ライフサイエンスコーパス: abdominal wall

1 cm; all tumors were extra-abdominal (41% in abdominal wall).

2 s exteriorized as a stoma in the lower right abdominal wall.

3 ension that were not affixed to the chest or abdominal wall.

4 rmine the safe zone of entry of the anterior abdominal wall.

5 arrier was laid in between the cecum and the abdominal wall.

6 host, and then placed subcutaneously in the abdominal wall.

7 r 5-mm trocars inserted through the anterior abdominal wall.

8 ical examination revealed laxity of the left abdominal wall.

9 ion and prominent vascular markings over his abdominal wall.

10 ing smooth muscle of adjacent viscera or the abdominal wall.

11 ments that displaced the colon away from the abdominal wall.

12 ntreated cultures or in fibroblasts from the abdominal wall.

13 ot deformity, and congenital weakness of the abdominal wall.

14 f chronic pain and perception of mesh in the abdominal wall.

15 plane of the right forearm and the anterior abdominal wall.

16 esence of a prosthetic-mesh footprint in the abdominal wall.

17 r and seems as a safe option to preserve the abdominal wall.

18 the diaphragm and protrusion of the anterior abdominal wall.

19 at a lower force compared with nonherniated abdominal walls.

20 (17%), mesentery (14%), adrenal gland (8%), abdominal wall (8%), colon (6%), stomach (3%), and gallb

21 We report on a patient with an abdominal wall abscess that developed after an inguinal

22 or pediatric transplantation, closure of the abdominal wall after liver transplantation is occasional

23 analysis from abdominal tissue including the abdominal wall after removal of the major organs, of wil

24 Immediate revascularization of the abdominal wall allograft substantially reduces cold isch

25 We describe our initial experience with abdominal wall allotransplantation to facilitate abdomin

26 l procedures, and repeated disruption of the abdominal wall among the factors most strongly associate

27 Abdominal wall and anorectal motion, anorectal pressures

28 them from skin fibroblasts derived from the abdominal wall and from the pretibium.

29 ion at the SolviMax Center of Excellence for Abdominal Wall and Groin Pain, Eindhoven, The Netherland

30 schisis, a severe disruption of the anterior abdominal wall and herniation of the abdominal organs.

31 e also had multiple ulcerated lesions on her abdominal wall and in the perianal region.

32 architecture of a patent airway conduit and abdominal wall and internal intercostal muscles providin

33 Infection within the abdominal wall and peritonitis are still important cause

34 ed radiation doses of 0, 10, or 20 Gy to the abdominal wall and underwent laparotomy 4 weeks later.

35 l differential diagnosis of abnormalities of abdominal wall and urinary system, consideration of urac

36 limb, 10 uterus, 5 craniofacial, 1 scalp, 1 abdominal wall, and 1 penile).

37 of analgesia to the parietal peritoneum and abdominal wall, and are best used combined with oral or

38 quadrants of the bilateral breasts, anterior abdominal wall, and forearm.

39 rmed patients' lives by enabling limb, face, abdominal wall, and penile transplants.

40 to extract intestines located away from the abdominal wall, and to quantify intestinal motor pattern

41 rome type 1 that includes dental, ocular and abdominal wall anomalies as cardinal features.

42 g repair of large or recurrent hernia of the abdominal wall are at risk for early postoperative hyper

43 f the open abdomen and reconstruction of the abdominal wall are being developed from negative pressur

44 to M. smegmatis, was isolated both from the abdominal wall aspirate and from surgically drained mate

45 ted that hernia formation is associated with abdominal wall atrophy and fibrosis after 5 weeks in an

46 More important, the skin of the transplanted abdominal wall (AW) may serve as an immunological tool f

47 of labeled terminal profiles per area of the abdominal wall, axial, and pelvic floor motoneuron pool

48 motoneuron pools that supply muscles of the abdominal wall, axial, and pelvic floor.

49 patients (1.3%) with flank lesions (lateral abdominal wall below the rib cage, above the iliac crest

50 Trauma to abdominal wall blood vessels occurs in 0.2% to 2% of lap

51 HG signals by electrodes, the tension of the abdominal wall by tocodynamometry (TOCO) and maternal pe

52 niorrhaphy more completely reverses atrophic abdominal wall changes than primary herniorrhaphy, despi

53 modeling of conduit vessels arising from the abdominal wall circulation.

54 ng defects affecting craniofacial structure, abdominal wall closure and epidermal stratification that

55 nt, EphB2/EphB3 are shown to mediate ventral abdominal wall closure by acting principally as ligands

56 ions for intestinal transplant patients with abdominal wall closure either primarily or with foreign

57 Primary abdominal wall closure following small bowel transplanta

58 Primary abdominal wall closure was achieved in all.

59 ominal compartment syndrome during attempted abdominal wall closure, and need to reassess extent of b

60 ion leads to visceral edema often precluding abdominal wall closure.

61 Incisional hernias complicate 11% of abdominal wall closures, resulting in 200,000 incisional

62 us capsules on diverse organs, including the abdominal wall, colon, stomach, lung and heart, over 12

63 Overall, abdominal wall complaints decreased from 82% to 13% of t

64 tion, and fatigue), and questions addressing abdominal wall complaints.

65 become fibrotic during herniation, reducing abdominal wall compliance and increasing the transfer of

66 e length and tension relationships and total abdominal wall compliance.

67 ions, whereas BMI was a risk factor only for abdominal wall complications; BSA did not reach signific

68 Transplantation of an abdominal wall composite allograft can facilitate recons

69 We undertook nine cadaveric abdominal wall composite allograft transplants in eight

70 ake of the 99mTc bone tracer in the anterior abdominal wall confined to the sites of subcutaneous hep

71 Analyses of abdominal wall connective tissue thickness and peritonea

72 Restoring abdominal wall cover and contour in children undergoing

73 There was a membrane covered, midline, abdominal wall defect at the base of the umbilical cord

74 Absorbable mesh provides effective temporary abdominal wall defect coverage with a low fistula rate.

75 ular pedicle to reconstruct a full-thickness abdominal wall defect in the same mouse.

76 Patients with enteric fistulas and an abdominal wall defect present an extreme challenge to su

77 years, a mean BMI of 24.4 kg/m2, and a mean abdominal wall defect size of 247.9 cm2.

78 ed neonates with gastroschisis, a congenital abdominal wall defect that leads to exposure of the feta

79 Full-thickness abdominal wall defect was reconstructed using this engin

80 hypoplastic left heart syndrome, oral cleft, abdominal wall defect).

81 While adjusted pooled RRs were increased for abdominal wall defects (1.46; 95% CI, 0.89-2.38), tetral

82 Survival for newborns with congenital abdominal wall defects (primarily omphalocele and gastro

83 Abdominal wall defects comprising both gastroschisis and

84 Our management scheme for giant abdominal wall defects consists of 3 stages: stage I, ab

85 Outcomes of abdominal wall defects have been discussed more often in

86 re intestinal atresia in 28 (54.9%) studies, abdominal wall defects in 27 (52.9%), anorectal malforma

87 Complex or recurrent abdominal wall defects may be the result of a failed pri

88 tion with anterior diaphragmatic and ventral abdominal wall defects suggestive of thoraco-abdominal v

89 ient selection, NPWT may leave patients with abdominal wall defects that require further treatment.

90 The staged management of patients with giant abdominal wall defects without the use of permanent mesh

91 system MCMs to 1.20 [95% CI, 0.75-1.91] for abdominal wall defects), or for any of the 75 individual

92 valence of neural tube defects, oral clefts, abdominal wall defects, and chromosomal anomalies in Haw

93 ), which causes prenatal overgrowth, midline abdominal wall defects, macroglossia, and embryonal tumo

94 terized by somatic overgrowth, macroglossia, abdominal wall defects, visceromegaly, and an increased

95 ngs regarding outcomes and interventions for abdominal wall defects.

96 ntestinal transplant recipients with complex abdominal wall defects.

97 ment of patients with open abdomen and giant abdominal wall defects.

98 s including overgrowth, enlarged tongue, and abdominal wall defects.

99 repair in contaminated fields and for large abdominal wall defects; however, more studies need to be

100 methylation of LIT1 in patients with midline abdominal-wall defects and macrosomia was significantly

101 osomia, ear pits or ear creases, and midline abdominal-wall defects.

102 the human phenotype, including diaphragm and abdominal-wall defects.

103 Patients with unilateral abdominal wall deficiency, unilateral undescended testis

104 Mesh-repaired abdominal walls demonstrated a trend toward an intermedi

105 The formation of the abdominal wall depends on a flawless merge of several de

106 at an angle of 20 degrees from the anterior abdominal wall, directed at the substernal space.

107 te bladder irritation, dramatic increases in abdominal wall EMG activity in response to CRD were obse

108 to 40 cm H2O produced no notable changes in abdominal wall EMG activity.

109 genital anomaly (aOR 5.17, 95% CI 1.9-14.1), abdominal wall erythema or discolouration at presentatio

110 Defecation was initiated by abdominal wall expansion that was coordinated with anore

111 me surrounding the needle; 3) imaging of rat abdominal wall explants, with and without needle rotatio

112 The internal oblique muscles of the abdominal wall express a pattern of changes consistent w

113 nal failure, and fistulation, with resulting abdominal wall failure.

114 systems, including kidney (13% vs. 28%) and abdominal wall fat (10% vs. 13%), PET identified involve

115 f the right forearm (Fig 5) and the anterior abdominal wall (Fig 6).

116 Common locations of the abscess are in the abdominal wall followed by the intra-abdominal cavity, u

117 nsertion of a Bardport subcutaneously in the abdominal wall for intraperitoneal therapy.

118 art from an increased mean time to close the abdominal wall for mesh-augmented reinforcement compared

119 The aim of the study was to examine abdominal wall function in patients undergoing abdominal

120 The literature on abdominal wall function in patients with incisional hern

121 e survived, five of whom have intact, viable abdominal wall grafts.

122 arynx, vascularized knee, trachea, face, and abdominal wall has been performed.

123 PMA of the abdominal wall has been studied as a preventive measure

124 he herniation of the small bowel through the abdominal wall, has increased in the US since the 1960s.

125 those of uterus, penis, trachea, larynx, or abdominal wall have confirmed the potential for vascular

126 deleterious effects on bowel anastomosis or abdominal wall healing.

127 Abdominal wall hernia is one of the most common conditio

128 inguinal hernia repair (PFS, 15.5-22.1), and abdominal wall hernia repair (PFS, 21.6-26.1).

129 Rising rates of abdominal wall hernia repair have been described; howeve

130 esh-related complications following elective abdominal wall hernia repair in a population with comple

131 and risk-adjusted adverse event rates after abdominal wall hernia repair was determined.

132 2005-2009), 71,054 patients who underwent an abdominal wall hernia repair were identified (17% laparo

133 biological mesh materials used to reinforce abdominal wall hernia repair.

134 materials are increasingly used to reinforce abdominal wall hernia repairs.

135 erative CT and who had surgically proved non-abdominal wall hernia small-bowel obstruction (n=68) or

136 ons frequently complicate surgical repair of abdominal wall hernia.

137 biological mesh materials for the repair of abdominal wall hernia.

138 ion without surgery for bowel obstruction or abdominal-wall hernia (14.2% vs. 8.1%, P<0.001).

139 more established conditions include anterior abdominal wall hernias, piriformis syndrome, thoracic ou

140 ntaining tissues or organs (i.e., diaphragm, abdominal wall, ileum, and rectum).

141 olon cancer may result in the development of abdominal wall implants because of disseminated disease

142 transplant recipients--one to buttress a lax abdominal wall in a 22-month-old child with megacystis m

143 The absence of Pitx2 leads to an open abdominal wall in mice, while mutations in humans result

144 cted biopsies from human limb allografts and abdominal walls in various stages of rejection for histo

145 We sought to reduce the high incidence of abdominal wall incisional hernias using sustained releas

146 eported to improve outcomes in the repair of abdominal wall incisional hernias.

147 s frequently used to reinforce the repair of abdominal wall incisional hernias.

148 As well as postoperative changes in the abdominal wall, increased vigilance for groin hernia see

149 omplications in 25 patients (18.5%) included abdominal wall infection (n = 9), fascial dehiscence (n

150 an be significant but are usually limited to abdominal wall infection and hernia.

151 e case, wound classification, and history of abdominal wall infection.

152 ulature related to birth defects and loss of abdominal wall integrity from multiple surgeries.

153 ntercostal nerve endings at the level of the abdominal wall is an effective surgical procedure for pa

154 y mesh augmentation is a method in which the abdominal wall is strengthened to reduce incisional hern

155 h a Mediport implanted subcutaneously in the abdominal wall is used currently for treatment of perito

156 undescended testis and female neonates with abdominal wall laxity are classified as Pseudo Prune Bel

157 a whirl of blood vessels seen along anterior abdominal wall leading to these lesions suggesting torsi

158 The perianal and abdominal wall lesions were suspected to be pyoderma gan

159 oids, but surgery alone is curative for most abdominal wall lesions.

160 Recurrences appear as a new or enlarging abdominal wall mass, often involving subjacent omental f

161 nt of the viscera within an unyielding stiff abdominal wall may compromise the perfusion of the intes

162 surgical solution to the problem of infected abdominal wall mesh.

163 simultaneously measured (i) chest and upper abdominal wall motion using opto-electronic plethysmogra

164 result of hemorrhagic shock were seen in the abdominal wall muscle and the stomach as assessed by gas

165 air and mesh design should take into account abdominal wall muscle length and tension relationships a

166 e slowly than the bowel, but faster than the abdominal wall muscle pH, gastric PCO2 gap, or pHi.

167 ude and rapidity compared with stomach pH or abdominal wall muscle pH.

168 engineered lymphatic constructs into a mouse abdominal wall muscle resulted in anastomosis between ho

169 A 1 x 1 cm of abdominal wall muscle was excised directly over the ceca

170 as 54 +/- 49 (paraspinal muscle), 78 +/- 51 (abdominal wall muscle), and 59 +/- 35 (psoas) for the pr

171 h, the submucosa of the small bowel, and the abdominal wall muscle.

172 l undescended testis and absence of anterior abdominal wall muscles.

173 ional hernia specifically improved long-term abdominal wall muscular function and quality of life.

174 ly syndrome (PBS) and whether the absence of abdominal wall musculature impairs exercise performance

175 scles of the body wall (intercostal muscles, abdominal wall musculature).

176 chronic incisional hernias or acute anterior abdominal wall myofascial defects.

177 The purpose of this study is to measure abdominal wall myopathic histologic and mechanical chang

178 = 34), breast (n = 3), chest wall (n = 18), abdominal wall (n = 1), and perineal (n = 7).

179 pper limbs and face (n = 2), uterus (n = 4), abdominal wall (n = 19), larynx (n = 2), penis (n = 1),

180 One placement was unsuccessful (abdominal wall not breached), two patients were ultimate

181 A ventral hernia, surgically created in the abdominal wall of female swine, was repaired using silic

182 A silicone patch was secured to the lateral abdominal wall of groups of C57BL/6 mice, followed by ce

183 affixed to the serosal side of the anterior abdominal wall of rats, and solutions containing radiola

184 These lesions are usually located to the abdominal wall on postoperative scars, perineum and ches

185 as minimized by remotely revascularizing the abdominal wall on the forearm vessels, synchronous to th

186 and adipose tissue from patients undergoing abdominal wall or abdominoplasty surgery.

187 t is unknown whether this is specific to the abdominal wall or due to an improvement in overall physi

188 ith Gardner's syndrome, usually occur in the abdominal wall or intra-abdominally.

189 representative cases of intra-abdominal and abdominal wall pathology.

190 es does not limit solute transfer across the abdominal wall peritoneum during dialysis.

191 antrum connected to a neurostimulator in an abdominal wall pocket.

192 stinal, foregut, hepatopancreaticobiliary vs abdominal wall procedure), and complexity (eg, adhesions

193 n (12.9% EVR versus 17.8% open; P<0.001) and abdominal wall procedures (0.6 per 100 person-years EVR

194 ce imaging, reinterventions (AAA-related and abdominal wall procedures), and all-cause admissions wit

195 93 mL; P < .001 vs basal value) and anterior abdominal wall protrusion (32 +/- 3 mm increase in girth

196 osterior component separation via TAR during abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) continues to gain po

197 dominal wall function in patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) for incisional herni

198 Regarding abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR), long-term outcomes

199 Patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction for 106 recurrent or compl

200 rithm based on defect analysis and location, abdominal wall reconstruction has been achieved in 92% o

201 Complex abdominal wall reconstruction has witnessed tremendous s

202 esh and scarred fascia followed by immediate abdominal wall reconstruction using bilateral sliding re

203 , to date, 73 of the 120 have had definitive abdominal wall reconstruction using the modified compone

204 Abdominal wall reconstruction with ADA biologic mesh pro

205 One-stage abdominal wall reconstruction with enteric fistula taked

206 he patient ultimately survived and underwent abdominal wall reconstruction with mesh.

207 fication M1 to M5 ventral hernias undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction with PCS.

208 al options are available perioperatively for abdominal wall reconstruction.

209 ue is the procedure of choice for definitive abdominal wall reconstruction.

210 mpassing acute management through definitive abdominal wall reconstruction.

211 nt, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and eventual abdominal wall reconstruction.

212 centers in the US with specialized units for abdominal wall reconstruction.

213 old poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) in complex abdominal wall reconstruction.

214 evidence demonstrating its efficacy in open abdominal wall reconstruction.

215 d to simple bupivacaine and placebo for open abdominal wall reconstruction.

216 ated with porcine cadaveric mesh for complex abdominal wall reconstructions.

217 Three patients had proven abdominal wall rejection, all treated successfully.

218 ssynergia (ie, diaphragmatic contraction and abdominal wall relaxation) in patients with disorders of

219 One in 8 patients undergoing abdominal wall repair suffer inadvertent enterotomy foll

220 ive data of all patients undergoing elective abdominal wall repair were included in a prospective coh

221 nterotomies and long-lasting adhesiolysis in abdominal wall repair.

222 A cohort of 133 abdominal wall repairs was analyzed.

223 The hernia group developed lateral abdominal wall shortening and oblique muscle atrophy.

224 Unrepaired abdominal walls significantly demonstrated greater stiff

225 local circumference changes of the chest and abdominal walls simultaneously.

226 tion, and the myosin/actin ratio in limb and abdominal wall skeletal muscle of prolonged critically i

227 Both limb and abdominal wall skeletal muscles of prolonged critically

228 itive if they revealed any of the following: abdominal wall soft tissue contusion, free fluid, bowel

229 Intact abdominal wall strips were cut perpendicular to the woun

230 o which the developmental network leading to abdominal wall syndromes can be built.

231 basic scientific underpinning to understand abdominal wall syndromes.

232 pisode of acute rejection of the skin of the abdominal wall that resolved with corticosteroid therapy

233 cted an ancient anatomical dissection of the abdominal wall, the peritoneal cavity, and its organs (a

234 nce interval [CI]: 1.03, 1.21; P = .006) and abdominal wall thickness (odds ratio, 2.50; 95% CI: 1.32

235 Northern blot analysis of abdominal wall tissue showed that five of six talc-treat

236 rt experiments with a chamber affixed to the abdominal wall to determine mass transfer coefficients o

237 surface of the rat cecum, liver, stomach, or abdominal wall to measure the in vivo bidirectional mass

238 orce needed to bring the fascial edge of the abdominal wall to the midline after each step of a PCS (

239 r involvement, a full-thickness vascularized abdominal wall transplant was performed.

240 Abdominal wall transplantation (AWTX) has revolutionized

241 Although abdominal wall transplantation was reported 10 years ago

242 report six cases of combined small bowel and abdominal wall transplantation where the ischemic time w

243 r outcomes following combined intestinal and abdominal wall transplantation, focusing on the presenta

244 have performed five combined intestinal and abdominal wall transplants to date.

245 Two patients received abdominal wall transplants, 1 patient received a scalp t

246 In addition, in 7 patients with significant abdominal wall tumor involvement, a full-thickness vascu

247 The presence of an abdominal wall tumor recurrence affected patient care in

248 Demonstration of abdominal wall tumor recurrence affects patient care.

249 t the effects of laparoscopic procedures and abdominal wall tumor recurrence.

250 Abdominal wall tumors had the best outcome (5-year local

251 h a control group of patients with an intact abdominal wall undergoing colorectal resection (n = 18).

252 We categorized surgeries as abdominal wall, vascular, abdominal, cardiac, chest, or

253 tion and treatment of acute rejection of the abdominal wall vascularized composite allograft (VCA).

254 ction, and propose that while the skin of an abdominal wall VCA may reject independently of the intes

255 Both superficial and deep abdominal wall vessels are at risk.

256 n through a previously prosthetic-reinforced abdominal wall was associated with increased surgical co

257 rategy was introduced for burst abdomen: The abdominal wall was closed using a slowly absorbable runn

258 en the visceral transplant was complete, the abdominal wall was removed from the forearm and revascul

259 Fourteen patients (11.6%) had abdominal wall weakness or hernias.

260 Augmentation of the abdominal wall with a retro-muscular lightweight polypro

261 Prophylactic augmentation of the abdominal wall with a retromuscular lightweight polyprop

262 tile smooth muscle, wrinkled flaccid ventral abdominal wall with skeletal muscle deficiency, and intr

263 al pancreatic tissue subcutaneously into the abdominal wall without immunosuppression.

264 al pancreatic tissue subcutaneously into the abdominal wall without immunosuppression.

265 clustered small-bowel loops adjacent to the abdominal wall without overlying omental fat and central

266 s (median >10 units), inability to close the abdominal wall without tension, development of abdominal