ライフサイエンスコーパス: activation energy

1 on is slow and has a large negative apparent activation energy.

2 .178 Hz the time evolution of the aging-rate activation energy.

3 ucture, reduce soot ignition temperature and activation energy.

4 echanism of degradation in terms of rate and activation energy.

5 ty in an organic device is determined by the activation energy.

6 the same temperature range, with a very low activation energy.

7 ce group also affected the reaction rate and activation energy.

8 ionic conductivity and reasonable Arrhenius activation energy.

9 d by a purely thermal mechanism with a fixed activation energy.

10 InI(3) and an alkyne moiety and reduces the activation energy.

11 l/mol compared to the experimentally derived activation energies.

12 ace-induced dissociation patterns at similar activation energies.

13 ential factors and small but distinguishable activation energies.

14 and estimate the amplitudes, time scales and activation energies.

15 nteractions that account for their different activation energies.

16 s-type equation was applied to determine the activation energies.

17 ger changes in conformation result in higher activation energies.

18 oom temperature conductivity values and high activation energies.

19 theory and compared with experimental Gibbs activation energies.

20 d by a few polaritonic channels with smaller activation energies.

21 and it is confirmed that the lowest overall activation energy (0.73 eV) migration path is along the

22 and our calculations reveal that the lowest activation energy (1.13 eV) migration path is two dimens

23 ant, earth-abundant catalyst possesses a low activation energy (10.8 kcal mol(-1)) and a high turnove

24 equivalent) as well as oxidative stability (activation energy 105.6 kJ/mol).

25 conformation change (consistent with a high activation energy, 106 kJ/mol) that increases Mn(II) aff

26 he swift exchange reactions that have a high activation energy (120 kJ/mol).

27 n of phenol degradation had a relatively low activation energy (18.4 +/- 2.7 kJ mol(-1)).

28 somerization pathways, the lowest Gibbs free activation energy 25.8 kcal/mol was in close agreement w

29 The activation energy (35 kJ/mol) for dimerization is almost

30 utein increased with increasing temperature (activation energy=38 kJ/mol).

31 rst-order kinetics (k25 degrees C=34.4d(-1), activation energy=51.0kJ/mol).

32 voltage-independent mobility with vanishing activation energy above 280 K.

33 s examples of properties that correlate with activation energy across many classes of ionic conductor

34 heory (ln k/T vs. 1/T) were used to estimate activation energies, activation enthalpies and entropies

35 Experimental Gibbs free activation energy, activation enthalpy, and activation e

36 The present evaluation of isoconversional activation energies affords accurate kinetic modeling of

37 -terminus of ADH decreased at high in-source activation energies after the initial increase.

38 ure range, allowing the measurement of local activation energies along the chain, and the assignment

39 hey exhibit similar turnover rates, apparent activation energies and apparent reaction orders at the

40 e found to be concerted involving small free activation energies and are all exoenergonic.

41 were unimodal and linear, affording negative activation energies and entropies.

42 Arrhenius analysis of the data gives similar activation energies and pre-exponential factors for diff

43 taset of the distributions of organic carbon activation energy and corresponding radiocarbon ages in

44 BN exhibits p-type semiconductivity with low activation energy and high thermal stability, making it

45 rbenic nitrile imine, requires a much higher activation energy and is therefore not competitive with

46 eveloped and refined to estimate the overall activation energy and its component parts, and they span

47 the reaction coordinate (RC) overcoming the activation energy and promoting the ground state reactio

48 ic properties by simultaneously reducing the activation energy and selectively producing a desired bu

49 The reduced activation energy and super-linear dependence on light i

50 ty, we will show that the calculation of the activation energy and the determination of the Thiele mo

51 okinetic modeling when the binding energies, activation energies, and entropies of adsorbed species a

52 e past, however, AOS devices required higher activation energies, and hence higher processing tempera

53 these tail states, lowering the conductivity activation energy, and giving the non-linear switching p

54 evidences, including molecular orientation, activation energy, and intermediate reactive species, ha

55 peratures below the bulk solvent Tg, has low activation energy, and is likely due to fast vibrations

56 n and the kinetic parameters (rate constant, activation energy, and temperature quotient) were calcul

57 n-Arrhenius equation, published estimates of activation energy, and time series of temperature from 2

58 electrodes narrows as temperature increases; activation energies are reported.

59 grain growth kinetics of zinc oxide, reduced activation energies are shown, and yet the mechanism beh

60 For bimolecular reactions, the activation energies are the sum of the energies to disto

61 ce-centered cubic crystals with little to no activation energy, are discussed.

62 theory, the traditional Arrhenius picture of activation energy as a single point on a free energy sur

63 the imidazolium rings is restricted, with an activation energy as high as 63 kJ mol(-1) in DMSO-d(6)

64 (-4) S . cm(-1) at room temperature, with an activation energy as low as 0.26 eV, i.e., the highest r

65 The activation energies associated with the temperature resp

66 s can shift the equilibrium and/or alter the activation energy associated with key structural transit

67 onor level were introduced by As doping with activation energies at 88 meV, 293 meV and 377 meV.

68 ed by the phosphonate groups in lowering the activation energy at the rate-determining step.

69 lectrochemical stability up to 5 V and a low activation energy barrier (<0.2 eV) for microscopic lith

70 We determined the Gibbs activation energy barrier DeltaG (double dagger)r that o

71 temperature annealing to form because a high-activation energy barrier for interdiffusion must be ove

72 se-change materials as a way to introduce an activation energy barrier for phase-change materials sol

73 tubule growth and shortening requires a high activation energy barrier in lateral tubulin-tubulin int

74 tallic glass powders revealing a low thermal activation energy barrier of 22.6 kJ/mol.

75 It can lower the CO(2) activation energy barrier through stabilizing the COOH*

76 ur kinetic measurements demonstrate that the activation energy barrier to autocatalytic surface reduc

77 antly enhanced Li ion conduction and lowered activation energy barrier with increasing site disorder

78 free energy of formation is used to lower an activation energy barrier, likely related to a rate-limi

79 rapid refilling owing to an inherently high activation energy barrier.

80 allow understanding of individual effects on activation energy barriers and equilibrium constants, an

81 We show that the heights of the activation energy barriers can be selectively changed by

82 e of the nano-Cu particles results in higher activation energy barriers during the conversion of DMF

83 n in methane, as well as intrinsically lower activation energy barriers of breaking the methane C-H b

84 , with temperatures that are consistent with activation energy barriers of ~10 +/- 3 kcal/mol.

85 e with PC revealed a large difference in the activation energy barriers when Li(+) was the countercat

86 is much greater in fragile liquids, with the activation energy becoming very large near Tg.

87 modeled as a diffusion of methyl axis, have activation energy by a factor of 2.7 larger in the twofo

88 The increase of the activation energy can be attributed to the TiBw architec

89 on and amide hydrogen exchange have a higher activation energy compared to that required for displace

90 cycling myosin that contribute insufficient activation energy delay deactivation.

91 18.8 +/- 2.4 kcal/mol), while the Gibbs free activation energy DeltaG() for the hydrogenation of cycl

92 The Gibbs free activation energy DeltaG() was obtained experimentally w

93 Activation energies depend on the singlet's conformation

94 strained cycloalkenes, and that most of the activation energy differences are accounted for by this

95 relative magnitude of the fast change of the activation energy differs from that of the density, but

96 The range of activation energies displayed by all of these compounds

97 We find that activation energy distributions broaden over time in all

98 egrees C from 324 degrees C and the apparent activation energy drops from 130 kJ mol(-1) to 11 kJ mol

99 acceleration is attributed to a decrease in activation energy due to an early transition state where

100 bioluminescence in solution, but has higher activation energy due to being diffusion-controlled in t

101 ltaH and DeltaG), and activation parameters (activation energies E(a), enthalpies of activation Delta

102 The initial activation energies (E(a) values) were correspondingly l

103 iO(2) catalysts, we found different apparent activation energies (E(app)) depending on the feedwater

104 ased with temperature, exhibiting comparable activation energies (E, electronvolts [eV]) for all subs

105 This reaction exhibits low activation energy (E(a) ~ 60 meV).

106 Activation energy (E(a)) and frequency factor (k(0)) val

107 e (1/T) and heating temperature (T), and the activation energy (E(a)) can be directly calculated from

108 However, for both polyphenols, the activation energy (E(act)) of association (a) of free mo

109 0(-17) cm(3) molecule(-1) s(-1) at 294 K and activation energy Ea = 64 +/- 37 kJ/mol.

110 the boiling point, the effect of MWs on the activation energy Ea and k0 is found nonexistent.

111 ermined to be 3.33 x 10(-5) min(-1), with an activation energy Ea of 16.4 +/- 0.7 kcal mol(-1).

112 nover frequency (TOF) of 4896.8 h(-1) and an activation energy (Ea ) of 18.8 kJ mol(-1) .

113 Furthermore, the activation energy (Ea ) of soil N mineralization was sig

114 rized by thermal optima (Topt ) and apparent activation energy (Ea ), were determined by measuring po

115 temperature sensitivity, as measured by the activation energy (Ea , in eV).

116 lytically impaired Phe61Ala with an elevated activation energy (Ea = 7.5 kcal/mol) and the wild type

117 ly bound NH(3)(g) (81%) but similar sorption activation energy (Ea) as S-150.

118 ching identification method by utilizing the activation energy (Ea) extraction methodology is demonst

119 Calculation of the rate constant (k) and activation energy (Ea) for this hydrolysis reaction are

120 The activation energy (Ea) of enzyme electrode is 35.93KJmol

121 between WPM and polyphenolic compounds, the activation energy (Ea) required for their diffusion in t

122 Thermal-oxidation activation energy (Ea) requirements ranged from 51 to 12

123 The frequency factor (A) and activation energy (Ea) were correlated well with the val

124 emperature on photosynthetic capacity (i.e., activation energy, Ea ; deactivation energy, Hd ; entrop

125 O2 production step is subject to an apparent activation energy (Eapp) of 56.5 (+/-5) kJ mol-1 and is

126 ely rapid and subject to an average apparent activation energy (Eapp), across the techniques applied,

127 Overall activation energies (Eoverall) for particle formation ca

128 detailed electrochemical properties such as activation energy, exchange current density, rate capabi

129 Importantly, the activation energies for amide hydrogen exchange were fou

130 Activation energies for bond exchange in the solid state

131 d reaction rates and computationally derived activation energies for different iodoarenes.

132 on density functional theory calculations of activation energies for electrochemical carbon monoxide

133 Computed activation energies for elementary steps for the redox a

134 The activation energies for Li-ion conduction traversing the

135 ies suggest are less tortuous and have lower activation energies for migration than in stoichiometric

136 tify ion dynamics in MASnBr(3) and establish activation energies for motion and show that this motion

137 The activation energies for proton migration are calculated

138 Instead, the activation energies for rotations in the crystals of 2 a

139 In addition, the activation energies for the conductivity and Hall effect

140 bled calculation of the limits for the Gibbs activation energies for the conversions of compound 0 --

141 positions of C-phenylnitrile imine lower the activation energies for this rearrangement so that it be

142 Activation energies for total carotenoids, polyphenolic,

143 The activation energies for vacancy-mediated diffusion of B-

144 ng a structure-function analysis of rate and activation energy for a series of mutations at a second

145 The high temperature provides the activation energy for atom dispersion by forming thermod

146 with an increase in optimum temperature and activation energy for cellobiose hydrolysis.

147 nsfer states and the ground state, and lower activation energy for charge generation.Molecular orient

148 bulk liquid, we show that we can predict the activation energy for crystal growth rates, including ac

149 tude reveal a fourfold decrease in Kissinger activation energy for crystallization upon the glass tra

150 -Mehl-Avrami model was used to determine the activation energy for decomposition of FAPbI3 into PbI2.

151 For a strong liquid, the activation energy for eta changes little with cooling to

152 reduction of H(2) O and affording decreased activation energy for HER.

153 This is due to the lower activation energy for ion diffusion and the lower electr

154 eal an approximately three-fold reduction in activation energy for ion transport at a sodium bromide

155 Utilizing Phe61Ile, which displays the same activation energy for k(cat) as WT, as a control, we wer

156 The activation energy for linear viscoelastic flow was sligh

157 Activation energy for MeIQ formation from crotonaldehyde

158 We estimate that the activation energy for methane C-H bond cleavage is 9.5 k

159 on, and ordered anion adlayers may lower the activation energy for nucleation on the surface.

160 ms ([Formula: see text]20 nm), the effective activation energy for rearrangement (temperature depende

161 nded to show higher TOF and smaller reaction activation energy for Rh NPs encapsulated in either dend

162 emarkably, to the best of our knowledge, the activation energy for spontaneous bilayer fusion has nev

163 f relaxation times) becomes smaller than the activation energy for surface diffusion.

164 Between 70 and 90 degrees C, activation energy for the degradation of betalains was 4

165 see text]) become mobile above 200 K and the activation energy for the diffusion process is obtained

166 The Gibbs activation energy for the first stage was 18.7 kcal.mol(

167 d, revealing important kinetics steps and an activation energy for the gas-phase cycloaddition of two

168 s equation was used to ascertain an apparent activation energy for the rearrangement from the kinetic

169 red with the gas phase reaction, the overall activation energy for the solution phase reaction is dec

170 h atomic packing topology, and also with the activation energy for thermally activated relaxation and

171 HOOP) band decay kinetics, we determined the activation energy for these processes in dependence of t

172 edtointact, as suggested by the 2-fold lower activation energy for unfoldingfound for the cleavedform

173 Warming increased the activation energy for V(cmax) and J(max) (E(aV) and E(aJ

174 ular dynamics trajectories and determine the activation energy for viscosity.

175 scoelastic flow was slightly higher than the activation energy for viscous flow.

176 IRE-RNA/IRP1 binding changed activation energies: FRT IRE-RNA 47.0 +/- 2.5 kJ/mol, AC

177 Higher overall activation energies (>3 eV) are observed for oxygen migr

178 The activation energy had a maximum in the rate minimum at p

179 rs to overcome the fundamental issue of high activation energy has been proposed and investigated the

180 eoretical models require a typically unknown activation energy, hindering implementation in materials

181 e GaAsBi band gap diagram to correlate their activation energies in samples with different Bi content

182 ogs, CoPc-based and O-linked MOFs have lower activation energies in the formation of carboxyl interme

183 Experimentally, apparent reaction activation energies in the range of 96 +/- 19 kJ/mol are

184 We report the apparent activation energy in both atmospheres using three Kissin

185 ty, stronger adsorption strength, and higher activation energy in hydrophobic nanopores than those in

186 o Arrhenius ("strong") behavior with a large activation energy in no man's land.

187 e complex occurred in a single step with the activation energy independent of temperature.

188 inspired complex, the recombination reaction activation energy is <2 kcal mol(-1).

189 st parameters are minimally affected, though activation energy is impacted quite substantially.

190 In both atmospheres, a bimodal apparent activation energy is observed, suggesting a two stage pr

191 re, T (meta) , and a small positive apparent activation energy is observed.

192 to that of [Formula: see text] In fact, the activation energy is proportional to [Formula: see text]

193 A new physical model of the activation energy is proposed by virtue of the energy an

194 l sulfonates to complex with VB12 and not an activation energy issue that can be overcome by stronger

195 sidering transition structure geometries and activation energies, it was concluded that rearrangement

196 cture of the thermal quenching processes and activation energy levels.

197 ocesses have an order of magnitude different activation energies of 0.13 and 1.3 eV.

198 3) and 3.07x 10(-3) s(-1), yielding apparent activation energies of 17.13 and 24.94 kcal/mol within t

199 e majority lithium characterized by very low activation energies of 58(2)-98(1) meV.

200 n Arrhenius dependence with two well-defined activation energies of 73 +/- 5 meV and 420 +/- 10 meV,

201 to slowly and spontaneously fully fuse with activation energies of approximately 30 kBT Our data dem

202 d with the optical pumping, and the apparent activation energies of both steps are estimated based on

203 n/interaction model shows that the increased activation energies of cyclic 1-azadienes originate from

204 diffusion rates and enables calculations of activation energies of diffusion from Arrhenius plots.

205 The rate constants and activation energies of HDX for peptide segments are quan

206 examine, with a consistent level of theory, activation energies of prototypical radical reactions (d

207 DFT calculations, were used to determine the activation energies of the conformational exchange arisi

208 The activation energies of the process span 135 kJ/mol to 22

209 Moreover, the activation energies of these composites are significantl

210 ies, strain energies, transition states, and activation energies of these rearrangements with the goa

211 The activation energy of (Co(x)Ni(3-x))(HITP)(2) alloys scal

212 onductivity as high as 10(-1) S/cm and a low activation energy of 0.176 eV.

213 nce number of 0.9 at room temperature and an activation energy of 0.18 eV without additionally incorp

214 ted 3D RT conductivity of 10(-2) S/cm, a low activation energy of 0.210 eV, a giant band gap of 8.5 e

215 transport for wires >4 nm in length with an activation energy of 0.245 +/- 0.008 eV for OPI-7; (iii)

216 te concerted ion migration, leading to a low activation energy of 0.25 eV.

217 nic conductivity of 0.9x10(-4) S cm with low activation energy of 0.33 eV was achieved without any op

218 played first order reaction kinetic with low activation energy of 0.665, 2.650 and 13.893 kJ/mol for

219 gh thermal stability red pigment production (activation energy of 10.5kcal.mol(-1)), turning an inter

220 roscopy shows the presence of a trap with an activation energy of 114 meV presumably associated with

221 uantum yield on a time scale < 100 ps and an activation energy of 12.6 +/- 1.4 kJ/mol.

222 e dependent admittance spectroscopy, with an activation energy of 131 meV determined via that techniq

223 Among these traps, trap with an activation energy of 166 meV dominates the persistence p

224 s-metal-based catalysts, with a low apparent activation energy of 17.60 kcal.mol(-1).

225 ons, circling the surface OH with a measured activation energy of 187 +/- 10 meV.

226 c Monte Carlo simulations yield a self climb activation energy of 2 (2.5) times the vacancy migration

227 ionic conductivity of 3 mS cm(-1) and a low activation energy of 29 kJ mol(-1) as determined by impe

228 ma > 10(-3) S cm(-1) at room temperature and activation energy of 30-32 kJ mol(-1) expanding the rece

229 ng, which significantly increased (+63%) the activation energy of 3HM subunit exchange.

230 quenching was temperature-dependent with an activation energy of 4.654+/-0.1091kJmol(-1) to withstan

231 m its Boat to Chair conformation requires an activation energy of 42 kJ/mol, which is substantially l

232 angement to cyanopyridine N-imide 40 with an activation energy of 43 kcal/mol.

233 enol into its phenolate moiety with a modest activation energy of 48 kJ/mol.

234 The activation energy of 4b (Ea = 0.71 kcal mol(-1)) is the

235 le reaction mechanism, exhibiting an overall activation energy of 7 kJ mol(-1), which was estimated i

236 reatinine within a wide pH range and with an activation energy of 81.1 +/- 1.4 kJ/mol.

237 of the graphene sheet with a relatively low activation energy of about 1.0 electronvolt, a value clo

238 C, at slightly basic pH values, and with an activation energy of about 50 kJ/mol.

239 at 94 degrees C, we find the crystallization activation energy of Ag(3.9)Sb(33.6)Te(62.5) and AgSbTe(

240 erimental settings, though the magnitude and activation energy of attack rate were specific to each p

241 at various temperatures, we report that the activation energy of complete membrane fusion is at the

242 onstrates a nearly threefold decrease in the activation energy of conformational diffusion upon react

243 sed on probability distributions of apparent activation energy of counterparts (epsilona).

244 t with a notable exception: WW decreased the activation energy of decomposition, indicating a "slowin

245 The activation energy of Diels-Alder reactions correlates ve

246 correlates with an increase of the apparent activation energy of diffusivity.

247 s in n-type GaAs1-x N x and assumes that the activation energy of electron traps decreases with the B

248 ly, this value falls within the range of the activation energy of highly efficient enzyme-catalyzed b

249 e migration pathways of ions to increase the activation energy of ion migration, which is demonstrate

250 structed and it is confirmed that the lowest activation energy of migration (0.60 eV) path is three d

251 ine the orders of reaction and the Arrhenius activation energy of polymerization.

252 ed out to determine the guanidinium promoted activation energy of pseudorotation.

253 These residues lower the activation energy of reactions by performing several cat

254 Mn(2+) (50 microM) decreased the activation energy of RNA-IRP1 binding for both IRE-RNAs.

255 s same field, the ordered solvent lowers the activation energy of the hydrogen-transfer reaction of o

256 FG experiments were performed to measure the activation energy of the interfacial reaction, enabling

257 nsible for the enhanced activity and reduced activation energy of the photochemical reverse water gas

258 The overall activation energy of the process must be large enough to

259 RML reduced by a factor of 3.12 and 1.16 the activation energy of the reaction with Lipozyme(R) RM IM

260 We observe a universal scaling between the activation energy of the transistors and the interfacial

261 he results indicate a remarkable drop in the activation energy of this process for dialkylphosphate e

262 gs play an important role in controlling the activation energy of Z-E isomerization as well as the sh

263 We obtain an activation energy of ~0.2 eV for this ionization process

264 The dependencies of the activation energy on the gate voltage and the drain volt

265 nucleation, with this process having a lower activation energy on the obtuse step.

266 ers, and observe an increasing dependency of activation energy on the reaction progress.

267 ine and alcohol occurs with almost identical activation energy (particularly when water is considered

268 ogen phosphonate groups and gives a very low activation energy pathway for proton transfer.

269 response to temperature (as described by its activation energy) provides a simple heuristic for predi

270 on energies and interaction energies over an activation energy range of 45 kcal/mol.

271 membrane structure and thereby increase the activation energy required for fusion, likely through an

272 mixture revealed no correlation between the activation energy requirement of the different species a

273 and other modifications, showed predictable activation energy requirement.

274 tural explanation of the growth of effective activation energy scale and the concomitant huge increas

275 75%St+25%Su presented the highest values of activation energy showing the greatest stability in the

276 n energy for crystal growth rates, including activation energies significantly smaller than those for

277 nd a strong Lewis acid in the presence of an activation energy source had been studied extensively, t

278 onductivity values of 0.02-0.04 S.cm(-1) and activation energies strongly influenced by hydrostatic p

279 These region-specific apparent activation energies suggest that ATPS formation involves

280 reactions of carbon nucleophiles have lower activation energies than those of amines.

281 ep for the amine takes place with much lower activation energy than that for the alcohol.

282 indistinguishable from Arrhenius law with an activation energy, the entropy barrier mechanism is more

283 We find the ground-state dissociation activation energy to be 4.74 eV/N2, with Fe as the activ

284 ntramolecular rotation, increasing the known activation energy to rotation from 8.5 to 10.6 kcal mol(

285 The calculated activation energy to separate the attractively bound sol

286 to propargyl and allenyl systems occurs with activation energies typical for vinylation of ketones.

287 Process II is observed above 170 K, with activation energy typical of beta relaxations in a glass

288 The activation energy values at atmospheric pressure were 54

289 l-Avrami-Kolmogorov (JMAK) model to estimate activation energy values for recovery and recrystallizat

290 s were generated to calculate the respective activation energy values for the various solute molecule

291 111.174 kJ mol(-1) and 93.311 kJ mol(-1) of activation energy values were found for L( *), Hue angle

292 ivities across species, often quantified as "activation energy" values, is typically right-skewed.

293 res and levofloxacin concentrations, and the activation energy was determined.

294 Furthermore, the activation energies we measured for PV RdRp catalytic st

295 By determining rate constants and activation energies, we fully quantify the reaction ener

296 nd insulating grain boundaries, and that the activation energies were calculated to be 0.052 eV and 0

297 Activation energies were of the order of magnitude assoc

298 The ionic conductivity and Arrhenius activation energy were explored for the LiOH-LiCl system

299 hat the adsorption configuration reduces the activation energy, which generates high selectivity, act

300 for [1,5]H-shift reaction despite its higher activation energy, which results in a competition betwee