コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 A antibodies in both mice and humans may be anamnestic.
2 .64), which suggests that responses were not anamnestic.
5 we assessed the magnitude of the primary and anamnestic Ag-specific IgG responses of mice to four cli
6 Mitigating the problem of AMBR requires the anamnestic and de novo DSA responses to be prevented and
7 at much lower viral loads and coincided with anamnestic anti-hepatitis B surface (HBs) responses and
11 1, MSP-2, and MSP-3 that are needed to evoke anamnestic antibody and effector T-cell responses elicit
12 ully vaccinated individuals developed robust anamnestic antibody and T cell responses after infection
13 infection with virulent chlamydiae promotes anamnestic antibody and T cell responses that protect th
14 2 were impaired in their ability to mount an anamnestic antibody response and were more susceptible t
15 Our data suggest that the cross-reactive anamnestic antibody response has a protective capacity d
20 ses in naive hosts, ICC-1132 elicited potent anamnestic antibody responses in mice primed with P. fal
21 on against SARS-CoV-2 in NHPs and that rapid anamnestic antibody responses in the lung may be a key m
23 sure to pathogens or their antigens triggers anamnestic antibody responses that are higher in magnitu
24 owever, neither route of vaccination induced anamnestic antibody responses to the surface antigens of
25 ty, induced durable immunity, and primed for anamnestic antibody responses, making it an attractive c
29 ortant immunologic questions include whether anamnestic CD4 T cell responses drive disease rather tha
30 llowing the CL-13 boost, a greater number of anamnestic CD8 T cells localized to the lymph nodes, exh
33 6a) did not develop viremia but did show an anamnestic cell-mediated immune response after rechallen
36 bjective molecular clusters, irrespective of anamnestic clinico-morphological features, despite the c
37 d macaques exhibited a rapid and substantial anamnestic CTL response specific for the p11C, C-M Gag e
38 ociated with the evolution of high-frequency anamnestic CTL responses specific for a dominant Mamu-A*
44 nths, and re-exposure to antigen resulted in anamnestic effector and central memory CD8(+) T-lymphocy
45 e boost vaccination minimizes contraction of anamnestic effectors and maximizes memory CD8+ T cell qu
46 er, prior immunization capable of priming an anamnestic Env antibody response did not accelerate V1/V
47 t in protective immunity was associated with anamnestic Env-specific cellular immunity that developed
48 wever, 13 blips of virus in six macaques and anamnestic Env-specific rectal IgA responses in three of
49 lls are required for protection, there is no anamnestic expansion of SIV-specific CD8(+) T cells in a
51 able ASC responses to primary infection, and anamnestic fecal IgA responses likely contributed to sel
52 eased both the magnitude and the kinetics of anamnestic Gag-specific T cell responses following HIV-1
53 V-gag/pol/env prime was able to induce rapid anamnestic gp140 antibody response upon SIV encounter.
54 ng of the immune system to induce protective anamnestic heterotypic neutralizing antibody responses u
55 nonvaccinated acutely infected individuals, anamnestic HIV-1-specific B- and T-cell responses appear
57 SV pre-exposed NHPs elicits a dose-dependent anamnestic humoral immune response comparable to a subun
58 memory B cells upon antigen re-exposure for anamnestic humoral responses, but little is known about
60 -VLPs (with or without mLT) developed higher anamnestic IgA and IgG ASC responses in ileum after chal
61 sting with an unadjuvanted protein amplified anamnestic IgA responses in both the upper and the lower
63 at a rapid IgG response to SARS-CoV-2 and an anamnestic IgG response to the nucleoprotein of the CCCs
64 ugate-vaccinated and control G2 mice induced anamnestic IgG- and VH3-positive responses to GXM and wa
65 valent vaccine (HR-Tet) showed a tetravalent anamnestic immune response in 100% (16/16) of AGMs after
70 erosol challenge model, and that primary and anamnestic immune responses to toxin proteins provide pr
74 ivotal role for IL-33 in driving primary and anamnestic immunity against the rodent hookworm Nippostr
79 nd matched controls were surveyed on general anamnestic information, eating and drinking habits, and
83 is a promising vector to use to prime for an anamnestic neutralizing antibody response following infe
85 human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV89.6P), an anamnestic neutralizing antibody response was observed,
87 V/6120/DeltaNS2/1030s primed for substantial anamnestic neutralizing antibody responses following nat
89 xhibited functional exhaustion and decreased anamnestic potential following secondary antigen challen
90 IMV to induce affinity maturation results in anamnestic production of nonprotective, complement-fixin
91 ation because it takes advantage of both the anamnestic properties of an adaptive immune response and
92 or T-cell-deficient mice lacked the complete anamnestic protection observed in immunocompetent mice.
94 se to current antigens but instead suggested anamnestic recall of antibody to earlier influenza virus
96 xisting FIX inhibitors exhibited a transient anamnestic response (5 Bethesda units) at 2 weeks after
102 n, and levels of both increased in a typical anamnestic response following a challenge infection.
103 acaques exhibited a CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell anamnestic response following booster immunization.
105 on Beta/B.1.351 (rS-Beta) produces a robust anamnestic response in baboons against SARS-CoV-2 varian
112 peak anti-Nef titers, a more rapid anti-Nef anamnestic response postchallenge, and expanded CD8(CM)
116 However, such patients are at risk for an anamnestic response resulting from a proinflammatory res
118 fter the initial immunization resulted in an anamnestic response to C-GTF resulting in 10- and 100-fo
121 ing immunization with NYVAC/SIV(gpe) and the anamnestic response to SIV(mac251) at 48 h after challen
122 n there is an association between a systemic anamnestic response to toxin A, as evidenced by increase
123 d an immune reaction compatible with a local anamnestic response upon contact with the replicating FM
124 after primary CHIKV immunization and then an anamnestic response upon subsequent VEEV vaccination.
126 timing of humoral response was similar, and anamnestic response was driven by the variant involved d
130 Following challenge infection, the dominant anamnestic response was solely in the B-cell compartment
132 or T cells, memory is often equated with the anamnestic response, the ability of secondary lymphoid t
144 survival after secondary challenge and rapid anamnestic responses directed against toxin proteins.
147 e, concentrations were extremely low with no anamnestic responses in mice with secondary infection.
148 odies (DSA) that are most often generated as anamnestic responses in sensitized recipients or de novo
154 y illness (RSV-MAALRI) and primed for potent anamnestic responses upon natural exposure to wild-type
155 monstrated that both vaccines induced potent anamnestic responses upon virus challenge, potentiated i
157 stsurveillance without RSV-MAARI, indicating anamnestic responses without significant illness after i
158 assay to study antibody-maturation patterns, anamnestic responses, and cross-immunity to the common-c
159 nogenicity and primed vaccine recipients for anamnestic responses, encouraging further evaluation of
160 both proximal and distal sites contribute to anamnestic responses, T cells from proximal IC-LNs prefe
167 oire of cancers depends, on one hand, on the anamnestic retention of their ontogenesis and, on the ot
173 peptides as immunogens to prime for strong, anamnestic, strain-cross-reactive type 1 immune response
174 of these antigen delivery systems to induce anamnestic systemic and secretory responses to the clone
175 a chlamydial component drives a deleterious anamnestic T cell response upon oviduct reinfection.
178 emia during persistence could result from an anamnestic Th lymphocyte response to conserved regions o
181 eropositive individuals may have resulted in anamnestic, vector-specific CD4(+) T lymphocytes that co
182 ion rate), and all groups showed significant anamnestic virus-specific IgG and IgA ASC responses.