ライフサイエンスコーパス: accommodative

1 y lens retains a significant fraction of its accommodative ability after transection of the anterior

2 o alter ocular SA to -0.10 microm to improve accommodative accuracy and reduce any lag of accommodati

3 These results suggest that poor accommodative accuracy in individuals with DS may be pre

4 Accommodative accuracy was not related to age (4-90 mont

5 For example, the initial magnitude of accommodative adaptation in the dark after nearwork is g

6 the critical test is to assess this initial accommodative aftereffect and its subsequent decay in th

7 ommodative-stimulus response (ASR) function, accommodative amplitude (AA), AC/A, and CA/C ratios in a

8 ckward during accommodation in proportion to accommodative amplitude and lens thickening.

9 riorly during accommodation in proportion to accommodative amplitude and the sclera bows inward with

10 Guidelines for predicting accommodative amplitude by age are often based on subjec

11 Maximum accommodative amplitude correlated significantly with th

12 ontraction is age independent, even as total accommodative amplitude declines.

13 These data indicate that accommodative amplitude decreases in a curvilinear manne

14 tudy, objective methods were used to measure accommodative amplitude in a wide age range of individua

15 The maximum accommodative amplitude of each subject was plotted by a

16 onkey eyes but does not affect EW-stimulated accommodative amplitude or dynamics in anesthetized, iri

17 responses showed linear peak velocity versus accommodative amplitude relationships that were not stat

18 ngent analysis of the fit indicated that the accommodative amplitude remained relatively stable until

19 d add powers) was indicated, measurements of accommodative amplitude show a weak tendency toward the

20 ge and CLS together are better predictors of accommodative amplitude than is age alone.

21 Centrally stimulated accommodative amplitude was 10.08 +/- 1.15 D before pilo

22 Accommodative amplitude was 11.25 +/- 0.18 D before atro

23 Accommodative amplitude was measured by coincidence refr

24 Accommodative amplitude was measured with a Hartinger co

25 Over all ages studied, age could explain accommodative amplitude, but not as well as accommodativ

26 When limited to studies only measuring accommodative amplitude, female sex was not associated w

27 nd of itself, has a causal relationship with accommodative amplitude, or that changes in the CLS play

28 topically to manipulate resting refraction, accommodative amplitude, starting point, and end point i

29 plitude: the greater the CLS the greater the accommodative amplitude.

30 l lens movement nor the 76% (10.2 D) loss in accommodative amplitude.

31 cle is believed to be inhibitory, decreasing accommodative amplitude.

32 n critical flicker-fusion frequency (CFF) or accommodative amplitude.

33 parity stimuli and to age-related changes in accommodative amplitude.

34 The CLS correlated significantly with the accommodative amplitude: the greater the CLS the greater

35 In iridectomized monkeys, postphenylephrine accommodative amplitudes were similar to prephenylephrin

36 he total number of latency measurements (17% accommodative and 16% disaccommodative) were longer than

37 actions among hyperopic refractive error and accommodative and binocular functions as a way of identi

38 ight that the age of myopia onset influences accommodative and binocular vision behavior in adulthood

39 apy Group will receive new near glasses with accommodative and convergence eye exercises.

40 action, amplitude, and starting point affect accommodative and disaccommodative dynamics in anestheti

41 Pharmacologic manipulations showed that accommodative and disaccommodative dynamics in anestheti

42 Accommodative and disaccommodative dynamics were analyze

43 Mean accommodative and disaccommodative latencies decreased l

44 Age-related changes in dynamics occur in accommodative and disaccommodative latencies, accommodat

45 Familiarity with accommodative and multifocal lenses, in conjunction with

46 NCX occurs in both accommodative and nonaccommodative ET; high hyperopia is

47 rrecting certain types of strabismus such as accommodative and partially accommodative esotropia.

48 ctive surgery can be useful in patients with accommodative and partially accommodative esotropia.

49 The sustained accommodative and vergence characteristics of participan

50 y investigated the accuracy and stability of accommodative and vergence functions in children with an

51 However, increased accommodative and vergence instabilities were associated

52 The magnitude of accommodative and vergence responses was not related to

53 eropes have increased instabilities in their accommodative and vergence responses, which may adversel

54 lized clinical management strategies such as accommodative and vergence training in late-onset myopia

55 o underwent surgery for infantile, partially accommodative, and basic esotropia over eleven years and

56 ontrast to previous reports showing only the accommodative anionic sublattice.

57 nships were studied in rhesus monkeys, whose accommodative apparatus and age-related loss of accommod

58 aracterization of age-related changes in the accommodative apparatus may help to model the system for

59 : (a) biomechanics and neural control of the accommodative apparatus, (b) its behavioral properties,

60 s, who may still benefit from their residual accommodative capacity.

61 This accommodative change in CSA, which decreases with age, m

62 Accommodative change in distances between the vitreous z

63 Previous studies suggest that lens biometric accommodative changes are different with pharmacological

64 That both age and accommodative changes in CSA appear to be limited to the

65 In vivo, nicotine induced similar accommodative changes in iridectomized and control eyes.

66 on, and goniovideography was used to measure accommodative changes in lens diameter in the iridectomi

67 image on the retina due to microsaccades or accommodative changes in the lens of the eye but instead

68 ration of one tissue within an organ compels accommodative changes in the surrounding tissues.

69 neal power, crystalline lens power, ratio of accommodative convergence to accommodation (AC/A ratio),

70 The links among hyperopia, accommodative convergence, and strabismus are well estab

71 d handheld devices and necessarily prolonged accommodative-convergence effort at near, both at school

72 Centripetal accommodative CP and capsule movement increased in veloc

73 Post-ICLE compared with pre-ICLE centripetal accommodative CP movement was dampened in all eyes in wh

74 Accommodative deficits in myopia may be the functional c

75 ; and 1 (1%) had both convergence excess and accommodative deficits.

76 errations did not change systematically with accommodative demand in Crystalens eyes.

77 r target positions were changed to create an accommodative demand of 1.5 D from starting positions of

78 evaluate the effect of refractive error and accommodative demand on transient axial elongation of th

79 e for static targets between 0.17 and 4.00 D accommodative demand was measured with the SRW-5000 (Shi

80 Zernike coefficients were analyzed for each accommodative demand, and the change of Zernike coeffici

81 lens for 5 minutes at either 5.00- or 2.50-D accommodative demand, followed by 3 minutes of viewing t

82 Despite having greater accommodative demand, uncorrected hyperopes accommodate

83 3 minutes of viewing the target at a 5.00-D accommodative demand.

84 al aberrations, and pupil diameter) with the accommodative demand.

85 rical and alignment changes in the lens with accommodative demand.

86 Intermediate accommodative demands (1.25 D) elicited the greater shif

87 e C(4,0) changed gradually with age only for accommodative demands below 3 D.

88 (2) Fixed near: accommodative demands from 1 to 5 D were created by plac

89 ects, under three conditions: (1) Fixed far: accommodative demands from 1 to 6 D were created by plac

90 nvergence insufficiency (all with concurrent accommodative disorders); 4 (5%) had both a nonspecific

91 The magnitude of NITM correlated with the accommodative drift after viewing a distant target for m

92 Accommodative dynamics as a function of amplitude were n

93 Changes were found in accommodative dynamics as a function of starting point a

94 the nasal iridocorneal angle at 2 levels of accommodative effort (2.5 diopters [D] and 15 D).

95 d accommodation (0.1 diopter [D]) and strong accommodative effort (8.0 D).

96 Accommodative effort increases SC size in healthy eyes,

97 es with age, the thickness of the lens under accommodative effort is only modestly age-dependent.

98 Repetitive changes in accommodative effort were induced in 15 subjects (18-34

99 modative structures and changes with age and accommodative effort will further the development of new

100 d a loss of physiologic SC dilatation during accommodative effort, which may reflect a reduction in o

101 The A-IOL did not shift systematically with accommodative effort, with 9 lenses moving forward and 1

102 ilt changes with respect to natural lens and accommodative effort.

103 stalline lens, with increasing tendency with accommodative effort.

104 dilated and natural viewing conditions (for accommodative efforts ranging from 0 to 2.5 diopters [D]

105 al viewing conditions and phenylephrine (for accommodative efforts ranging from 0 to 2.5 diopters [D]

106 fined as affected; two had esotropia with an accommodative element; and three underwent strabismus su

107 ening Program examined whether screening for accommodative errors by using videorefraction without cy

108 e family history study, 23% of children with accommodative esotropia had an affected first-degree rel

109 Identification of risk factors for accommodative esotropia may help to determine which chil

110 sometropia had a 7.8-fold increased risk for accommodative esotropia over nonanisometropic patients.

111 t bifocals improve outcomes in children with accommodative esotropia with high AC/A.

112 children who received strabismus surgery for accommodative esotropia with hypermetropia larger than s

113 a, 177 (13.5%) (95% CI, 11.7-15.5) had fully accommodative esotropia, 252 (19.3%) (95% CI, 17.1-21.5)

114 52 (19.3%) (95% CI, 17.1-21.5) had partially accommodative esotropia, and 181 (13.8%) (95% CI, 12.0-1

115 ia, fully accommodative esotropia, partially accommodative esotropia, and all exotropia revealed inte

116 sation of pre-existing strabismus, new-onset accommodative esotropia, concurrent onset of systemic di

117 dence curves for congenital esotropia, fully accommodative esotropia, partially accommodative esotrop

118 roups of children, with right and left fully accommodative esotropia, respectively, pointed at target

119 In children with accommodative esotropia, the critical period for suscept

120 se a significant risk for the development of accommodative esotropia.

121 used successfully in adult patients to treat accommodative esotropia.

122 ecutive patients, aged 18 to 60 months, with accommodative esotropia.

123 butes to poor outcomes in both infantile and accommodative esotropia.

124 ising option for the treatment of refractive accommodative esotropia.

125 rabismus such as accommodative and partially accommodative esotropia.

126 in patients with accommodative and partially accommodative esotropia.

127 Similar findings are true for accommodative esotropia; children treated within the fir

128 Patients with high AC/A accommodative esotropia; evidence of stereopsis, binocul

129 Patients with late-onset accommodative ET and intermittent infantile strabismus r

130 Patients with infantile ET and infantile accommodative ET had high concordance between mVEP respo

131 Accommodative ET occurred in 60% of cases, and only 35.7

132 gh NCX is considered to occur in early-onset accommodative ET with high hyperopia, consensus on causa

133 fantile accommodative ET, 22 with late-onset accommodative ET, 10 with intermittent infantile strabis

134 ren: 20 with infantile ET, 16 with infantile accommodative ET, 22 with late-onset accommodative ET, 1

135 The commonest dysfunctions were accommodative excess and convergence excess.

136 set myopic adults have significantly reduced accommodative facility and lower fusional vergence ampli

137 t late-onset myopic individuals have reduced accommodative facility and lower negative and positive f

138 Monocular accommodative facility measurements were taken for a 40-

139 accommodation, which led to a lower distance accommodative facility rate.

140 the dynamic changes in refraction during the accommodative facility test in myopes and emmetropes.

141 During distance accommodative facility testing, myopes exhibited a lower

142 Accommodative facility was reduced in late-onset myopes

143 ters such as the amplitude of accommodation, accommodative facility, accommodative response, AC/A rat

144 EOM and LOM in both monocular and binocular accommodative facility, negative fusional vergence and p

145 Field of view and accommodative focus are two fundamental attributes of ma

146 is present particularly in intermittent and accommodative forms; however, further research is requir

147 Accommodative function was also assessed in an age-match

148 at present in CP has a significant impact on accommodative function.

149 rage dioptric value, reading difficulty, and accommodative function.

150 For both fully accommodative groups, the pointing responses to the cent

151 In relation to Accommodative Insufficiency (AI), a frequency rate of 10

152 Convergence and accommodative insufficiency represent the main cause of

153 Accommodative intraocular lens design and development ar

154 lens designs are attempting to commercialize accommodative intraocular lens devices.

155 To inform the reader of forthcoming accommodative intraocular lens technologies that are bei

156 Accommodative intraocular lenses could revolutionize not

157 re currently available or pending release on accommodative intraocular lenses.

158 The Lumina accommodative IOL effectively restores the visual functi

159 Twenty eyes with a 1CU accommodative IOL implanted were refracted and distance

160 ) who underwent implantation of a Crystalens accommodative IOL, and control groups of 9 normal subjec

161 currently being tested to achieve-finally-an accommodative IOL.

162 VIEW FIL611PV multifocal and OPTOFLEX FIL618 accommodative IOLs (Soleko, Ltd., Rome, Italy) in patien

163 Accommodative IOLs tend to be slightly more vertically t

164 sponse of eyes implanted with the Crystalens accommodative IOLs, measured objectively using laser ray

165 Children had high accommodative lag and also had near esophoria if their m

166 however, not finding an association between accommodative lag and myopia progression is inconsistent

167 A +2.00-D bifocal add did not eliminate accommodative lag and reduced lag by less than 25% of th

168 r target, there was only a greater amount of accommodative lag in children who became myopic compared

169 Accommodative lag in children who became myopic was comp

170 Elevated accommodative lag is unlikely to be a useful predictive

171 Increased hyperopic defocus from accommodative lag may be a consequence rather than a cau

172 Increased accommodative lag occurred in children after the onset o

173 the subjects with CP, 57.6% demonstrated an accommodative lag outside normal limits at one or more d

174 Substantive and consistent elevations in accommodative lag relative to model estimates of lag in

175 Monocular accommodative lag to a 4-D Badal stimulus was measured o

176 Overall, the accommodative lag was 0.44 D greater in the participants

177 Accommodative lag was greater in individuals susceptible

178 At baseline, accommodative lag was higher (1.72 +/- 0.37 D; mean +/-

179 Accommodative lag was measured annually with either a Ca

180 Accommodative lag was measured with the following correc

181 Accommodative lag was not associated with myopia progres

182 In the sample as a whole, accommodative lag was not significantly different in chi

183 Accommodative lag was not significantly elevated during

184 background had the chosen chromaticity, the accommodative lag was reduced by an average of 0.16 D (P

185 eccentric photorefractor was used to record accommodative lag while participants viewed a cross on a

186 t, and Hispanic children having intermediate accommodative lag.

187 viously thought in myopic children with high accommodative lag.

188 he colored background slightly increased the accommodative lag.

189 rts hyperopic defocus-based theories such as accommodative lag; however, not finding an association b

190 Children with larger accommodative lags (>0.43 D for a 33 cm target) wearing

191 Significantly larger accommodative lags were measured with MFCLs compared to

192 New multifocal and accommodative lens technology should enhance patient sat

193 accommodative amplitude, but not as well as accommodative lens thickening and resting muscle apex th

194 or muscle apex were important for predicting accommodative lens thickening.

195 st US Food and Drugs Administration approved accommodative lens.

196 With the advent of interest in accommodative lenses as a solution for presbyopia and th

197 commodation in accordance with the Helmholtz accommodative mechanism and in contrast to the accommoda

198 Some debate surrounds the accommodative mechanism in primates, particularly whethe

199 commodative mechanism and in contrast to the accommodative mechanism originally proposed by Tschernin

200 Future descriptions of the accommodative mechanism, and approaches to presbyopia th

201 The magnitude of accommodative microfluctuations during sustained near ac

202 ncies, peak velocities, and the magnitude of accommodative microfluctuations were calculated from the

203 atencies, accommodative peak velocities, and accommodative microfluctuations, all of which decrease w

204 there is a significant posttask blur-driven accommodative NITM, which is sustained for longer than h

205 is crowded, whereas that of lysozyme is more accommodative of either isomer.

206 avitreal LAT-A of 10 microM had no effect on accommodative or miotic responses to intramuscular PILO.

207 and binocular vision assessment, integrating accommodative parameters, were used to analyse the visua

208 Accommodative peak velocities were fastest in subjects i

209 ccommodative and disaccommodative latencies, accommodative peak velocities, and accommodative microfl

210 ion between tonic accommodation, the resting accommodative position of the eye in the absence of a vi

211 ctive correction and, hopefully, the type of accommodative range that we take for granted when we are

212 on accommodation, age, and age dependence of accommodative rate.

213 Other measurements included accommodative response (by an open field of view autoref

214 nce instabilities were associated with total accommodative response (P < 0.05).

215 Accommodative response amplitude is reduced with pilocar

216 Accommodative response and cycloplegic refractive error

217 Static aspects of accommodation (maximum accommodative response and lag) were measured with an au

218 n children with lower versus higher baseline accommodative response at near (P = 0.03) and with lower

219 Fourier analysis was used to determine the accommodative response at the frequency of the stimulus.

220 The disparity in accommodative response between EMMs and LOMs, however, a

221 Mean accommodative response for emmetropic children was lower

222 the dark-focus values and the slopes of the accommodative response function are not significantly di

223 nsory part not only affects the slope of the accommodative response function but also increases the s

224 differences in dark focus, the slope of the accommodative response function, and the ET were compare

225 demand led to a significant reduction in the accommodative response in all subjects (0.0 D: by -0.35

226 cond, continuous-objective recordings of the accommodative response measured with an open-view infrar

227 The accommodative response of eyes implanted with the Crysta

228 ts of amplitude and the starting point of an accommodative response on the dynamics of far-to-near (a

229 o the data to determine peak velocity versus accommodative response relationships.

230 asing cognitive demand caused a reduction in accommodative response that was attributable principally

231 , the 2- to 4-month-old infants generated an accommodative response to at least the 0.75 D amplitude

232 Long-term treatment with ECHO decreased the accommodative response to pilocarpine and increased intr

233 The static accommodative response to targets at proximal distances

234 The accommodative response was obtained by analyzing changes

235 de of accommodation, accommodative facility, accommodative response, AC/A ratio, near point of conver

236 VA, accommodative response, and stereoacuity were significan

237 Accommodative response, binocular near VA, and near ster

238 tive push-up test data that overestimate the accommodative response.

239 by the visual system, thereby improving the accommodative response.

240 y (Hedge's g = 0.40 [CI: 0.17, 0.64]) of the accommodative response; and increased self-reported visi

241 DS subjects had lower maximum accommodative responses (mean = 2.52 +/- 1.66 D) and hig

242 erences in the accuracy and stability of the accommodative responses across refractive groups (P < 0.

243 Eccentric photorefraction was used to record accommodative responses at 25 Hz.

244 en with CP demonstrate significantly reduced accommodative responses compared with their neurological

245 The greatly attenuated accommodative responses in vitro for iridectomized eyes

246 Dynamic analysis of the accommodative responses showed linear peak velocity vers

247 ith Down syndrome showed considerably poorer accommodative responses than normally developing childre

248 Five accommodative responses to 20/100 letters located at 4 m

249 Accommodative responses to a step stimulus cartoon movie

250 meral LAT-A of 5 microM inhibited miotic and accommodative responses to intramuscular PILO.

251 d the use of auditory biofeedback to improve accommodative responses to near visual stimuli in patien

252 The subject's accommodative responses to one-, two-, three-, and four-

253 of this study was to record infants' dynamic accommodative responses to stimuli moving at a range of

254 Accommodative responses were also measured for a counter

255 Accommodative responses were measured continuously with

256 Accommodative responses were measured in 140 subjects ag

257 Dynamic accommodative responses were measured with infrared phot

258 Dynamic accommodative responses were measured with infrared phot

259 Binocular accommodative responses were recorded at 25 Hz.

260 Reduced accommodative responses were significantly associated wi

261 Static and dynamic EW-stimulated accommodative responses were studied in five iridectomiz

262 d model of static accommodation, in which an accommodative sensory gain as a linear operator is added

263 Within refractive groups, however, accommodative shifts with increasing cognition correlate

264 line of sight for the stimulus while holding accommodative state fixed.

265 ed statistically independent of both age and accommodative state.

266 meter does not correlate with age for either accommodative state.

267 anterior portion increased with age in both accommodative states.

268 Short-term adaptive changes in accommodative step response dynamics could be induced, a

269 cted to demonstrate short-term adaptation of accommodative step response dynamics to optically induce

270 At higher levels of accommodative stimulation, a significantly greater trans

271 During relatively short periods of accommodative stimulation, axial length increases in bot

272 and myopic subjects during short periods of accommodative stimulation.

273 ved forward on average by 0.07 mm under - 3D accommodative stimuli and 0.16 mm for - 6D.

274 Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA), while accommodative stimuli of 0, 2, 4 and 6 D were presented

275 ecreased by an average magnitude (related to accommodative stimuli) 0.44 mm/D, and PLRC decreased 0.0

276 ve corrections while viewing a letter target accommodative stimulus of 4 D (either in a Badal system

277 The objective accommodative stimulus-response curve for static targets

278 rst near-spectacle reading correction on the accommodative-stimulus response (ASR) function, accommod

279 th a history of onset of either infantile or accommodative strabismus before 5 years of age.

280 antifying normal biometric dimensions of the accommodative structures and changes with age and accomm

281 The physiological amenability of the accommodative structures in the presbyopic eye to accomm

282 ntly, the crystal structures reveal open and accommodative substrate-binding sites, which correlates

283 The dynamics of the infant accommodative system are almost unknown and yet have a l

284 immaturity in the motor capabilities of the accommodative system compared with the sensory visual sy

285 to age-related biomechanical changes in the accommodative system.

286 a thorough examination of their vergence and accommodative systems so that an accurate diagnosis can

287 Pencil push-ups and use of accommodative targets have a role in the treatment of co

288 pically describe discrete gaze shifts to non-accommodative targets performed under laboratory conditi

289 ence suggests that office-based vergence and accommodative therapies improve motor outcomes in childr

290 trials found that office-based vergence and accommodative therapies were effective in improving moto

291 In young adults, office-based vergence and accommodative therapies were not superior to placebo in

292 m was designed to appear to be real vergence/accommodative therapy, without stimulating vergence, acc

293 use in future clinical trials using vergence/accommodative therapy.

294 Although general anesthesia reduced the accommodative tone in most children, it was still signif

295 cular (disparity-driven) convergence and use accommodative vergence and saccades to refixate near tar

296 duction in accommodation, increased ratio of accommodative vergence to accommodation, and relative di

297 Monocular viewing (i.e., accommodative vergence) caused substantial reductions in

298 scaled to a standardized pupil size for each accommodative vergence.

299 These results provide evidence of accommodative vigor in youth and a slowing of accommodat