, as well as the
130 the severity of 5 gastrointestinal symptoms (abdominal pain, bloating, nausea, gas, and fullness) bef
131 ldren (known as MIS-C), manifested by severe abdominal pain, cardiac dysfunction and shock.
132 oenterology outpatient department with acute abdominal pain centered in the epigastrium.
133 0%, and 13%, respectively, for patients with abdominal pain, chest pain and/or dyspnea, and headache;
134 ncy department who were referred for CT with abdominal pain, chest pain and/or dyspnea, or headache w
135  scenario is a young patient presenting with abdominal pain, chronic diarrhoea, weight loss, and fati
136  the 8 mg/kg dose of ramucirumab had grade 3 abdominal pain, colitis, hepatitis, interstitial lung di
137 ecrease in the weekly average of worst daily abdominal pain compared with baseline in at least 4 week
138 stical correlation between lead toxicity and abdominal pain consistency and intensity, constipation,
139 c diseases with signs and symptoms including abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting
140  taking add-on antidepressants suffered from abdominal pain, constipation, dizziness, and dry mouth.
141 ENS or developmental defects cause vomiting, abdominal pain, constipation, growth failure, and early
142 irritable bowel syndrome, chronic functional abdominal pain, constipation, or diarrhea.
143   Of 188 reported AEs, diarrhea, flatulence, abdominal pain/cramping, and constipation were most comm
144 ) have ongoing bowel symptoms of diarrhea or abdominal pain despite mucosal healing.
145 estinal disorder characterized by persistent abdominal pain despite recovery from acute gastroenterit
146 uded, presented to emergency room with acute abdominal pain diagnosed as primary fat necrosis.
147 ally observed in patients with IBD including abdominal pain, diarrhea, and poor growth.
148 disease (EVD) symptoms (eg, fever, headache, abdominal pain, diarrhea, emesis, and fatigue) with symp
149  symptoms were grouped into four categories, abdominal pain, diarrhea, weight loss, and gastroesophag
150 n presented to his local hospital with acute abdominal pain, diarrhoea, and vomiting, and was admitte
151 rmint oil did, however, significantly reduce abdominal pain, discomfort, and IBS severity.
152                 Secondary endpoints included abdominal pain, discomfort, symptom severity, and advers
153 nked to SIBO include bloating, diarrhea, and abdominal pain/discomfort.
154 rs" (AP-FGID) has been changed to functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPD) and we have derived a ne
155 e interventions for children with functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs).
156                                   Functional abdominal pain disorders are common disorders with a pre
157                        Paediatric functional abdominal pain disorders, currently referred to as disor
158    Therefore, patients present with cyclical abdominal pain during menstruation along with normal men
159 11, para 8) presented with increasing severe abdominal pain during the first trimester of pregnancy a
160 GS subjects and jaundice was associated with abdominal pain, dyspepsia or loss of appetite in 54 (53.
161  57 patients, most commonly hypokalaemia and abdominal pain (each three [5%] patients).
162                          Average duration of abdominal pain episodes correlated with GE (r = -0.58, p
163 fferential of patients complaining of sudden abdominal pain, especially after chronic PEG utilization
164 food causes bloating, overfilled intestines, abdominal pain, excessive feces, steatorrhea, and malnut
165 sented with a variety of symptoms, including abdominal pain, fatigue, muscle weakness, and low plasma
166 old woman presented with a 1-week history of abdominal pain, fever and jaundice.
167 sian boy presented with a two-day history of abdominal pain, fever up to 40 degrees C, and polyuria.
168 ommon AEs reported were headache, dizziness, abdominal pain, fever, nausea, and fatigue.
169  common drug-related adverse events included abdominal pain (five [10%] of the 48 participants while
170 hy (five [28%]), diarrhoea (five [28%]), and abdominal pain (four [22%]).
171 n Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania with non-traumatic abdominal pain from September 2017 to October 2017.
172 l abuse presented to the hospital with acute abdominal pain, generalized weakness, weight loss, and p
173              Scores obtained for severity of abdominal pain had a negative correlation with A (r = -0
174 tection of salivary VZV DNA in patients with abdominal pain helps to identify putative enteric zoster
175 y care providers (PCPs) for CT evaluation of abdominal pain, hematuria, or weight loss were identifie
176                             In patients with abdominal pain, hematuria, or weight loss, leading diagn
177 y using a composite of four variables: worst abdominal pain, IBS symptom frequency, Bristol Stool For
178                                              Abdominal pain in adults represents a wide range of illn
179 nce, presentation, causes and mortality from abdominal pain in an established emergency department of
180 estinal disorder with the primary symptom of abdominal pain in conjunction with bloating and bowel mo
181 fferential diagnosis of severe and resistant abdominal pain in patients referring to general EDs or G
182 s study aimed to determine the prevalence of abdominal pain in patients seen in the Laghman Hakim Hos
183 reatment-related serious adverse events were abdominal pain in patients with gastric or gastro-oesoph
184  preventing glycation reactions might reduce abdominal pain in patients with IBS with sensitivity to
185 ced visceral hypersensitivity, symptoms, and abdominal pain in patients with IBS.
186 DNF) has been reported to be associated with abdominal pain in patients with irritable bowel syndrome
187                                      Chronic abdominal pain in some patients is caused by the anterio
188 bowel syndrome is characterised by worsening abdominal pain in the context of escalating or continuou
189 nal infections, gastrointestinal disease, or abdominal pain in the first year of life.
190 ttent melena, accompanied by the episodes of abdominal pain in the left upper quadrant and generalize
191       He had experienced similar episodes of abdominal pain in the past that had been treated with su
192 a for Adverse Events, version 4.03) included abdominal pain (in 18% of patients), nausea (8%), ascite
193 se events were nausea (in ten participants), abdominal pain (in six), and vomiting (in five).
194 is is exemplified in the assessment of acute abdominal pain, in which a physician's palpation determi
195 ation fever (PEF), nausea and vomiting (NV), abdominal pain, infection, acute hepatic decompensation
196 ints were: 1) a decrease of more than 50% in abdominal pain intensity and frequency scores; and 2) fo
197                                              Abdominal pain is a frequent postoperative complication
198   Differential diagnosis can be difficult as abdominal pain is common in pediatric C1-INH-HAE, but al
199 fter Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) chronic abdominal pain is common, however the etiology is largel
200  regarding patients with unexplained chronic abdominal pain is sparse.
201 ns (ie, increased frequency of loose stools, abdominal pain), it is hard to differentiate C. difficil
202      She consulted for a 6-months oppressive abdominal pain located in the mesogastrium as well as ab
203  change in bowel habit, hoarseness, fatigue, abdominal pain, lower abdominal pain, weight loss, and t
204                                              Abdominal pain may be a presenting symptom of lead poiso
205 an score after FMT, 0.37; range, 0.00-1.00), abdominal pain (mean reduction, 26%; median score before
206 dominal pain were defined as those reporting abdominal pain more than 2 times weekly within the last
207 th of FMT included diarrhea (n = 5 [2%]) and abdominal pain (n = 4 [2%]); 3 patients (1%) had hospita
208 ts have had an appendectomy due to recurrent abdominal pain (n = 5) or parental wish (n = 1) during t
209 n = 129 [77.7%]), fatigue (n = 116 [69.8%]), abdominal pain (n = 90 [54.2%]), headache (n = 87 [52.4%
210  fibrillation (n=2 [4%]), sepsis (n=2 [4%]), abdominal pain (n=1 [2%]), syncope (n=1 [2%]), celluliti
211 n=2), anaemia (n=1), pneumothorax (n=1), and abdominal pain (n=1, unlikely related).
212 necrosis and persistent unwellness marked by abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and nutritional failur
213 urnal dyspnea, swelling of the legs or feet, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, melena, or hematochezi
214 eight [15%] patients vs ten [16%] patients), abdominal pain (nine [17%] patients vs four [6%] patient
215     For failure to achieve an improvement in abdominal pain, none of the active treatments showed sup
216  with incidence rate ratios close to 1.0 for abdominal pain, nonspecific pain, headache, hypotension/
217 dyspepsia, abdominal migraine and functional abdominal pain not otherwise specified, as defined by th
218  and we have derived a new term, "functional abdominal pain -not otherwise specified", to describe ch
219 wo serious adverse events (biliary colic and abdominal pain), occurring in the same participant, were
220 t repeat treatment, defined as a decrease in abdominal pain of >/=30% from baseline and a decrease in
221 ocedures were symptomatic cholelithiasis and abdominal pain of unknown origin.
222 mbocytopenia (seven [7%] vs three [6%]), and abdominal pain (one [1%] vs three [6%]).
223 vent: autoimmune disorder (two [13%]), lower abdominal pain (one [7%]), fatigue (one [7%]), and influ
224 c of Loghman Hakim Hospital with unexplained abdominal pain or abdominal pain resistant to treatment
225 tients still needed insulin or had recurrent abdominal pain or both.
226 was not recommended in patients with chronic abdominal pain or diarrhea, in whom there was no evidenc
227 based on Rome III criteria, with symptoms of abdominal pain or discomfort for at least 2 days/wk) and
228 rritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and functional abdominal pain or functional abdominal pain syndrome (FA
229 severe asparaginase-associated pancreatitis (abdominal pain or pancreatic enzymes at least three time
230  95% CI, 1.59-3.23) and severe self-reported abdominal pain (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.64-4.84).
231 association between low lactase activity and abdominal pain (OR = 1.78; 95% CI = 1.07-2.97; p < 0.05)
232 ratio < 0.2 were found to be associated with abdominal pain (OR = 2.25; 95% CI = 1.25-4.04; p < 0.05)
233 ), hemorrhage (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.27-1.30), abdominal pain (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.05-1.08), complicati
234 ong analgesics was a risk factor for chronic abdominal pain (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.59-3.23) and severe
235 ating (P < .04), and of depression levels on abdominal pain (P = .007), reflecting a general upward s
236 ements than placebo in secondary outcomes of abdominal pain (P = .016), discomfort (P = .020), and IB
237 afety for total number of adverse events and abdominal pain (P-score 0.08).
238 atitis was defined by at least two criteria: abdominal pain, pancreatic enzymes at least three times
239  reporting bloody diarrhea, fever, vomiting, abdominal pain; percentage hospitalized; duration of hos
240 , algorithms for vaginal discharge and lower abdominal pain perform poorly in women.
241 ts post-cholecystectomy, whereas non-biliary abdominal pain persists in >40%, particularly in those w
242 miting frequency and symptom scores (nausea, abdominal pain, postprandial fullness, and bloating) on
243 n presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain preceded by approximately one month of fr
244 ns of leukocytes), feasibility (evaluated by abdominal pain recurrence), the presence and recurrence
245                              The presence of abdominal pain reduced the risk (OR 0.5 (0.3-0.7)), whil
246                                    Rome III "abdominal pain related functional gastrointestinal disor
247 S with Neuro-Stim has sustained efficacy for abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disor
248 ed the efficacy of PENFS in adolescents with abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disor
249 d 11-18 years) who met Rome III criteria for abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disor
250  safe and effective therapies for paediatric abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disor
251 8, 2015, and Nov 17, 2016, 115 children with abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disor
252 ood counts, but with headaches, lethargy, or abdominal pain, reported symptom resolution with prophyl
253 ts undergoing RYGB surgery developed chronic abdominal pain requiring strong analgesics, and one in f
254  Hospital with unexplained abdominal pain or abdominal pain resistant to treatment were enrolled.
255                                              Abdominal pain response did not differ significantly bet
256 uced statistically significant reductions in abdominal pain response or overall symptom relief, when
257                     The primary endpoint was abdominal pain response, as defined by the US Food and D
258 eduction from baseline of the weekly average abdominal pain score for 6 or more of 12 weeks of treatm
259 e 46% vs placebo 13%; P = .024), and reduced abdominal pain scores (ebastine 39 +/- 23 vs placebo 62
260  The primary efficacy endpoint was change in abdominal pain scores.
261 is (eight [5%]), hyponatraemia (eight [5%]), abdominal pain (seven [5%]), and fatigue (seven [5%]).
262 rious adverse events; the most frequent were abdominal pain (seven [5%]), pyrexia (seven [5%]), chola
263 M is a rare anomaly that presents with upper abdominal pain, signs of acute pancreatitis and massive
264 rl who presented with dysmenorrhea and lower abdominal pain since a few months.
265 10%] of 147 patients), anaemia (eight [5%]), abdominal pain (six [4%]), hypokalaemia (six [4%]), conj
266 ome, IBS, bloating, constipation, functional abdominal pain, sphincter of Oddi dyskinesia, pelvic flo
267 symptoms and higher frequencies of vomiting, abdominal pain, swollen stomach, and loss of appetite, c
268                                              Abdominal pain, symptom relief, and health-related quali
269                           Centrally Mediated Abdominal Pain Syndrome (CAPS), formerly known as Functi
270  and functional abdominal pain or functional abdominal pain syndrome (FAP[S]).
271 yndrome (CAPS), formerly known as Functional Abdominal Pain Syndrome, can be distinguished from other
272 old male was admitted due to recurring upper abdominal pain that lasted several weeks.
273 e individuals within a population defined by abdominal pain that might have enteric zoster.
274 cy department with subacute poorly localized abdominal pain that was increasing in intensity.
275 frame, developing a severe (NRS 6-8) chronic abdominal pain that was only diagnosed after a substanti
276 ib group were anaemia (seven [4%] patients), abdominal pain (three [2%] patients), and intestinal obs
277                 Symptoms may range from mild abdominal pain to life-threatening obstruction and stran
278 of chronic constipation presents with severe abdominal pain to the emergency department.
279 ediate allergic reaction including erythema, abdominal pain, vomiting, and anaphylactic shock.
280 ore with berotralstat than with placebo were abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, and back pain.
281      The prevalence of postoperative chronic abdominal pain was 11% and the prevalence of severe self
282 % and the prevalence of severe self-reported abdominal pain was 21%.
283                         Pancreatitis-related abdominal pain was a major symptom in 81% of children wi
284                                              Abdominal pain was associated with significant morbidity
285 istory of hysterectomy presenting with vague abdominal pain was completely evaluated with ultrasound
286 ere similar between the two groups, although abdominal pain was more common in adults, and weight los
287 ressants were ranked first for efficacy when abdominal pain was used as the outcome measure.
288 , hoarseness, fatigue, abdominal pain, lower abdominal pain, weight loss, and the "any other symptom"
289 sting need for insulin therapy and recurrent abdominal pain were associated with having had pseudocys
290           Patients with severe self-reported abdominal pain were defined as those reporting abdominal
291                        Patients with chronic abdominal pain were defined as those using strong analge
292           Adult patients with gallstones and abdominal pain were included.
293 ation in immunocompetent, while diarrhea and abdominal pain were more common in immunocompromised.
294  greater symptoms of reflux, indigestion and abdominal pain were reported.
295                          Icterus, fever, and abdominal pain were the leading symptoms.
296 ent in global IBS symptoms or improvement in abdominal pain, were included.
297 on presenting symptoms in CD are fatigue and abdominal pain while in UC bloody BM and diarrhea are mo
298    One hundred seventeen patients with acute abdominal pain who underwent abdominal CT were enrolled
299  syndrome generally present with nonspecific abdominal pain, with the left renal vein (LRV) lodged be
300 rior to the current admission, she developed abdominal pain, worsening diarrhea and was diagnosed wit

 
Page Top