ライフサイエンスコーパス: aftereffect

1 tical lines seem oppositely tilted (the tilt aftereffect).

2 not interfere with the orientation-specific aftereffect.

3 of the face does not interfere with the face aftereffect.

4 nutes, a phenomenon termed the ventriloquism aftereffect.

5 myopes were most susceptible to the nearwork aftereffect.

6 eraction by measuring the cross-modal motion aftereffect.

7 context of the phenomenon known as the shape aftereffect.

8 iases that are consistent with the direction aftereffect.

9 isensory stimuli, known as the ventriloquism aftereffect.

10 he adapting motion face led to a significant aftereffect.

11 on duration resembled traditional perceptual aftereffects.

12 is a general property for facial-expression aftereffects.

13 thin STS predict the magnitude of behavioral aftereffects.

14 able motion can generate consistent rotation aftereffects.

15 pe to account for well-documented perceptual aftereffects.

16 t's report for inducing stimuli versus their aftereffects.

17 proved focality and greater magnitude of its aftereffects.

18 ketamine's long-term perseverance-enhancing aftereffects.

19 ior ccPAS studies have focused on protocol's aftereffects.

20 les drove partial adaptation but no opposing aftereffects.

21 sugars inferred reduced perception of bitter aftereffects.

22 ming at the same rate and showed significant aftereffects.

23 ing negative afterimages, fading, and motion aftereffects.

24 ocessing, we examined the transfer of motion aftereffects.

25 sort of adaptive coding is the face-identity aftereffect [2, 3, 4, 5], in which adaptation to a parti

26 ry on the buildup of the threshold elevation aftereffect, a form of contrast adaptation thought to tr

27 irection, observers experienced a consistent aftereffect: a bistable PL walker, which could be percei

28 In the well-known visual motion aftereffect, adapting to visual motion in one direction

29 3 T MRI-scanner as well as their respective aftereffects after participants left the scanner.

30 participants briefly exhibit an error-based aftereffect against the direction of the constraint, fol

31 daptation is sufficient to generate a motion aftereffect, an illusory sensation of movement experienc

32 test is to assess this initial accommodative aftereffect and its subsequent decay in the light under

33 orrelation between the magnitude of the tilt aftereffect and that of fMRI response adaptation in V1,

34 Results showed that the threshold-elevation aftereffect and the translational motion aftereffect wer

35 essing, because both the threshold-elevation aftereffect and translational motion aftereffect arise,

36 of adaptation is consistent with perceptual aftereffects and indicates that different cortical regio

37 th subjects of both sexes, account for short aftereffects and large savings after adaptation to large

38 r prolonged exposure to movement (the motion aftereffect), and exposure to tilted lines can make vert

39 oth psychophysically, by the behavioral tilt aftereffect, and physiologically, using fMRI response ad

40 s, effects of age and genetic factors on TBS aftereffects, and then summarize alterations of TMS-TBS

41 ventriloquism effect, and the ventriloquism aftereffect are also reviewed.

42 nts, we show this not to be the case: visual aftereffects are consistent with the simultaneous yet se

43 cDCS aftereffects are not uniform throughout cortical layers,

44 However, the neural mechanisms underlying PA aftereffects are poorly understood as only little neuroi

45 These characteristics of tactile distance aftereffects are similar to those of low-level visual af

46 Shape aftereffects are suppressed when the adaptor contour is

47 evation aftereffect and translational motion aftereffect arise, at least in part, from adaptation at

48 We tested the novel hypothesis that the null aftereffect arises from the large difference in the back

49 the adapting and test stimuli can influence aftereffects, as in contingent adaptation; (2) weak or n

50 We have recently discovered a paradoxical aftereffect associated with inhibition in the gerbil aud

51 , adaptation to these stimuli induced a tilt aftereffect at the target location, consistent with sign

52 is procedure allowed dissociating adaptation aftereffects at retinal and spatiotopic positions.

53 strate that a single, short SD has long-term aftereffects at the genomic regulatory level and highlig

54 but also exhibited neural signatures of view aftereffect before neurons with narrower tuning.

55 irst time, present counterintuitive magnetic aftereffect behavior that is consistent with the mechani

56 cluding the correlation and forward/backward aftereffects between two reported orientations in a tria

57 (both sexes) for processes predictive of the aftereffect biases following the exposure to spatially o

58 re to tactile motion induces a visual motion aftereffect, biasing the perceived direction of counterp

59 y adaptation techniques to generate duration aftereffects: bidirectional distortions of perceived dur

60 ent with the Aschoff's rule, and entrainment aftereffects, both of which are properties described for

61 sharpening mechanisms contribute to the tilt aftereffect, but that they operate at different points i

62 Our aim was to further characterize PA aftereffects by using an approach that allows distinguis

63 by a new demonstration that a gaze direction aftereffect can be influenced by beliefs about the gazer

64 This aftereffect can be obtained with spatially nonoverlappin

65 The rotation aftereffect can only be observed when the adapting and t

66 We show that opposite viewpoint aftereffects can simultaneously be induced for forwards

67 Thus, this heading direction aftereffect cannot be explained by local, disparity-spec

68 iases, including sensory illusions, adaptive aftereffects, choice history biases, central tendency ef

69 The resulting visuomotor adaptations and aftereffects demonstrated that the planned grip size, de

70 we report a novel cross-category adaptation aftereffect demonstrating that prolonged viewing of a hu

71 We further investigated the nature of the aftereffects, demonstrating that they are orientation- a

72 Moreover, for both eyes, blur aftereffects depended on whether the adapting blur was s

73 The magnitude of this aftereffect depends on the angular difference between th

74 The ventriloquism aftereffect describes an enduring shift in the perceptio

75 The size of the tilt aftereffect did not differ between the groups.

76 spatially disparate visual stimulus, and the aftereffect did not transfer across sounds that differed

77 This suggests that tsDCS-induced aftereffects did not occur at brainstem or cortical leve

78 ze or appeared on opposite sides of fixation aftereffects did occur.

79 different hands did result in contextualized aftereffects differing between hands across generalizati

80 We show that the negative aftereffects do not transfer to unadapted launch directi

81 While this aftereffect emerges following trial-wise or cumulative e

82 Duration aftereffects exhibited robust inter-ocular transfer alon

83 caused a significant reduction of visuomotor aftereffect (F(1,137.8) = 6.133, P = 0.014) and retentio

84 No child manifested aftereffects ("flashbacks") in the days following the VR

85 multisensory and spatial memory mediate the aftereffect following both trial-wise and cumulative ada

86 volved in consolidating and implementing the aftereffect following prolonged exposure.

87 Period aftereffects following entrainment to T-cycles were simi

88 e by measuring the audiovisual ventriloquism aftereffect for stimuli of varying visual reliability.

89 This unidirectional cross-modal motion aftereffect found in the deaf participants could not be

90 The aftereffect from processing motion language gained stren

91 Humans can experience aftereffects from oriented stimuli that are not consciou

92 debated [9-11], though robust tactile motion aftereffects have recently been demonstrated [12, 13].

93 TBS-induced aftereffects, however, vary between subjects, and the me

94 n in the visual system (i.e., cause a motion aftereffect illusion).

95 ealthy participants and patients, due to its aftereffect impacting on a number of visuospatial and vi

96 splaced visual stimuli induced ventriloquism aftereffect in both humans (approximately 50% of the dis

97 mporal motor pattern that is expressed as an aftereffect in regular walking conditions.

98 , followed by a longer-lasting use-dependent aftereffect in the direction of the constraint.

99 This provides novel insight into the PA aftereffect in the healthy brain and may help to inform

100 arent motion produced a robust visual motion aftereffect in the opposite direction, when measured in

101 There was no myopic aftereffect in the remaining two refractive groups.

102 , subjects exhibited a strong and persistent aftereffect in trials in which preparation time was limi

103 was shown to entail long-lasting therapeutic aftereffects in PD patients and related animal models.

104 Upon exiting the scanner, we observed aftereffects in the opposite direction manifested in bot

105 The existence of motion aftereffects in the tactile domain was debated [9-11], t

106 correctly predict illusory changes - visual aftereffects - in movement direction, but in V1, they ar

107 Using aftereffects induced by quickly alternating images, we s

108 We demonstrated the presence of a strong aftereffect, induced by the simultaneous presentation of

109 The observed rotation aftereffect is likely due to direction-contingent dispar

110 Overall, we show that the motion aftereffect is not merely an intriguing perceptual illus

111 lus that generates the aftereffect or of the aftereffect itself, both of which can be seen clearly in

112 se impacts the strength of the visual motion aftereffect (MAE) during a subsequent test phase, and (i

113 hantom-inducing gratings can elicit a motion aftereffect (MAE) in the gap region, it is not known whe

114 We used the motion aftereffect (MAE) to psychophysically characterize tunin

115 In the motion aftereffect (MAE), a stationary pattern appears to move

116 elates with the strength of perceived motion aftereffect (MAE), the illusory motion of a stationary p

117 he opposite direction-the traditional motion aftereffect (MAE).

118 ses correlated with perception of the motion aftereffect (MAE).

119 We tested for motion aftereffects (MAEs) following explicit motion imagery, a

120 ielded correspondingly weak cross-cue motion aftereffects (MAEs) in the face of very strong within-cu

121 ceptible to adaptation that generates motion aftereffects (MAEs).

122 d a significant decrease after relearning in aftereffect magnitudes during no-feedback trials, a dire

123 The prevalence of discomfort and aftereffects may be less than that reported for adults.

124 ding and subsequent memory recall, revealing aftereffects more than 20 s after end of stimulation.

125 osity perception, giving rise to a repulsive aftereffect: motion to the left adapts small numbers, le

126 it remains debated whether the ventriloquism aftereffects observed following trial-wise and cumulativ

127 These aftereffects occur not only for simple stimulus features

128 We also assessed the aftereffect of EEG coherence on executive functioning, u

129 mporary or chronic tinnitus or to some other aftereffect of long-duration sound.

130 onal visuospatial, processes underlie the PA aftereffect of rightward-deviating prisms in healthy par

131 was often elicited, apparently because of an aftereffect of synaptic inhibition.

132 5 min, which completely cancelled perceptual aftereffects of adaptation.

133 cantly with current symptomatology, and face aftereffects of children with elevated symptoms only one

134 Yet, there are likely other indirect aftereffects of COVID-19 infection in addition to the di

135 These negative aftereffects of exposure to collisions are spatially loc

136 These aftereffects of habituation have been thought to reflect

137 e to the disturbances and produce short-term aftereffects of increased gait stability once the cables

138 adults showed alterations in USV observed as aftereffects of intoxication, despite greater initial bl

139 ing from occupational bioassay to monitoring aftereffects of nuclear accidents.

140 Under nicotine, the inhibitory aftereffects of PAS were delayed and prolonged, while th

141 erefore all functional changes observed were aftereffects of rotenone toxicity in vivo.

142 wo independent experiments revealed that the aftereffects of stop-signal training are negligible afte

143 high-resolution chronology of the immediate aftereffects of the Chicxulub impact event in the Wester

144 additional factor for Caribbean reefs is the aftereffects of the epizootic that reduced the abundance

145 second-order stimuli usually produces little aftereffect on first-order stimuli has been interpreted

146 in the structured environment; the negative aftereffect on path deviation was twice that in the spar

147 der face did not produce a facial-expression aftereffect on the first-order faces.

148 r coordination during pointing as well as to aftereffects on a number of sensorimotor and attention t

149 Whereas most adaptation aftereffects on appearance are opposite in direction to

150 Similar nonuniform cDCS aftereffects on cortical excitability were also found in

151 that discrepant multisensory evidence shapes aftereffects on distinct timescales via common neurophys

152 Our study suggests that aftereffects on FRP may be an emergent property of the s

153 s of human ultrasociality, and agriculture's aftereffects on large-scale social organization.

154 Impulse activity in axons generates aftereffects on membrane excitability that can alter the

155 us has both acute and sustained long-lasting aftereffects on motor function in parkinsonian nonhuman

156 ns, from 32 to 256 seconds, and measured the aftereffects on perceived auditory location.

157 cles of non-24 h duration (T-cycles) induces aftereffects on period that act to bring the intrinsic p

158 athway of the motor network and measured the aftereffects on plasticity (both sexes).

159 egulation via reappraisal, and the immediate aftereffects on spontaneous (i.e., not instructed and au

160 These crossmodal aftereffects, operating both from vision to touch and fr

161 could not be explained by unisensory motion aftereffect or discrimination threshold.

162 y unaware of the stimulus that generates the aftereffect or of the aftereffect itself, both of which

163 tificial scotoma did not have any additional aftereffects over those of adaptation to a gray screen,

164 sed this issue by implementing an adaptation-aftereffect paradigm with passive touch.

165 eye movements accompanied each blink, and an aftereffect persisted for a few blinks after target disp

166 In the shape aftereffect, prolonged viewing, or adaptation to a parti

167 Importantly, aftereffect reduction was correlated with the proportion

168 c space, it is likely that the ventriloquism aftereffect reflects a change in the cortical representa

169 We also found that the face aftereffect remained intact when the visual distracters

170 here report that the face identity-specific aftereffect requires a visible face; it is effectively c

171 This perceptual adaptation and the resulting aftereffect reveal important characteristics regarding h

172 wareness can nevertheless produce measurable aftereffects, revealing neural processes that do not dir

173 rception by asking whether the strong motion aftereffects seen in the perceptual domain lead to simil

174 daptation; (2) weak or null cross-adaptation aftereffects should be interpreted with caution; and (3)

175 V5 and psychophysical measures of the motion aftereffect showed reduced motion processing during high

176 Analysis of aftereffects showed that walking adaptations are stored

177 macaque monkeys experience the ventriloquism aftereffect similar to the way humans do in all tested r

178 macaque monkeys experience the ventriloquism aftereffect similar to the way humans do.

179 amined, for the first time, the origin of PA aftereffects studying oscillatory brain activity.

180 rameters that give rise to the ventriloquism aftereffect suggest that the changes in the cortical rep

181 The absence of any aftereffects suggested that the improved balance perform

182 onkeys, as well as humans, exhibit face-view aftereffect, suggesting the presence of a view-sensitive

183 cts are similar to those of low-level visual aftereffects, supporting the idea that distance percepti

184 ly striking accommodatively related nearwork aftereffect susceptibility.

185 sphenes correlated with the size of the tilt aftereffect (TAE) in the PPR group only.

186 ntation selective detectors producing a tilt aftereffect (TAE).

187 otosensitivity was assessed using two visual aftereffects that occur after prolonged adaptation.

188 a given direction produced a tactile motion aftereffect, the illusion of motion in the opponent dire

189 To account for such aftereffects, these units must either be able to inhibit

190 We then examined PA aftereffects through changes in known oscillatory EEG si

191 ubjects, and the mechanisms underlying these aftereffects to date remain poorly understood.

192 nded) body states are necessary for separate aftereffects to emerge, suggesting that the role of sens

193 Here, we report that visual-form aftereffects transfer across separate fixations when ada

194 Consistent with previous findings, motion aftereffect transferred between vision and touch in a bi

195 We assessed whether this negative aftereffect transfers to test events with a new set of f

196 ls compared to baseline, late adaptation, or aftereffect trials.

197 this hypothesis, we first quantified the SF aftereffect using a psychophysical paradigm where human

198 Additionally, this aftereffect was not due to response bias, because its de

199 The duration of the motion aftereffect was shorter in the PPR group than in the con

200 h manipulation the degree to which the shape aftereffect was suppressed.

201 To artificially induce aftereffects, we photostimulated mitral cells using chan

202 se both the extended response to NPY and any aftereffect were blocked by coapplication of glutamate r

203 ion aftereffect and the translational motion aftereffect were reduced substantially during binocular

204 For excitability-diminishing tDCS and PAS, aftereffects were abolished or converted trendwise into

205 Motion and tilt aftereffects were compared in healthy subjects with (n =

206 Viewpoint aftereffects were found within, but not across, categori

207 Long-lasting aftereffects were not observed with classical deep brain

208 Weaker threshold elevation aftereffects were observed when the adapting image was e

209 daptation function, as well as an attenuated aftereffect when relearning from the clamped feedback.

210 n the native blur of the better eye, with no aftereffect when the blur equaled the aberrations of the

211 cked mossy fiber perturbations and exhibited aftereffects when stimulation was removed.

212 he removal of the perturbation, there was an aftereffect, where the error was in the opposite directi

213 These stimuli generated robust duration aftereffects which showed partial selectivity for adapt-

214 accounts, we exploited the well-known "tilt aftereffect", which reflects adaptation to orientation i

215 A classic example is the ventriloquism aftereffect, which emerges following both cumulative (lo

216 ception in human subjects, the ventriloquism aftereffect, which presumably reflects a corresponding c

217 We observed this multilevel aftereffect with both cartoon and real test faces when t

218 re could have reflected various neuroplastic aftereffects with extended time courses.

219 illusory movement is induced (via the motion aftereffect) within a stationary pattern, it can be show

220 A phase-scrambled adaptor produced no aftereffect, yet when adapting and test walkers differed