コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 patients off medication (except 1 patient on amiodarone).
2 33 to 0.99] for ICD; 0.44 [0.24 to 0.80] for amiodarone).
3 s), as well as drug-induced steatosis (i.e., amiodarone).
4 r high-risk medications (eg, spironolactone, amiodarone).
5 on and recent studies have shown promise for amiodarone.
6 entifying patients eligible for prophylactic amiodarone.
7 aining 36 (66%) did so spontaneously or with amiodarone.
8 nge 8 weeks after the patient stopped taking amiodarone.
9 uvir and daclatasvir by 2 patients receiving amiodarone.
10 odarone-treated patients and patients not on amiodarone.
11 reated patients and patients who were not on amiodarone.
12 were compared with those who did not receive amiodarone.
13 One patient in each group was on amiodarone.
14 ay, and non-CV death were more frequent with amiodarone.
15 he efficacy and safety of dronedarone versus amiodarone.
16 miodarone, and 1 trial of dronedarone versus amiodarone.
17 l and patient specific factors on the use of amiodarone.
18 drug; 8,883 (60%) of these patients received amiodarone.
19 c drug; 108 (40%) of these patients received amiodarone.
20 d VT recurrence and ICD shocks compared with amiodarone.
21 odrugs elicit bradycardia when combined with amiodarone.
22 terol is correlated with the accumulation of amiodarone.
23 e in the recipient pretransplantation use of amiodarone.
24 I antiarrhythmic drugs, and 62 (22%) were on amiodarone.
25 inhibitors may exhibit this cardiac DDI with amiodarone.
31 is against POAF with beta-blockers (85%) and amiodarone (28%) was allowed on the basis of caregivers'
32 .6% (1.1% to 4.1%) in patients randomized to amiodarone, 3.2% (1.8% to 4.7%) in patients randomized t
33 amiodarone infusion, or a 60-min infusion of amiodarone (5 mg/kg) followed by a maintenance infusion
34 irst CVH event rates at 3 years were 47% for amiodarone, 50% for sotalol, and 44% for Class 1C versus
35 higher rate of symptom relief compared with amiodarone (53.4% of vernakalant patients reported no AF
37 ion, 3026 patients were randomly assigned to amiodarone (974), lidocaine (993), or placebo (1059); of
38 cellular uptake of the antiarrhythmic agent amiodarone, a phospholipidosis-inducing pharmaceutical c
41 icular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, amiodarone (adjusted hazard ratio 0.39, 95% confidence i
42 (adjusted odds ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1), amiodarone (adjusted odds ratio, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.9-4.0),
43 8.8]); but not in recipients of intraosseous amiodarone (adjusted risk ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.66-1.32
44 ficantly higher in recipients of intravenous amiodarone (adjusted risk ratio, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.06-1.50
45 ted a further reduction in heart rate during amiodarone administration, indicating that the reduction
48 e cytotoxic effects observed in cancer cells Amiodarone also has an indirect effect on angiogensis, a
50 e percent of adults with VF/pVT who received amiodarone also received lidocaine, while 67% of childre
51 Desethylamiodarone, a major metabolite of amiodarone, also exerts voltage-independent but Ca(2+) d
52 tion between nitrophenols (pi-acceptors) and amiodarone (AM) was performed using electronic absorptio
56 eve absolute cell quantification of the drug amiodarone (AMIO) and its major metabolite, N-desethylam
57 hether catheter ablation (CA) is superior to amiodarone (AMIO) for the treatment of persistent atrial
61 azine may be of benefit as an alternative to amiodarone and dofetilide in the management of AF in pat
64 e further confirmed by the autophagy inducer amiodarone and miR-224 antagonist using an orthotopic SD
65 biomicroscopy), and serum concentrations of amiodarone and N-desethylamiodarone also were determined
69 tantly, through a direct demonstration using amiodarone and rifampicin as model drugs, we showed that
72 with those who qualified but did not receive amiodarone and those not evaluated (11.1% versus 38.7% a
73 dronedarone, 4 placebo-controlled trials of amiodarone, and 1 trial of dronedarone versus amiodarone
74 ed with different concentrations of the drug amiodarone, and we observed that the upregulation of pho
75 adults who had received standard CPR in the amiodarone arm of the ALPS trial (Amiodarone, Lidocaine,
77 dings lay the ground for further research of Amiodarone as a possible clinical agent that, used in sa
79 r docking of a series of compounds including amiodarone, astemizole, danazol, ebastine, ketoconazole,
80 Hek 293 have a significantly lower amount of amiodarone at 0.43 and 0.36 pg per cell, respectively.
81 ine characteristics of patients who received amiodarone at randomization were compared with those who
87 rrhythmic agent pharmacologically related to amiodarone but developed to reduce the risk of side effe
88 of nutrient-responsive genes was affected by amiodarone but not CaCl(2), indicating that activation o
89 ntiarrhythmic therapy, including intravenous amiodarone, but invariably responded to quinidine therap
90 lar accumulation of L-ala,SP metabolites +/- amiodarone, but no D-ala,RP metabolites were detected.
91 /ventricular fibrillation who survive 3 hrs, amiodarone, but not lidocaine, is associated with an inc
100 alone: 38.09 for NOAC use alone vs 52.04 for amiodarone (difference, 13.94 [99% CI, 9.76-18.13]); 102
101 5 in an independent replication cohort of 28 amiodarone dLQTS cases versus 173 control subjects (meta
103 bolite formation, yet exacerbated L-ala,SP + amiodarone effects, implicating the prodrugs in these ef
105 of optic neuropathy in patients treated with amiodarone, especially in males and possibly in patients
107 vular atrial fibrillation, concurrent use of amiodarone, fluconazole, rifampin, and phenytoin compare
109 atorvastatin; digoxin; verapamil; diltiazem; amiodarone; fluconazole; ketoconazole, itraconazole, vor
110 ernakalant demonstrated efficacy superior to amiodarone for acute conversion of recent-onset AF.
111 atients received digoxin, beta-blockers, and amiodarone for rate control; device interrogation showed
112 cy and safety of intravenous vernakalant and amiodarone for the acute conversion of recent-onset atri
114 quantitative measurements of cell-associated amiodarone for the population using LC/MS/MS and cell co
116 he efficacy and safety of dronedarone versus amiodarone for the prevention of recurrent atrial fibril
118 tal diameter was significantly higher in the amiodarone group compared with the control group (AK gro
121 pixaban with warfarin, patients who received amiodarone had a stroke or a systemic embolism rate of 1
129 rom a small number of patients suggests that amiodarone has superior efficacy in preventing ventricul
130 owed better outcomes with Rate compared with amiodarone (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.18, 95% confidence inte
131 s 40%, 40%, and 36%, respectively, for Rate (amiodarone HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.40, p = 0.02, sot
132 R] 1.59; 95% confidence interval 1.13-2.24), amiodarone (HR 2.63; 1.77-3.89), and sotalol (HR 1.72; 1
133 a nonsignificant increase in mortality with amiodarone (HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.53, p = 0.15) wi
134 ive care unit stay or death was shorter with amiodarone (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.46, p = 0.03).
138 ent arms (ICD, HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.27; amiodarone, HR 1.33, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.93; and placebo, H
139 ate heart failure were randomized to receive amiodarone, implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs)
142 ive magnesium and steroids, and preoperative amiodarone in high-risk patients should be rigorously ev
143 hod that has been shown to enable imaging of amiodarone in single rat macrophage (NR8383) cells.
144 hase III Superiority Study of Vernakalant vs Amiodarone in Subjects With Recent Onset Atrial Fibrilla
145 ion of landmark studies and the inclusion of amiodarone in the American Heart Association Guidelines
147 clinical events and bleeding with the use of amiodarone in the ARISTOTLE (Apixaban for Reduction in S
151 approach to the management of patients with amiodarone-induced alterations in thyroid function tests
153 ogies include destructive thyroiditis (e.g., amiodarone-induced thyroid dysfunction) and factitious h
155 fusion (2 mg/kg) if still in AF, plus a sham amiodarone infusion, or a 60-min infusion of amiodarone
156 pendent, but was Ca(2+)-dependent: 30 microM amiodarone inhibited 81.5+/-1.9% of I KAS induced with 1
170 LPS trial (Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Amiodarone, Lidocaine or Placebo Study), when stratified
171 , double-blind trial, we compared parenteral amiodarone, lidocaine, and saline placebo, along with st
172 patients receiving epinephrine, vasopressin, amiodarone, lidocaine, atropine, bicarbonate, calcium, m
174 he analysis was replicated among ALPS trial (Amiodarone, Lidocaine, or Placebo in Out-of-Hospital Car
181 ditions and nitrogen depletion suggests that amiodarone may interfere with nutrient sensing and regul
185 atients received lidocaine (n = 664, 59.0%), amiodarone (n = 50, 4.4%), both (n = 110, 9.8%), or no a
186 ted with antiarrhythmic drugs (most commonly amiodarone [n=103] or sotalol [n=78]) and AF catheter ab
189 t the reduction was the result of actions of amiodarone on I(Na), I(Kur), I(CaL), I(CaT), I(f) and be
191 t PVCs and DCM were substantially reduced by amiodarone or flecainide, which are drugs that have sodi
192 redictors of thromboembolism; treatment with amiodarone or ICD treatment was a significant predictor
194 odification by drug administration route for amiodarone or lidocaine in comparison with placebo durin
195 nt estimates for survival were greater after amiodarone or lidocaine than placebo, without increased
198 CD-HeFT randomized 2521 subjects to placebo, amiodarone, or shock-only, single-lead ICD therapy.
200 g increasing INR (antiarrhythmics class III [amiodarone], other opioids [tramadol], glucocorticoids,
202 liver-attenuation and LAI were not higher in amiodarone patients in VNC-Chest and in VNC-Abdomen.
205 patients with moderate heart failure (HF) to amiodarone, placebo drug, or implantable cardioverter-de
207 patients, of which 21 have been treated with amiodarone, receiving SDCT-examinations (unenhanced-ches
210 Overall, the transcriptional responses to amiodarone revealed by this study were found to be disti
211 SK2 current inhibition may in part underlie amiodarone's effects in preventing electrical storm in f
213 that reserve by receptor alkylation unmasked amiodarone's enhancement of the maximal IP response to a
215 rvations indicate that patients treated with amiodarone should be continuously monitored within the f
217 effectiveness (in the rate-control group) or amiodarone side effects or adverse drug reactions (in th
221 e who received their first AAD prescription (amiodarone, sotalol, dronedarone, or Class Ic) within 14
223 model incorporating all trial evidence found amiodarone superior to dronedarone (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.
225 ardiovascular hospitalization was lower with amiodarone than Class Ic (HR 0.80; 0.70-0.92), but not n
227 e is a noniodinated benzofuran derivative of amiodarone that has been developed for the treatment of
229 nsive care units (< or = 50 beds) to receive amiodarone; the association persisted in multivariable a
232 st patients have complete VT control without amiodarone therapy and limited need for antiarrhythmic d
234 achycardia of 190 beats/min was administered amiodarone through an accidently placed arterial access
235 nd device-based interventions such as adding amiodarone to baseline beta-blocker therapy, adjusting I
236 the perinuclear region (i.e., cytoplasm) of amiodarone-treated cells had significantly elevated band
237 ear and perinuclear regions of untreated and amiodarone-treated cells showed that the perinuclear reg
239 nal period, optic neuropathy developed in 17 amiodarone-treated patients (0.3%) and 30 control patien
241 ted, but were not significantly different in amiodarone-treated patients and patients not on amiodaro
242 and major bleeding compared with warfarin in amiodarone-treated patients and patients who were not on
243 ivariate Cox regression analysis showed that amiodarone-treated patients had a 2-fold increased risk
250 teady 3-year nonrecurrence rate with reduced amiodarone use and hospitalizations indicate improved lo
256 This study addresses the changing pattern of amiodarone use over time, following the publication of l
259 rea [BSA], chronic kidney disease [CKD], and amiodarone use) and genetic factors (CYP2C9*2, *3, *5, *
260 rfarin dose was influenced by age, BSA, CKD, amiodarone use, and CYP2C9*3 and VKORC1 variants in both
263 ions were more pronounced in the subgroup of amiodarone users, in which 3 SNPs, including rs10800397,
264 ion in patients treated and not treated with amiodarone using true-non-contrast (TNC) and virtual-non
265 sotalol (HR 1.72; 1.17-2.54), but lower with amiodarone versus Class Ic (HR 0.68; 0.57-0.80) and sota
266 e events requiring drug discontinuation with amiodarone versus dronedarone (OR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.33 to
268 oints (95% CI, -1.0 to 6.3; P=0.16); and for amiodarone versus lidocaine, 0.7 percentage points (95%
269 ant estimated reduction in recurrent AF with amiodarone versus placebo (odds ratio [OR]: 0.12; 95% co
271 nshockable-turned-shockable arrhythmias with amiodarone versus placebo were 2.3% (-0.3, 4.8), P=0.08,
272 non-CV death being significantly higher with amiodarone versus Rate (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.24,
273 mended initial 300-mg intravenous bolus, and amiodarone was administered an average of 8 mins later i
274 ncy warned that bradycardia could occur when amiodarone was administered in combination with sofosbuv
284 interaction between randomized treatment and amiodarone was tested using a Cox model, with main effec
285 ajority of JET patients (89%), and of those, amiodarone was the most commonly reported effective agen
289 time to prescription of recovery medication (amiodarone) was the only parameter showing an intergroup
290 patients treated with dronedarone instead of amiodarone, we estimate approximately 228 more recurrenc
292 s III anti-arrhythmic agents vernakalant and amiodarone were introduced in the model by inhibiting ap
295 r (ICD) therapy and appeared to be harmed by amiodarone, whereas New York Heart Association functiona
296 ximal inhibition was observed with 50 microM amiodarone which inhibited 85.6 +/- 3.1% of IKAS induced
297 nd HepG2 cells uptake the greatest amount of amiodarone with an average of 2.38 and 2.60 pg per cell,
298 randomized trial, we compared ICD therapy or amiodarone with state-of-the-art medical therapy alone i
300 1 show growth sensitivity to multiple drugs (amiodarone, wortmannin, sulfometuron methyl, and tunicam