コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 eristic impedance (Zc), a measure of central aortic stiffness.
2 s likely account for the greater increase in aortic stiffness.
3 carotid and femoral arteries as a measure of aortic stiffness.
4 lapril, did not significantly reduce central aortic stiffness.
5 (cfPWV) is regarded as the gold standard for aortic stiffness.
6 mmation in AA, leading to ECM deposition and aortic stiffness.
7 sity may accelerate age-related increases in aortic stiffness.
8 microvascular function, and does not impair aortic stiffness.
9 tic DL-powered evaluation of the MRI-derived aortic stiffness.
10 The male mice had progressive, age-related aortic stiffness.
11 ion and vasodilatation responses, suggesting aortic stiffness.
12 se wave velocity (aPWV), a robust measure of aortic stiffness.
13 nt of alterations in angiotensin II-mediated aortic stiffness.
14 ident stroke independently of CV factors and aortic stiffness.
15 stroke risk prediction beyond Framingham and aortic stiffness.
16 n is predominantly correlated with increased aortic stiffness.
17 this effect correlates with the decrease in aortic stiffness.
18 sociations were also observed with follow-up aortic stiffness.
19 cancer therapy adversely increases thoracic aortic stiffness, a known independent predictor of adver
22 content and improved its solubility, reduced aortic stiffness, ameliorated diabetic nephrosclerosis,
27 (PMAP), peripheral vascular resistance, AIx, aortic stiffness and central pulse pressure, but only an
28 ess associations between changes in proximal aortic stiffness and changes in fitness, fatness, and ot
29 ur results suggest that associations between aortic stiffness and CVD events are mediated by pathways
30 analyses, 8% to 13% of the relation between aortic stiffness and CVD events was mediated by hyperemi
32 onsistent with the hypothesis that increased aortic stiffness and excessive flow pulsatility damage t
33 ysis showed that 34% of the relation between aortic stiffness and GFR was mediated by pulsatility ind
34 for pulsatility index, the relation between aortic stiffness and GFR was no longer significant (P=0.
36 at preceded left atrial dilatation linked to aortic stiffness and increased fibrosis in myocardium an
40 and determine their relationship to central aortic stiffness and left ventricular (LV) remodeling.
47 in lamellae and is responsible for increased aortic stiffness and subsequent cardiovascular events.
48 arable with EDS patients, they had decreased aortic stiffness and tensile strength and hyperextensibl
51 ators of vascular phenotype severity such as aortic stiffness and vertebral tortuosity index have bee
52 which indexes such as aortic distensibility, aortic stiffness, and aortic compliance can be obtained
53 ining reversed the reduction in E/A, reduced aortic stiffness, and eliminated impairment of coronary
57 nd without myocardial fibrosis, have altered aortic stiffness as assessed by magnetic resonance imagi
58 d whether this association is independent of aortic stiffness as estimated by carotid-femoral pulse w
62 creased filling pressures were correlated to aortic stiffness (augmentation pressure and index, P<0.0
63 i-corrected p < 0.0125) and higher follow-up aortic stiffness (B = -1.12, 95% CI -1.95, -0.29, Bonfer
64 terial tonometry, we evaluated 3 measures of aortic stiffness: brachial pulse pressure; carotid-femor
66 were observed for cardiorespiratory fitness, aortic stiffness, circulating glucose, lipids and inflam
67 P amplification, mainly related to increased aortic stiffness, contributes to the significant increas
70 al pulse wave velocity, a measure of central aortic stiffness, decreased after cranberry juice (8.3 +
72 and small-sized arteries, showed that, while aortic stiffness did not change with increasing degree o
73 inear relationship of PMAP with both AIx and aortic stiffness did not differ significantly between dr
74 intensity reduces central blood pressure and aortic stiffness-equivalent to a ~4-year reduction in va
75 n is a promising tool for measuring regional aortic stiffness for non-invasive cardiovascular disease
77 ansplant recipients (KTRs) is uncertain, and aortic stiffness has not yet been incorporated into risk
78 ditionally, pulse pressure (PP), a marker of aortic stiffness, has been associated with increased ris
80 of microvascular structure and function, and aortic stiffness in 2045 participants (1107 women, mean
81 aortic arch is related to increased proximal aortic stiffness in individuals without cardiovascular d
84 elationship between telomere length (TL) and aortic stiffness in well-characterized, younger and olde
86 nt for age, important correlates of abnormal aortic stiffness included higher mean arterial pressure,
87 n the participants receiving anthracyclines, aortic stiffness increased markedly (relative to baselin
92 Increased pulse pressure, a reflection of aortic stiffness, increases cardiac load and may increas
93 - 1.6 x 10(-3) mm Hg, p < 0.001) and greater aortic stiffness index (26.7 +/- 25.8 and 55.9 +/- 76.8
100 t that the burden of disease attributable to aortic stiffness is likely to increase considerably over
101 atrilat compared with enalapril suggest that aortic stiffness is maintained by specific, partially re
104 ese analyses provide the first evidence that aortic stiffness may contribute to lower GFR by transfer
105 dation of the role this novel locus plays in aortic stiffness may facilitate development of therapeut
106 ch as renal dysfunction and enhanced central aortic stiffness may play an important role in the devel
107 Being a factor of various severe diseases, aortic stiffness may play an important role in the early
109 ng adults with a CTD was performed to derive aortic stiffness measures (strain, distensibility, and b
112 partum hypertensive stimuli develop enhanced aortic stiffness, microvascular myogenic tone, AngII con
113 erations in left ventricular function and in aortic stiffness occur during the early phase of aneurys
116 individuals (<50 years), whereas changes in aortic stiffness per se are more marked in older individ
118 es included measures of myocardial fibrosis, aortic stiffness, physical functioning, quality of life
123 E/A), myocardial performance index (MPI) and aortic stiffness (pulse wave velocity; PWV) were evaluat
124 n IVRT, a 64% decrease in E/A, and increased aortic stiffness (PWV: 6.36 +/- 0.47 vs.4.89 +/- 0.41, O
125 ral hemodynamic parameters involve increased aortic stiffness, reduced wave reflections, and increase
128 Results At the 4-month follow-up visit, aortic stiffness remained similar to baseline in the con
131 were independently associated with increased aortic stiffness, renal injury, and incident cardiovascu
133 lying clinical conditions known to influence aortic stiffness, such as hypertension or diabetes (P <
134 st, however, after additional adjustment for aortic stiffness, suggesting a shared causal pathway.
138 h IFG to prevent LV hypertrophy and abnormal aortic stiffness that is observed in middle-aged and old
139 e velocity (CFPWV) is a heritable measure of aortic stiffness that is strongly associated with increa
140 ected five highly significant QTLs affecting aortic stiffness: two interacting QTLs (AS-m1 on chromos
141 included central (aortic) blood pressure and aortic stiffness using cardiovascular magnetic resonance
144 cardiovascular disease risk factors, higher aortic stiffness was associated with increased LV mass (
147 for mean arterial pressure, each measure of aortic stiffness was associated with reduced hyperemic f
152 modify arterial stiffness, proximal thoracic aortic stiffness was not increased in those with IFG com
153 ted for age, sex, heart rate, and body size, aortic stiffness was related to GFR (Slope of regression
154 pulse wave velocity, which reflects central aortic stiffness, was statistically significantly lower
155 in which factors known to influence thoracic aortic stiffness were included as covariates in the mode
157 trophy, diastolic dysfunction, and increased aortic stiffness, which are independent predictors of ca
159 rmal (9.2 +/- 2.2 m/s), indicating increased aortic stiffness, which strongly correlated with NT-proB
160 H patients have increased apparent ascending aortic stiffness, which was strongly associated with the
161 anges in vascular properties responsible for aortic stiffness with aging would be greater in old male
162 as to discuss the methodology used to assess aortic stiffness, with particular emphasis on radiologic