ライフサイエンスコーパス: antiseptic

1 ormone metabolism than does the preoperative antiseptic.

2 ived chlorhexidine as a topical preoperative antiseptic.

3 d received povidone-iodine as a preoperative antiseptic.

4 s resistance to chlorhexidine, a widely used antiseptic.

5 se 2019, thus advocating application of oral antiseptics.

6 imal exploration and liberal use of then-new antiseptics.

7 ases, are commonly treated with various oral antiseptics.

8 ecificity to a wide range of antibiotics and antiseptics.

9 tics or sequential applications of different antiseptics.

10 f virus infectivity and the effectiveness of antiseptics.

11 ping, and determined their susceptibility to antiseptics.

12 able on the susceptibility of B anthracis to antiseptics.

13 reater efficacy among the alcohol-containing antiseptics.

14 mparing wound irrigation with 0.9% saline to antiseptic 0.04% polyhexanide solution in elective lapar

15 operative subcutaneous wound irrigation with antiseptic 0.04% polyhexanide solution is effective in r

16 P = 0.028), scrubbing eyelids or lashes with antiseptic (43.6% vs. 30.5%; P = 0.008), and being less

17 ed in winemaking, due to its antioxidant and antiseptic activities.

18 , evidence is limited to guide the choice of antiseptic agent at cesarean delivery, which is the most

19 ap (antimicrobial or nonantimicrobial) or an antiseptic agent on at least the night before the operat

20 At quarterly intervals, the antiseptic agent used on each nursing unit was switched.

21 The choice of antiseptic agent, povidone iodine or chlorhexidine gluco

22 hol-based CH is now considered a second-line antiseptic agent.

23 chlorhexidine (CH) is a possible alternative antiseptic agent.

24 ot statistically significant between the two antiseptic agents (P = 1.0).

25 the area was debrided and then treated with antiseptic agents for 30 days.

26 Endophthalmitis cases associated with both antiseptic agents had a comparable prognosis with respec

27 d randomized controlled trials that compared antiseptic agents, virustatic agents, or immune-modulati

28 s the endophthalmitis rate utilizing these 2 antiseptic agents.

29 ffed, tunneled, or coated with antibiotic or antiseptic agents.

30 culture contamination rates among these four antiseptics, although there was some evidence suggesting

31 or injections, but also to cold medication, antiseptics, analgetics, or antibiotics.

32 reduced skin NO synthesis, although topical antiseptic and antibiotics had little effect on NO gener

33 varied in the carriage of plasmids encoding antiseptic and antimicrobial resistance determinants.

34 Triclosan (TCS), employed as an antiseptic and disinfectant, comes into direct contact w

35 PVP-I is a safe antiseptic and does not appear to impede wound healing o

36 Segments of antiseptic and non-antiseptic-impregnated catheters were

37 e was 5.4 and 11.3 per 1000 catheter days in antiseptic and nonantiseptic triple-lumen catheter group

38 to food to extend its shelf life due to its antiseptic and preservation properties.

39 the following statements: PVP-I is a potent antiseptic and, when used as a component in a rinse with

40 Use of some antiseptics and antibiotics and sterile gloves during MM

41 ects seen with the use of sterile gloves and antiseptics and antibiotics are clinically significant a

42 Clinical Question: Do antiseptics and antibiotics benefit surgical wounds heal

43 mily are proton-coupled exporters of diverse antiseptics and antimicrobials, including polyaromatic c

44 standardized by protocol-driven use of skin antiseptics and occlusive dressings.

45 l anaesthetic, antinociceptive, cicatrizing, antiseptic, and especially antibacterial and antifungal

46 is resistant to a wide range of antibiotics, antiseptics, and heavy metals due to resistance genes en

47 ers, including one sample where hgcA and the antiseptic/antibiotic resistant gene (qacG) were colocat

48 bacterials, nonsteroidal antiinflammatories, antiseptics, antiepileptics, lipid regulators, beta-bloc

49 Adverse events related to antiseptic application were only observed with patients

50 antibiotics might not be available, topical antiseptics are an alternative.

51 These antiseptics are derived from different chemical categori

52 c CHG 4%-5% was ranked as the most effective antiseptic as it halved the risk of surgical site infect

53 Using pacifiers without antiseptic at 6 months was not associated with food alle

54 tion procedures include antibiotic-based and antiseptic-based eradication of S aureus from the nose a

55 status, and performing decolonization using antiseptic bathing soap and a nasal product in a specifi

56 Increasing the effectiveness of antiseptic bathing soap to 48% yielded a relative reduct

57 Subclavian antiseptic-bonded CVCs combined with standardized daily

58 Femoral and internal jugular antiseptic-bonded CVCs develop bacterial colonization ea

59 ections with these organisms occurred in the antiseptic catheter group (P = 0.003).

60 0.01 to 2.34 per 1000 catheter-days) for the antiseptic catheter group (P = 0.6).

61 Cost-benefit analysis indicated that the antiseptic catheter should prove cost-beneficial if an i

62 The antiseptic catheter was not compared with an antibiotic-

63 No adverse effects from the antiseptic catheter were seen, and none of the 122 isola

64 Antiseptic catheters were less likely to be colonized at

65 Antiseptic catheters were less likely to be colonized at

66 were classified into 7 groups: antibiotics, antiseptics, cationic peptides, enzymes, plant extracts,

67 ine replacement of central venous catheters; antiseptic chamberfilled hub or hub-protective antisepti

68 Although triclosan, as a widely used antiseptic chemical, is known to promote the transmissio

69 Among pacifier users, antiseptic cleaning was still associated with food aller

70 Antiseptic coating appears to reduce microbial colonizat

71 This is the first report of a pacifier-antiseptic combination being associated with a higher ri

72 central venous catheters impregnated with an antiseptic combination of chlorhexidine and silver sulfa

73 These studies suggest that antiseptic compounds elute from catheters during broth-

74 antiseptic testing and a novel alcohol-based antiseptic containing 4 to 5% of the polar aprotic solve

75 sepsis is possible using new formulations of antiseptics containing strongly polarized but nonionizin

76 irocin has raised questions about whether an antiseptic could be advantageous for ICU decolonization.

77 ive drugs from soft formulations, such as an antiseptic cream (chlorhexidine) and a nicotine-containi

78 crobial agent used in mouthwash products and antiseptic creams, embedding the drug between alginate a

79 Nasal iodophor antiseptic did not meet criteria to be considered noninf

80 medicine due to its carminative, stimulant, antiseptic, diuretic, antihypertensive, and hepatoprotec

81 ed levels of resistance against antibiotics, antiseptics, dyes, and detergents.

82 To assess the impact of the antiseptic effects of silver sulfadiazine-chlorhexidine-

83 To assess the duration of the antiseptic effects, catheter segments were suspended for

84 protective effects of pet ownership and non-antiseptic environs reported for allergic disease).

85 logistic regression analysis indicated that antiseptic foot dips reduced the odds ratio (OR) for det

86 ine (PI) is widely used as an ocular surface antiseptic for intravitreal injections (IVIs).

87 eptics, isopropyl alcohol may be the optimal antiseptic for use prior to obtaining blood for culture,

88 ylococcal agents and antistaphylococcal skin antiseptics for high-risk procedures (0.8% with decoloni

89 ylococcal agents and antistaphylococcal skin antiseptics for high-risk procedures, controlling for pe

90 There are numerous disinfectants and antiseptics for treating materials in hospitals and comm

91 onium chloride (BAK), are frequently used in antiseptic formulations, including toothpastes, mouthwas

92 Even though the properties of an ideal oral antiseptic have been identified, its formulation has pro

93 Current antiseptics have a suboptimal efficacy resulting in subs

94 A number of skin antiseptics have been used to prevent the contamination

95 P = 0.008), and being less likely to instill antiseptic immediately before injection (89.7% vs. 95.7%

96 The use of antimicrobial/antiseptic-impregnated and/or heparin-impregnated CVCs i

97 h the colony counts for broth exposed to non-antiseptic-impregnated catheters (170 versus 540 CFU/ml)

98 ts were noted at 45 min for broth exposed to antiseptic-impregnated catheters compared with the colon

99 Inhibition of bacterial growth by antiseptic-impregnated catheters disappeared after 14 da

100 In the base-case analysis, use of antiseptic-impregnated catheters resulted in a decrease

101 er suggest that the antimicrobial effects of antiseptic-impregnated catheters wane within several day

102 Segments of antiseptic and non-antiseptic-impregnated catheters were sonicated in thiog

103 R-BSI of 2.2% (5.2% for standard vs 3.0% for antiseptic-impregnated catheters), a decrease in the inc

104 th of 0.33% (0.78% for standard vs 0.45% for antiseptic-impregnated), and a decrease in costs of $196

105 catheter used ($532 for standard vs $336 for antiseptic-impregnated).

106 We included 17 studies comparing 5 antiseptics in 14,593 individuals.

107 relative efficacy of CHG and PVI based skin antiseptics in clean surgery remains unclear.

108 fer resistance to a range of antibiotics and antiseptics in many gram-negative bacteria, including pa

109 sought to compare the efficacy of four skin antiseptics in preventing blood culture contamination in

110 Simple and inexpensive local antiseptic interventions with a chlorhexidine disc and h

111 The most effective antiseptic is 0.5% chlorhexidine in 80% ethanol, which i

112 Among the evaluated antiseptics, isopropyl alcohol may be the optimal antise

113 The efficacy of Dettol Antiseptic Liquid (DAL) for inactivating Ebola virus (Ma

114 s that were indicated for the formulation of antiseptics: Liriodendron tulipifera, Aralia spinosa, an

115 Umbilical cord cleansing with antiseptics might reduce infection and mortality risk, b

116 ria in the oral cavity through the use of an antiseptic mouthwash.

117 sue is of interest because standard adjuvant antiseptics, namely chlorhexidine (CHX), prove damaging

118 identified specific mixtures of fragrant or antiseptic oils, tars and resins that were used to embal

119 hexidine gluconate washcloths and intranasal antiseptic ointment is effective in eradicating MRSA in

120 eed to daily use of topical over-the-counter antiseptics on the areas affected by hidradenitis suppur

121 Antiseptic or antibiotic-impregnated central venous cath

122 Concerns exist that widespread use of antiseptic or disinfectant biocides could contribute to

123 Chlorhexidine is widely used as an antiseptic or disinfectant in both hospital and communit

124 it is uncertain whether treating SWHSI with antiseptics or antibiotics is beneficial.

125 cular catheters, blood sampling, combination antiseptics or sequential applications of different anti

126 ite guanidinium, bulky hydrophobic drugs and antiseptics, polyamines, and glycolipids across the memb

127 The study population, site of insertion, antiseptic preparation, catheter days, and prevalence of

128 e-Iodine (PI) may be diluted when used as an antiseptic prior to an intravitreal injection in an atte

129 Development of novel antiseptic products continues.

130 ed to examine the association between use of antiseptic products for hand hygiene of staff and reduct

131 The hope for the future is that now antiseptic products will treat oral disease better and o

132 that this selection of plants exhibited some antiseptic properties in the prevention and management o

133 thnobotany as food, beverages, seasoning and antiseptic remedies, among others.

134 None of the studies evaluated antibiotic/antiseptic resistance as the outcome.

135 ncluded the biofilm-associated bhp gene, the antiseptic resistance qacA gene, the cassette chromosome

136 rse major attributes: antibiotic, metal, and antiseptic resistance; degradation of chemicals; type IV

137 The DMSO-containing antiseptic resulted in a 1- to 2-log enhanced killing of

138 cline-treated SPF mice to chlorhexidine oral antiseptic rinses.

139 kocytes in tissues, in addition to its known antiseptic role.

140 iene, the use of surgical masks, appropriate antiseptic selection and application, and proper prepara

141 r determine that commonly used chlorhexidine antiseptic serves as a protective and decolonizing agent

142 developing antimicrobial biomaterials using antiseptic silver ions to treat osteomyelitis.

143 to promiscuously export quaternary ammonium antiseptics, similar to the activity of a clade of multi

144 In addition to topical antiseptics, simple, low-cost interventions such as hand

145 re facilities have instituted a preadmission antiseptic skin cleansing protocol using chlorhexidine g

146 f Randomized trials to Evaluate Preoperative antiseptic skin solutions in orthopaedic Trauma) program

147 e, duration, and timing was used to maximize antiseptic skin surface concentrations of chlorhexidine

148 18.0% squeezed out the wound, and 71.1% used antiseptic solution for cleansing a puncture wound.

149 hile povidone-iodine (PI) is a commonly used antiseptic solution for postinjection endophthalmitis (P

150 ts were randomly assigned to receive a nasal antiseptic solution, containing povidone-iodine as the m

151 Compared with no irrigation, antiseptic solutions (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.44-0.81; high

152 Antiseptic solutions applied to the anterior nares can t

153 Using alcohol-free antiseptic solutions in the periocular region and taking

154 Alcohol-containing antiseptic solutions may cause severe toxic keratopathy;

155 raoperative incisional wound irrigation with antiseptic solutions was associated with a reduction in

156 Alcohol-containing antiseptic solutions were used for presurgical preparati

157 tiseptic chamberfilled hub or hub-protective antiseptic sponge for central venous catheters; and use

158 Antiseptic susceptibility was similar for microbes recov

159 Despite modern antiseptic techniques, surgical site infection (SSI) rem

160 Here, we introduce an in vitro method for antiseptic testing and a novel alcohol-based antiseptic

161 Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) is an antiseptic that is widely used in healthcare due to its

162 Subjects in the test group received antiseptic therapy (Treatment 1), which included mechani

163 -degree burn wound after debridement/topical antiseptic therapy significantly accelerated epitheliali

164 dard therapy (burn wound debridement/topical antiseptic therapy) with (n = 22) or without (n = 22) de

165 e cord, a boiled thread to tie the cord, and antiseptic to clean the umbilicus were each significantl

166 3.04% for 70% isopropanol-1% iodine (control antiseptic) to 1.04% for 70% isopropanol-1% iodine-5% DM

167 d a proteoliposome-based quaternary ammonium antiseptic transport assay that we developed, we dissect

168 the antituberculosis drug isoniazid and the antiseptic triclosan, which are inhibitors of fatty acid

169 The use of antiseptic triple-lumen catheters may substantially redu

170 using a Cox Proportional Hazards Model, the antiseptic triple-lumen catheters were associated with a

171 These dressings release antiseptic under occlusion onto the skin surrounding cat

172 was driven by the joint exposure of pacifier-antiseptic use (adjusted odds ratio, 4.83; 95% CI, 1.10-

173 Furthermore, persistent and repeated antiseptic use over the first 6 months was associated wi

174 , 3.56; 95% CI, 1.18-10.77) compared with no antiseptic use.

175 tter of aversive conditioning, with invasive antiseptics used in the absence of antibiotics.

176 The anti-HCV activity of commercial antiseptics varied.

177 ture contamination rate associated with each antiseptic was then determined.

178 r of HCV virucidal activity of commonly used antiseptics was bleach (1:10) > cavicide (1:10) > ethano

179 in acute care settings from the traditional antiseptic wash to use of plain, mild soap and an alcoho

180 ition in HIV-infected women, and of applying antiseptic washes to the cervix and vagina during labor,

181 the use of prophylaxis with an antibiotic or antiseptic were significantly associated with an increas

182 control measure based on the use of topical antiseptics, which was more effective at reducing transm

183 Resistance to chlorhexidine, an antiseptic widely used to combat A. baumannii, is effect

184 other microbes in vitro compared to the same antiseptic without DMSO.