戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 it a multifaceted and promising tool for the allergist.
2  is much easier compared with referral to an allergist.
3 urden to patients and are a challenge to the allergist.
4 tory suggesting NSAID-H were evaluated by an allergist.
5 that includes both an ophthalmologist and an allergist.
6 utpatient clinic under the supervision of an allergist.
7 he diagnostic allergen portfolios offered to allergists.
8 e conduct of drug provocation testing by non-allergists.
9 for data-driven AC use and interpretation by allergists.
10  guidelines and the opinions of 14 pediatric allergists.
11 tions, the general public, policymakers, and allergists.
12 ing to the opinion of the 14 local pediatric allergists.
13 a blinded fashion by 2 experienced attending allergists.
14 ulation and should receive more attention by allergists.
15 olute adjusted difference for female vs male allergists, 6.0%; 95% CI, -8.3% to 20.2%).
16                           Among 507 academic allergists (9.3% of practicing US allergists in 2014), 3
17  are onerous, require specialist input of an allergist and are resource-dependent.
18  of AD from the distinct perspectives of the allergist and dermatologist.
19 f allergic diseases, referral of patients to allergist and preferred method of learning and assessmen
20 age, departments had 3 allergists/paediatric allergists and 2 nurses.
21      A well-structured collaboration between allergists and allergy centres offers the possibility of
22 re one of the most frequent problems seen by allergists and clinical immunologists in daily practice.
23                                              Allergists and clinical immunologists should have a lead
24 agnosis of AD have largely been agreed upon, allergists and dermatologists have similar and divergent
25  and ACD can be encountered in pure forms by allergists and dermatologists, patients with AD often pr
26                                              Allergists and gastroenterologists need to pay attention
27 ceptions of AD between US dermatologists and allergists and health care professionals in other areas
28            Ultimately, the aim is to empower allergists and heath care providers with new tools that
29                                              Allergists and immunologists can use practical ways to a
30  management and intensive care, during which allergists and immunologists may encounter patients with
31 ey to assess Guidelines implementation among allergists and immunologists who manage infants for food
32 nonionic contrast material was sent to 1,017 allergists and immunologists.
33 diagnosis of OA are proposed for use by both allergists and ophthalmologists.
34 nical Immunology (BSACI) and is intended for allergists and others with a special interest in allergy
35 ic) research, teach medical students, future allergists and provide postgraduate training.
36                   The seventh "Future of the Allergists and Specific Immunotherapy (FASIT)" workshop
37 ctable epinephrine education, referral to an allergist, and be educated about thresholds for further
38                                              Allergists are uniquely poised to treat the entire aller
39 OA is considered a medical need not only for allergists but also for ophthalmologists.
40 e horizon, we discuss the key means by which allergists can contribute to the diagnosis and managemen
41                               In particular, allergists can participate in screening for subtle EoE s
42                            It is targeted at allergists, clinical immunologists, internal medicine sp
43 rtainment of the primary clinical outcome of allergist-confirmed IgE-mediated food allergy by 12 mont
44 n of patients seen by general pediatricians, allergists, dermatologists, and other specialists.
45 ded adult and pediatric gastroenterologists, allergists, dieticians, pathologists, psychologists, res
46                     550 HCPs (pediatricians, allergists, dietitians), 68% from Europe, participated.
47 chieved a more complete allergy history than allergist documentation in the electronic health record,
48 ce analysis against electronic health record allergist documentation.
49 tals from 38 US states, 44% had access to an allergist for inpatient consultations and 39% had access
50                                              Allergist, from different continents, knowledgeable in A
51                                              Allergists, gastroenterologists, pathologists, internist
52                                              Allergists gave 61 (28.5%) patients diagnoses of anaphyl
53 actitioners in Europe, including 'practicing allergists', general practitioners and any other physici
54 ion to challenge (i.e. in the opinion of the allergist had persistent allergy) acted as comparison gr
55                              The role of the allergist has evolved to embrace all the above exciting
56                                 In addition, allergists have made significant research contributions
57 ice of an academic medical center-affiliated allergist-immunologist practice.
58 iagnosed AERD" cases to have been seen by an allergist/immunologist (38.7% vs 93.2%; P < .0001).
59 OR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.53-0.78) or visiting an allergist/immunologist (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95) bef
60 ptoms in many cases, which suggests that the allergist/immunologist is the appropriate specialist for
61                            Involvement of an allergist/immunologist significantly increases the likel
62               The Empowering Next Generation Allergist/immunologist toward Global Excellence Task For
63 phylaxis care (ie, EAI prescription fill and allergist/immunologist visit) was associated with a sign
64 utoinjector (EAI) prescription or visited an allergist/immunologist, but more likely to have had an E
65 d pediatricians, including a board-certified allergist/immunologist, independently reviewed each pote
66 dromes, patients are likely to present to an allergist/immunologist.
67 aper has therefore combined the expertise of allergists, immunologists and anaesthesiologists.
68                          It is important for allergists, immunologists, and other health care provide
69                            Service leads are allergists/immunologists (91%) or anaesthetists (7%).
70                                 Furthermore, allergists/immunologists can play a role in building tru
71                          We discuss pathways allergists/immunologists can use to contribute to addres
72 ittee on Drugs and Contrast Media and expert allergists/immunologists including members of the Advers
73 wenty-nine percent (946 of 3281) of surveyed allergists/immunologists responded, and 87.1% (825 of 94
74                              Essentially all allergists/immunologists who responded to the survey rep
75       Recent studies support the role of the allergist in eosinophilic esophagitis management, especi
76           This review covers the role of the allergist in eosinophilic esophagitis with a focus on th
77 7 academic allergists (9.3% of practicing US allergists in 2014), 323 (63.7%) were men, and 184 (36.3
78 shortage of clinician-educators and academic allergists in A/I.
79 s, an observation that has been confirmed by allergists in many parts of the world.
80 ended that pediatricians should consult with allergists in the case of for children with histories of
81 wheal measurement system that not only helps allergists in their medical practice but also allows for
82 ues, and (4) promoting collaboration between allergists, insurance companies, aeroallergen manufactur
83  for antibiotic therapy, when referral to an allergist is not feasible.
84  therefore, the expertise of allergologists (allergists) is required.
85 of experts including exercise physiologists, allergists, lung physicians, paediatricians and a biosta
86                            Joining forces of allergists, manufacturers and authorities are of high im
87                                              Allergists need to adapt diagnostic and treatment strate
88 nt healthcare practitioners (ie, physicians, allergists, nurses, pharmacists).
89 concern for different specialties, including allergists, ophthalmologists, primary care physicians, r
90                 Children were examined by an allergist or pulmonologist based on the first parental r
91                On average, departments had 3 allergists/paediatric allergists and 2 nurses.
92                       A group of experienced allergists, paediatricians, dieticians, epidemiologists
93 ltidisciplinary team of gastroenterologists, allergists, pathologists, and dieticians.
94 t specialists including gastroenterologists, allergists, pathologists, and otolaryngologists.
95 on skin condition treated by dermatologists, allergists, pediatricians, and primary care physicians.
96 subspecialty providers (e.g., pulmonologists/allergists), pharmacists, health department staff, and l
97 npatient consultations for patients when the allergist practices outside of the hospital.
98 ple aeroallergens are used, whereas European allergists preferably administer separate injections of
99 s important for pediatric pulmonologists and allergists, primary care providers, and the whole interd
100 multidisciplinary panel of experts including allergists, pulmonologists, physiologists and sports phy
101                        As data obtained from allergists reveal a different rank order of elicitors, t
102                                          The allergist's approach to weather pattern changes should b
103 -sectional physician data set containing the allergist's sex, age, years since residency, faculty app
104                                              Allergists should be vigilant of this diagnosis because
105                While the primary audience is allergists, these guidelines are also relevant to all ot
106                While the primary audience is allergists, this document is relevant for all other heal
107 SP teams at 3 hospitals received training by allergists to offer BLAST for eligible patients with inf
108                   Thus it is imperative that allergists understand the differences in efficacy betwee
109                                  A survey of allergists was conducted by using a snowball approach.
110                           Final diagnosis by allergists was considered the reference standard.
111             The interrater agreement between allergists was substantial (kappa = 0.77).
112  of full professorship among female and male allergists were not significantly different (absolute ad
113                   In this multicentre study, allergists were required to carefully record diagnosis a
114                                       Female allergists were younger (47.9 vs 56.9 years, P < .001),
115  products for peanut allergy treatment, each allergist will need to understand the specificities of t
116 to a future therapeutic landscape of choice, allergists will need to understand each patient's goal o
117                                        Among allergists with US medical school faculty appointments,

 
Page Top