戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  patients with aromatase inhibitor-resistant advanced breast cancer.
2 e in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer.
3  occurrence in the majority of patients with advanced breast cancer.
4 ptake and patterns of aggressive behavior in advanced breast cancer.
5  outcome for women with both early-stage and advanced breast cancer.
6 al growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive advanced breast cancer.
7 ctomy for the treatment of early and locally advanced breast cancer.
8 chemotherapy on ECD levels, in patients with advanced breast cancer.
9 xel (GD) with capecitabine-docetaxel (CD) in advanced breast cancer.
10  combination in patients with ErbB2-positive advanced breast cancer.
11 n a phase II clinical trial in patients with advanced breast cancer.
12 axel (GT) versus paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer.
13 apy in patients with inflammatory or locally advanced breast cancer.
14 vant therapy for HER2-overexpressing locally advanced breast cancer.
15 apeutic approach to treat inoperable locally advanced breast cancer.
16 s for patients with locally and systemically advanced breast cancer.
17 hemotherapy in women with primary or locally advanced breast cancer.
18 epilone in women with metastatic and locally advanced breast cancer.
19 to doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.
20 ion should be evaluated for the treatment of advanced breast cancer.
21 mal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer.
22 nducted a phase II study in 76 patients with advanced breast cancer.
23 nd are more likely to receive a diagnosis of advanced breast cancer.
24 tment of anthracycline- and taxane-resistant advanced breast cancer.
25 ith hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.
26 owth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpressing advanced breast cancer.
27 and/or poor-performance status patients with advanced breast cancer.
28 DK6 is now part of the standard treatment in advanced breast cancer.
29 pically distinct from other forms of locally advanced breast cancer.
30 imal schedules of taxanes in early-stage and advanced breast cancer.
31 emotherapy response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.
32 herapy compared with GM-CSF in patients with advanced breast cancer.
33 e, hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative advanced breast cancer.
34 trogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.
35 of neoadjuvant treatment outcomes in locally advanced breast cancer.
36 t of AR-positive, ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.
37 and remains a critical challenge in treating advanced breast cancer.
38 atabase, including for metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer.
39  in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.
40 T cells using an orthotopic model of locally advanced breast cancer.
41 mal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer.
42 romising strategy for treating patients with advanced breast cancer.
43 endent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor approved for advanced breast cancer.
44 to impact and guide management decisions for advanced breast cancer.
45 al growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer.
46 e, hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative advanced breast cancer.
47 ential agent for advanced bladder cancer and advanced breast cancer.
48 th hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer.
49 potential combinatorial treatment options in advanced breast cancer.
50 th hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer.
51 hibitor-resistant ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.
52  oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer.
53  patients with PD-L1-positive, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.
54  hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.
55 ation chemotherapy is commonly used to treat advanced breast cancer.
56 eviously treated patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.
57  epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer.
58 by prior aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy in advanced breast cancer.
59  49 eligible randomised controlled trials of advanced breast cancer.
60 ndard therapy for estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer.
61 cian's choice plus trastuzumab in women with advanced breast cancer.
62  Bone metastases are common in patients with advanced breast cancer.
63 of estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.
64 with HER2-negative/hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer.
65  choice in patients with heavily pre-treated advanced breast cancer.
66 ne treatment for patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.
67 ients with germline BRCA mutation-associated advanced breast cancer.
68 metastases among patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.
69 crine therapy for patients with HER-positive advanced breast cancer.
70 ug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of advanced breast cancer.
71 istant and taxane-pretreated, HER2-positive, advanced breast cancer.
72 first-line therapy in patients with AI-naive advanced breast cancer.
73 rexpressed in breast cancer, particularly in advanced breast cancer.
74  improved PFS in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.
75 mechanism of metastasis and hypercalcemia in advanced breast cancers.
76 a potential precision treatment strategy for advanced breast cancers.
77 n initial staging of inflammatory or locally advanced breast cancer?
78    In a previous trial in women with locally advanced breast cancer, 3 months of high-dose epirubicin
79 ars (range, 30 to 90 years); 32% had locally advanced breast cancer, 42% had been diagnosed with brea
80 th high versus low or average risk of 6-year advanced breast cancer (5.5 [95% CI: 3.5, 8.6] vs 1.3 [9
81 ugh trastuzumab is approved for treatment of advanced breast cancer, a number of concerns exist with
82 with these Abs are approved for treatment of advanced breast cancer, a number of concerns exist.
83 mal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) demonstrated significant PF
84                              The genomics of advanced breast cancer (ABC) has been described through
85 patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) resulted in statistically s
86 al growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) with disease progression on
87  versus letrozole (LET) in receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC).
88 h factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-negative) advanced breast cancer (ABC).
89 rowth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC).
90  epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC).
91 al growth factor receptor-2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancers (ABCs) and is associated with po
92 metastases among patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.Additional information is availab
93 II study documents a role for gemcitabine in advanced breast cancer after anthracycline-based adjuvan
94 acy of this technique for patients with more advanced breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
95 ed, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, after progression on a CDK4/6 in
96 ssociated with a significantly lower risk of advanced breast cancer among the 3.6% of women with extr
97 ctometry was associated with reduced risk of advanced breast cancer among women with light constituti
98 hesis that sunlight exposure reduces risk of advanced breast cancer among women with light skin pigme
99  progression, in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer and a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mut
100                                In women with advanced breast cancer and acquired resistance to aromat
101 -DM1) is presently approved for treatment of advanced breast cancer and after incomplete response to
102 llness were more likely to be diagnosed with advanced breast cancer and aggressive tumor characterist
103 ed >=18 years) with histologically confirmed advanced breast cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncolo
104 th hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncolo
105            Women aged 18 years or older with advanced breast cancer and baseline clinical anxiety wer
106 ow that CBD can be used safely in women with advanced breast cancer and clinical anxiety.
107 One hundred ninety-one patients with locally advanced breast cancer and cytologically documented ALN
108 s), derived from blood samples of women with advanced breast cancer and directly inoculated into the
109  States are more likely to be diagnosed with advanced breast cancer and have a higher risk of mortali
110 e occurred in all five patients with locally advanced breast cancer and in eight of 20 patients (40%;
111 e standard of care for patients with locally advanced breast cancer and is being evaluated in patient
112 hly active in women with HER2-overexpressing advanced breast cancer and is well tolerated.
113 ly pretreated, endocrine-resistant HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer and limited treatment options.
114 guidelines, staging of patients with locally advanced breast cancer and local-regional recurrent brea
115 by number of previous systemic therapies for advanced breast cancer and measurable versus non-measura
116 usion, D1R overexpression is associated with advanced breast cancer and poor prognosis.
117          This AMPK-PDHc axis is activated in advanced breast cancer and predicts poor metastasis-free
118 with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer and progression during/after arom
119 e recommendations to encompass patients with advanced breast cancer and rare tumours such as gastroin
120 d to assess the accuracy of ctDNA testing in advanced breast cancer and the ability of ctDNA testing
121 cause mortality, as well as the incidence of advanced breast cancer and treatment-related morbidity;
122 a suggest that the cMethDNA assay can detect advanced breast cancer, and monitor tumor burden and tre
123 orld region, number of previous regimens for advanced breast cancer, and presence of visceral disease
124 tients with previously treated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, and validate HER2 as a therapeut
125             BCAR4 expression correlates with advanced breast cancers, and therapeutic delivery of loc
126 that 14-3-3 zeta is overexpressed in >40% of advanced breast cancers, and this overexpression predict
127 differences in approach to and management of advanced breast cancer; and (4) discuss treatment in ter
128 ntrol study found that individuals with more advanced breast cancer at diagnosis were more likely to
129  nonwhite ethnicity, be obese, and have more advanced breast cancer at diagnosis.
130  ten patients with biopsy-confirmed, locally advanced breast cancer at the pre-treatment timepoint.
131  routinely screened women, the proportion of advanced breast cancers attributed to biennial vs annual
132 umab as first-line therapy for patients with advanced breast cancer (BC) to evaluate progression-free
133 formed outcomes in patients with ER+ /HER2 - advanced breast cancer (BC).
134 ancer on the incidence of and progression to advanced breast cancer, breast cancer morbidity, and bre
135  (FDG), is applied for whole-body staging in advanced breast cancer but has limited accuracy in evalu
136 ted the activity of glembatumumab vedotin in advanced breast cancer by gpNMB expression.
137 k factors that explain a large proportion of advanced breast cancers by race and ethnicity are unknow
138    Resequencing in a multiethnic panel of 95 advanced breast cancer cases revealed no common missense
139 he EGFR is common in many cancers, including advanced breast cancer, characterization of EGF-induced
140 ain, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Qatar, and Kuwait), advanced breast cancer, colorectal cancer, leukaemia, th
141 niluracil has high activity in patients with advanced breast cancer comparable with the most active c
142  of the physician's choice for patients with advanced breast cancer demonstrated a significant improv
143 s) screening mammograms associated with 1815 advanced breast cancers diagnosed within 2 years of scre
144                      To reduce the number of advanced breast cancer diagnoses, primary prevention sho
145 of ramucirumab to docetaxel in HER2-negative advanced breast cancer did not meaningfully improve impo
146  epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer, each intrinsic subtype exhibited
147 particle emitter, has potential for treating advanced breast cancer, especially human epidermal growt
148  recommended for patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, except for those with clinical c
149 ng everolimus to exemestane in patients with advanced breast cancer experiencing recurrence/progressi
150 ted from patients with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer express high levels of the adipon
151 trogen therapy was the standard treatment of advanced breast cancer for three decades until the disco
152                                              Advanced breast cancers frequently metastasize to bone,
153 ed DCE-MR images from 132 women with locally advanced breast cancer from the I-SPY1 trial to evaluate
154 iscriminating patients with stage II or more advanced breast cancers from healthy females had an area
155 R61 transcripts in tumors from patients with advanced breast cancer, further ratifying the clinical r
156                            The LABC (locally advanced breast cancer) group included 17 patients with
157 PK pathway contributes to the maintenance of advanced breast cancers harboring Pten loss.
158 ase II and III trials of hormonal therapy in advanced breast cancer have examined the role of exemest
159 iscovery in other cancers (including locally advanced breast cancer, head and neck squamous cell carc
160 the subclonal diversification of pre-treated advanced breast cancer, identifying distinct mutational
161 more high-risk alleles increases the risk of advanced breast cancer in a dose-response fashion.
162 49 tissue samples from patients with locally advanced breast cancer in a prospective study.
163 dered for use as an alternative treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women after tre
164 graphy to characterize HA in mouse models of advanced breast cancer in relevant skeletal locations.
165 ptor-positive, HER2-negative, PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer in SOLAR-1; limited data are avai
166 ptor-positive, HER2-negative, PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer in SOLAR-1; limited data are avai
167 d limitations of serum ECD in both early and advanced breast cancer in the following clinical context
168 d demonstrated activity in patients with ER+ advanced breast cancer in this signal-finding phase II s
169                We found an increased risk of advanced breast cancer in women carrying an A2 allele.
170 EER) database suggests that the incidence of advanced breast cancer in young women is increasing.
171 esults with the intervention; no longer-term advanced breast cancer incidence or morbidity and mortal
172    Approvals for oestrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer include the PI3K inhibitor alpeli
173  tumorsphere formation in multiple models of advanced breast cancer including tamoxifen (TamR) and pa
174 buparlisib plus fulvestrant in patients with advanced breast cancer, including an evaluation of the P
175 e other hand, Hsf1 expression increases with advanced breast cancer, indicating that there is an addi
176 distant metastases) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer initially staged at fluorine 18 (
177                     Much of the morbidity of advanced breast cancer is a consequence of this process.
178 mal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer is a rapidly evolving field owing
179 in as first-line chemotherapy for women with advanced breast cancer is an active regimen.
180 ave recently reported that increased risk of advanced breast cancer is associated with a common allel
181 ing whether these refugees present with more-advanced breast cancer is crucial for guiding resource a
182  of tamoxifen in the sequential strategy for advanced breast cancer is less well studied.
183 s, a clinical trial in patients with locally advanced breast cancer is planned.
184     Improvements in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) are needed.
185                                      Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is commonly treated with n
186 rd-of-care imaging (SOC) for staging locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) or evaluating suspected re
187 ating patients with chemorefractory, locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) or metastatic TNBC.
188       The prognosis of patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) remains poor.
189 haracterize the biologic response of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) to chemotherapy using (15)
190                        Patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) typically undergo staging
191  inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) or locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) were randomly assigned to
192 he conventional primary treatment in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).
193  prospectively to a second set of 20 locally advanced breast cancer lesions not included in the initi
194 opausal women with hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer, maximum double endocrine treatme
195                                           An advanced breast cancer model was established by inoculat
196 usters versus single CTCs from patients with advanced breast cancer (mostly female).
197 ader, in postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (NCT03284957), who were mostly he
198                                Patients with advanced breast cancer often fail to respond to treatmen
199                          Brain metastasis of advanced breast cancer often results in deleterious cons
200 treatment of naive hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer on the basis of an improvement in
201          Patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer or MBC were treated with 3.6 mg/k
202                        Patients with locally advanced breast cancer or MBC were treated with the arom
203  at least one previous line of treatment for advanced breast cancer or relapsed within 12 months of n
204  95% CI (confidence interval), 0.65-1.12] or advanced breast cancer (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.54-1.32).
205 e first demonstrate that a majority of large advanced breast cancers overexpress translation regulato
206  effective in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer overexpressing or amplifying HER2
207  provides a promising reagent for inhibiting advanced breast cancer pathogenesis.
208 nse to Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in advanced breast cancer patients (p < 0.05), identifying
209                           Our data show that advanced breast cancer patients have an increased propor
210 es, as well as reduced response of early and advanced breast cancer patients to CDK4/6 inhibitors (n
211                                              Advanced breast cancer patients were treated with ixabep
212  time to aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy in advanced breast cancer patients, and found that circCNOT
213   For 20 newly diagnosed, untreated, locally advanced breast cancer patients, both the maximum SUV an
214 al metastases, the leading cause of death in advanced breast cancer patients, depend on tumor cell in
215 ent of resistance to aromatase inhibitors in advanced breast cancer patients.
216 improve clinical outcomes for both early and advanced breast cancer patients.
217 is may help eradicate this deadly feature in advanced breast cancer patients.
218  NK cell functions are profoundly altered in advanced breast cancer patients.
219    The safety profile was consistent with an advanced breast cancer population receiving systemic the
220 ears) with centrally confirmed HER2-positive advanced breast cancer previously treated with both tras
221 l in patients with hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer previously treated with nonsteroi
222 ntrally confirmed, measurable, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer previously treated with trastuzum
223  capecitabine in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer previously treated with trastuzum
224 ized trial, patients with metastatic/locally advanced breast cancer previously untreated for advanced
225 ithin 12 months of screening mammography and advanced breast cancer (prognostic pathologic stage II o
226                Postmenopausal women with ER+ advanced breast cancer progressing on a nonsteroidal aro
227 are needed to evaluate interval invasive and advanced breast cancer rates, intermediary outcomes rela
228              Endocrine therapy resistance in advanced breast cancer remains a significant clinical pr
229 stance, and its ultimate place in therapy of advanced breast cancer remains to be determined.
230                        Patients with locally advanced breast cancer require multimodality treatment c
231                             In patients with advanced breast cancer responsive to cytotoxic chemother
232 ients with high versus low or average 6-year advanced breast cancer risk (37.0 [95% CI: 28.2, 48.4] v
233 C risk prediction models of estimated 6-year advanced breast cancer risk and 5-year invasive breast c
234 e a biomarker for the onset of ovulation and advanced breast cancer risk.
235  Sixteen women with biopsy-confirmed locally advanced breast cancer scheduled to undergo doxorubicin-
236            SPECT/CT imaging in patients with advanced breast cancer showed focal uptake of (131)I-GMI
237  in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, showing that AR activation can r
238 se did not appear to have translated to more advanced breast cancer stages at diagnosis or decreases
239           The genetic complexity observed in advanced breast cancer suggests that such treatments sho
240 docetaxel versus paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer that had progressed after an anth
241 ed to test this combination in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer that had progressed after previou
242 ment option for postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer that has become refractory to sta
243 pecitabine alone in women with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer that has progressed after treatme
244  or delay resistance to endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer that is positive for hormone rece
245 e sought to study in detail these aspects of advanced breast cancers that have resulted in lethal dis
246       Hypoxia is a common feature of locally advanced breast cancers that is associated with increase
247 mic treatment for HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, the duration of progression-free
248  epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer, the STIC CTC trial established t
249 ghly expressed in both cancer cell lines and advanced breast cancer tissues, and the levels of TRIM28
250  MRI data to predict the response of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant therapy in a commu
251  epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy an
252 n hematopoietic recovery in 88 patients with advanced breast cancer treated with high-dose chemothera
253 xtracellular domain (sHER2) in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with lapatinib using data
254  epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative advanced breast cancer treated with ribociclib plus ET o
255 outcomes for a small number of patients with advanced breast cancer treated with weekly infusions of
256 line DCE-MRI scans of 156 women with locally advanced breast cancer, treated with neoadjuvant chemoth
257 astrozole Compared in Hormonal Therapy Naive Advanced Breast Cancer) trial.
258 ograms/kg/d for 5 or 7 days in 38 women with advanced breast cancer undergoing high-dose chemotherapy
259            Thirty-nine patients with locally advanced breast cancer underwent (18)F-FDG PET before an
260 with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive locally advanced breast cancer was investigated by analyzing tum
261                                  Survival in advanced breast cancer was not affected by group therapy
262 of paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced breast cancer was performed to determine the ob
263                                              Advanced breast cancer was reduced for women aged 50 yea
264 rmed BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and recurrent, advanced breast cancer were assigned to two sequential c
265 nts with anthracycline- and taxane-resistant advanced breast cancer were enrolled onto this open-labe
266 ts that are now outdated, and definitions of advanced breast cancer were heterogeneous.
267 ber 1988 and January 1991, 534 patients with advanced breast cancer were randomized to two multicente
268  with HER2-positive MBC or recurrent locally advanced breast cancer were randomly assigned to trastuz
269 y-one patients with inflammatory and locally advanced breast cancer were treated with bevacizumab for
270 ohorts of three patients with ErbB2-positive advanced breast cancer were treated with escalating dose
271        Patients with inflammatory or locally advanced breast cancer were treated with one cycle of be
272  with advanced prostate cancer, myeloma, and advanced breast cancer were used for model testing, and
273                                  All locally advanced breast cancers were (18)F-fluciclovine-avid.
274 ore than one in 10 participants with locally advanced breast cancer, which was more than 2.5 times mo
275 oprotective agent when used in patients with advanced breast cancer who continue to receive doxorubic
276 e status 0-2) with progressive HER2-positive advanced breast cancer who had received two or more HER2
277  724 patients with hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer who had recurrence or progression
278 ith hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had relapse or disease progre
279 new standard for patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer who have previously received tras
280 n the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who progressed following tamoxife
281 wo FDG PET scans in 12 patients with locally advanced breast cancer who received G-CSF treatment were
282                      Forty-one patients with advanced breast cancer who were either over the age of 6
283 t in patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer who were not given dexamethasone
284 buparlisib plus fulvestrant in patients with advanced breast cancer who were pretreated with endocrin
285                                Patients with advanced breast cancer who were treated with HDC without
286 andomly assigned patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, who had previously been treated
287                   One hundred two women with advanced breast cancer, who were offered palliative chem
288 eatment option for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer whose disease progresses on tamox
289 rative chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer with better sensitivity for prima
290                                              Advanced breast cancer with distant organ metastases is
291 on cost-effectiveness of liver resection for advanced breast cancer with liver metastasis are lacking
292 erphase, and have low or no efficacy against advanced breast cancer with mutant or deficient p53.
293 th hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative advanced breast cancer with no prior therapy in the meta
294 th hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer with tumour PIK3CA mutation, foll
295 had hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer with unresectable, locally advanc
296 r older, with locally assessed HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, with Eastern Cooperative Oncolog
297 ated into major advances in the treatment of advanced breast cancer, with several targeted therapies
298 ved previous trastuzumab or chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer within 12 months of randomisation
299 nesis is an established prognostic factor in advanced breast cancer, yet response to antiangiogenic t

 
Page Top