コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 iritual support, preference for heroics, and advance care planning).
2 ioner relationship were associated with more advance care planning.
3 their families more than their physicians in advance care planning.
4 gate decision making and documents to aid in advance care planning.
5 lanned and potential treatment is central to advance care planning.
6 t of new and chronic medical conditions, and advance care planning.
7 lack of discussions about goals of care and advance care planning.
8 19, 95 % confidence interval: 0.02-0.36) for advance care planning.
9 in building bridges between participants in advance care planning.
10 lehealth is feasible and may improve QOL and advance care planning.
11 acute kidney injury requiring dialysis, and advance care planning.
12 the aims, values, and potential benefits of advance care planning.
13 iscussions regarding treatment decisions and advance care planning.
14 nts who may benefit from palliative care and advance care planning.
15 erve as models for best practices to improve advance care planning.
16 the implementation of advance directives and advance care planning.
17 s for the needs of caregivers, and timing of advance care planning.
18 ons, setting postoperative expectations, and advance care planning.
19 research related to decision aids for adult advance care planning.
20 % of participants (n = 43) had not discussed advance care planning.
21 social care underpins a growing interest in advance care planning.
22 aged a diverse sample of homeless persons in advance care planning.
23 help promote more accurate and comprehensive advance care planning.
24 mptom management, monitoring, education, and advance care planning.
25 ual support, QOL, treatment preferences, and advance care planning.
26 ty of life (QOL), treatment preferences, and advance care planning.
33 ality of life (QOL) scale (primary outcome), Advance Care Planning (ACP) Engagement Survey, Brief Pai
40 major surgery, surgeons believe preoperative advance care planning (ACP) is valuable and routinely pe
46 AD) designation is an important component of advance care planning (ACP) that helps align care with p
47 ous complications and death, yet few discuss advance care planning (ACP) with their kidney clinicians
48 their use in pain, dyspnea, depression, and advance care planning (ACP), and to identify research ga
51 -documented racial and ethnic differences in advance care planning (ACP), we know little about why th
53 en clinician-led approaches to engagement in advance care planning (ACP), which are effective but res
55 ing of conversations about goals of care and advance care planning among AYAs at the end of life as o
56 vance care planning and to determine whether advance care planning and assessment of specific family
58 beneficial treatment are felt to be improved advance care planning and communication training for hea
59 eholders (> 80%) and perceived that improved advance care planning and communication training would b
60 ication with family, encouraging appropriate advance care planning and decision making, supporting ho
61 ely comfort focused, and their engagement in advance care planning and end-of-life care, which reflec
62 ng therapies have made decision making about advance care planning and end-of-life issues more comple
63 Black residents were reluctant to engage in advance care planning and favored more aggressive care.
64 ensive symptom assessment and management, 3) advance care planning and goals of care discussions, 4)
65 t-provider communication issues ("paucity of advance care planning and goals-of-care designation," "m
66 In the base-case analysis, if in-hospital advance care planning and ICU-based palliative care cons
71 atic review to answer three questions: 1) Do advance care planning and palliative care interventions
73 ards for clinician patient communication and advance care planning and that payers and care delivery
74 ed the proportion of dementia decedents with advance care planning and their end-of-life care prefere
75 sought to evaluate parental preferences for advance care planning and to determine whether advance c
76 iscussions represent a fundamental aspect of advanced care planning and impose major challenges for c
77 red decision making about treatment options, advance care planning, and attention to physical, emotio
79 collected participant demographics, previous advance care planning, and decision control preferences.
80 t for low-resource facilities, standardizing advance care planning, and educating staff about evidenc
81 ychosocial and religious/spiritual measures, advance care planning, and end-of-life treatment prefere
82 tine PC subspecialty care, symptom tracking, advance care planning, and psychosocial programs promoti
83 ecialist and nonspecialist end-of-life care, advance care planning, and quality of care in the last y
84 are system pursues rationing, more effective advanced care planning, and augmented capacity to care f
85 h enhanced communication, medication safety, advanced care planning, and enhanced training to manage
86 ng lower rates on the quality of dying, less advanced care planning, and higher intensity of interven
87 rts have led to changes in patterns of care, advanced care planning, and symptom control among childr
88 ife throughout the disease course, sensitive advanced care planning, and timely patient-centred end-o
89 on-making, age-friendly care principles, and advance care planning are vital components of palliative
90 d trial of a video-assisted intervention and advance care planning checklist versus a verbal descript
94 ety and fear of inaction, and limitations in advance care planning-contribute to communication challe
95 ies) and 11 primary articles with a range of advance care planning definitions and of variable qualit
96 spiritual needs, preference for heroics, and advance care planning (do-not-resuscitate order, living
97 included palliative care consultation, prior advance care planning document, and do-not-resuscitate c
98 .83; 95% CI, 0.69-0.98), 8 times the odds of advance care planning documentation (OR, 7.18; 95% CI, 2
100 and prior wishes and increased completion of advance care planning documents but quality of primary r
101 with complex chronic conditions highly value advance care planning, early in the illness course.
105 should include further research, training of advance care planning facilitators, dissemination and ac
106 der what circumstances the implementation of advance care planning for older people can be normalised
107 cision support tool and patient checklist on advance care planning for patients with heart failure.
108 ity and reduce costs through two mechanisms: advance care planning for patients with life-limiting il
109 decision-making capacity is key to optimize advance care planning for people with dementia and their
110 ing decision aids as interventions for adult advance care planning found that most are proprietary or
111 good repair and nonmalodorous), standardized advance care planning, greater staff engagement in share
115 ns about death is paramount to mainstreaming advance care planning implementation in long-term care f
116 plications for disease management, including advance care planning in adults with severe (ie, estimat
117 ared decision-making, age-friendly care, and advance care planning in advanced cardiovascular disease
119 ent to which health care systems prioritized advance care planning in the face of competing clinical
120 Whether this reflects a greater lack of advance care planning in the nephrology community, as we
122 findings suggest multiple opportunities for advance care planning in this surgical cohort, with a pa
123 al decision-making, resource allocation, and advanced care planning in aging, multimorbid patient pop
125 d evaluate strategies to ensure high-quality advance care planning including specific assessment of f
126 OMMENDATION 5: Clinicians should ensure that advance care planning, including completion of advance d
127 of the COVID-19 pandemic created urgency for advance care planning, including documenting goals-of-ca
128 he appropriate development and evaluation of advance care planning interventions for older people in
129 ug users, and less educated individuals need advance care planning interventions in clinical HIV prog
130 However, the characteristics and impacts of advance care planning interventions on readiness are not
132 ies reporting on ICU admissions suggest that advance care planning interventions reduce the relative
135 uctured intervention in health care and that advance care planning is best viewed as one component in
137 t there demonstrate how the ordinary lack of advance care planning is deleterious for patients who ar
138 vations suggest that extra effort to address advance care planning is needed for these patients.
142 young adults with complex chronic conditions advance care planning may be a vital component of optima
143 wledge about end-of-life care is needed, and advance care planning must be preceded by education abou
145 effect of palliative care interventions and advance care planning on ICU admission and length of sta
146 tudy type and quality, patients who received advance care planning or palliative care interventions c
147 t significantly change their diet, exercise, advanced care planning, or cancer screening behaviors.
148 The authors contend that the objective for advance care planning ought to be the preparation of pat
150 tellectual disabilities included problems in advanced care planning (p=0.0003), adherence to the Ment
152 associated consistently with improvements in advance care planning, patient and caregiver satisfactio
155 c physical and emotional symptom management, advance care planning), provided by primary care and car
158 es were based on self-reported engagement in advance care planning, resuscitation preferences, values
161 integration of palliation into cancer care, advance care planning, sentinel events as markers for th
163 vance directives offer only limited benefit, advance care planning should emphasize not the completio
165 ity of life, symptom burden, survival, mood, advance care planning, site of death, health care satisf
166 in these settings, including innovations in advance care planning, staff training, and systematic ch
167 ntions can improve the overall readiness for advance care planning, suggesting the necessity to integ
169 nd/or completion of the Lyon Family-Centered Advance Care Planning Survey (session 1), Respecting Cho
171 er distress, and palliative care issues (eg, advance care planning, symptoms, and hospice) (n = 99).
172 lude family members in future discussions of advance care planning than wanted to include physicians
174 ecommendations: 1) institutions should offer advance care planning to prevent patients at high risk f
175 pants were no less likely to have engaged in advance care planning, to value relief of pain and disco
176 ians and nurses from practice settings where advance care planning typically takes place were surveye
180 response rate) and all parents reported that advance care planning was important, with a majority (70
181 portion of dementia beneficiaries completing advance care planning was lower among Black (146 of 704
182 ent of specific family considerations during advance care planning were associated with differences i
185 in pulmonary rehabilitation are receptive to advance care planning, which is promoted by education on
186 Questions about whom patients involve in advance care planning, whom patients would like to inclu
189 breaking bad news, setting treatment goals, advance care planning, withholding or withdrawing therap