ライフサイエンスコーパス: anal sex

1 rth control at last penile-vaginal or penile-anal sex).

2 (24%) men reported not practicing receptive anal sex.

3 ing, lifetime sexual partners, and receptive anal sex.

4 with patients in general, and profoundly for anal sex.

5 ance of the initial infection; none reported anal sex.

6 , be HIV positive, and engage in unprotected anal sex.

7 han a versatile role (both practices) during anal sex.

8 of HIV-infected sex partner and unprotected anal sex.

9 (24%) men reported not practising receptive anal sex.

10 -defined homosexual identity, and condomless anal sex.

11 ave sex with men (MSM) engaging in receptive anal sex.

12 use as well as condom use during commercial anal sex (46.5% to 55.0%, p < 0.001) were increasing.

13 rs of follow-up, couples reported condomless anal sex a total of 76 088 times.

14 ion had a 56% larger reduction in condomless anal sex acts (95% CI 35-71; p<0.0001) from baseline to

15 tcome was change in the number of condomless anal sex acts between study conditions.

16 ficant reduction in the number of condomless anal sex acts in the intervention group compared with th

17 e primary outcomes were number of condomless anal sex acts with male partners during the past month (

18 India was efficacious in reducing condomless anal sex acts, with evidence for mediation effects in tw

19 9% of the intervention effect on condomless anal sex acts.

20 ent infection include reporting a history of anal sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.08, 1.11-8.57), ha

21 groups, ranging from 26% (95% CI 22-32) for anal sex among transgender women to 32% (27-37) for vagi

22 Self-reported anal sex and anal symptoms were independently associated

23 crease the risk of blood-blood contacts (eg, anal sex and fisting), was initially found in human immu

24 Engaging in unprotected vaginal or anal sex and having lower risk partners was reported by

25 cies of vaginal sex and alcohol consumption, anal sex, and certain characteristics of partners (regul

26 One-third of men and women had ever had anal sex, and three-quarters had ever had oral sex.

27 among young women, even those who report no anal sex, and was associated with cervical HPV infection

28 Having had receptive anal sex (aOR, 6.23 [95% CI, 2.23-19.08]) or genital war

29 No association was noted with condomless anal sex (aPR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.88-1.06, P = .88), sexual

30 trated a 44% overall reduction in condomless anal sex at 3-month follow-up compared with the delayed

31 es in numbers of sex partners and condomless anal sex (CAS) acts with casual partners over time using

32 llowing in the previous 6 months: condomless anal sex (CAS), anal sex with partner(s) living with HIV

33 95% CI 1.84 to 22.64, p < 0.001), condomless anal sex (CLS) (26/741; HR 3.75, 95% CI 1.31 to 10.74, p

34 When adjusted for age, condomless receptive anal sex, depression, interpersonal stigma, law enforcem

35 Prevalence of unprotected anal sex during the past 6 months was high (overall, 41%

36 female who engages in unprotected receptive anal sex (HR, 6.8), having short-term sex partners (HR,

37 onths, use of hormonal contraception, having anal sex in the past 3 months, and HIV status of 0.60 (9

38 past 3 months, and never using a condom for anal sex in the past 6 months were independently associa

39 e more likely to report condomless receptive anal sex in the prior 12 months (OR 2.44, 95% CI 2.05-2.

40 MSM) is closely related to the role taken in anal sex (insertive, receptive or both), but little is k

41 have sex with men (MSM) reporting insertive anal sex only (insMSM; n = 156); and (4) MSM reporting r

42 th a partner of the opposite sex, or oral or anal sex or genital contact with a partner of the same s

43 Testing on indication of self-reported anal sex or symptoms is used to manage anorectal Chlamyd

44 = 185) of women had an indication (reported anal sex or symptoms), 72.5% (n = 689) did not have an i

45 I)(2) 0%-91%), and engagement in unprotected anal sex (OR = 1.72, 95% CI(OR) 1.44-2.05, I(2) = 0.0%,

46 .6; 95% CI, 1.2-10.7), unprotected receptive anal sex (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.4-4.2), condom failure (OR,

47 sexual repertoires--particularly in oral and anal sex--over time.

48 anal sex (P = .04), and no condom use during anal sex (P = .04) were associated with HPV-16 persisten

49 anal touching during sex (P = .045), recent anal sex (P = .04), and no condom use during anal sex (P

50 STDs (P =.02); more partners (P<.001); more anal sex (P<.001); and more sexual exposure to men (P<.0

51 6% among YMSM with a history of 1 receptive anal sex partner and 31% among YMSM with >/= 2 partners.

52 ex to 47.3% in men reporting >/= 4 receptive anal sex partners (P < .001).A similar pattern was also

53 ex to 14.8% in men reporting >/= 4 insertive anal sex partners (P = .014).

54 -risk HPV was associated with number of male anal sex partners and inversely associated with number o

55 ong MSM, a younger age, reporting >/= 2 male anal sex partners in the past 3 months, and never using

56 The number of lifetime male receptive anal sex partners was significantly associated with HPV

57 at sexual debut, higher number of receptive anal sex partners, and less frequent condom use.

58 number of sex partners, number of condomless anal sex partners, the number of sex acts while under th

59 number of sex partners, number of condomless anal sex partners, the number of sex acts while under th

60 Receptive anal sex, previous genital warts, and anal hrHPV infecti

61 M; n = 156); and (4) MSM reporting receptive anal sex (recMSM; n = 415).

62 ers between subsets of gay men delineated by anal sex role (ASR).

63 tcome measure was serodiscordant unprotected anal sex (SDUA).

64 tal lesions more commonly reported receptive anal sex than those without anorectal lesions (adjusted

65 Among MSM who primarily engaged in insertive anal sex, the association between male circumcision and

66 eraction of gender with condomless receptive anal sex, the odds of HIV infection for transgender wome

67 rom 3.7% in men reporting no prior insertive anal sex to 14.8% in men reporting >/= 4 insertive anal

68 om 10.0% in men reporting no prior receptive anal sex to 47.3% in men reporting >/= 4 receptive anal

69 he upper 95% confidence limit for condomless anal sex was 0.71 per 100 couple-years of follow-up.

70 re aged 18-24 years, and median age of first anal sex was 18 years (IQR 17-21).

71 te models for men and women, having ever had anal sex was associated with white race, age of 20-44 ye

72 MSM aged >=18 years who engage in receptive anal sex was conducted at the Melbourne Sexual Health Ce

73 Condom use during last oral or anal sex was relatively uncommon.

74 teria for screening nor history of receptive anal sex was significantly associated with HSIL.

75 Rates for penile-anal sex were also similar by gender (4% to 6%).

76 Vaginal and anal sex were associated with lesions at those sites.

77 al warts, and among men having had receptive anal sex were risk factors for anal hrHPV in KTRs.

78 black, mixed, or other race; having ever had anal sex with a man (OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.8-13.8); or havi

79 being assigned male sex at birth and having anal sex with a man in the past 12 months.

80 primary sex partner and ever having oral or anal sex with a man was associated with infection with a

81 Men reporting consensual oral/anal sex with a man were more likely to be HIV+ than men

82 of transactional sex activity, or condomless anal sex with a man who was of unknown HIV status or ser

83 urrent smokers, and 56% reported ever having anal sex with a man.

84 y (one or more occasion of vaginal, oral, or anal sex with a partner of the opposite sex, or oral or

85 aged 18 years or older who reported oral or anal sex with another man in the past 12 months were rec

86 7282 (72%) participants reported condomless anal sex with at least one male partner in the previous

87 re assigned as male at birth and had oral or anal sex with at least one other man in their lifetime).

88 an an insertive sex toy before use, and oral-anal sex with female partners.

89 following in the 4 months before screening: anal sex with four or more male partners (protected or u

90 All 46 ES reported frequent unprotected anal sex with known HIV-1-infected partners at enrollmen

91 In contrast, commercial anal sex with male (11.9% to 7.1%, p < 0.001) and drug u

92 ere at least 18 years of age, had condomless anal sex with men in the past year, reported not testing

93 duration, and who have a history of oral or anal sex with men were most likely to have an anal HPV i

94 1 prophylaxis among men who have unprotected anal sex with men.

95 revious 6 months: condomless anal sex (CAS), anal sex with partner(s) living with HIV, any bacterial

96 nt partners, P = .003; episodes of insertive anal sex with serodiscordant partners, P = .001).

97 umber of male partners, P = .04; episodes of anal sex with serodiscordant partners, P = .003; episode

98 partners, P = .003; episodes of unprotected anal sex with serodiscordant partners, P = .003; episode

99 ificantly more often than those reporting no anal sex without a condom (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 5

100 Having one partner and insertive anal sex without a condom had the highest NNTs (100 and

101 inations to screen for evidence of receptive anal sex without consent and mandate routine nucleic aci