ライフサイエンスコーパス: acute appendicitis

1 to the hospital, or number of patients with acute appendicitis.

2 treatment with antibiotic therapy for early, acute appendicitis.

3 675 of 2871 patients (23.5%) had confirmed acute appendicitis.

4 een shown to be accurate in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

5 ars) who were clinically suspected of having acute appendicitis.

6 ch data are available in adult patients with acute appendicitis.

7 pendix at multidetector CT reliably excludes acute appendicitis.

8 etected in three (75%) of four patients with acute appendicitis.

9 appendectomies for histologically confirmed acute appendicitis.

10 epicted in 17 (89.5%) of 19 patients without acute appendicitis.

11 eal neoplasms had presented with symptoms of acute appendicitis.

12 tine evaluation of women suspected of having acute appendicitis.

13 Fifty-one (22.4%) of 228 patients had acute appendicitis.

14 n CT significantly improves the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

15 curate technique for diagnosing or excluding acute appendicitis.

16 adult patients presenting with uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

17 years) diagnosed with presumed uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

18 tomy, and open appendectomy in uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

19 ing modality in children suspected of having acute appendicitis.

20 n adult patients with presumed uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

21 ndations for diagnostic imaging of suspected acute appendicitis.

22 , leads to higher morbidity in patients with acute appendicitis.

23 of nonoperative management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

24 in nonoperative management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

25 pective study was conducted on patients with acute appendicitis.

26 to antibiotics in adults with uncomplicates acute appendicitis.

27 stic sensitivity and accuracy for diagnosing acute appendicitis.

28 than that in patients in the early stages of acute appendicitis.

29 of surgical versus conservative treatment of acute appendicitis.

30 omography (CT) criteria for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

31 ppendicoliths should prompt the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

32 ervation had histologically proven recurrent acute appendicitis.

33 dectomies were performed in 57 patients with acute appendicitis.

34 o were operated on had pathologically proven acute appendicitis.

35 stolytica is not a common causative agent of acute appendicitis.

36 e study comprised 2756 children operated for acute appendicitis.

37 s of surgical and conservative treatment for acute appendicitis.

38 icitis in patients with a high likelihood of acute appendicitis.

39 = 1975) who underwent surgery for suspected acute appendicitis.

40 that were interpreted as being equivocal for acute appendicitis.

41 ger than 18 years old who were evaluated for acute appendicitis.

42 t and 1 patient after 9 months for recurrent acute appendicitis.

43 nd effective procedures for the treatment of acute appendicitis.

44 ery for treating patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

45 ring system for more accurate diagnostics of acute appendicitis.

46 rty (37%) patients had pathologically proved acute appendicitis.

47 argely adopted in the treatment of pediatric acute appendicitis.

48 ignated positive, negative, or equivocal for acute appendicitis.

49 laparoscopic surgery performed for suspected acute appendicitis.

50 tudies supporting a semielective approach to acute appendicitis.

51 the value of PSP in the diagnostic workup of acute appendicitis.

52 the value of PSP in the diagnostic workup of acute appendicitis.

53 There were 2 further patients with recurrent acute appendicitis 1 to 5 years after inclusion.

54 Pathologic state was graded 1 (G1) for acute appendicitis, 2 (G2) for gangrenous acute appendic

55 c pregnancy (2010, 94.12%; 2011, 93.48%) and acute appendicitis (2010, 86.87%; 2011, 84.31%).

56 or acute appendicitis, 2 (G2) for gangrenous acute appendicitis, 3 (G3) for perforation or phlegmon,

57 Out of 110 subjects of acute appendicitis 41 subjects (37.27%) had hyperbilirub

58 appendix is prone to various diseases, with acute appendicitis (AA) being the most common.

59 The familial aspect of acute appendicitis (AA) has been proposed, but its hered

60 Establish a protocol of management of acute appendicitis (AA) in ambulatory surgery (AmbSurg)

61 Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most common reason

62 has typically been regarded as the cause of acute appendicitis (AA).

63 dult patients clinically suspected of having acute appendicitis, abdominopelvic CT frequently identif

64 Among the 48 cases of acute appendicitis, abnormal appendices were identified

65 Adult intussusception is a rare phenomenon, acute appendicitis accompanying multiple transient intus

66 ssment of diagnostic performance of MDCT for acute appendicitis, according to the reference standard

67 004-2011) for all patients with diagnosis of acute appendicitis, acute cholecystitis, and diverticuli

68 Acute appendicitis affects 96.5 to 100 people per 100 00

69 Although the incidence of acute appendicitis among adults 65 years and older is hi

70 ic appendicitis" through studying cluster of acute appendicitis among Tibetan students at a high scho

71 Eighty patients (20.0%) had acute appendicitis and 79 (19.8%) had another cause for

72 Sixty patients with suspected acute appendicitis and body mass index <30 kg/m were enr

73 diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and in providing alternative diagnose

74 a total of 184 patients with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis and indicated for surgery were includ

75 6.3%) of these underwent an appendectomy for acute appendicitis and laparoscopy was used in 74.4% of

76 IV-1-infected individuals who presented with acute appendicitis and later underwent appendectomy at o

77 the diagnostic accuracy of PSP in predicting acute appendicitis and therefore the evidence of appendi

78 erwent appendectomy for clinically suspected acute appendicitis and underwent preoperative evaluation

79 urrence of Clostridium difficile colitis and acute appendicitis, and (5) temporary renal function imp

80 d MR imaging findings that were positive for acute appendicitis, and 336 had negative findings.

81 0.0%; 95% CI, 4.1% to 19.5%) had complicated acute appendicitis, and 5 (7.1%; 95% CI, 2.4% to 15.9%)

82 y, both patients showed clinical evidence of acute appendicitis, and an appendectomy was performed.

83 pecificity of MR imaging in the detection of acute appendicitis, and corresponding 95% confidence int

84 everity of an inflammatory process regarding acute appendicitis, and its convalescence.

85 gery group had histopathologically confirmed acute appendicitis, and there were no significant compli

86 Seven patients underwent surgery; four had acute appendicitis, and three had ovarian torsion.

87 Antibiotics for suspected acute appendicitis are safe and effective and may avoid

88 Using acute appendicitis as a model, we tested the hypothesis

89 onsecutively admitted to our hospital due to acute appendicitis as established by clinical presentati

90 h to imaging in children suspected of having acute appendicitis at a large urban pediatric teaching h

91 nt care settings for evaluation of suspected acute appendicitis at a single academic medical center f

92 undergoing acute appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis at Karolinska University Hospital, St

93 lts who underwent appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis at our tertiary hospital during 2015

94 ctomy has long been the standard of care for acute appendicitis because of the risk of progression to

95 1 patients who underwent an appendectomy for acute appendicitis between 1998 and 2004 was conducted.

96 ts 16 years or older operated on for assumed acute appendicitis between January 1, 2008, and December

97 e to appendectomy for managing uncomplicated acute appendicitis, but the optimal antibiotic regimen i

98 Appendectomy remains first-line therapy for acute appendicitis, but treatment with antibiotics rathe

99 ergency medicine were examined for suspected acute appendicitis by using thin-section nonenhanced hel

100 in pediatric patients, which suggested that acute appendicitis can be managed in an elective manner

101 Atypically located acute appendicitis can show atypical presentation and re

102 Two of the acute appendicitis cases had normal, the other two had e

103 s, precious clinical and imaging findings of acute appendicitis coexisting with multiple spontaneousl

104 The ACS model appears to improve outcomes of acute appendicitis compared with a TRAD home-call model.

105 s issue is important for timely diagnosis of acute appendicitis complications and making decision abo

106 ients aged 18 to 60 years with uncomplicated acute appendicitis confirmed by a CT scan.

107 alysis of omental samples from patients with acute appendicitis confirmed neutrophil recruitment and

108 A test that rules out acute appendicitis could be cost effective if it allowed

109 mains the standard of care for uncomplicated acute appendicitis despite several randomized clinical t

110 Cytokine responses in patients following acute appendicitis did not differ from healthy controls.

111 se 22, only 1 patient (5%) had recurrence of acute appendicitis during follow-up.

112 We compared the rates of complicated acute appendicitis during the lockdown period from March

113 The sensitivity of CT and US for diagnosing acute appendicitis exceeded 93% and 77%, respectively, i

114 ficant proportion of pediatric patients with acute appendicitis experience prolonged in-hospital dela

115 subanalysis, seasonal variation was found in acute appendicitis (F = 119.62, P < 0.0001), acute chole

116 estigations in clinically suspected cases of acute appendicitis for early diagnosis of complications.

117 ve undergone computed tomography: those with acute appendicitis (for whom it was assumed that there w

118 ective cohort study of 122,990 patients with acute appendicitis from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample

119 ge of clinical presentation in children with acute appendicitis, from mild inflammation of the append

120 ence in the 5-HIAA concentration between the acute appendicitis group (0.3 +/- 0.04 mg/dl) and the pe

121 +/- 6.07 years, and that of patients in the acute appendicitis group was 29.6 +/- 6.96 years.

122 group and 110 patients in the noncomplicated acute appendicitis group.

123 eoperative computed tomography for suspected acute appendicitis has dramatically increased since the

124 use of CT as the gold standard in diagnosing acute appendicitis has raised concerns regarding radiati

125 astatic spread to the appendix presenting as acute appendicitis has rarely been reported.

126 The treatment of acute appendicitis has seen changes in diagnosis and the

127 has played a fundamental role in identifying acute appendicitis, helping to reduce the rate of blind

128 in the evaluation of abdominal MR images for acute appendicitis improved after training with direct f

129 Diagnostic accuracy of helical CT for acute appendicitis improved significantly with use of in

130 nosis of normal appendix in 632 (13%) cases, acute appendicitis in 3286 (66%) cases, and perforated a

131 onidazole, successfully treats uncomplicated acute appendicitis in approximately 70% of patients.

132 rial suggests that nonoperative treatment of acute appendicitis in children is feasible and safe and

133 reatment with antibiotics versus surgery for acute appendicitis in children.

134 ishing between uncomplicated and complicated acute appendicitis in patients with a high likelihood of

135 monoclonal antibody (LeuTech) for diagnosing acute appendicitis in patients with an equivocal clinica

136 readmission rates following appendectomy for acute appendicitis in pediatric patients.

137 Estimates of the incidence of acute appendicitis in pregnancy remain imprecise and inc

138 s an excellent modality for use in excluding acute appendicitis in pregnant women who present with ac

139 diagnostic advancements for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the pediatric population, the role

140 role in the prompt and accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the pediatric population.

141 Criteria for diagnosis of acute appendicitis included an enlarged appendix (> 6 mm

142 The diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis increases to over 90% using the three

143 ent strategy for children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis, incurring less morbidity and lower c

144 s series cover the ultrasonographic signs of acute appendicitis, inflammatory bowel disease, and infe

145 Acute appendicitis is a common cause of abdominal pain a

146 Acute appendicitis is a common clinical problem.

147 Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency worldw

148 that medical (antibiotics only) treatment of acute appendicitis is an acceptable alternative to surgi

149 Acute appendicitis is an emergent surgically treated dis

150 The clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis is based on history and physical, lab

151 formed first in children suspected of having acute appendicitis is highly accurate and offers the opp

152 The diagnosis of acute appendicitis is made in approximately 90% of patie

153 Acute appendicitis is one of the most common abdominal e

154 ise for evaluation of pregnant women in whom acute appendicitis is suspected by enabling diagnosis of

155 Acute appendicitis is the most common abdominal surgical

156 Acute appendicitis is the most common indication for eme

157 Acute appendicitis is the most common nonobstetric surgi

158 Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency

159 Inflammation of the appendix, acute appendicitis, is one of the most common reasons fo

160 ergent admissions to hospital (as in case of acute appendicitis), leading to delayed surgical interve

161 Acute appendicitis may be missed at initial clinical exa

162 Since patients with acute appendicitis may not always show the typical signs

163 ing modality in children suspected of having acute appendicitis, MRI examinations had high diagnostic

164 The natural history of acute appendicitis nonoperatively treated with antibioti

165 tor CT scans in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis, nonvisualization of the appendix was

166 The cohort study included 2510 patients with acute appendicitis, of whom 812 (32.4%) had complex find

167 n developing histologically proven recurrent acute appendicitis or a clinical diagnosis of recurrent

168 r no insurance who underwent a procedure for acute appendicitis or acute cholecystitis at inpatient h

169 as not inferior to standard CT in diagnosing acute appendicitis or distinguishing between uncomplicat

170 m clinical records were reviewed to document acute appendicitis or other causes of abdominal pain.

171 Scans were read as positive or negative for acute appendicitis or other intraabdominal infection.

172 emic inflammation in a prospective cohort of acute appendicitis patients.

173 operative treatment options in uncomplicated acute appendicitis patients.

174 -standardized incidence of appendectomy with acute appendicitis (perforated or not) or with a normal

175 of a carcinoid tumor were identified in one acute appendicitis sample with no histologic evidence of

176 were performed on 31 patients, 2 of whom had acute appendicitis secondary to malignant obstruction an

177 t women are less likely to be diagnosed with acute appendicitis than nonpregnant women, with the lowe

178 areas have higher rates of perforation with acute appendicitis than urban patients.

179 -located appendix cases, including four with acute appendicitis that presented to our emergency depar

180 ed tomography or ultrasonography to diagnose acute appendicitis, the accuracy of these imaging tests

181 In patients with acute appendicitis, the presence of an in-house acute ca

182 In adult patients with acute appendicitis, the risk of developing advanced path

183 In the traditional model of acute appendicitis, time is the major driver of disease

184 know the diagnostic criteria for complicated acute appendicitis to be able to recommend the best trea

185 cal diagnosis, and laparoscopic treatment of acute appendicitis; to describe the state-of-the art use

186 We studied 134 patients with acute appendicitis treated at an urban hospital.

187 Among adults with uncomplicated acute appendicitis, treatment with 7 days of oral moxifl

188 hildren with histologically proven recurrent acute appendicitis under active observation was 12% (95%

189 In pediatric patients with acute appendicitis undergoing appendectomy, SDD is not a

190 He was initially treated as acute appendicitis, undergoing an appendectomy but follo

191 cutive patients clinically suspected to have acute appendicitis underwent abdominal and pelvic CT.

192 als in which the same patient with suspected acute appendicitis underwent both standard and low-dose

193 with the time outside pregnancy, the rate of acute appendicitis was 35% lower during the antepartum p

194 Acute appendicitis was favored in 371 of 1571 (23.6%) pa

195 .35-0.64) for all ages; no increased risk of acute appendicitis was observed in the postpartum period

196 itis had undergone an appendectomy, although acute appendicitis was only histologically confirmed in

197 Historically, acute appendicitis was treated with emergency appendecto

198 ostic imaging modality for the evaluation of acute appendicitis were 97.9% (95 of 97; 95% CI: 92.8%,

199 ts who presented clinically with symptoms of acute appendicitis were analyzed retrospectively and in

200 Absolute rates of acute appendicitis were calculated during the antepartum

201 computed tomography-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis were enrolled in the trial.

202 A total of 1552 participants with acute appendicitis were randomized to antibiotics (776 p

203 rgoing open or laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis were selected from the 2012 American

204 criteria, all cases of clinically diagnosed acute appendicitis were taken for this prospective, sing

205 ange, 4-83 years) with pathologically proved acute appendicitis who underwent abdominopelvic multidet

206 Eligible children had acute appendicitis with an appendix mass and were succes

207 review the CT findings of atypically located acute appendicitis with cases and remind the clinicians

208 st rank, 6; prevalence rank, 38; ICC, 0.27), acute appendicitis with peritonitis (cost rank, 13; prev

209 d that major depressive disorder, scoliosis, acute appendicitis with peritonitis, asthma, and dehydra

210 ICC, 0.25; cleft lip and palate: ICC, 0.24; acute appendicitis with peritonitis: ICC, 0.21).

211 management is safe for selected adults with acute appendicitis, with no greater risk of complication

212 ICC, 0.36; diabetic ketoacidosis: ICC, 0.33; acute appendicitis without peritonitis: ICC, 0.30), and