ライフサイエンスコーパス: affluent

1 er puzzle is their lower frequency among the affluent.

2 en people in public spaces frequented by the affluent.

3 eductions (-1.2% versus -1.7%) than the most affluent.

4 the age of 70 years than those who are more affluent.

5 18%-40%); more so in deprived (37%) than in affluent (25%) areas.

6 ed (74.6 years [95% CI, 74.1-75.1]) and most affluent (79.9 [95% CI, 79.6-80.2]) diverged (interactio

7 most affluent adolescents than in the least affluent adolescents in 11/14 countries (P for linear tr

8 proportions of daily consumers in the least affluent adolescents in 2018 in 5/14 countries (P 0.05).

9 n was reduced at faster rates among the most affluent adolescents than in the least affluent adolesce

10 consumption adversely affecting younger and affluent age groups.

11 r being older and more female, educated, and affluent, although all strata are represented.

12 rom the United States tended to live in more-affluent and better-educated neighborhoods than the aver

13 More affluent and educated enrollees had higher odds of filli

14 limitation of this study was the relatively affluent and ethnically homogeneous sample.

15 Expanding WUE gaps between affluent and less affluent states, and persisting WUE ga

16 The results show that, for affluent and mature cities, higher gasoline prices combi

17 ife course exposure of Black mothers to less affluent and more disadvantaged neighborhoods explained

18 diets and the prevalence of obesity between affluent and poor countries have been used to support a

19 Comparisons of women in affluent and poor countries have recorded mean populatio

20 sed among white people, particularly in less affluent and rural counties.

21 tured questionnaire was administered in both affluent and under-resourced clinics, capturing data fro

22 self-regulation that mainly affects the less affluent and whose failures may play an important role i

23 patients who seek homeopathic care are more affluent and younger and more often seek treatment for s

24 nificantly among children living in the most affluent areas (-2.27%, -4.41 to -0.07) but not among th

25 Compared with trial participants in the most affluent areas (ADI, 0%-20%), trial participants from ar

26 ties in the delivery of care if practices in affluent areas are more able to respond to the incentive

27 eas, whereas men of a low income residing in affluent areas had 61 (39-81) fewer self-harm episodes a

28 Children from more affluent areas had a higher relative risk of developing

29 spanic White peers, and children residing in affluent areas had higher odds of receiving EIP services

30 men from a low-income background residing in affluent areas had, on average, 95 (highest density inte

31 ision between the most (reference) and least affluent areas have remained constant for both joints (h

32 Low-income, older adults living in more affluent areas of the country are healthier, and areas w

33 ported that low-income adults living in more affluent areas of the United States have longer life exp

34 thout access to a car and living in the most affluent areas or in rural areas.

35 attendance patterns, with urban practices in affluent areas that typically have appointment waiting t

36 hs in the most deprived compared to the most affluent areas were much higher in younger age groups, b

37 ng function compared with children from more affluent areas, but these inequalities do not widen with

38 In affluent areas, disparities in tooth retention were negl

39 Compared to affluent areas, poorer areas had the highest relative ri

40 Compared with patients in the most affluent areas, those in the most deprived areas had sig

41 me adults appeared to benefit from living in affluent areas, while wealthier adults living in poor ne

42 individuals, and patients who lived in more affluent areas.

43 areas of socioeconomic disadvantage than in affluent areas.

44 equivalently disadvantaged peers residing in affluent areas.

45 ilarly disadvantaged individuals residing in affluent areas.

46 is was performed to compare the lowest (most affluent areas: ADI, 0%-20%) and highest (most deprived

47 mary care for the top tier will cater to the affluent as "full-service brokers" and will be delivered

48 Our findings indicate that affluent children in public schools are relatively isola

49 sites for interaction between more- and less-affluent children.

50 The affluent citizens of the world are responsible for most

51 ome HIV testing will attract a predominantly affluent clientele, composed disproportionately of HIV-u

52 Black race (aOR: 1.67, CI: 1.56-1.80), less affluent communities (aOR: 1.04 per 10-unit DCI increase

53 CI, 0.67 to 0.74]) than those from the most affluent communities (C, 0.80 [CI, 0.78 to 0.81]).

54 e of ensuring that children who live in less affluent communities have access to the necessary servic

55 Patients treated at hospitals in affluent communities were more likely to receive CRT-D t

56 Limitations: Patients from affluent communities were overrepresented.

57 clines in SSB sales, even in this relatively affluent community, accompanied by revenue used for prev

58 ion (scores range from 0 to 100; 0 indicates affluent counties and 100 indicates disadvantaged counti

59 between economically disadvantaged and more affluent counties, as well as between ethnic minority an

60 ger association seen in non-affluent than in affluent countries (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.96, 95% C

61 ylation levels were generally higher in more affluent countries and in more urban communities.

62 Populations of vegetarians living in affluent countries appear to enjoy unusually good health

63 Five to ten percent of the population in affluent countries are allergic to dog.

64 nt and commercialization of bioherbicides in affluent countries are still plagued by technological hu

65 The recent escalation of obesity in affluent countries has been suggested to contribute to t

66 The prevalence of autoimmune disorders in affluent countries has reached epidemic proportions.

67 Many affluent countries have encountered challenges in test d

68 Africa, and lastly the sample of relatively affluent countries in Europe, North America, and Oceania

69 In non-affluent countries organisations tend to promote social

70 ation have been found fairly consistently in affluent countries, but little is known about these rela

71 is prevalent in certain population groups in affluent countries, but the functional significance of t

72 Nevertheless, in affluent countries, the deliberate infection of patients

73 gic disease) are mainly a phenomenon of more affluent countries, whereas greater severity of symptoms

74 ements in healthy, nonobese adults living in affluent countries.

75 significant departure from the world's other affluent countries.

76 ts into the increase in allergy incidence in affluent countries.

77 e significantly (P < 0.005) stronger in more affluent countries.

78 e is known about these relationships in less affluent countries.

79 miliaris) affects 5-10% of the population in affluent countries.

80 In children born at term in an affluent country with free access to health care, higher

81 confidence interval: 1.28, 1.77) and in more affluent couples (P = 0.035).

82 e was on average substantially lower in more affluent CZs.

83 sis assay would be useful especially in less affluent deprived areas of the world where SCD is most p

84 with technologies of low efficiency in less affluent, developing countries.

85 ng the prepubescent period (indicative of an affluent diet and good general health) were at increased

86 ated further ozone pollution) is stronger in affluent dwellers, regardless of comorbidities and lack

87 BMI was generally higher in the more affluent eastern parts of Accra, and BP was higher in th

88 d processed foods and associated with older, affluent, educated, urban women was associated with a lo

89 ' direct expenses are comparable to those of affluent families and are similar to their spending on h

90 g for racial minorities and youths from less affluent families.

91 ng food demand by a growing and increasingly affluent global population is placing unprecedented pres

92 expected to intensify as a growing and more affluent global population requires more agricultural an

93 utritious food to a growing and increasingly affluent global population requires multifaceted approac

94 roup compared with stable rates for the most affluent group (1.2%, -0.3 to 2.8).

95 so earlier in life than those from the most affluent group (adjusted difference -3.51 years, 95% CI

96 in the most deprived group than in the most affluent group (hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.11)

97 tive most affluent group, rates in the least affluent group were 26 percent lower among whites and 39

98 tive most affluent group, rates in the least affluent group were 33 percent lower among whites and 22

99 th immunization rates in the respective most affluent group, rates in the least affluent group were 2

100 ith mammography rates in the respective most affluent group, rates in the least affluent group were 3

101 tion-based studies that overrepresent White, affluent groups and may not be generalizable.

102 Affluent groups will achieve the 5% tobacco-free goal a

103 her in deprived socioeconomic groups than in affluent groups, especially in people younger than 65 ye

104 ntributed to increasing incidence among more affluent groups.

105 s per week difference between most and least affluent groups; p=0.0008), zBMI (0.15 to 0.18; p<0.0001

106 gitudinal Study (FGLS), we studied educated, affluent, healthy women, with adequate nutritional statu

107 14.4% (251/1748) were in the most affluent IMD decile compared to 4.5% (78/1748) in the mo

108 ound for the most deprived than for the most affluent (incident rate ratio 1.34, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.35)

109 re likely to develop heart failure than were affluent individuals (incidence rate ratio 1.61, 95% CI

110 unities seem to have greater risks than more affluent individuals partly because of fetal and postnat

111 rld-setting exposure to inequality decreases affluent individuals' willingness to redistribute.

112 status of a global pandemic, spreading from affluent industrialized nations to the emerging economie

113 umed that conclusions drawn from research in affluent, industrialized countries can be applied global

114 And a more affluent lifestyle in high-income countries was still as

115 n Mexican Pima Indians not yet exposed to an affluent lifestyle than in non-Pima Mexicans living in t

116 cally, and rural populations (typically less affluent) may face barriers accessing cancer care, which

117 ty during lockdowns as much as those in more affluent municipalities.

118 analyses reveal striking geographical biases-affluent nations dominate the publishing landscape and v

119 are probably similar to those of children in affluent nations except for the additional needs imposed

120 Some of the most affluent nations have extremely male biased publication

121 nd is one of the most common malignancies in affluent nations, in part due to the application of new

122 nce in a poor neighborhood (compared with an affluent neighborhood) equaled 1.3 (95% confidence inter

123 ducation exhibited greater reactivity to the affluent neighborhood.

124 the patients came from a disadvantaged or an affluent neighborhood.

125 Compared with the most affluent neighborhoods (ADI quintile 1), living in the m

126 all jurisdictions among patients residing in affluent neighborhoods (quintile 5) compared with poorer

127 at follow-up (2002), and total time spent in affluent neighborhoods and duration-weighted poverty.

128 worse health outcomes than residents of more affluent neighborhoods and/or less racially or economica

129 children of the same age, those in the most affluent neighborhoods had log-transformed SDQ scores 0.

130 Residing in affluent neighborhoods was associated with improved ment

131 We tested the hypothesis that, in affluent neighborhoods, low-income adults retain more te

132 with high deprivation but lower odds in more affluent neighborhoods.

133 erty and inequality, individuals residing in affluent neighbourhoods have lower risks of self-harm an

134 -BP and 2,4OH-BP tended to be higher in more affluent, older, and leaner women.

135 7 as compared with deprivation score 1 (most affluent, P = 0.033).

136 In our affluent participant sample, there was a trend toward no

137 ssociation was less strong for younger, more affluent patients and those from rural areas.

138 Affluent patients in nations with long waiting lists do

139 gions are more than twice as likely as their affluent peers to be obese.

140 Relative to their affluent peers, children of low socioeconomic status (SE

141 ools are relatively isolated from their less affluent peers, while low- and middle-income students ex

142 ransport of suspended solids from one of its affluents, polluted by an industrial point source.

143 ghly energetic daily fire events intersected affluent, populated areas.

144 levels of allergic disease in the relatively affluent populations compared with those who maintain a

145 cades and the rarity of this disease in less affluent populations confirms the importance of environm

146 located in areas with socioeconomically more affluent populations with higher proportions of self-ide

147 d life expectancy of parents in contemporary affluent populations, its impact in developing societies

148 decrease health disparities between poor and affluent populations.

149 The most affluent quintile could reach the 5% goal sooner than th

150 s significantly (p<0.01) higher for the most affluent quintile of area-based income deprivation than

151 by bus was significantly lower for the most affluent quintile than for other quintiles in urban area

152 e most deprived to 29% (16%-42%) in the most affluent quintile.

153 England, with the steepest falls in the most affluent quintiles.

154 re common in poorer regions than in the more affluent regions.

155 household water conservation behavior in an affluent residential community in urban India.

156 reductions were greater in places with more affluent residents and better access to public transport

157 on are epidemics of the impoverished and the affluent, respectively, in India, and this association i

158 nt urban areas, 1.22 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.46) in affluent rural areas and 1.64 (95% CI: 1.51, 1.79) in th

159 s and 1.64 (95% CI: 1.51, 1.79) in the least affluent rural areas.

160 fe deployment of these interventions in less affluent settings.

161 is one of the commonest chronic diseases of affluent societies.

162 nic differences (which tend to be largest in affluent socio-economic groups) are not explained by NS-

163 Expanding WUE gaps between affluent and less affluent states, and persisting WUE gaps between water-a

164 The risk of underweight was lower in affluent states, but this was seen mainly in women of hi

165 reas with large minority populations to more affluent suburban and rural areas with primarily white p

166 In especially affluent suburbs, these emissions can be 15 times higher

167 racteristics such as stimulating morphology, affluent surface-oxygen-vacancies and chemical compositi

168 ear, with a stronger association seen in non-affluent than in affluent countries (adjusted odds ratio

169 nts were self-selected, and younger and more affluent than non-participating patients, and the possib

170 ree areas: deprived urban area, a relatively affluent urban area and a deprived rural area were purpo

171 were 1.23 (95% CI: 0.97, 1.54) in the least affluent urban areas, 1.22 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.46) in afflu

172 Compared to more affluent urban areas, rate ratios for all-cause mortalit

173 ersons receive fewer cardiac procedures than affluent white male patients do, but rates of use are cr

174 e most deprived areas compared with the most affluent, with socioeconomic deprivation particularly as

175 Feeding a growing and increasingly affluent world will require expanded agricultural produc

176 Accelerometry counts were highest in the affluent younger group, followed by the deprived younger