ライフサイエンスコーパス: age difference

1 tch of potential transplant, and donor-donor age difference.

2 ing that endothelial NOS likely explains the age difference.

3 ding to a 13.8 +/- 5.3 million year apparent age difference.

4 chieve equal self-reported sex and a minimal age difference.

5 is now difficult to reconcile with a >11-My age difference.

6 asured by gestational age at birth and PedBE age difference.

7 were numerically higher after adjusting for age difference.

8 eness and Conscientiousness paralleled human age differences.

9 nted tremendous obstacles due to species and age differences.

10 efficients were included to test for sex and age differences.

11 Glu3 receptor mRNA levels showed substantial age differences.

12 were observed, alongside large and variable age differences.

13 her samples cannot be explained by income or age differences.

14 ver time in TMD symptoms and possible sex or age differences.

15 of anxiety disorders, this study identified age differences.

16 dative peak velocities showed no significant age differences.

17 source of dysregulated Ca2+ should eliminate aging differences.

18 --but does this approach capture even coarse age differences?

19 Daughters of tea consumers had a later mean age (difference = 0.41 years at >/= 3 cups (0.7 liter)/d

20 [95% CI, -39.53 to 14.24] g) and gestational age (difference, -0.09 [95% CI, -0.16 to -0.03] weeks),

21 males and four females in each group; median age difference: 1 year; age range: 29-63 for patients an

22 n the overall AMD cohort after adjusting for age (difference, -19.9% [95% CI, -25.6% to -12.7%], P <

23 min D deficiency was associated with younger age (difference, -5.0; 95% CI, -7.2 to -2.8), Black race

24 CT cohort; P = .06) did not differ in either age (difference, 69.20 years; 95% CI, 62.84-72.07 years;

25 and five (8.3%) were aged 41-49 years: mean age difference 8.7 years (95% CI 6.8-10.6; p<0.0001).

26 ively associated with BMD and BMC at 20 y of age [differences: 8.6 mg/cm(2) (95% CI: 3.0, 14.1 mg/cm(

27 CI, 1.77-2.14) and MCI (OR, 1.17 per 5-year age difference, 95% CI, 1.09-1.26).

28 a (weighted odds ratio [OR], 1.95 per 5-year age difference; 95%, CI, 1.77-2.14) and MCI (OR, 1.17 pe

29 erences in 99th percentile values paralleled age differences across cohorts.

30 roductivity and NIH funding not explained by age differences alone warrant additional investigation.

31 two experiments, one in which we manipulated age differences among nestlings within broods, and anoth

32 There were important race, sex, and age differences among the victims who had used cocaine a

33 Our results suggest that age difference and, to a lesser extent, playmate sex inf

34 We also examined sex and age differences and relationship with autistic traits an

35 This age difference appeared to be because of the old rats be

36 n but more salient during mental replay, and age differences at perception could not account for olde

37 our study uncovers hitherto unknown sex and age differences at the level of proteins and protein net

38 ation on the nascent centrioles, erasing the age difference between centrioles in one cell.

39 Measurements of the age difference between coexisting benthic and planktic f

40 The substantial age difference between female and male sexual partners i

41 Over time, a 5.3 year (95% CI, 5.2-5.5) age difference between men and women remained.

42 tionwide Inpatient Sample, we calculated the age difference between patients with SLE and their race-

43 rther supported independently by the stellar age difference between quiescent and star-forming galaxi

44 antibody response were older age (mean [SE] age difference between responders and nonresponders, 3.9

45 s were found to only be significant when the age difference between siblings was less than 2 years.

46 ease, allowing the alignment of the ~30-year age difference between the cohorts on a clinically meani

47 provides further protection according to the age difference between the index child and the sibling.

48 In addition, we calculated the age difference between white patients with SLE and sex-m

49 The mean age difference between women with and those without SLE

50 significant (P < .05) after consideration of age differences between groups of subjects.

51 1.91; p = 0.04; p = 0.08 after adjusting for age differences between groups).

52 hout pancreatitis; there were no significant age differences between groups.

53 There were no age differences between invasive vs conservative managem

54 Mother-daughter pairs and pairs with large age differences between members interacted and associate

55 Patterns of age differences between sexual partners - "age-mixing" -

56 cial effect of smoking on outcomes is due to age differences between smokers and non-smokers and is t

57 Age differences between study populations may partly exp

58 characteristics (accuracy 69%) but not when age differences between the groups were taken into accou

59 Age differences between these clusters can indicate the

60 Despite there being no systematic age differences between women and men in the workforce a

61 All age differences between women with SLE (n = 3,627) and w

62 uration (height, weight, body mass index for age, difference between current and expected adult heigh

63 Up to 14 d of age, differences between mutant and control PCs were not

64 Here, we evaluated whether brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD) was sensitive to the presence

65 e was calculated to indicate brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD).

66 the model, we calculated the brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD: predicted age-chronological a

67 d age and chronological age (brain-predicted age difference [brain-PAD]).

68 Brain Predicted Age Difference (BrainPAD) was computed as the gap betwee

69 Moreover, we observed functionally relevant age differences confined to rostral LC.

70 ated at a whole brain level as the predicted age difference defined using T1-weighted images, and at

71 statistically insignificant, confirming that age differences did not influence the observed refractiv

72 contextualizes prior findings that regional age differences do progress along an S-A axis at a group

73 ut recipient age, donor age, recipient-donor age difference, donor gender, donor type, or cold ischem

74 ings with the 56 women aged 25-40 years, the age difference dropped to 1.1 years (95% CI -0.6 to 2.8;

75 Focal age differences emerged in regions related to emotional

76 ion in ventral visual cortex, whether or not age differences exist at the item level was a matter of

77 Age difference for these groups was not statistically si

78 ons between relationship characteristics and age differences for 1,922 participants.

79 DA, PFNA) were observed, showing larger mean age differences for the combined puberty indicator in th

80 These findings inform crucial sex and age differences for the therapeutic application of ocula

81 Intelligence quotient and age difference from controls, composition of sex assigne

82 Conclusions were identical if we examined a) age difference from one's own age, and b) a dataset limi

83 life, which resulted in a 2.98-cm height-for-age difference (HAD) between sexes in the village and a

84 site for AL scoring incorporating gender and age differences, high quartile approach, clinical refere

85 ld BMI emerged from age 4 and increased with age (difference in BMI z score comparing low with high e

86 U, with the most marked difference at 1 y of age (difference in means -0.71 kg/m(2), 95% confidence i

87 Increasing age (difference in SIT-12 score, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.05 to

88 e breastfed group during FU from 1 to 5 y of age (differences in means from 0.59 to 0.96 kg/m(2), res

89 ationships among dyads were common (>=5-year age difference in 67% of dyads), including 3/6 dyads inv

90 nt work has suggested that one cause of this age difference in exploration is a reduction in the exte

91 using adult and pubertal mice eliminated the age difference in gut bacterial diversity.

92 age-related differences in LTD induction, no age difference in LTP magnitude was revealed.

93 initial-attraction gender difference for the age difference in mixed-gender couples.

94 Adult age differences in a variety of cognitive abilities are

95 The conditions under which age differences in anxiety are observed in rodents are u

96 To investigate whether age differences in associative memory are related to com

97 of theta-gamma coupling contribute to adult age differences in associative memory.

98 dult and pubertal mice were pair-housed, the age differences in both peripheral cytokine concentratio

99 present findings support the hypothesis that age differences in brain signal variability reflect agin

100 number of CRH-BP positive fibers revealed no age differences in CeA; however, with regards to CRH-pos

101 nths) demonstrated statistically significant age differences in cerebellum-dependent delay eyeblink c

102 , 50-64, and 65-75 years) and assess whether age differences in chemotherapy matched survival gains a

103 However, age differences in choice behavior may be reduced if old

104 o alter dopamine neuron activity, eliminated age differences in cocaine self-administration.

105 In this study, we investigate age differences in distractor rejection by presenting ta

106 rences in EaI/E(LV)I during exercise, due to age differences in EaI, E(LV)I, or both, may help to exp

107 Thus, age differences in EaI/E(LV)I during exercise, due to ag

108 Gender and age differences in ERalpha mRNA expression were observed

109 fast fibres, which was explained entirely by age differences in fibre size.

110 In this study, we examined age differences in financial decisions across the adult

111 This cross-sectional study examined whether age differences in frontostriatal white matter integrity

112 Controlling for age differences in full sibling pairs, the hazard rate f

113 lated to general task demands and to examine age differences in functional connectivity both within a

114 These results demonstrate age differences in GABAergic regulation of the LAT, and

115 Many complex human diseases exhibit sex or age differences in gene expression.

116 Age differences in height derived from cross-sectional s

117 ward-guided behavioral model that quantifies age differences in impulsive actions in adult and adoles

118 In the UK Biobank, age differences in individual connectome elements corres

119 Our analysis suggests that age differences in interference control have multiple so

120 be performed within the focus of attention, age differences in interference control may be more easi

121 Are age differences in interference control more myth than r

122 riatal paths could statistically account for age differences in learning.

123 Our findings reveal age differences in LT and Wnt pathways during airway inf

124 However, after age differences in memory were taken into account, none

125 creased gray matter volume in these regions, age differences in motor distinctiveness remained signif

126 This study assessed age differences in navigational behavior in a virtual Mo

127 ght pattern similarity analyses to elucidate age differences in neural distinctiveness at both catego

128 Our results suggest that age differences in neural representations can be observe

129 from safety cues to test these hypotheses on age differences in neurodevelopment.

130 ced in the field (Trials 7-8), there were no age differences in new object exploration.

131 Importantly, age differences in occipital item specificity were large

132 of postoperative delirium, which may signify age differences in pathogenesis of the syndrome.

133 We investigated age differences in perceptual and conceptual processing

134 However, age differences in performance on measures of interferen

135 A long-standing conundrum is whether age differences in personality are due to generation, or

136 cline, we used functional MRI to investigate age differences in PFC activity during separate WM task

137 ondom during sex were associated with larger age differences in relationships of both men and women.

138 se "compensatory" activations simply reflect age differences in response to experimental task demands

139 tal white matter integrity could account for age differences in reward learning in a community life s

140 No age differences in sensitivity to MK-801 were found betw

141 While this identifies a substrate underlying age differences in social drive, we then determined that

142 Thus, age differences in spatial memory do not appear to be ex

143 Reliable age differences in switch-related reductions of decoding

144 Of greater significance, however, are the age differences in the different conditioning paradigms.

145 captured by this pattern is associated with age differences in the differential encoding of unique m

146 ated the contributions of brain structure to age differences in the distinctiveness of motor represen

147 dhood along with more subtle region-specific age differences in the effects of task switching on rule

148 orcement learning work that has investigated age differences in the effects of uncertainty and sugges

149 11-30 years, to allow for the exploration of age differences in the impact of online social evaluativ

150 dy assessed the neural mechanisms underlying age differences in the integration of auditory and visua

151 nces in GABAergic regulation of the LAT, and age differences in the mechanism for the effects of repe

152 potential mechanisms underlying the possible age differences in the MVPA-diabetes association.

153 nation across age groups, with evidence that age differences in the nature of representations emerges

154 To examine age differences in the neurophysiological mechanisms of

155 Here, we investigated age differences in the relationships between handedness,

156 gue-mimicking condition, potentially masking age differences in the sensitivity of the cross-bridge t

157 ts, the present study measured the extent of age differences in the specificity of memory representat

158 Sex and age differences in the sympathetic control of resting bl

159 However, the lack of significant age differences in toe clearance suggests this strategy

160 e using neuroimaging methodology, identified age differences in trust and their neural underpinnings.

161 In contrast, we found no evidence for age differences in value-related processing or age-relat

162 Hence, age differences in values seem both due to generation, a

163 f this study were to characterize the normal age differences in white matter integrity in several bra

164 Vascular risk factors modified age differences in white matter integrity.

165 properties, inter-animal variability, animal age, differences in spike timing between the synaptic re

166 ducted in separate cohorts, models examining age-differences in association, and in RQR models examin

167 eal that the OFC-DMS pathway is critical for age-differences in reward-guided impulsive actions and p

168 om specific organs to measure organ-specific aging differences in living individuals.

169 neurons and, notably, reduced or eliminated aging differences in the biomarkers.

170 We estimated adjusted age differences (in months) at attaining various puberta

171 (OR=3.7, 1.6-8.6, p=0.0007) and fell as the age difference increased (p for trend=0.004).

172 ity increased with age, and the magnitude of age differences increased beginning with the middle of t

173 treatment strategies rarely consider patient age differences, leading to variable therapeutic efficac

174 the shift to reproductive status rather than age differences matched the pattern of changes in olfact

175 Three age difference measures were explored as predictors of p

176 Although age differences narrowed over time, women older than 70

177 large interjurisdictional variation in this age difference (odds ratio 0.05; 95% PI 0.01 to 0.19).

178 antial interjurisdictional variation in this age difference (odds ratio [OR] 0.38; 95% PI 0.20-0.73).

179 5; P = .07), trisomy 8 (HR = 2.26; P = .02), age (difference of 10 years, HR = 1.46; P = .01), and th

180 rida couples were Hispanic; there was a mean age difference of 18 years between perpetrators and vict

181 6.1 +/- 11.1 and 36.7 +/- 12.3 years, a mean age difference of 19.3 +/- 5.2 years (P < .0001); accele

182 nd that among children in the same grade, an age difference of a few months was associated with the f

183 y older blood donors representing an average age difference of approximately 27 y.

184 ions, but previous studies mostly focused on age differences of categorical information representatio

185 No age difference or correlations with behavior were found

186 k was used to integrate 44 studies reporting age differences or changes in coping from infancy throug

187 timated to be "older," with a mean predicted age difference (PAD) between chronological and estimated

188 of cognitive reserve and the predicted brain age difference (PAD) on the risk of being diagnosed with

189 msTBI) is associated with a higher predicted age difference (PAD), but the progression of PAD over ti

190 ge, which represents a considerable relative age difference, particularly in the early years.

191 To attempt to understand this sex and age difference, potential mechanisms by which i.c.v. CRH

192 Meta-regressions were performed for age difference, publication year, quality assessment sco

193 Modest age differences remained for a few types of cancer, whic

194 sults are often confounded by small numbers, age differences, severity of symptoms, comorbidity, use

195 These age differences suggest that processes involving top-dow

196 Brain age differences support the hypothesized early aging mec

197 of unconnected folds associated with higher age differences than bridged folds, but this difference

198 These findings suggest that, despite the age difference, the clinical phenotype of BP is not affe

199 There was an age difference; the protective effect of residential gre

200 Thus, we tested sex and age differences using the English version of the Eyes Te

201 A slight but statistically significant age difference was found between the study and control g

202 This significant age difference was paired with a shift in perceptual per

203 To understand the etiology of biological age differences, we also examined DNA methylation predic

204 PedBE age difference (weeks) was calculated by subtracting Ped

205 These age differences were consistent across all body sites.

206 treatment RESULTS: No clinical parameters or age differences were found between males and females, al

207 Age differences were found in feature-selective attentio

208 Gamma frequency age differences were not observed in hippocampus.

209 That these age differences were observed among both male and female

210 Considerable race, sex, and age differences were observed in the association between

211 ents relative to emerging adults, whereas no age differences were observed in the POC.

212 ger compared to younger participants, but no age differences were seen in brain responses to emotiona

213 At 12 weeks of age, differences were found in body weight and islet TAG

214 At 2 or 4 weeks of age, differences were not detectable.

215 The findings indicate significant age differences when dealing with multiple tasks during

216 To adjust the age difference, which reflects the known difference in c

217 ncrease in male participant age, the average age difference with their partners increased by 0.26 yea

218 oss-sectional associations which can confuse age differences with cohort differences.

219 ulation, reaching almost 26%; (2) gender and age differences, with the largest prevalence of isolatio

220 This study was successful in determining age differences within the empty cases, which to date, h