戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 c parameters or in dimensional change of the alveolar ridge.
2 ale gender and mostly involves the maxillary alveolar ridge.
3 ransmucosally placed into rat hard palate or alveolar ridge.
4 the time of implant placement in a preserved alveolar ridge.
5 is frequently performed to augment deficient alveolar ridges.
6 ng severe bilateral erosion of the maxillary alveolar ridges.
7 was to compare extraction socket healing and alveolar ridge alteration after socket augmentation usin
8 ze-dried bone allografts (FDBAs) are used in alveolar ridge (AR) preservation; however, each material
9            Likewise, buccal-lingual width of alveolar ridge as well as thickness of buccal wall was c
10                                          The alveolar ridge at 81 virtual implant sites (96%) was cla
11  did contribute to attenuate post-extraction alveolar ridge atrophy in most investigations.
12 operating microscope (OM) for extraction and alveolar ridge augmentation (ARP) is increasing due to e
13 e outcomes of ARP/ARR and ISD therapy (i.e., alveolar ridge augmentation [ARA] and maxillary sinus fl
14  fresh-frozen bone allografts (FFBAs) during alveolar ridge augmentation and to assess 1-year surviva
15 nd result in acceptable implant survival for alveolar ridge augmentation by GBR.
16 junction with an allograft, provides lateral alveolar ridge augmentation comparable to that achieved
17  The objective of this study was to evaluate alveolar ridge augmentation following surgical implantat
18              Eighty patients requiring local alveolar ridge augmentation for buccal wall defects (> o
19                                              Alveolar ridge augmentation has been proposed to facilit
20                                              Alveolar ridge augmentation procedures are often needed
21 dicine as they apply to periodontal disease, alveolar ridge augmentation, and barrier membrane therap
22 ssment of grafted sites following horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation.
23 SE((R)) for sinus augmentation and localized alveolar ridge augmentation.
24 icating that both membranes are suitable for alveolar ridge augmentation.
25 entistry requires predictable procedures for alveolar ridge augmentation.
26 n extraction sites or in sites that required alveolar ridge augmentation.
27 ealing, promoted socket bone fill, preserved alveolar ridge bone, and reduced postoperative pain in v
28  in less buccal plate resorption and a wider alveolar ridge by day 21.
29 lous patients requiring bone augmentation of alveolar ridges by guided bone regeneration (GBR) to pla
30 of this study is to radiographically compare alveolar ridge changes with and without RP with cone-bea
31 resh extraction socket may partly reduce the alveolar ridge contraction and that several factors like
32                                 Standardized alveolar ridge defects ( approximately 15 x 8 x 5 mm) we
33                                              Alveolar ridge defects (approximately 15 x 10 x 10 mm),
34  provide clinically relevant augmentation of alveolar ridge defects for placement of endosseous denta
35                                  Clinically, alveolar ridge defects receiving rhBMP-2/ACS exhibited a
36                                              Alveolar ridge deformities are usually the result of tra
37 let-rich fibrin (PRF) membranes can preserve alveolar ridge dimension after tooth extraction.
38 servation in the maintenance of the residual alveolar ridge dimension beyond 6 months after treatment
39 ffect of osseodensification drilling (OD) on alveolar ridge dimension changes and implant stability c
40 this study was to compare the differences in alveolar ridge dimensional change following ridge preser
41                No significant differences in alveolar ridge dimensional change were noted between the
42 phy were used to assess socket bone fill and alveolar ridge dimensional changes at selected dates.
43  evaluate the histological wound healing and alveolar ridge dimensional changes following ridge prese
44 ncing socket repair via WNT3A and preserving alveolar ridge dimensions following tooth extraction.
45 ficant differences when comparing changes in alveolar ridge dimensions of the two groups.
46                                   Changes in alveolar ridge dimensions were also determined.
47  After minimally traumatic tooth extraction, alveolar ridge dimensions were measured using a custom-f
48 icant difference was observed for changes in alveolar ridge dimensions.
49 bined with soft tissue grafting in preserved alveolar ridges does not result in a better esthetic out
50 eservation of the dimensions of the residual alveolar ridge following tooth extraction.
51  Volumetric assessment of the changes in the alveolar ridge for the E group showed a slight decrease
52 f an easy and noninvasive means of promoting alveolar ridge formation.
53 riance, t test) at days 0, 7, 14, and 28 for alveolar ridge height and width and for markers of infla
54 n ridge height of -0.56 +/- 1.04 mm, whereas alveolar ridge height appeared to remain unchanged in th
55                Significantly greater loss in alveolar ridge height was found in molar sites allowed t
56 ired longer healing periods in patients with alveolar ridge heights varying between <1 to 5 mm.
57 ng guided bone regeneration (GBR) to augment alveolar ridges is not retained during healing.
58 this improved technique offers a predictable alveolar ridge maintenance enhancing the bone quality fo
59                            Resorption of the alveolar ridge occurred at all sites with no statistical
60  contralateral, both buccal-lingually in the alveolar ridge (P = 0.007) and in buccal wall thickness
61    The use of biologics may be indicated for alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) and reconstruction (AR
62                                              Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) by placing bone partic
63 context of delayed implant placement whether alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) is previously performe
64                                              Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) therapy is indicated t
65 trial was to compare a flapless technique of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) to a flap technique to
66 tcomes of implants placed in sites following alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) using allogeneic or xe
67 ral studies have compared the performance of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) using different bone s
68 ft and hard tissue dimensional changes after alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) using two membranes co
69 orizontal ridge width in patients undergoing alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) with a collagenated bo
70 en 3 and 6 months after tooth extraction and alveolar ridge preservation (ARP).
71 e allografts (FDBA) are available for use in alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction.
72  P-15 (Putty P15) to determine the effect on alveolar ridge preservation following exodontia.
73                                We found that alveolar ridge preservation is effective in limiting phy
74 at the favorable effects of PRF membranes in alveolar ridge preservation may be attributed, at least
75 ockets, suggesting that it may be useful for alveolar ridge preservation prior to dental implant plac
76                                              Alveolar ridge preservation strategies are indicated to
77                                              Alveolar ridge preservation via socket grafting (ARP-SG)
78 s often associated with a large bone defect, alveolar ridge preservation with bone grafts prior to im
79 e grafting at single implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation, either with a CTG or XCM, d
80 e allograft (SDBA) are both commonly used in alveolar ridge preservation.
81 grafts and xenografts are viable options for alveolar ridge preservation.
82 ve the most desirable effects for the use in alveolar ridge preservation.
83  zone versus delayed implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation.
84 surgery, treatment of infrabony defects, and alveolar ridge preservation/reconstruction and implant s
85 ations (e.g., gingival augmentation therapy, alveolar ridge preservation/reconstruction, and implant
86 ation, peri-implant tissue regeneration, and alveolar ridge reconstruction.
87 he extraction socket was treated with WNT3A, alveolar ridge resorption was significantly reduced.
88                    Tooth extraction triggers alveolar ridge resorption, and when this resorption is e
89 an extraction socket heals and the extent of alveolar ridge resorption.
90 d to simultaneously follow socket repair and alveolar ridge resorption.
91  regeneration in mandibular, full-thickness, alveolar ridge, saddle-type defects following surgical i
92 al specimens, the upper lip (coronal plane), alveolar ridge, tooth sockets, point of fusion of primar
93                                          The alveolar ridge undergoes reabsorption and atrophy subseq
94 rtical and/or horizontal regeneration of the alveolar ridge using titanium grids, in association or n
95 t resection were female sex, Black race, and alveolar ridge, vestibule, and retromolar subsite.
96 rial has on the prevention of postextraction alveolar ridge volume loss as compared with tooth extrac
97 and postimplantation to determine changes in alveolar ridge volume.
98                                          The alveolar ridge was measured pre- and postoperatively to
99 se result in narrowing and shortening of the alveolar ridge, which compromise esthetics and complicat
100                                      Loss of alveolar ridge width and height after tooth extraction i
101    Secondary outcomes included the change in alveolar ridge width and the buccal and lingual ridge he
102 R) is a widely used procedure for augmenting alveolar ridge width prior to placement of endosseous im
103 ical and radiographic dimensional changes in alveolar ridge width with an average horizontal bone gai
104 P-2 resulted in an almost 2-fold increase in alveolar ridge width, including a greater percentage of
105 st and control sites lost similar amounts of alveolar ridge, with the loss of buccolingual width occu

 
Page Top