コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ography pain and burden were also lower with alfentanil (2.0 vs. 1.6; P = 0.014 and 2.1 vs. 1.7; P =
2 c improvement in the separation of fentanyl, alfentanil, 4-aminophenyl-1-phenethylpiperidine (4-ANPP)
3 saturations < 90% SpO2 were more common with alfentanil (8.1% vs. 44.4%; P < 0.001, but no clinically
5 ers were randomly assigned to three doses of alfentanil: a) none (control); b) a target plasma concen
6 ity to distinguish the isobars in a mixture, alfentanil and ortho-isopropyl furanyl fentanyl, is demo
7 , to 4.9+/-1.5 degrees C x hr with 100 ng/mL alfentanil, and to 5.1+/-1.7 degrees C x hr with 200 ng/
8 n scores during insufflation were lower with alfentanil as compared with placebo, 5.3 versus 3.0 (P <
10 refore evaluate whether a single intravenous alfentanil bolus has a clinically relevant analgesic eff
12 ay, to 38.0+/-0.4 degrees C on the 100 ng/mL-alfentanil day and 38.0+/-0.6 degrees C on the 200-ng/mL
16 r (NT$) 103 (approximate US$ 4) cheaper than alfentanil, leading to a significant difference in total
17 domized and double-blinded clinical trial of alfentanil, midazolam and propofol versus fentanyl, mida
23 s reasonable to hypothesize that low dose of alfentanil used in BPS might also result in more rapid r