戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 cimen (preferably of tissue) for aerobic and anaerobic culture.
2  evaluate the microbiota of severe ECC using anaerobic culture.
3  stationary-phase survival and recovery from anaerobic culture.
4 M. Alden Research Laboratory for aerobic and anaerobic culture.
5 fficile in stool specimens was determined by anaerobic culture.
6                                 Quantitative anaerobic cultures also detect high quantities of anaero
7 nd community composition were analyzed using anaerobic culture and 16S rDNA pyrosequencing.
8 crobial identification was carried out using anaerobic culture and 16S rRNA-based PCR identification
9 n between AAD and C. innocuum in stool using anaerobic culture and quantitative polymerase chain reac
10 cytotoxicity assay, isolated C. difficile by anaerobic culture, and performed PCR ribotyping.
11 xicity assay (CCA), isolated C. difficile by anaerobic culture, and performed PCR ribotyping.
12 ty in the mutant strain was not repressed in anaerobic cultures as reported previously for the parent
13 e test performed equally well on aerobic and anaerobic culture broth.
14 associated with this uptake was repressed in anaerobic cultures but was rapidly induced by exposure o
15 nt with this, addition of a ROS scavenger or anaerobic culture conditions also worked to promote L-fo
16 utility is limited due to the requirement of anaerobic culture conditions and microbiological experti
17 erobacteriaceae species was unaffected under anaerobic culture conditions in vitro, illustrating how
18 tions) were compared to those of CDBB (under anaerobic culture conditions) for the recovery of C. dif
19  environmental samples, without the need for anaerobic culture conditions.
20                             We conclude that anaerobic culture detected as wide a diversity of specie
21              When mRNA levels of aerobic and anaerobic cultures during exponential growth were compar
22 ro Cd assay and a standard CCCNA compared to anaerobic culture for the detection of toxigenic C. diff
23 culture-independent molecular techniques and anaerobic cultures have broadened our view of CF airway
24 , coupled with machine learning and targeted anaerobic culturing, identified and isolated two previou
25 genomic sequencing with standard aerobic and anaerobic culture in 97 sonication fluid samples from pr
26                                              Anaerobic culture is employed routinely in the primary i
27 s that sequential treatment with specialized anaerobic cultures may be explored at field sites in ord
28 uggests that the presence of ferrous iron in anaerobic culture media exacerbates the toxicity of hydr
29 of 13 days to be applied to both aerobic and anaerobic culture media for all periprosthetic specimens
30 nded culture incubation been applied only to anaerobic culture media.
31 ficant induction is observed in a continuous anaerobic culture of human fecal bacteria, suggesting th
32  that sboX is induced in stationary phase of anaerobic cultures of JH642.
33                                              Anaerobic cultures of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 grown w
34           We then used IgA-SEQ and extensive anaerobic culturing of fecal bacteria from IBD patients
35                  A total of 32 proteins from anaerobic cultures show pH-dependent expression, and onl
36 ated at 35 degrees C for 5 to 7 days in each anaerobic culture system.
37 ack system compared with that of established anaerobic culturing techniques was similar and significa
38   In this report, we combine high-throughput anaerobic culturing techniques with gnotobiotic animal h
39 laboratory lacking resources for traditional anaerobic culturing techniques.
40                        Relative to toxigenic anaerobic culture, the sensitivity, specificity, and pos
41                                          For anaerobic cultures, the times were 90.8 and 45 h, respec
42                                          For anaerobic cultures, these times were 45.1 and 9.9 h, res
43 utility of the platform for both aerobic and anaerobic culture, three bacteria with differential oxyg
44  inoculated in 10-ml aliquots to aerobic and anaerobic culture vials.
45 jects positive for C. difficile by toxigenic anaerobic culture were asked to submit additional specim
46 etabolic by-product secretion in aerobic and anaerobic culture were consistent with experimental data
47                 Standard aerobic and aerobic-anaerobic cultures were negative.
48                     Quantitative aerobic and anaerobic cultures were obtained from 24 premenopausal w
49 tinal simulator) comprised a continuous-flow anaerobic culture which was inoculated with fecal sample
50  or nitrite metabolism, or (ii) flushing the anaerobic culture with argon (which should purge it of n