ライフサイエンスコーパス: abiotic

1 In both abiotic and biological experiments, the DNAN was reduced

2 tion (epsilon(Cl)) associated with the major abiotic and biotic CH(3)Cl sinks in the environment, nam

3 rsity and its response to ongoing and future abiotic and biotic changes in the 21st century.

4 ng community responses to ongoing and future abiotic and biotic changes.

5 Se mediation of Hg behavior and toxicity in abiotic and biotic compartments.

6 demographics, social and spatial structure, abiotic and biotic conditions and pathogen infections.

7 Spatial variation in parasite pressure, abiotic and biotic conditions, and anthropogenic factors

8 radation trends of plastic debris by linking abiotic and biotic degradation behavior in seawater with

9 al system to independently control potential abiotic and biotic drivers of the F(soil)-T hysteresis.

10 We show how environmental abiotic and biotic drivers, as well as human cultural an

11 immune function: (a) parasite pressure, (b) abiotic and biotic factors and (c) anthropogenic changes

12 Darwin's hypothesis, iRLT hypothesizes that abiotic and biotic factors can interact to impact both l

13 Abiotic and biotic factors cause plant wounding and trig

14 e populations requires information about how abiotic and biotic factors limit their distributions.

15 Our aim was to determine the effects of abiotic and biotic factors on phenotypic plasticity of t

16 ern is likely attributed to a combination of abiotic and biotic factors, with a cooling-driven extinc

17 For implanted devices, both abiotic and biotic fuel cells can utilize the dissolved

18 test competing hypotheses about the role of abiotic and biotic mechanisms for structuring range boun

19 th to form the realized niche, and that both abiotic and biotic niches show limited phylogenetic cons

20 o characterize and distinguish between major abiotic and biotic processes contributing to the CH(3)Cl

21 differences are discussed with reference to abiotic and biotic processes.

22 g complex developmental programs directed by abiotic and biotic signals.

23 Abiotic and biotic stress conditions provide new context

24 an, for example, regulate plant responses to abiotic and biotic stress conditions.

25 nt protein catabolic process, ion transport, abiotic and biotic stress responses besides transcriptio

26 hobic layer that provides protection against abiotic and biotic stresses and prevents organ fusion du

27 Abiotic and biotic stresses widely reduce light harvesti

28 Plants exist in an environment of changing abiotic and biotic stresses.

29 ency makes plants highly susceptible to both abiotic and biotic stresses.

30 ant acclimation and defense during different abiotic and biotic stresses.

31 as rootstock for their resistance to various abiotic and biotic stressors.

32 Because of the complex suite of interacting abiotic and biotic variables present in ecosystems, anim

33 DNAN degradation (abiotic and biotic) was faster than degradation of RDX,

34 survival of hybrid F1 seeds, suggesting that abiotic and genetic parameters play important roles in p

35 ard this broad family of targets based on an abiotic annulation/rearrangement strategy resulting in a

36 the magnitudes of the population impacts of abiotic, biotic, and anthropogenic drivers differ, accou

37 n, E25 sterol congeners were measured in all abiotic/biotic samples, revealing coprostanol, a proxy f

38 Similar impact magnitudes for abiotic/biotic/anthropogenic drivers hold for plants of

39 As the abiotic carbon cycle responds, further metabolic evoluti

40 However, deeper sources of H(2) and abiotic CH(4) are missing from current models, which mai

41 Geological sources of H(2) and abiotic CH(4) have had a critical role in the evolution

42 m) generates significant amounts of H(2) and abiotic CH(4), as well as H(2)S and NH(3).

43 ldwide, hosts large sources of deep H(2) and abiotic CH(4), potentially providing energy to the overl

44 to mount a metabolic response to biotic and abiotic challenges.

45 Soil biotic and abiotic characteristics of plantations differed signific

46 ns were further modified into arginine by an abiotic chemical reaction, improving both structure and

47 possess specific properties in comparison to abiotic, chemically synthesized magnetite.

48 nal space, where each dimension describes an abiotic condition or biotic resource required by a speci

49 n evaluate the likely importance of changing abiotic conditions (linked to migratory recovery) with c

50 rile recipient soil treatments, differing in abiotic conditions (no soil additives, salt addition, ur

51 ophic control is not static, but varies with abiotic conditions - dynamics that only become evident w

52 Both biotic community and abiotic conditions are important in explaining variation

53 Rapidly changing biotic and abiotic conditions can alter host community assembly, wh

54 These results suggest that abiotic conditions can overshadow microbial source histo

55 te patterns may impose novel combinations of abiotic conditions on animals, yet understanding of the

56 nge can shape evolution directly by altering abiotic conditions or indirectly by modifying habitats,

57 species colonization is driven by changes in abiotic conditions or reduced biotic resistance will aff

58 ase are particularly sensitive to changes in abiotic conditions such as temperature and moisture avai

59 y the result of the plant's interaction with abiotic conditions, but also of multiple interactions in

60 growth form categorizations within specific abiotic conditions, independently of phylogenetic relati

61 d soil microbes through their impact on soil abiotic conditions, primarily soil pH and C:N ratios.

62 or biomes characterized by harsher or milder abiotic conditions, suggesting that all 3 drivers have e

63 s in flower colouration relate to biotic and abiotic conditions.

64 ary dynamics, along with selection driven by abiotic conditions.

65 tochemically oxidized by light under anoxic, abiotic conditions.

66 e due to its correlation with variability in abiotic conditions.

67 Salinity is a major abiotic constraint for rice farming.

68 tial trade-offs between competing biotic and abiotic constraints.

69 e the success of in situ remediation through abiotic contaminant reduction.

70 eractions and how they are influenced by the abiotic context in which they play out.

71 d to measure substrate depletion relative to abiotic controls.

72 But, in many animals, biotic and abiotic cues, like temperature and bacterial colonizers,

73 matter (NOM) is the product of microbial and abiotic decay of plant and animal remains in terrestrial

74 Here we show that static abiotic dissolution cannot rationalize this result, wher

75 rationalize this result, whereas two dynamic abiotic dissolution systems (one flow-through and one fl

76 on a first-differences approach on potential abiotic drivers controlling richness, we find an overall

77 , but accounting for its numerous biotic and abiotic drivers is a significant challenge.

78 Consequently, the biotic and abiotic drivers of arboreal arthropod abundance are stil

79 s are excellent models to explore biotic and abiotic drivers of diversity because they are of low com

80 rginally more sensitive to 1 SD of change in abiotic drivers relative to biotic drivers, but sensitiv

81 Among abiotic drivers, natural disturbance (not climate), and

82 tributable to the biotic driver, rather than abiotic drivers.

83 has hampered the disentangling of biotic and abiotic effects.

84 ain-elongating bioreactor broth with just an abiotic electrochemical cell.

85 communication between biotic components and abiotic electrodes.

86 hat subtle variations in the structure of an abiotic energy source can be used to control the force a

87 ce strongly depends on parasite genotype and abiotic environment and comes at the cost of reduced pho

88 cterial synthetic community, manipulated the abiotic environment and measured bacterial colonization

89 e much more to learn about influences of the abiotic environment on flower colour.

90 bility of AMF was largely independent of the abiotic environment, but related to plant properties and

91 spond similarly to changes in the biotic and abiotic environment.

92 Abiotic environmental change, local species extinctions

93 ork reveals a strong influence of biotic and abiotic environmental factors (including the environment

94 ulticellular development is affected by both abiotic (environmental porosity) and biotic (signaling)

95 tion in the presence of RDX was evaluated in abiotic experiments using substoichiometric, stoichiomet

96 ) dissolution rates were similar to those of abiotic experiments with nitrite (from 1.15 x 10(-14) to

97 Ultimately, linking abiotic factors and biotic interactions on niche width w

98 dictions may arise from correlations between abiotic factors and biotic interactions, as a lack of da

99 They are primarily maintained by abiotic factors and disturbance regimes that could hinde

100 conflict during the adult stage is shaped by abiotic factors and frequency-independent pre-reproducti

101 In conclusion, abiotic factors and geographical features have different

102 sensors, which is well established for some abiotic factors but not yet fully elucidated for others.

103 Conversely, abiotic factors can also mediate biotic interactions alo

104 However, abiotic factors can impose constraints on both limits an

105 Our results suggest that abiotic factors covarying with latitude interact with th

106 heme of range-limit theory (RLT) posits that abiotic factors form high-latitude/altitude limits, wher

107 n soil lithology, suggesting scale-dependent abiotic factors influence feedbacks underlying the relat

108 We investigated whether abiotic factors influence the bacterial community richne

109 We examine how abiotic factors influence trait expression in both plant

110 The many biotic and abiotic factors influencing FTE behaviour make poleward

111 w of carbon through soil, yet how biotic and abiotic factors interact to drive it remains unclear.

112 f fossil melanosomes is biased by biotic and abiotic factors is, however, unknown.

113 l and also mediate the effects of biotic and abiotic factors later in life.

114 versity are the strongest predictors of CUE, abiotic factors modulated the relationship between diver

115 effects of four major climate change-related abiotic factors on the spatiotemporal distribution and g

116 singly revealing substantial fluctuations in abiotic factors over ecologically and evolutionarily rel

117 Different levels of these biotic and abiotic factors resulted in significant variation in tot

118 terial communities are known to be shaped by abiotic factors which thus may indirectly modulate host

119 different class, depending on the biotic and abiotic factors within which species are observed.

120 fferent temperature and moisture conditions (abiotic factors) to manipulate microbial diversity and c

121 s of developmental processes with biotic and abiotic factors, and we used it here to investigate the

122 Abiotic factors, including atmospheric CO(2) concentrati

123 ultaneous environmental changes, in climatic/abiotic factors, interacting species, and direct human i

124 Yet, abiotic factors, principally precipitation regimes, shap

125 on of arthropod abundances via resources and abiotic factors, rather than for competition and predati

126 factors-individually and in combination with abiotic factors-should be considered as powerful regulat

127 r these in combination with other biotic and abiotic factors.

128 growth, are influenced by various biotic and abiotic factors.

129 ed to exploit local, fine-scale variation in abiotic factors.

130 Fe(III) photoreduction besides microbial and abiotic Fe(2+) oxidation by oxygen suggests an active Fe

131 suggests that, in addition to microbial and abiotic Fe(III) reduction, including Fe(III) photoreduct

132 rring the conceptual line between biotic and abiotic filters.

133 The abiotic flow cells thus adequately predicted the overall

134 d variable, being affected by both selective abiotic forces and by the history of colonizing microorg

135 ly recognized to produce H(2) and favour the abiotic genesis of CH(4) in shallow settings.

136 The abiotic H(2) sink we identify has implications for the p

137 Within this control volume, we assess abiotic H(2) sources (~6 x 10(12) mol H(2)/y) and sinks

138 Colonization on both biotic (patients) and abiotic (health care objects) surfaces, along with trave

139 lity to predict g(s) , and then explored the abiotic (i.e. month, site-month interaction) and biotic

140 that niche specialization is uncorrelated on abiotic (i.e. temperature response) and biotic (i.e. hos

141 n assessing global-change-related biotic and abiotic implications, including land-atmosphere feedback

142 rises from a complex interplay of biotic and abiotic interactions, and is a major determinant of ecos

143 Here we show an abiotic ionic circuit that is inspired by concepts from

144 roles in numerous elemental cycles in biotic/abiotic loops as the key redox center.

145 p-n junction between functional proteins and abiotic materials remains a challenge for bioelectronics

146 c bioaccumulation, and compared with that of abiotic matrices (seawater, surface sediment, and suspen

147 Yet the broad abiotic measures, such as temperature, humidity and UV-B

148 xposure to cold temperatures and enhanced by abiotic microclimatic modification and biotic physiologi

149 c targets, as well as plausible syntheses of abiotic molecules.

150 ed, our results highlight the coupled biotic-abiotic nature of oxidative mechanisms, with Mn-mediated

151 Experimental investigations into abiotic noncanonical nucleotide synthesis reveal that ma

152 The chemistry of abiotic nucleotide synthesis of RNA and DNA in the conte

153 provides tolerance against a combination of abiotic (nutrient deprivation, metal toxicity) and bioti

154 ing on the strength and the direction of the abiotic or biotic factors.

155 Upon detecting abiotic or biotic stress, plants generally reduce their

156 degrees N, with different planting dates and abiotic or biotic stresses.

157 his presence of N-bearing compounds requires abiotic or possibly biotic N-fixation and ammonia storag

158 ailability of carbon compounds to biotic and abiotic oxidation and to compare fundamental chemical pr

159 ties, but highlight that multiple biotic and abiotic pathways must be considered to scale up globally

160 overriding the otherwise prominent effect of abiotic (pH) conditions.

161 Our results show that both biotic and abiotic (pH) treatments had a persistent influence on th

162 a general design principle for synthesizing abiotic polymer inhibitors of enzymes.

163 r acts as the solvent for natural biotic and abiotic processes and in many technological contexts.

164 HNPs are generated by biotic and abiotic processes and range in complexity from low molec

165 Globally, spring phenology and abiotic processes are shifting earlier with warming.

166 While abiotic processes usually act identical on enantiomers,

167 n are largely unknown, the relative roles of abiotic processes vs growth-linked biodegradation vs com

168 within a restricted range inconsistent with abiotic processes.

169 dation in complex environmental systems from abiotic processes.

170 r of bacteria can be subverted to induce the abiotic production of a carbon-centered radical species

171 eothermometry to a traditionally qualitative abiotic proxy, glendonite calcite, to generate quantitat

172 study was to estimate the pseudo first-order abiotic reaction rate coefficients in diffusion-dominate

173 However, the synergy between Fe(0) abiotic reactions and microbiological TCE and ClO(4)(-)

174 Because a systematic characterization of abiotic reactions of organic pollutants with oxidants su

175 metabolic processes, sometimes combined with abiotic reactions.

176 provided new insights for natural biotic and abiotic redox reactions, and explained the dominance of

177 g Fe(0) in situ injection mostly yielded TCE abiotic reduction to ethene/ethane.

178 s and obviating the need for metal-catalysed abiotic reductive aminations.

179 ter in terms of cumulative energy demand and abiotic resource depletion potential ~94 and ~96% of the

180 highlight how local biotic conditions modify abiotic selection, in some cases promoting diversity in

181 sites on the parent carbocycles and enables abiotic skeletal rearrangements to additional underlying

182 woody plant traits, site level climate, and abiotic soil conditions.

183 is crucial in rehabilitating the biotic and abiotic soil environment, while also improving slope sta

184 ssociated with acquisition of nutrients from abiotic sources (nifH).

185 ater challenge, as they were likely based on abiotic, spontaneously synthesized amino acids.

186 ting new insights into effectors that target abiotic stress adaptation pathways, tampering with key f

187 ones that orchestrates the plant response to abiotic stress and drive changes in transcriptomic, meta

188 Improving crop tolerance to abiotic stress conditions requires a deep understanding

189 Each year, abiotic stress conditions such as drought, heat, salinit

190 tyl esters accumulate in higher levels under abiotic stress conditions.

191 es a high proportion of beta-carotene during abiotic stress conditions.

192 will become increasingly compounded by harsh abiotic stress conditions.

193 Rapidly communicating the perception of an abiotic stress event, wounding or pathogen infection, fr

194 associated with suppression of ABA-inducible abiotic stress genes.

195 Tolerance of abiotic stress in woody plants is known to be constraine

196 s include the significant upregulation under abiotic stress of several expanded ICE-L gene families,

197 search to improve the understanding of plant abiotic stress perception.

198 enhanced nutrition, disease suppression and abiotic stress resistance, and have potential to contrib

199 y adaptive loci related mainly to biotic and abiotic stress resistance.

200 ole in plant flowering, seed development and abiotic stress response.

201 like kinase (CrRLK1L) and others involved in abiotic stress response.

202 ection, in some cases promoting diversity in abiotic stress response.

203 ets, controls the balance between biotic and abiotic stress responses and is a master regulator of pl

204 transcription factors (TFs) are involved in abiotic stress responses and plant development.

205 te pathogen effectors that induce biotic and abiotic stress responses in the plant, as a first step t

206 r, the biological functions of CDK8 in plant abiotic stress responses remain largely unexplored.

207 oxygen species are key players in biotic and abiotic stress responses, but there is no consensus on w

208 in kinase-2s (SnRK2s) are critical for plant abiotic stress responses, including abscisic acid (ABA)

209 OsHOX24, a member of HD-ZIP I subfamily, in abiotic stress responses.

210 rotenoids, functions in seed germination and abiotic stress responses.

211 ysis reveals a fundamental trade-off between abiotic stress tolerance and competitive ability, whereb

212 Plants lacking PBS3 exhibited enhanced abiotic stress tolerance at the cost of decreased fitnes

213 One of four genes involved in generalized abiotic stress tolerance increased with ambient N deposi

214 nding the genetic and physiological basis of abiotic stress tolerance under field conditions is key t

215 nal network revealed mechanism of biotic and abiotic stress tolerance, energy conservation and photop

216 f crop traits, including disease resistance, abiotic stress tolerance, yield, nutritional quality and

217 nctional traits, change within the limits of abiotic stress tolerance.

218 t performance and may also impact biotic and abiotic stress tolerance.

219 N-glycosylation, cell wall biosynthesis, and abiotic stress tolerance.

220 all major theories about trade-offs between abiotic stress tolerances, providing a unified trade-off

221 Abiotic stress treatments incited changes in poly(A) sit

222 ts from single cell gene expression and from abiotic stress treatments.

223 h reduce oxidative damage during extremes of abiotic stress, a pattern that would be expected to ampl

224 tes may contribute to mulberry fitness under abiotic stress, and it provides a foundation for the dev

225 intensity of habitat disturbance, degree of abiotic stress, and methods of trait characterization.

226 tudies revealed that in response to a single abiotic stress, applied to a single leaf, plants mount a

227 umulated transcripts functionally related to abiotic stress, including oxidative stress, as well as i

228 thought to be required for the tolerance of abiotic stress, is not required for high rates of photos

229 rly and late phases of the plant response to abiotic stress, the key role of respiratory burst oxidas

230 all defense while simultaneously suppressing abiotic stress-responsive genes.

231 has been scarcely studied in the context of abiotic stress.

232 iable estimates of this trait in response to abiotic stress.

233 integration during the response of plants to abiotic stress.

234 xpression patterns in response to biotic and abiotic stress.

235 ntial for plant survival under conditions of abiotic stress.

236 e response genes in the absence of biotic or abiotic stress.

237 plants as well as in fortifying them against abiotic stress.

238 l benefits for crop resistance to biotic and abiotic stress.

239 plants from pathogens, promotes tolerance to abiotic stresses and fortifies cells to withstand the fo

240 With increased risk from abiotic stresses due to climate variability, it is imper

241 stem can be manipulated to impose biotic and abiotic stresses for testing how microbial inoculants in

242 characteristics and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses in hexaploid wheat can be drastically i

243 ator of defense responses against biotic and abiotic stresses in plants.

244 ptional regulation in mediating responses to abiotic stresses in Sorghum.

245 d these accessions to an array of biotic and abiotic stresses including heat, ER stress-inducing chem

246 The protective function of melanin in abiotic stresses is well documented.

247 Interestingly, abiotic stresses led to the re-directing of transcriptio

248 Perception of biotic and abiotic stresses often leads to stomatal closure in plan

249 ws for confirmatory diagnostic of biotic and abiotic stresses on plants.

250 compounds in olive leaves and the effect of abiotic stresses on their synthesis, this study evaluate

251 rt of a larger global response of Sorghum to abiotic stresses that involves the re-direction of trans

252 This is particularly true under abiotic stresses that lead to the accumulation of reacti

253 tantly exposed to a wide range of biotic and abiotic stresses which they must defend themselves again

254 rammed cell death in development, biotic and abiotic stresses, damage-induced immune response, and re

255 ed to a combination of two or more different abiotic stresses, each potentially triggering its own st

256 Abiotic stresses, including drought and salinity, trigge

257 st developments in the perception of various abiotic stresses, including drought, salinity, flooding,

258 canonical poly(A) site choice in response to abiotic stresses.

259 environmental factors, including biotic and abiotic stresses.

260 nt, hormone response, response to biotic and abiotic stresses.

261 nment and survive a combination of different abiotic stresses.

262 rovide wider protection from combinations of abiotic stresses.

263 signalling cascade in response to biotic and abiotic stresses.

264 thogens and to increase tolerance to various abiotic stresses.

265 imilarly regulated by different hormones and abiotic stresses.

266 lant responses to a wide range of biotic and abiotic stresses.

267 rtant for plant responses to both biotic and abiotic stresses.

268 tegies for obtaining nutrients and resisting abiotic stresses.

269 decreased fitness under combined biotic and abiotic stresses.

270 bly confer enhanced tolerance to postharvest abiotic stresses.

271 eeds, leaves, and roots exposed to different abiotic stresses.

272 bscisic acid-a plant hormone associated with abiotic stresses.

273 es whose expression is strongly regulated by abiotic stresses.

274 ication in the alleviation of the effects of abiotic stresses; however, its role in mitigating Buta t

275 highly invasive and resilient to biotic and abiotic stressors causing recurrent massive mortalities

276 Here, the effects of abiotic stressors on OMV contents and composition from b

277 accharide used by living systems to tolerate abiotic stressors provides a beneficial environment for

278 diversity in traits involved in responses to abiotic stressors, but what maintains this diversity is

279 that NatB is required for tolerance of these abiotic stressors.

280 and indistinct from symptoms of other biotic/abiotic stressors.

281 were associated with a variety of biotic and abiotic substrates, the results of this study demonstrat

282 YrIlm promote biofilm formation on different abiotic substrates.

283 are contributed by biomass pyrolysis, while abiotic sulfate (SO(4) (2-)) reduction produces large de

284 precursor to the colonization of biotic and abiotic surfaces, and an important cause of drug resista

285 esins that enable binding to both biotic and abiotic surfaces.

286 lity to harness cellular redox processes for abiotic synthesis might allow the preparation of enginee

287 n-storage molecule, but requires a selective abiotic synthesis of both RNA and DNA building blocks in

288 The abiotic synthesis of ribonucleotides is thought to have

289 lity, and (3) utility of the biocatalyst for abiotic synthesis.

290 l chemistries that can be broadly applied in abiotic systems in the same way that ATP hydrolysis is e

291 novel targets for improving plant biotic and abiotic tolerance and rubber production.

292 ld maximize tick survival under the range of abiotic traits.

293 Abiotic transformation of trichloroethene (TCE) in fract

294 Abiotic transformation rate coefficients based on gas fo

295 were selected as case chemicals; biotic and abiotic transformation reactions were considered using f

296 that sod additions diminished the effect of abiotic treatments through time.

297 Abiotic variables (air temperature, vapour pressure defi

298 plants experience more genetic, biotic, and abiotic variation across space and over time than cultiv

299 mediated molecular strategy for constructing abiotic water channels, we demonstrate that a 20% enlarg

300 molecular and structural components link the abiotic world of the whole plant with the turgor pressur