ライフサイエンスコーパス: accreditation

1 l infrastructure, and little use of external accreditation.

2 e Liaison Committee on Medical Education for accreditation.

3 ellence and many bariatric centers obtaining accreditation.

4 he billing of services according to level of accreditation.

5 implement the quality system and seek formal accreditation.

6 y measures, and Commission on Cancer program accreditation.

7 The PA field received a 5-year accreditation.

8 ssary part of World Marrow Donor Association accreditation.

9 of their service even in the absence of full accreditation.

10 formance on these measures differs by cancer accreditation.

11 of maintaining different qualifications and accreditations.

12 masses) was evaluated with the mammographic accreditation ACR phantom.

13 emands for data from employer-purchasers and accreditation agencies and the adoption of strategies fo

14 The flexible scope of accreditation allowed for minor modifications and extens

15 critically assess proposed reforms, such as accreditation and central IRBs, according to how well th

16 sented at the meeting, including health care accreditation and certification entities, foundations, g

17 rom CCM stakeholder organizations, including accreditation and certification organizations, critical

18 el will need to overcome major challenges of accreditation and certification, alternative education p

19 lity standards in medicine, with emphasis on accreditation and certification.

20 ons within the existing framework of medical accreditation and certification.

21 ctitioners need to comply with the pertinent accreditation and licensing requirements.

22 laboratory or in a laboratory that meets the accreditation and proficiency testing requirements set o

23 Cancer center accreditation and public reporting are 2 approaches avai

24 he 2015-2018 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP)

25 2015 to 2018 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP)

26 mes from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Participan

27 ata from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program participan

28 ied from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Participan

29 standard technical performance measures met accreditation and regulatory requirements.

30 Official fellowship accreditation and subspecialty certification, however, s

31 esence of Adult Congenital Heart Association accreditation, and adult versus pediatric hospital desig

32 ly in duration, class size, target audience, accreditation, and projected training settings.

33 hospital characteristics related to volume, accreditations, and offering of advanced care services.

34 ave accredited fellowships, and a fellowship accreditation application is under review for obstetric

35 gh to use for public reporting, payment, and accreditation are not well-defined.

36 strongly universal Hamiltonians and quantum accreditation as well as experimental progress toward th

37 nd referral as a condition for cancer center accreditation beginning in 2015.

38 can College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer accreditation benchmarks.

39 tal, and an independent Pharmacy Compounding Accreditation Board-accredited pharmacy).

40 selection process by residency programs and accreditation bodies is needed to ensure workforce equit

41 s therefore critical for medical schools and accreditation bodies to evaluate current curriculum and

42 We therefore propose that all accreditation bodies work cooperatively to create a rout

43 ncies, we recommend expansion of the role of accreditation bodies.

44 rgeon procedure volume, but unrelated to COE accreditation by professional organizations.

45 lowships must meet specific requirements for accreditation by the Accreditation Council for Graduate

46 ult Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology fellowship accreditation by the American College of Graduate Medica

47 Cancer center recognition, offered as accreditation by the American College of Surgeons Commis

48 ng, qualifications, and appropriate facility accreditation can improve patient outcomes compared to s

49 and, in collaboration with the International Accreditation Commission (IAC), an accreditation program

50 CQI process that incorporated Intersocietal Accreditation Commission standards.

51 s well as collaborated with national imaging accreditation commissions and imaging certification boar

52 erest.CME Credit: SNMMI is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (

53 While the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education p

54 tion Council for Graduate Medical Education, Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education,

55 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

56 t present, the 6 general competencies of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

57 In 2003, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

58 Although the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

59 educators feel increasing pressure from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

60 in the United States were established by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

61 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

62 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

63 g the most comprehensive data available, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

64 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

65 New Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

66 ns across the United States who completed an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

67 xed findings regarding gender differences in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

68 , residents and fellows who were enrolled in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

69 enrolled in EM residencies accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

70 hort study included physicians who completed Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

71 he Association of American Medical Colleges, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

72 eld, the implementation of Milestones by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

73 Longitudinal Milestones data reported to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

74 Multicenter data were obtained from 10 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

75 male residents in performance evaluations on Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

76 in academic NM, describe the demographics of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

77 ssed whether outcomes changed after the 2011 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

78 Participating in the study are Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

79 Programs were randomly assigned to current Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

80 with standard duty hours, as adopted by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

81 significantly increased in number following Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

82 iple training pathways are recognized by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

83 In 2003, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

84 Patient outcomes associated with the 2011 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

85 In 2011, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

86 In 2010, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AC

87 Material published by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and

88 f Colon and Rectal Surgery, working with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and

89 study used publicly available data from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and

90 survey of all GME programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education as

91 Evaluations are mandated by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education but

92 tiary academic medical center and associated Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Car

93 ns among general surgery residents using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education cas

94 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Review of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education cas

95 ve review of categorical postgraduate year 1 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education cas

96 d in the ICU--areas that encompass different Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education cor

97 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education cor

98 rtable with several areas of the nonclinical Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education cor

99 spects of surgical training, including the 6 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education cor

100 Diversity of cases was assessed based on Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education def

101 Compliance with the new Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education dut

102 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education dut

103 In 2003, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education ena

104 variability and address the requirements of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education for

105 idency Review Committee Ophthalmology of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has

106 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has

107 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has

108 Although the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has

109 on in Nutrition, hosted in March 2023 by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education in

110 patient care had improved as a result of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education man

111 ciation of American Medical Colleges and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Mil

112 and lifelong learning competencies, and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Mil

113 uate medical education was introduced by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education of

114 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Out

115 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education rec

116 cal care interventions was constructed using Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education rec

117 e changed little since the initiation of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education reg

118 f teaching and evaluation, and the impact of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education reg

119 Instead, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education reg

120 ernight shifts, a position reinforced by new Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education req

121 Since 2003, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education req

122 receiving data about practice habits on the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education res

123 axis for every patient, and results from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education res

124 These findings support the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education sta

125 To test our hypotheses, we analyzed the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Sur

126 hour limits were implemented in 2003 by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education to

127 n general surgery programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education wer

128 Despite implementation of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education wor

129 l duties for research fellows as a result of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education wor

130 In support of the new Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education wor

131 s across all specialties were extracted from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education yea

132 gical Association Annual Census data and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's D

133 The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's n

134 rograms from 2008 to 2022 used data from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's p

135 American College of Critical Care Medicine, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Ac

136 ssociation of American Medical Colleges, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, an

137 n of University Professors of Ophthalmology, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, As

138 hifts, which are currently sanctioned by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, po

139 eview Committee for Internal Medicine of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, pr

140 ecific requirements for accreditation by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, tr

141 as sent to all program directors (n = 67) of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-acc

142 critical care medicine program directors of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-acc

143 Physician graduates of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-acc

144 active general surgery residents training in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-acc

145 Interactive Database was used to identify US Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-acc

146 ysicians who completed residency training at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-acc

147 One third (320 of 863; 37%) of fellows in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-acc

148 Fellowship-trained glaucoma faculty at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-acc

149 Fellowship-trained vitreoretinal faculty at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-acc

150 Participants included US Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-acc

151 PARTICIPANTS, AND/OR CONTROLS: Faculty from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-acc

152 t had surgery, anesthesiology, and pulmonary Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-acc

153 y is an expectation for program directors of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-acc

154 Within the adult critical care Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-acc

155 There is an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-app

156 based on 6 broad competencies defined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.

157 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.

158 the work-hour limitations introduced by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.

159 petitive accreditation standards through the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.

160 te medical education (GME) accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.

161 ss US IM residency programs accredited by US Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.

162 ment of the Next Accreditation System of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.

163 were included for analyses if they were both Accreditation Council Graduate Medical Education accredi

164 overlapping sets of instruments testing the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACG

165 m the graduating classes of 2016 and 2017 at Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACG

166 raduate medical education (GME), in 2020 the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACG

167 h residents demonstrate their skill in a new Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education comp

168 In 2002, the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education enac

169 Residents and fellows employed by Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education-accr

170 United States Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education-appr

171 An evidence-based, reproducible, and accreditation council-compliant SEE module would be a va

172 policies within our professional societies, accreditation councils and workplaces.

173 ariatric surgery led to the establishment of accreditation criteria for bariatric centers of excellen

174 pectively from American College of Radiology accreditation data (January 1, 2015, to December 31, 201

175 Blue carbon accreditation for climate mitigation services provided b

176 s a recently introduced intermediate tier of accreditation for hospitals at which patients with acute

177 ied by the UK regulatory bodies and attained accreditation for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing by the U

178 C(org) (75-88%) and that current blue carbon accreditation frameworks undervalue these ecosystems.

179 lenges including resource disparity, lack of accreditation frameworks, overreliance on technology, an

180 It shifts residency program accreditation from external audit of educational process

181 h respect to structural characteristics (ie, accreditations, geography, and oncologic services provid

182 Funding agencies, physician accreditation groups, and quality improvement initiative

183 ecedented collaboration to develop the first accreditation guidelines for authentic ocean sanctuaries

184 stics suggestive of higher quality (eg, more accreditations) have greater VTE prophylaxis adherence r

185 credited (Pulmonary Hypertension Association accreditation), high-volume (with 10 patients receiving

186 of "Bariatric Surgery Center of Excellence" accreditation; however, future research into the quality

187 Regulatory authorities for accreditation in North America have included nontechnica

188 ce the beginnings of its standardization and accreditation in the early 20th century, its growth duri

189 rvice priorities for Paediatric Allergy Care accreditation in the UK.

190 In a first-time use of national accreditation information from the CoC, enrollment to ca

191 The data were obtained from accreditation information submitted by the 1,200 CoC pro

192 Future collaborative QI endeavors leveraging accreditation infrastructure may help address other gaps

193 s presumed that echocardiographic laboratory accreditation leads to improved quality, but there are f

194 cialty certifying boards, resident education accreditation, licensure boards, and hospital medical st

195 l involved parties, testing methods used for accreditation, limited audits, publication of policy, an

196 To increase the utility of the monthly accreditation mammographic phantom image, the authors ad

197 Hospitals with existing healthcare quality accreditation, more cardiologists, and private ownership

198 y, units from non-Netcord Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy (Netcord-FACT)-accredi

199 ation program (e.g., the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization's [JCAHO] new O

200 d Services (CMS) and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) measur

201 hologists (CAP), and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO), all o

202 cal Specialties, and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (organizations

203 In July 2002, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations implemented st

204 nd Medicaid Services/Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations performance me

205 The Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations recommends ven

206 itals (later renamed the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations) was formed to

207 te federal agencies, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, and the pharm

208 of Orthopaedic Surgery, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, Veteran's Hea

209 nit core measures of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.

210 requirements of the Joint Commission for the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.

211 In 1951, the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Hospitals (later renamed the Joint Comm

212 erring physicians, patients, and the public; accreditation of imaging facilities; management of self-

213 Validation and accreditation of metagenomics protocols to ensure qualit

214 ded; and 9) certification of individuals and accreditation of programs are rejected.

215 c health systems (eg, workforce development, accreditation of reference laboratories, improvement of

216 espiratory Care (NBRC), and the Committee on Accreditation of Respiratory Care education (CoARC) rela

217 lla were performed according to the scope of accreditation of the respective laboratories conforming

218 Early on, there was no supervision or accreditation of these fellowships, and they varied wide

219 e penalized more frequently had more quality accreditations, offered advanced services, were major te

220 tudies have evaluated the impact of hospital accreditation on all bariatric surgery outcomes.

221 esults underscore the potential for national accreditation organizations to transform oncology practi

222 d be the role of federal and state agencies, accreditation organizations, and philanthropic foundatio

223 scans of an American College of Radiology CT accreditation phantom (module 2, low contrast) were perf

224 to resolve the four 6-mm rods in the ACR CT accreditation phantom can be lost.

225 e the American College of Radiology (ACR) CT accreditation phantom LCR section at volume CT dose inde

226 Methods The American College of Radiology CT accreditation phantom was scanned by using a dual-source

227 directly with the use of the ACR mammography accreditation phantom.

228 fees and the characteristics (affiliations, accreditations, population income) and fees and charges

229 (CTC) do not undergo compulsory performance accreditation, potentially lowering diagnostic sensitivi

230 tandards, we set out to design and assess an accreditation procedure for allergen-specific serum IgE.

231 Method validation according to the accreditation procedure under the EN ISO 15189 standard

232 le analyte assay in view of the EN ISO 15189 accreditation procedure.

233 Council, is in the process of introducing an accreditation process to further ensure the highest qual

234 or are accredited by a nationally recognized accreditation program (e.g., the Joint Commission on Acc

235 rnational Accreditation Commission (IAC), an accreditation program for facilities administering RPT.

236 he American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program reviewed clinical images for 2,341

237 of Surgeons-Bariatric Surgery Center Network accreditation program, and its prospective, longitudinal

238 erican College of Radiology (ACR) breast MRI accreditation program.

239 and August 1993 through the ACR Mammography Accreditation Program.

240 We present an accreditation protocol for analogue, i.e., continuous-ti

241 res at a high standard and provides data for accreditation purposes.

242 eflecting quality (hospital size, numbers of accreditations/quality initiatives) and performance on V

243 In addition, strict accreditation requirements and student/faculty concerns

244 d and nutrition security, and curricular and accreditation requirements for medical nutrition educati

245 Accreditation requirements mandate teaching quality impr

246 of this review is to collate regulatory and accreditation requirements that, in essence, mandate DxS

247 Accreditation requirements, holistic review initiatives,

248 Regulatory and accreditation requirements, professional guidelines, and

249 blished scholarly guidelines consistent with accreditation requirements.

250 This is possible within current accreditation requirements.

251 specialization when designing curriculum and accreditation requirements.

252 erating procedures and diagnostic laboratory accreditation serve to build trust and confidence among

253 V-2 diagnostic testing by the United Kingdom Accreditation Service.

254 boratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) checklist and the Strengthening L

255 Strengthening Laboratory Management Towards Accreditation (SLMTA) curriculum were used in 6 MOH labo

256 et bacterial testing and the promulgation of accreditation standards by the College of American Patho

257 llege of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) accreditation standards require providing a survivorship

258 s have collectively fostered anticompetitive accreditation standards through the Accreditation Counci

259 ove DEI in residency, ensure compliance with accreditation standards, and improve health outcomes for

260 Contrary to accreditation standards, most US and Canadian dental sch

261 nitored with the use of stringent laboratory accreditation standards, proficiency testing, and compet

262 r inform quality improvement initiatives and accreditation standards.

263 stigators blinded to the external laboratory accreditation status and echocardiographic results.

264 Hospital accreditation status is associated with safer outcomes,

265 data evaluating the association of hospital accreditation status with differences in treatment among

266 cal Education, proposes a new outcomes-based accreditation strategy for residency training programs i

267 tencies, achieved through voluntary hospital accreditation, supported through an expanded process of

268 The method was accredited by the Hellenic Accreditation System and it was applied for an 8 years s

269 lestones is an important element of the Next Accreditation System of the Accreditation Council for Gr

270 s such as regional resource sharing, modular accreditation systems, human-AI collaborative teaching,

271 e programs, posing risks to higher education accreditation that will be amplified as these models imp

272 acquisitions, and professional training and accreditation), the need for qualitative and quantitativ

273 there is emerging literature linking office accreditation to improved patient outcomes, more work is

274 ne with the current trend of laboratory test accreditation to international standards, we set out to

275 uire managed care organizations seeking NCQA accreditation to measure and report the percentage of pa

276 should be a mandatory requirement to achieve accreditation to perform transplant surgeries.

277 By contrast, ISO15189 accreditation was reported by 90 (23%) laboratories and

278 ying for American College of Radiology (ACR) accreditation were collected between August 1987 and Aug