戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  intima-media thickness, carotid plaque, and ankle-brachial index).
2 ernal carotid intima-media thickness, or the ankle brachial index.
3 ned from cardiovascular risk factors and the ankle brachial index.
4 n increase in common femoral artery flow and ankle brachial index.
5  resistance, common femoral artery flow, and ankle brachial index.
6 ipheral revascularization and lower baseline ankle-brachial index.
7 dized testing for the presence of PAD by the ankle-brachial index.
8 lesterol, HDL cholesterol, leg symptoms, and ankle-brachial index.
9 ences in carotid intima-medial thickness and ankle-brachial index.
10  mean postprocedural increase of 0.23 in the ankle-brachial index.
11 , lipid and inflammatory biomarkers, and low ankle-brachial index.
12 l carotid artery intima-media thickness, and ankle-brachial index.
13 ignificant change in resting or postexercise ankle/brachial indexes.
14 matic PAD (12 men, age 67 +/- 10 years, mean ankle brachial index 0.62 +/- 0.13) were studied.
15 le, 53% diabetic, 64% with tissue loss, mean ankle-brachial index 0.41, and mean toe pressure 26 mm H
16  68 +/- 10 years) with mild-to-moderate PAD (ankle-brachial index 0.69 +/- 0.14) had their most sympt
17 fe (-0.06; 95% CI: -0.17, 0.03; P = .20), or ankle-brachial index (0.03; 95% CI: -0.08, 0.14; P = .57
18                  PAD was defined based on an ankle.brachial index .0.90.
19 domized (mean age, 72.3 years [+/-7.1]; mean ankle brachial index, 0.66 [+/-0.15]), 40 (91%) complete
20                         Technicians measured ankle-brachial index 6 years apart in 2,298 participants
21            Of 125 limbs with noncompressible ankle brachial index, 72 (57.6%) anterior tibial and 80
22                           PAD was defined as ankle brachial index (ABI) < or =0.90 or history of lowe
23 ticipants included 332 men and women with an ankle brachial index (ABI) <0.90 and 212 with ABI 0.90 t
24 ticipants included 392 men and women with an ankle brachial index (ABI) <0.90 and 249 with ABI 0.90 t
25                                          The ankle brachial index (ABI) and measures of upper and low
26 enome-wide association studies (GWAS) of the ankle brachial index (ABI) and PAD (defined as an ABI <
27 disease (PAD), specific leg symptoms and the ankle brachial index (ABI) are cross-sectionally related
28 ears) free of known cardiovascular (CVD) had ankle brachial index (ABI) assessment of their bilateral
29 erotic progression was assessed by computing ankle brachial index (ABI) at baseline (1,582 participan
30 s of subclinical atherosclerosis such as the ankle brachial index (ABI) could improve risk prediction
31                                        A low ankle brachial index (ABI) indicates atherosclerosis and
32                                          The ankle brachial index (ABI) is a noninvasive, reliable me
33 that defined peripheral artery disease as an ankle brachial index (ABI) lower than or equal to 0.90.
34 on of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with high ankle brachial index (ABI) measurement and to compare it
35  sought to determine the association of high ankle brachial index (ABI) measurements with left ventri
36 achial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) and ankle brachial index (ABI) were significantly higher but
37 associations of low (<0.90) and high (>1.40) ankle brachial index (ABI) with risk of all-cause and ca
38 months and changes in circulating PC levels, ankle brachial index (ABI), and walking impairment quest
39 mance predict mortality independently of the ankle brachial index (ABI).
40 oderate arsenic exposure and incident PAD by ankle brachial index (ABI).
41  purpose of this study is to determine if an ankle-brachial index (ABI) >or=1.40 is associated with r
42 -sectional association of PAD, defined as an ankle-brachial index (ABI) <0.9, and renal insufficiency
43     The authors studied associations between ankle-brachial index (ABI) and subclinical atheroscleros
44                                              Ankle-brachial index (ABI) and TCO2 measurements were ob
45 ssible arteries (PCA) to those with a normal ankle-brachial index (ABI) and those with peripheral art
46                                              Ankle-brachial index (ABI) and toe-brachial index can be
47  reviewed the evidence on the use of resting ankle-brachial index (ABI) as a screening test for PAD o
48 atherosclerotic progression, measured by the ankle-brachial index (ABI) at 3 consecutive time points
49 invasive test for diagnosis of LE-PAD is the ankle-brachial index (ABI) at rest and typically an ABI
50 s to determine whether use of an alternative ankle-brachial index (ABI) calculation method improves m
51                                          The ankle-brachial index (ABI) is widely used in the clinica
52        Patients were eligible if they had an ankle-brachial index (ABI) of 0.80 or less or had underg
53                                          The ankle-brachial index (ABI) provides information on both
54 ed associations of borderline and low normal ankle-brachial index (ABI) values with functional declin
55                                          The ankle-brachial index (ABI) was 1.2 on both sides (normal
56 ine the association of both a low and a high ankle-brachial index (ABI) with incident cardiovascular
57 dentify genetic variants associated with the ankle-brachial index (ABI), a noninvasive measure of PAD
58   It can be noninvasively diagnosed with the ankle-brachial index (ABI), a ratio of Doppler-recorded
59 on between PAD, defined by low values of the ankle-brachial index (ABI), and future CVD risk has been
60                                              Ankle-brachial index (ABI), coronary artery calcificatio
61 esence of plaque, intima media thickness and ankle-brachial index (ABI), for N = 549.
62 the coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, the ankle-brachial index (ABI), high-sensitivity C-reactive
63 systolic blood pressure ratio, also known as ankle-brachial index (ABI), in RA patients.
64 , using different methods of calculating the ankle-brachial index (ABI).
65 C score predicted amputation better than the ankle-brachial index (ABI).
66  tibial, and brachial arteries to obtain the ankle-brachial index (ABI).
67 aluated by history and by measurement of the ankle-brachial index (ABI).
68 herosclerotic occlusive disease and abnormal ankle-brachial index (ABI).
69 l (PWV), aortic augmentation index (AIX) and ankle-brachial index (ABI).
70  severity were established by the use of the ankle-brachial index (ABI).
71 ary artery calcium score (CAC score, >0), or ankle-brachial index (ABI, <0.90).
72 1) young healthy subjects (YH) (n = 10; mean ankle-brachial index [ABI] 1.0 +/- 0.1, mean age 30 +/-
73 LVM, LVM index, relative wall thickness, and ankle-brachial index (all P <0.01).
74                   Plasma B2M correlated with ankle brachial index and functional capacity.
75 years, the 403 patients showed a significant ankle brachial index and toe brachial index deterioratio
76 isk factors, an inverse relationship between ankle-brachial index and cardiovascular events was obser
77                                  We assessed ankle-brachial index and hip bone mineral density, follo
78  participants with PAD, independently of the ankle-brachial index and other confounders.
79 No difference in pain-free walking distance, ankle-brachial index and quality of life was found durin
80  and tertiary end points included changes in ankle-brachial index and quality-of-life assessments.
81 otid intimal medial thickness, stenosis, and ankle brachial index) and risk of dementia, CHD, and tot
82  adjusted for age, sex, race, comorbidities, ankle brachial index, and other confounders.
83 y angiography, positron emission tomography, ankle-brachial index, and B-mode ultrasound.
84  fasting blood glucose, periodontal disease, ankle-brachial index, and carotid intima-media thickness
85 VM, LVM index, relative wall thickness, CAC, ankle-brachial index, and cIMT were more abnormal across
86 ted for age, sex, race, comorbid conditions, ankle-brachial index, and other confounders.
87 ed for age, gender, race, comorbidities, the ankle-brachial index, and other potential confounders.
88  is, pain score, pain-free walking distance, ankle-brachial index, and transcutaneous oxygen measurem
89 condary outcomes quality of life, rest pain, ankle-brachial index, and transcutaneous oxygen pressure
90  were independent of CVD risk factors or the ankle-brachial index, and VEGF treatment of ECs in vitro
91 sure, reduced vascular compliance, decreased ankle-brachial indexes, and adventitial thickening.
92                                The mean+/-SD ankle brachial index at baseline was 0.63+/-0.16.
93 artery disease (PAD) identified by screening ankle-brachial index benefit from preventive therapies t
94 CVD mortality, adjusting for age, sex, race, ankle-brachial index, body mass index, smoking, comorbid
95 ery calcium, carotid intima-media thickness, ankle-brachial index, brachial flow-mediated dilation, h
96 ical success was defined as improved resting ankle brachial index by > or =0.10, relief of resting pa
97 model without B-type natriuretic peptide and ankle-brachial index (C statistic, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.75-0.
98  and subclinical disease measures, including ankle-brachial index, carotid intimal-medial thickness,
99      Secondary measures, including DeltaPWT, ankle-brachial index, claudication onset time, and quali
100   Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, race, ankle brachial index, comorbidities, and other confounde
101 ace, body mass index, physical activity, the ankle brachial index, comorbidities, and other confounde
102                      Adjusting for age, sex, ankle brachial index, comorbidities, and other potential
103 pported angioplasty for CLI and LLC improves ankle brachial indexes comparable to tibial bypass, heal
104                MRA index, % wall volume, and ankle-brachial index correlated with most functional mea
105 0%, 6%, 2.6 (95% CI, 1.4-4.8), and 39.2; for ankle-brachial index criteria, 0.6%, 9%, 5%, 2.3 (95% CI
106 hen compared with patients enrolled based on ankle-brachial index criteria.
107 compared with patients enrolled based on the ankle-brachial index criterion.
108 S) 1999 to 2004 who underwent measurement of ankle brachial index, CRP, and fasting glucose and insul
109 sidered major progression, which was a -0.30 ankle brachial index decrease for LV-PAD and a -0.27 toe
110 on urine cadmium, potential confounders, and ankle brachial index determinations in the follow-up exa
111 s postoperatively with physical examination, ankle brachial index, duplex, and a quality-of-life ques
112 icity, comorbid conditions, body mass index, ankle-brachial index, education, leg symptoms, cigarette
113                                              Ankle-brachial index evaluation was also performed.
114 ses and disease severity measures, including ankle-brachial index, forced expiratory volume, and exer
115 tors of poorer cognitive performance were an ankle brachial index greater than 1.30 (OR, 18.56 [95% C
116  indirect measures of arterial stiffness, an ankle brachial index greater than 1.30 and increased blo
117 cle characteristics, greater declines in the ankle brachial index, greater declines in lower extremit
118 89 patients) with critical limb ischemia and ankle brachial index &gt;/=1.4 who underwent lower extremit
119  persisted after excluding participants with ankle brachial index &gt;1.4 only as well as in subgroups d
120  brachial flow-mediated dilation >5% change, ankle-brachial index &gt;0.9 and <1.3, high-sensitivity C-r
121                Moreover, patients with lower ankle-brachial index had (1) a more delayed reactive hyp
122 tivity C-reactive protein <2 mg/L and normal ankle-brachial index had DLRs >0.80.
123 or a measure of subclinical atherosclerosis (ankle brachial index) had little impact on these associa
124                     Coronary artery calcium, ankle-brachial index, high-sensitivity CRP, and family h
125                     Coronary artery calcium, ankle-brachial index, high-sensitivity CRP, and family h
126 ion, baseline atrial fibrillation, and lower ankle-brachial index identify peripheral artery disease
127                                          The ankle-brachial index improved significantly (0.33+/-0.05
128                                         Mean ankle-brachial indexes improved from 0.53 +/- 0.25 to 0.
129 score than carotid intima-media thickness or ankle-brachial index in subjects without and with CKD (H
130                                          The ankle-brachial index in the Viabahn group significantly
131 dysfunction, microalbuminuria, and a reduced ankle-brachial index) in 2680 Framingham Study participa
132 common carotid intimal-medial thickness, and ankle-brachial index) in 5,172 US adults without clinica
133 ility of the first-line diagnostic test, the ankle-brachial index, in clinics; incorrect perceptions
134 clusion of carotid intima-media thickness or ankle-brachial index, inclusion of the coronary artery c
135                                              Ankle brachial indexes increased for all groups (CLI = 0
136         Cell therapy significantly increased ankle brachial index, increased transcutaneous oxygen te
137 lantar flexion inversely correlated with the ankle-brachial index, indicating that patients with more
138             Using the single criterion of an ankle brachial index less than 0.9 to define PAD, the pr
139 D risk: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, ankle-brachial index, leukocyte count, fasting blood glu
140 class variable derived from body mass index, ankle-brachial index, low-density lipoprotein cholestero
141 heral artery disease had to be defined as an ankle-brachial index lower than or equal to 0.90.
142 .90, and severe prevalent PAD was defined as ankle brachial index &lt;/= 0.70, with both definitions als
143                 Prevalent PAD was defined as ankle brachial index &lt;/= 0.90, and severe prevalent PAD
144    The mean prevalence of PAD (defined as an ankle brachial index &lt;/=0.9) was 5.5% (SE, 0.47%).
145 eripheral arterial disease was defined as an ankle brachial index &lt;0.9 in at least 1 leg.
146 Participants were free of PAD, defined as an ankle brachial index &lt;0.9 or >1.4 at baseline, and had c
147  of 470 cases of incident PAD, defined as an ankle brachial index &lt;0.9 or >1.4, were identified.
148  Participants were 384 men and women with an ankle brachial index &lt;0.90 followed for a median of 47 m
149 e cumulative incidence of PAD, defined by an ankle brachial index &lt;0.90 or a confirmed PAD event, wit
150 articipants were 370 men and women with PAD (ankle brachial index &lt;0.90) and 231 without PAD.
151 pheral arterial disease (PAD) was defined by ankle brachial index &lt;0.90, coronary artery calcificatio
152              PAD participants (n=465) had an ankle brachial index &lt;0.90.
153 s-sectional analysis, 6,653 subjects with an ankle brachial index &lt;1.40 were analyzed.
154 en urinary BPA levels (in tertiles) and PAD (ankle-brachial index &lt; 0.9, n = 63) using logistic regre
155 kle-brachial index was used to diagnose PAD (ankle-brachial index &lt;/= 0.9).
156  Patients were enrolled based on an abnormal ankle-brachial index &lt;/=0.80 or a previous lower extremi
157                         We defined PAD as an ankle-brachial index &lt;/=0.90.
158          Patients age 35 to 85 years with an ankle-brachial index &lt;/=0.95 and without clinically reco
159 ltivariable modeling, previous LER, baseline ankle-brachial index &lt;0.50, surgical LER, and longer tar
160  baseline Rutherford category 4 to 6, and an ankle-brachial index &lt;0.8.
161            Incident PAD was determined by an ankle-brachial index &lt;0.9 assessed at 2 subsequent exami
162   Incident PAD was defined as a new onset of ankle-brachial index &lt;0.9 assessed at regular examinatio
163                PAD was defined as a baseline ankle-brachial index &lt;0.9.
164  percentile for age, sex, and ethnicity; and ankle-brachial index &lt;0.9.
165                  PAD, which is defined as an ankle-brachial index &lt;0.90 at the baseline visit, was di
166                        PAD was defined as an ankle-brachial index &lt;0.90 in either leg.
167                When any history of CVD or an ankle-brachial index &lt;0.90 were added to the model, SS r
168 R 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.2, P=0.03), and baseline ankle-brachial index &lt;=0.60 (HR 1.3 per 0.10 decrease, 9
169              Enrollment criteria included an ankle-brachial index &lt;=0.80 or previous lower extremity
170  in patients with claudication demonstrating ankle/brachial index &lt;0.8.
171 raction <50%, and peripheral artery disease (ankle-brachial index, &lt;0.90).
172                                              Ankle brachial index measurement was performed at the ba
173 nkle Brachial Index) participants undergoing ankle brachial index measurement.
174           Of these patients, 47.5% underwent ankle-brachial index measurement, 38.7% duplex ultrasoun
175 Along with coronary artery calcium scanning, ankle-brachial index measurement, and carotid artery ult
176 isk factors, B-type natriuretic peptide, and ankle-brachial index (model 6) yielded modest improvemen
177 if they had intermittent claudication and an ankle brachial index of <0.85, or if they had a prior pe
178      Plasma was collected from PAD patients (ankle brachial index of <0.90; n=45) and subjects with r
179 age of 74.4 (6.6) years, and had a mean (SD) ankle brachial index of 0.67 (0.18).
180          Non-PAD participants (n=292) had an ankle brachial index of 0.90 to 1.30.
181 n=3787) had a history of claudication and an ankle-brachial index of <0.85 or prior revascularization
182 ting vascular obstruction of 50% or greater, ankle-brachial index of less than 0.90, or physician-dia
183 ast 50%), or coronary artery disease with an ankle-brachial index of less than 0.90.
184 taine stage IIa, able to walk >200 m) and an ankle-brachial index of less than or equal to 0.90 or to
185 ted vasodilation (assessed as the FMD%), the ankle-brachial index, or autopsy.
186 cant differences in claudication onset time, ankle-brachial index, or quality-of-life measurements be
187 etABI study (German Epidemiological Trial on Ankle Brachial Index) participants undergoing ankle brac
188 d differences in pain-free walking distance, ankle-brachial index, quality of life, progression to cr
189 active protein, family history of ASCVD, and ankle-brachial index recommendations by the American Col
190 h critical limb ischemia and noncompressible ankle brachial index results, the prevalence of occlusiv
191                              Improvements in ankle-brachial index, Rutherford class, and quality of l
192 ation, but noninvasive measures, such as the ankle-brachial index, show that asymptomatic PAD is seve
193                                    Change in ankle-brachial index showed a similar relation (p for qu
194 , sex, race, comorbidities, body mass index, ankle brachial index, smoking, and walking exercise freq
195 djusted for age, sex, race, body mass index, ankle-brachial index, smoking, physical activity, and co
196 ent for age, sex, race, body mass index, the ankle-brachial index, smoking, physical activity, releva
197 iological measures including blood pressure, ankle-brachial index, spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide,
198 no carotid plaque, no family history, normal ankle-brachial index, test result <25th percentile (caro
199     Approximately 20% of patients undergoing ankle brachial index testing for critical limb ischemia
200  assessment of limb perfusion, including the ankle-brachial index, toe-brachial index, and other perf
201 en groups in secondary end points, including ankle-brachial index, toe-brachial index, pain relief, w
202 patients) precisely estimated the changes in ankle brachial index, transcutaneous oxygen tension, res
203 sted with carotid intima-media thickness and ankle-brachial index (two other measures of subclinical
204                                              Ankle-brachial index, ultrasound, and X-ray radiography
205                                              Ankle-brachial index values >or=1.40 have been associate
206                                          The ankle-brachial index values for the participants with SC
207  event was not increased, even at the lowest ankle-brachial index values, and was the same as in a pa
208                                              Ankle brachial index was measured, and participants repo
209 , brachial flow-mediated dilation was 0.024, ankle-brachial index was 0.036, carotid intima-media thi
210 ears, 73% were male, and the median baseline ankle-brachial index was 0.78.
211                                          The ankle-brachial index was used to diagnose PAD (ankle-bra
212                         Creatinine, age, and ankle-brachial index were among the top predictors of at
213 ripheral revascularization, smoking, and the ankle-brachial index were predictive of ALI.
214  intima-media thickness, carotid plaque, and ankle-brachial index) were evaluated.

 
Page Top