戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  average 3 drinks/wk (compared with lifelong abstainers).
2 5% CI, 3.2-4.6 years) for patients who quit (abstainers).
3  consistent moderate drinkers vs. consistent abstainers).
4 estimates for mortality compared to lifetime abstainers.
5 titis, ethanol intake >50 g/day, and current abstainers.
6 raction = 0.003) with lower risks in alcohol abstainers.
7  advanced liver disease compared to lifetime abstainers.
8 lower risk of coronary heart disease than do abstainers.
9 hol intake of 0-9 g/day compared to lifetime abstainers.
10 .55 (CI, 0.90 to 2.68) compared with that of abstainers.
11 risk of lethal prostate cancer compared with abstainers.
12 y consume moderate amounts of alcohol and in abstainers.
13 e lower rates of cardiovascular disease than abstainers.
14 rmance in many cognitive domains relative to abstainers.
15 cute cellular rejection in alcohol users and abstainers.
16 rognosis in posttransplant alcohol users and abstainers.
17 ntinued drinking were comparable to those of abstainers.
18 er behavioral and left NAcc PIT effects than abstainers.
19 ers vs 6.0 years (95% CI, 5.1-7.2 years) for abstainers.
20 ed; and by initiating alcohol use in current abstainers.
21               76 participants (42 successful abstainers, 34 smokers) were followed up.
22 sk factors compared with age-matched alcohol abstainers (A).
23                                Compared with abstainers, alcohol intake of 5 to 14.9 g/d was associat
24 ifferences at the time of evaluation between abstainers and alcohol users in age, sex distribution, s
25 red in PFC-Hb projections in both short-term abstainers and current cocaine users.
26 ls for biases affecting distinctions between abstainers and drinkers.
27 elapsers, while the opposite was observed in abstainers and healthy control subjects.
28 , 1.87-5.14) for 5 or more drinks per day vs abstainers and light drinkers as well as smoking (OR, 4.
29 A(1c), with a better metabolic profile among abstainers and light drinkers who modestly increased the
30                         At 5-year follow-up, abstainers and non-drinkers were associated with a lower
31 y distributed between both alcohol users and abstainers and sometimes occurred in the absence of anti
32                                           13 abstainers and two smokers had an episode of major depre
33 AF patients, 51% were non-drinkers, 13% were abstainers, and 36% were current drinkers.
34                                Non-drinkers, abstainers, and current drinkers were compared using inc
35 d > 15 g alcohol/d had 93% greater risk than abstainers, and men who averaged > 2 pieces fruit/d had
36  mortality, even when compared with lifetime abstainers, but consumption above recommended limits was
37 htly increased risk compared with consistent abstainers, but this was not significant.
38 epression at age 50 compared with consistent abstainers (CES-D-SF scores: b=-0.84, 95% CI=-1.47, -0.1
39  0.88 for consistent occasional drinkers vs. abstainers; CES-D-SF scores: b=-1.08, 95% CI=-1.88, -0.2
40                                Compared with abstainers, consumption of more than 60 g of alcohol per
41                Misclassification of lifelong abstainers could result in underestimation of harmful ef
42  at baseline was characterized into lifetime abstainers, former drinkers, and current drinkers of var
43 before and after AF diagnosis: non-drinkers; abstainers from alcohol after AF diagnosis; and current
44                                  Of 20 prior abstainers from intercourse who completed the study, 17
45 sk of type 2 diabetes mellitus compared with abstainers (hazard ratio = 0.47, 95% confidence interval
46 ormer drinkers had a higher risk of CHF than abstainers (HR 1.51, p < 0.01), but those who quit durin
47 r recurrence or mortality risk compared with abstainers (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.91; Ptrend = .00
48 difference between prospective relapsers and abstainers in the NAcc PIT effect in our study is small
49 ft ventricular ejection fraction recovery in abstainers is associated with an excellent prognosis.
50       On multivariable analysis, compared to abstainers, light and moderate alcohol use was not assoc
51                                Compared with abstainers, light drinkers had a multivariate-adjusted r
52 rting heavy drinking during pregnancy and 30 abstainers/light drinkers.
53 hese differential results regarding lifetime abstainers may suggest bias from differential unmeasured
54                                Compared with abstainers, moderate alcohol drinkers had higher plasma
55 benefits result from comparisons with coffee abstainers or decaffeinated coffee drinkers.
56 first acute myocardial infarction (AMI) than abstainers or heavy drinkers, but the effect of prior dr
57 s compared with those for ADH1C*1 homozygote abstainers (P(trend) = 0.02).
58                                Compared with abstainers, patients who consumed less than 7 drinks/wk
59                                Compared with abstainers, risk was greatest among men who consumed an
60 ted; alcohol consumption was quantified; and abstainers served as the reference group.
61 young social drinkers who were classified as abstainers showed a greater reduction in alcohol consump
62  a median age of 69 y at diagnosis, lifetime abstainers showed poorer overall [adjusted HR (aHR): 1.2
63  total alcohol-dependent group; however, the abstainers' slopes paralleled those of controls, whereas
64                       Compared with lifetime abstainers, summary relative risks were 0.95 (95% confid
65                                Compared with abstainers, the adjusted risk of CHF was lower among sub
66                                  Compared to abstainers, those who drank >/= 3 cups of caffeinated co
67 ose with intakes over 40 g/day compared with abstainers using a random-effects model (P for nonlinear
68  these data were used to construct groups of abstainers, very light, light, moderate, and heavy drink
69 e abnormally low FA, age trajectories of the abstainers were positive and progressing toward normalit
70                     Clusters of drinkers and abstainers were present in the network at all time point
71 nderwent cessation treatment, and successful abstainers were re-examined by FDOPA-PET after 3 months
72 betes remained if light drinkers rather than abstainers were used as the reference group (RR = 0.60,
73 nfidence interval (CI) 1.1-6.4) greater than abstainers, while that for individuals who reported drin
74 ay) had the highest risk; in comparison with abstainers with a folate intake of 400-599 micro g/day,
75                                     Lifetime abstainers with nonmetastatic disease showed poorer CRC-
76 e CT genotype had lower SDMT scores than did abstainers with the CC genotype or moderate drinkers wit
77                               However, women abstainers with the CT genotype had lower SDMT scores th