ライフサイエンスコーパス: absorbable

1 ecovery and biofilm formation from explanted absorbable (AB) and nonabsorbable (NAB) sutures from inf

2 of the need to convert water-soluble, poorly absorbable, active site inhibitors into fat-soluble prod

3 c agents, subcategorized as physical agents, absorbable agents, biologic agents, and synthetic agents

4 othesis that the microbiota-generated TPP is absorbable and could contribute toward host thiamine hom

5 Absorbable and non-absorbable sutures demonstrated equiv

6 This systematic review aims to compare absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in upper eyelid bl

7 The choice between absorbable and non-absorbable sutures remains debated, w

8 uture removal, as well as between RCTs using absorbable and non-absorbable sutures removed >/=10 days

9 nificant differences in CRC outcomes between absorbable and non-absorbable sutures when they were rem

10 Alpha-cyclodextrin (alpha-CD) is a non-absorbable and soluble fiber that causes weight loss.

11 Infection Prevention), adjunctive use of an absorbable antibacterial envelope resulted in a 40% redu

12 The absorbable antibacterial envelope was associated with a

13 Rifaximin, a non-absorbable antibiotic used in managing recurrent hepatic

14 rial to assess the safety and efficacy of an absorbable, antibiotic-eluting envelope in reducing the

15 gut microbiome perturbations, including non-absorbable antibiotics or osmotic laxatives, but is resc

16 were treated with a prolonged course of non-absorbable antibiotics via the drinking water, which res

17 y available therapeutic options, such as non-absorbable antibiotics, probiotics, and mesalazine, have

18 a sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose absorbable barrier developed to prevent adhesions after

19 Guided bone regeneration (GBR) using a non-absorbable barrier has provided clinicians the ability t

20 to be equal to, if not better than, the non-absorbable barrier.

21 bnitrate (BSN), which establishes a depot of absorbable Bi and produces morphological signs of neurot

22 Some plants provide absorbable calcium, but the quantity of vegetables requi

23 sulin secretion through avoidance of rapidly absorbable carbohydrates.

24 Hemostasis was achieved by placing absorbable cellulose fabric down the probe tract.

25 om intestinal micelles, reducing the pool of absorbable cholesterol, but they are also rapidly taken

26 A novel, absorbable-coating sirolimus-eluting stent (AC-SES) was

27 raft (FDBA) particles covered with a rapidly absorbable collagen dressing (RACD) (Group B) in functio

28 raft (FDBA) particles covered with a rapidly absorbable collagen dressing (RACD) (Group B) in functio

29 rforations were repaired during surgery with absorbable collagen membrane barriers.

30 R using allogeneic cancellous bone graft and absorbable collagen membrane to be a viable option for t

31 ee defects were implanted with rhBMP-2 in an absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) carrier (positive contr

32 ues, the PRP preparation soak-loaded onto an absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) carrier or ACS alone wa

33 e bone regenerative ability of rhBMP-2 on an absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) carrier to a collagen s

34 or E. coli-derived rhBMP-2 (0.2 mg/mL) in an absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) carrier.

35 The use of rhBMP-2/absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) combined with all of th

36 ation rate of additional carriers to rhBMP-2/absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) in a vertical guided bo

37 rphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) loaded in an absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) in human extraction sit

38 owing surgical implantation of rhBMP-2 in an absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) or a calcium phosphate

39 ytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE) membrane, or an absorbable collagen sponge as a barrier.

40 L) in a tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite/ absorbable collagen sponge composite (TCP/HA/ACS) or cal

41 RP at molar sites using FDBA and an absorbable collagen sponge may be a sufficient and econo

42 In experimental hemimandibles, rhBMP-2/absorbable collagen sponge was well mixed with allograft

43 Although these membranes are absorbable, collagen membranes have been demonstrated to

44 Although lightweight meshes with partially absorbable component resulted in an increased risk of re

45 nts undergoing GTR procedures with synthetic absorbable devices for the treatment of gingival recessi

46 treated with the orally administered but non-absorbable disaccharide lactulose have increased densiti

47 Lactulose is a non-absorbable disaccharide, which alters the intestinal lum

48 ound insufficient evidence about whether non-absorbable disaccharides are beneficial.

49 an increasing interest in the development of absorbable dressings that can be left in the injury site

50 Application of temporary, absorbable embolization materials could be advantageous

51 etary complex carbohydrates, liberating host-absorbable energy via fermentation products.

52 absorbable barrier (test treatment) or a non-absorbable ePTFE barrier (control treatment).

53 cedures with comparable success rates to non-absorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) memb

54 rgarine-type spreads, containing 35% and 60% absorbable fat, was 6.5 and 6.4 g/100 g after production

55 After that, the non-absorbable fraction was anaerobically incubated with hum

56 crospheres, polyvinyl alcohol particles, and absorbable gelatin powder were injected into the hepatic

57 bon gauze (group 2, n = 29) or non-medicated absorbable gelatin sponge (group 3, n = 25), 8-week bica

58 gauze control groups, while no sites in the absorbable gelatin sponge group had an adverse event.

59 as normal to rapid healing, compared to the absorbable gelatin sponge group where 40% of the sites w

60 control group patients were treated with an absorbable gelatin sponge.

61 ising: 1) oxidized regenerated cellulose; 2) absorbable gelatin sponge; or 3) sterile gauze with exte

62 ogically blocking protein ascorbylation with absorbable guanidino compounds is feasible and may repre

63 ostasis compared with commercially available absorbable hemostatic dressings, and are highly biocompa

64 ate, gemtuzumab ozogamicin; the oral, poorly absorbable hypomethylating agent, azacitidine; the lipos

65 ula, bioprosthesis, biocompatible materials, absorbable implants, dermis, and collagen.

66 fficacy for 5 weeks after implantation of an absorbable inferior vena cava (IVC) filter in a swine mo

67 inuous diet model were developed to optimize absorbable iron and zinc intake, using different absorpt

68 or the deviation was as large as 2.1 mg for absorbable iron.

69 Conclusion An absorbable IVC filter can be safely deployed in swine an

70 Eleven absorbable IVC filters made from polydioxanone suture we

71 clinical trial of coronary implantations of absorbable magnesium stents.

72 neic cancellous bone graft and covered by an absorbable membrane with at least 1-year follow-up were

73 to undergo periodontal therapy utilizing non-absorbable membranes agreed to have sterile polypropylen

74 anes have been shown to be comparable to non-absorbable membranes with regard to probing depth reduct

75 Use of absorbable membranes, root conditioning, shallow pretrea

76 eral edema resolved, bedside pleating of the absorbable mesh allowed delayed fascial closure in 37 pa

77 im of the study was to evaluate biosynthetic absorbable mesh in single-staged contaminated (Centers f

78 wall defects consists of 3 stages: stage I, absorbable mesh insertion for temporary closure (if edem

79 Absorbable mesh provides effective temporary abdominal w

80 allowing delayed fascial closure); stage II, absorbable mesh removal in patients without edema resolu

81 prospective longitudinal study, biosynthetic absorbable mesh showed efficacy in terms of long-term re

82 trial of 3 methods of repair: sutures versus absorbable mesh versus nonabsorbable mesh.

83 hods of hiatus hernia repair; sutures versus absorbable mesh versus nonabsorbable mesh.

84 ed in 23.1% after suture repair, 30.8% after absorbable mesh, and 12.8% after nonabsorbable mesh (P =

85 tal of 126 patients enrolled: 43 sutures, 41 absorbable mesh, and 42 nonabsorbable mesh.

86 126 patients were enrolled - 43 sutures, 41 absorbable mesh, and 42 nonabsorbable mesh.

87 tified in 39.3% after suture repair, 56.7% - absorbable mesh, and 42.9% - nonabsorbable mesh (P = 0.3

88 temporary closure with polyglactin 910 woven absorbable mesh.

89 ymptom outcomes were worse after repair with absorbable mesh.

90 oms which were more common after repair with absorbable mesh.

91 s; and inability to belch at 12 months after absorbable mesh.

92 ce of a novel second-generation drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold (DREAMS 2G) in patients with d

93 This serial analysis of drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold confirmed the safety and effic

94 This novel absorbable metal scaffold could be an alternative to abs

95 The drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold has demonstrated feasibility,

96 g the safety and performance of drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold in 46 patients with coronary a

97 long-term vascular responses to drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold.

98 ed significantly to LLL of sirolimus-eluting absorbable metal scaffolds.

99 vercome the limitations of conventional, non-absorbable metal-based drug-eluting stents.

100 echnique using inverting sutures with slowly absorbable monofilament material seems preferable.

101 ne laparotomy should be closed with a slowly absorbable monofilament suture material in a continuous

102 hus recommended to account for the amount of absorbable monosaccharides of foods for portion size cal

103 that breaks down di- and oligosaccharides to absorbable monosaccharides.

104 The accuracy of the calculation of absorbable nonheme iron and zinc content in diet-model-g

105 rocyanidins, particularly the polymers, into absorbable oligomers.

106 Determine whether absorbable or nonabsorbable mesh in repair of large hiat

107 A 100% absorbable oral formulation of the hypomethylating agent

108 KD and whether it was modifiable by altering absorbable phosphate.

109 rocessed and fast foods enriched with highly absorbable phosphorus additives.

110 that provided highest amounts of potentially absorbable phytoene/phytofluene was by far tomato juice

111 Absorbable plates and screws as well as cyanoacrylate gl

112 m (regular LWM-PP), lightweight PP mesh with absorbable poliglecaprone-25(LWM-PP/PGC), or polyglactin

113 The coating consisted of absorbable poly-lactide-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) and crys

114 chnique of continuous suturing with a slowly absorbable (polydioxanone) suture material in a wound-su

115 chnique of continuous suturing with a slowly absorbable (polydioxanone) suture material reduces the r

116 ed lesions were veneered by a rapidly formed absorbable polymer barrier of poly(DL-lactide) to enhanc

117 MiStent is a drug-eluting stent with a fully absorbable polymer coating containing and embedding a mi

118 In our early clinical experience with the absorbable polymer matrix scaffold P4HB, it seemed to pr

119 analysis of our initial experience with the absorbable polymer scaffold P4HB compared with a consecu

120 To evaluate the use of the new absorbable polymer scaffold poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB

121 P4HB, an absorbable polymer scaffold, may present a new alternati

122 mized Study of the MiStent Sirolimus Eluting Absorbable Polymer Stent System for Revascularization of

123 le metal scaffold could be an alternative to absorbable polymeric scaffolds for treatment of obstruct

124 The abdominal wall was closed using a slowly absorbable running suture in a mass closure technique wi

125 So far, only polymeric absorbable scaffolds are commercially available.

126 Absorbable scaffolds were designed to overcome the limit

127 Biocompatible, rapidly absorbable stent coatings enable the matching of drug re

128 uit punches contain large amounts of readily absorbable sugars and may contribute to weight gain and

129 essive calories and large amounts of rapidly absorbable sugars.

130 ntitatively detect MRSA, on contaminated non-absorbable surfaces.

131 However, the use of a longer-acting absorbable suture increases the rate of suture reaction

132 y of included RCTs (59%) reported use of non-absorbable suture materials.

133 Suturing is done with a 6-0 monofilament absorbable suture, but one can utilize any 5-0 or 6-0 su

134 Non-absorbable sutures are the gold standard for vessel anas

135 Absorbable and non-absorbable sutures demonstrated equivalent scar quality

136 ic review aims to compare absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in upper eyelid blepharoplasty, focus

137 oth suture types are clinically viable, with absorbable sutures offering logistical advantages.

138 The choice between absorbable and non-absorbable sutures remains debated, with implications fo

139 ell as between RCTs using absorbable and non-absorbable sutures removed >/=10 days postoperatively.

140 and muscle fixation to the sclera using non-absorbable sutures significantly corrects secondary devi

141 While absorbable sutures theoretically reduce follow-up burden

142 s in CRC outcomes between absorbable and non-absorbable sutures when they were removed >/=10 days aft

143 rformed to secure prolapsed glands using non-absorbable sutures, followed by skin closure.

144 muscle re-attachment to the sclera using non-absorbable sutures.

145 ocyanidin dimers, trimers, and tetramers are absorbable, whereas larger oligomers are not.

146 ble house crickets are a good source of well-absorbable zinc, and their increased consumption could c

147 For absorbable zinc, the maximum deviation was only 0.2 mg.

148 e considered when their usual diet is low in absorbable zinc; severe stunting, low plasma zinc, or bo