戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ling to attain sympatry early tend to remain allopatric.
2 tude is generally higher than where they are allopatric.
3  by natural selection indirectly refutes the allopatric alternative.
4  success of three laboratory-reared and wild allopatric An. coluzzii populations originating from eco
5                           Males from both an allopatric and a sympatric population produce more sperm
6 ests that species formation is predominantly allopatric and involves host expansion followed by local
7 genome-wide differentiation between pairs of allopatric and sympatric ecotypes.
8 o flower in early spring; they are shared by allopatric and sympatric population pairs.
9 o flower in early spring; they are shared by allopatric and sympatric population pairs.
10 tric morphometric methods for specimens from allopatric and sympatric populations from two geographic
11 ompared trait variation between samples from allopatric and sympatric populations of M. helenor to te
12 n the capacity of autonomous selfing in both allopatric and sympatric populations of two closely rela
13 addition, comparing haplotype frequencies in allopatric and sympatric populations, suggest locale spe
14 aphic variation in floral divergence between allopatric and sympatric populations.
15 e indicates that, under suitable conditions, allopatric and sympatric speciation can occur with simil
16 competitive settings representing the early (allopatric) and late (sympatric) evolutionary stages of
17                    Exploiters may also drive allopatric (between-population) diversification by creat
18 eriments between 109 related pairs of mostly allopatric bird species or subspecies in Amazonia and No
19 her these call types are also shared between allopatric breeding and foraging populations is unclear,
20 atterns are very similar between widespread, allopatric clades, it is unlikely that selective pressur
21 ion) and geographic variation (parapatric or allopatric colour variation), because these two patterns
22 ultiple, independent reproductively isolated allopatric communities displaying convergently evolved c
23 our species in general and (2) sympatric vs. allopatric communities.
24 the community they evolved in relative to an allopatric community.
25 licate populations within species, including allopatric comparisons.
26 ilising and outcrossing) under sympatric and allopatric conditions.
27 scaped into the wild, within the range of an allopatric congener, the European lobster (H. gammarus).
28 an for more closely related but historically allopatric congeners.
29 crucian carp had larger isotopic niches than allopatric conspecifics, a likely response to asymmetric
30 butional fragmentation, isolation leading to allopatric differentiation, and secondary contact among
31  markers were used to examine the effects of allopatric divergence and habitat on levels of gene flow
32 DNA phylogeny corroborates the hypothesis of allopatric divergence and multiple invasions, and when c
33 mplete geographical partitioning, suggesting allopatric divergence and secondary admixture.
34 ixture are specifically predicted to inhibit allopatric divergence and speciation [9].
35 e show that these populations have undergone allopatric divergence and then secondary contact without
36 t erosion through different rock types drove allopatric divergence between lineages of the Greenfin D
37 he most likely demographic scenario involved allopatric divergence followed by secondary contact, wit
38                                This supports allopatric divergence in situ being the precursor of spe
39  find is consistent with previous results on allopatric divergence of transcription factor-DNA bindin
40 ispersal across barriers, thereby increasing allopatric diversification and contributing to the latit
41  suggest a geologic mechanism for initiating allopatric diversification in mountains long after tecto
42                                 In contrast, allopatric diversity was greatly increased as a result o
43 native to the same (sympatric) or different (allopatric) environments.
44                         These subspecies are allopatric except for two known regions of sympatry in T
45  the vulnerabilities of closely related, but allopatric, forest species.
46 iew receded during the Modern Synthesis when allopatric (geographic) models of speciation were integr
47 hen two previously geographically separated (allopatric) groups meet after having evolved partial pos
48 planitibia from Maui are two closely related allopatric Hawaiian picture-winged Drosophila that produ
49                                              Allopatric host-pathogen exposure, in which the restrict
50         Tuberculosis cases that did occur in allopatric hosts disproportionately involved high-risk i
51 erial phylotypes than the gut communities of allopatric hosts.
52 speciation is largely sympatric, rather than allopatric, in nature.
53                                Signatures of allopatric incipient speciation, and the presence of a '
54 beria is identified as an area of successive allopatric innovations that apparently spread to Europe,
55  taxa with historically dynamic ranges, past allopatric isolation and range expansion can both influe
56 iation is not driven by vicariance, and that allopatric isolation following dispersal may be involved
57 ression of diversification starting with the allopatric isolation of Atlantic Arctic and Antarctic po
58 ergence appears to have resulted from either allopatric isolation; a recent, rare long-distance dispe
59 cepedianus; N = 120 sightings), an otherwise allopatric kelp-associated apex predator in False Bay.
60 ange, we identify three genetically distinct allopatric lineages (North Atlantic, Indo-Pacific, and N
61 encing (ddRAD-Seq) data has identified three allopatric lineages in the North American freshwater mus
62 , in a stabilizing fitness landscape, of two allopatric lineages leads to incompatibilities.
63                                 However, two allopatric lineages of C. aberti in the Ozark and Ouachi
64 asis of hybrid incompatibilities between two allopatric lineages, for a genotype-phenotype map of dev
65 ompared with widespread lineage 4 strains in allopatric macrophage infections.
66 ional overlap between the gut microbiotas of allopatric mammalian populations decayed exponentially w
67 mparing the gut microbiotas of sympatric and allopatric mammalian populations provided insights into
68 pirical evidence for behavioral shifts in an allopatric marine predator following the decline and dis
69 an in monoinfection, demonstrating that some allopatric microbes can drastically alleviate gene essen
70 ent hosts and biogeographic factors (such as allopatric migrations, geographic separation, and isolat
71 settle the debate over the prevalence of the allopatric mode of speciation.
72                 Second, we rejected a strict allopatric model of divergence without gene flow; instea
73                                 The strictly allopatric model of speciation makes definable predictio
74 live katydids to sympatric (experienced) and allopatric (naive) natural predators, the Australian mag
75  no evidence for morphological divergence in allopatric or sympatric palms.
76 n nearby solitary populations, suggesting an allopatric origin for adaptive variants and selection pr
77 pairing resulted in higher transmission than allopatric pairing, which suggests that local adaptation
78            Here, we show that relatively few allopatric pairs of birds, mammals, or amphibians exhibi
79                                              Allopatric parallel evolution during chronic lung infect
80 h more likely to spread in sympatric than in allopatric patient populations.
81 bia despite its active guest worker program (allopatric pattern).
82 agree that most speciation events require an allopatric phase (that is, geographic separation), but t
83  reproductive isolation, and that an earlier allopatric phase is highly unlikely.
84 species were present in low frequency in one allopatric population each of I. fulva and I. hexagona.
85 postzygotic reproductive isolation even when allopatric populations adapt to identical environments,
86                   These processes act within allopatric populations and may accelerate their divergen
87 lution drives rapid genetic divergence among allopatric populations and thereby acts as an important
88               Geographical expansion creates allopatric populations and thereby could promote diversi
89 tion occurs; yet genetic differences between allopatric populations are maintained.
90 and D. capensis, but morphologically similar allopatric populations are not monophyletic, indicating
91 pattern of reproductive barrier formation in allopatric populations has received much less attention
92 h a focus on 1) their sympatric range and 2) allopatric populations in N and S America and southern E
93 tact between previously genetically isolated allopatric populations of Bd may have allowed recombinat
94 assayed the gut communities of sympatric and allopatric populations of chimpanzees, bonobos, and gori
95 14 populations of H. annuus ssp. texanus, 14 allopatric populations of H. annuus, and three populatio
96 lis ssp. cucumerifolius were found in the 14 allopatric populations of H. annuus.
97            Comparisons between sympatric and allopatric populations of H. melpomene, H. cydno, and H.
98 hs differ more in sequence than samples from allopatric populations of the same karyomorph, suggestin
99 ogenomes) to explore genetic variation among allopatric populations of the weakly electric fish Stern
100 and trophic phenotypes between sympatric and allopatric populations of threespine stickleback and pri
101 n parental and reciprocal F1 hybrids between allopatric populations of Tigriopus californicus with ov
102 ted trait disparity in sympatric relative to allopatric populations or species.
103 may play a diversifying role when previously allopatric populations rejoin.
104 f sympatric populations with randomly paired allopatric populations revealed that the observed sympat
105 servations of enhanced premating barriers in allopatric populations suggest that sexual selection dri
106 ario where inversions arose in either of two allopatric populations that subsequently hybridized.
107 y were significantly less likely than nearby allopatric populations to mate with heterospecific males
108  resource use differences were found between allopatric populations, and comparisons of sympatric pop
109  2 h critical photoperiod difference between allopatric populations, and then tested whether the same
110 that these five call types are shared across allopatric populations, generations, and behavioural con
111 eotide diversity is up to 56% higher than in allopatric populations, thereby strongly shaping populat
112 tion from that taxon among sympatric but not allopatric populations.
113 ntly greater inhibition among sympatric than allopatric populations.
114 ies as a by-product of genetic divergence in allopatric populations.
115 tering rapid divergence of such traits among allopatric populations.
116 variation was also assessed in 13 additional allopatric populations.
117 s and the capacity to self autonomously than allopatric populations.
118 Danish hybrid zone border (contact) and from allopatric populations.
119  admixture in parapatric populations than in allopatric populations.
120 P. parva also had a smaller niche than their allopatric populations.
121  effect after the onset of gene flow between allopatric populations.
122 elation to niche overlap among sympatric and allopatric populations.
123 olation can quickly arise from diversifying (allopatric) postcopulatory sexual selection.
124  giant Galapagos tortoises represent a rapid allopatric radiation and further exemplify evolutionary
125 al range expansion, rather than isolation in allopatric refugia followed by range expansion, in struc
126 ation pervasively evolves indirectly between allopatric replicate populations that adapt to the same
127 iversification, and metabolomic evidence for allopatric segregation in plants has never been reported
128 sites occupying separate geographical areas (allopatric) showed no such significant difference.
129 nd geographic isolation of breeding grounds (allopatric speciation [16]).
130 ow this remarkable diversity arose, although allopatric speciation and ecological adaptation are thou
131                   Since the recognition that allopatric speciation can be induced by large-scale reco
132  cryptic species were identified, suggesting allopatric speciation connected to geographic or bathyme
133                The overall picture is of two allopatric speciation events that occurred quite near on
134 ro, a major Amazon tributary that has driven allopatric speciation for several animal taxa.
135                                              Allopatric speciation has been difficult to examine amon
136 , and which are defined here as analogous to allopatric speciation in animals, or by acquiring new ni
137 n glacial refugia could have been led to the allopatric speciation in separated populations.
138 ence of evolutionary processes necessary for allopatric speciation in sexual microbes.
139 mics in S. islandicus exposes the process of allopatric speciation in thermophilic Archaea and brings
140                                 We show that allopatric speciation is dominant, and while frequent sy
141 n being directly linked to landscape change, allopatric speciation is initiated to a greater extent b
142 and phenologically, indicating occurrence of allopatric speciation likely to be facilitated by geogra
143 nnot exclude the alternative, inter-specific allopatric speciation model.
144 echanisms would seem to favor sympatric over allopatric speciation models to explain the diversity an
145 phyte partners acted as a barrier driving an allopatric speciation of extant UCYN-A lineages.
146 ility of shallow marine environments and via allopatric speciation on land.
147 s and sphingophilous species are products of allopatric speciation on the diploid level.
148 reveal how genetic differences accumulate as allopatric speciation proceeds.
149 (1) the interspecific hypothesis proposes an allopatric speciation scenario for the parasite, whereas
150                                The theory of allopatric speciation suggests that reproductive barrier
151 er Earth's history, leading to high rates of allopatric speciation that contributed to LDGs.
152 e interactions, supporting the importance of allopatric speciation through habitat fragmentation in t
153 he rare biosphere are generated, and suggest allopatric speciation to be a powerful mechanism for div
154 nifold but are likely connected to increased allopatric speciation with eustatic sea level drop cause
155 logical isolation arising as a by-product of allopatric speciation, (ii) ethological isolation develo
156 y considering refuges as the main drivers of allopatric speciation, but instead by suggesting that hi
157 tial isolation is one of the main drivers of allopatric speciation, but the extent to which spatially
158 d consistent with a species neutral model of allopatric speciation, colonisation and local extinction
159  develop a dynamic null model of assembly by allopatric speciation, colonisation and local extinction
160 e diversity in Formica likely originated via allopatric speciation, highlighting the diversity of con
161 pitulating host phylogeny when hosts undergo allopatric speciation, limiting inter-host bacterial dis
162                                              Allopatric speciation, the divergence of species resulti
163 e explained more simply by the null model of allopatric speciation.
164 netic divergence of isolated populations and allopatric speciation.
165 robable intermediate stage in the process of allopatric speciation.
166  is a teleost fish that is in the process of allopatric speciation.
167 raphy, adaptation and different processes of allopatric speciation.
168 olation of populations that may then undergo allopatric speciation.
169 diversified under sympatric, parapatric, and allopatric speciation.
170 nators may cause different opportunities for allopatric speciation.
171 ewed as much less plausible than geographic (allopatric) speciation.
172 e to "animate" the process of geographic, or allopatric, speciation.
173 ach, together with the comparison to the two allopatric species D. mauritiana and D. sechellia, allow
174 st as species diversity, possibly because of allopatric species gaining improved defense with compoun
175 stribution modeling indicated that currently allopatric species likely had overlapping distributions
176 contributing to hybrid male sterility in the allopatric species pair Drosophila persimilis and D. pse
177 h of premating and postmating barriers in an allopatric species pair of the endangered Sonoran topmin
178 f elevated dXY are observed in sympatric and allopatric species pairs, suggesting that recent gene fl
179 e phenotypic distances between sympatric and allopatric species pairs.
180                                         When allopatric species with incomplete prezygotic isolation
181 ation, and suggest the presence of incipient allopatric species within S. dariensis.
182  Atlantic Oceans, comprising five previously allopatric species.
183 condary sexual traits among closely related, allopatric species.
184  genus, Erynnis, that involves well-diverged allopatric species.
185 aplotypes in a population initiated with two allopatric strains of Drosophila pseudoobscura, BogER fr
186 ther the antagonism was between sympatric or allopatric strains.
187 basis of color pattern variation between two allopatric subspecies of Drosophila malerkotliana, a wid
188  diversity and community structure among two allopatric subspecies of White-shouldered Fairywren, Mal
189 mination between sympatric taxa than between allopatric taxa has been attributed to the strengthening
190                   If male responses to novel allopatric taxa reflect female responses, then premating
191  find that speciating and recently speciated allopatric taxa seem to overwhelmingly evolve under simi
192 itans was more abundant when coinfected with allopatric than with sympatric microbes, and this increa
193 ndividuals from a population of H. melpomene allopatric to H. cydno court and mate with H. cydno more
194 atric paired species than predicted by their allopatric treatments, suggesting trophic impacts from i
195 mission rates were higher for sympatric than allopatric TSWV isolate-T. tabaci isoline pairings, viru
196 dictions for distinguishing geographic mode (allopatric versus sympatric) of divergence.
197       Furthermore, tests of the frequency of allopatric versus sympatric/parapatric divergence (that
198 ing, using sympatric eastern sakers falcons, allopatric western saker falcons and gyrfalcons as outgr
199 ve as a bridge for gene flow among otherwise allopatric wild taxa.
200 y exchanged the sex chromosomes between five allopatric wild-type populations in a round-robin design
201 ope signatures to show that recently evolved allopatric wintering populations of European blackcaps S
202 nges of wolves that were either sympatric or allopatric with bears.
203           Further diversification was mainly allopatric, with repeated more recent colonization of lo

 
Page Top