戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ostatic changes with increased and decreased acoustic stimulation.
2 throughout the tonotopic field determined by acoustic stimulation.
3  between opsins and less robust overall than acoustic stimulation.
4  had a simpler waveform than the response to acoustic stimulation.
5 ortex changed with the spectral range of the acoustic stimulation.
6 e administration, and moderate-to-high level acoustic stimulation.
7 xcitation indicates a requirement for strong acoustic stimulation.
8 c seizures (AGS) can be triggered by intense acoustic stimulation.
9 from the ears of tetrapods in the absence of acoustic stimulation.
10 instem after 1 hour of continuous free-field acoustic stimulation.
11  a cochlear ablation, even in the absence of acoustic stimulation.
12 awal (ETX) in rodents can be precipitated by acoustic stimulation.
13 e for modulating auditory nerve responses to acoustic stimulation.
14  of synaptic inputs to the IC in response to acoustic stimulation.
15 e units in response to monaural and binaural acoustic stimulation.
16  nucleus magnocellularis (NM) neurons during acoustic stimulation.
17 lizations are known, and they all respond to acoustic stimulation.
18 excitation that are normally associated with acoustic stimulation.
19 no sign of brain tissue damage caused by the acoustic stimulation.
20 d largely similar to the spread arising from acoustic stimulation.
21 librium materials formation through specific acoustic stimulation.
22 ials firing in synchrony at the onset of the acoustic stimulation.
23                                We found that acoustic stimulation alone evokes a change in the freque
24                                As repetitive acoustic stimulation and auditory conditioning do, elect
25 n auditory cortex channels that responded to acoustic stimulation and demonstrated well-defined frequ
26 el-free, and high-resolution technique using acoustic stimulation and holographic imaging to reconstr
27 lvian sulcus (FAES) is largely responsive to acoustic stimulation and its unilateral deactivation res
28 om olivocochlear terminals during high-level acoustic stimulation and suggest that muscarinic antagon
29 n normal animals, expression was produced by acoustic stimulation and was found to be tonotopically d
30 als generally display transient responses to acoustic stimulation, and typically respond to a brief s
31                                              Acoustic stimulation at either 10 kHz or 40 kHz was used
32 ors that bear the initial brunt of excessive acoustic stimulation, because they must convert excessiv
33 neurophysiological recordings in response to acoustic stimulation, both from sound-sensitive areas in
34 al vent seemingly in response to tactile and acoustic stimulation by the babies.
35         These data suggest that phase-locked acoustic stimulation can be a viable alternative to phar
36 eduction of surface AMPA receptors following acoustic stimulation correlated with changes in acoustic
37 gs may also have a pragmatic benefit in that acoustic stimulation could be used therapeutically to fa
38 x extracellular matrix which, in response to acoustic stimulation, displaces the hair bundles of oute
39 For cochlear implant users, combined electro-acoustic stimulation (EAS) significantly improves the pe
40 dolymphatic Ca(2+) concentration, repetitive acoustic stimulation fails to produce adaptation of MET-
41                        Combined electric and acoustic stimulation has proven to be an effective strat
42  well as entrainment to rhythmic noise-burst acoustic stimulation in 14% of electrodes.
43 thin auditory cortex by combining free-field acoustic stimulation in the frontal azimuthal plane with
44                            Combining dynamic acoustic stimulation in virtual space with extracellular
45 nists in cultured neurons and in response to acoustic stimulation in vivo.
46 or reactivity was observed with tactile (vs. acoustic) stimulation in both TBI and naive rats althoug
47 otility and hair bundle movement, to amplify acoustic stimulations increasing hearing sensitivity and
48                         Moreover, repetitive acoustic stimulation induces robust short-term habituati
49 ly being sensitive to rapid relative to slow acoustic stimulation, insensitive to the difference betw
50 is change in the IC becomes greater when the acoustic stimulation is made behaviorally relevant by pa
51                In this study, we paired loud acoustic stimulation (LAS) with transcranial magnetic st
52                                              Acoustic stimulation leads to fast changes both in membr
53                    Moreover, after 30 min of acoustic stimulation, levels of Kv3.1b immunoreactivity
54          This approach leverages interfacial acoustic stimulation, localized acoustic heating, and st
55                            With increases in acoustic stimulation, males lengthen call duration while
56 ectrical stimulation of a deaf ear can mimic acoustic stimulation of a normal-hearing ear.
57                           We also found that acoustic stimulation of egr-1 and fos differed in the th
58 or monitoring neural activity in response to acoustic stimulation of the control and the deprived ear
59 mory reactivation (TMR) and closed-loop (CL) acoustic stimulation on the up-phase of slow oscillation
60 cts whose hearing is evoked by either normal acoustic stimulation or electric stimulation of the audi
61 to be combined within the same ear (electric-acoustic stimulation, or EAS) and/or across ears (bimoda
62                     For instance, persistent acoustic stimulation produces sensory adaptation, which
63                                  Strikingly, acoustic stimulation promotes Foxo3 nuclear localization
64  of rippling water (SW), and 3) rest without acoustic stimulation (R).
65 cations in perceived tinnitus loudness after acoustic stimulation (residual inhibition) [4], permitti
66 resolved which statistical parameters in the acoustic stimulation spectrum affect frequency-specific
67 range as well as the spectral spacing of the acoustic stimulation spectrum on frequency-specific neur
68  Moreover, we conducted behavioral assays of acoustic stimulation that confirm acoustic triggering of
69                                         Upon acoustic stimulation, the partition responds principally
70 odest epileptiform EEG activity on the first acoustic stimulation to progressively higher amplitude,
71 ed spike fidelity surpassed ChR2 and natural acoustic stimulation to support a superior code for the
72                                     However, acoustic stimulation using higher frequency sounds did n
73                                              Acoustic stimulation vibrates the cochlear basilar membr
74 s in c-fos mRNA expression in the absence of acoustic stimulation were observed in the superficial do
75                          Neural responses to acoustic stimulation were present during both slow-wave
76 coupled to the overall spectral range of the acoustic stimulation, which suggests that neural adjustm
77 electric ITD tuning is as sharp as found for acoustic stimulation with broadband noise in normal-hear
78 odulated their discharge rate in response to acoustic stimulation with species-specific calls.