戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 re examined with CT, 382 underwent follow-up aortography.
2 ing multiple views of the ascending aorta by aortography.
3 t but not diagnostic of aortic dissection on aortography.
4 Sensitivity was 100% for HCTT versus 92% for aortography.
5     Accuracy was 86% for HCTT versus 97% for aortography.
6  Specificity was 83% for HCTT versus 99% for aortography.
7 nostic cardiac catheterization and abdominal aortography.
8 ctive value was 100% for HCTT versus 97% for aortography.
9 ictive value was 50% for HCTT versus 97% for aortography.
10 h-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR aortography.
11 ions result with four- versus one-channel CT aortography.
12  or pelvic arteries demonstrated by contrast aortography; 19 were asymptomatic and 3 had symptoms of
13 nding aneurysm, particularly if eccentric on aortography and associated with aortic valve regurgitati
14                                              Aortography and computed tomography angiography (CTA) sh
15 n arteriography, to establish the utility of aortography and ovarian arteriography in the routine pra
16  was high (kappa values of 0.81 and 0.90 for aortography and selective study, respectively), but not
17 US) and, in four patients, with conventional aortography as well.
18                                           CT aortography-based coronary calcium scores strongly and i
19                                              Aortography can be reserved for indeterminate HCTT scans
20 uld be an alternative to computed tomography-aortography (CTA) in the lifelong surveillance of patien
21            Of the 207 patients who underwent aortography directly without CT, 10 had traumatic aortic
22 t of all patients who underwent emergency CT aortography from January 2007 through January 2012 for s
23                                              Aortography has been the standard for diagnosing BAI for
24        A prospective study comparing HCTT to aortography in the diagnosis of BAI was performed.
25 ns to question whether conventional thoracic aortography is still the reference standard.
26 Aortic Syndrome, Coronary Artery Calcium, CT Aortography, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events, Mortal
27 s with aortic dissection were evaluated with aortography (n = 62), intravascular ultrasound (US) (n =
28 f traumatic aortic injury were examined with aortography only.
29 vity of ovarian artery (OA) visualization at aortography performed after uterine fibroid embolization
30                                              Aortography rarely helps identify patients with substant
31    The primary outcomes were the ratio of CT aortography rates to rates of positive CT aortographic e
32                           The sensitivity of aortography was approximately 18%.
33                                    Follow-up aortography was performed in all patients with moderate
34              No advantages of one-channel CT aortography were demonstrated.
35       Ten (0.8%) patients were identified at aortography with collateral OA supply to more than 10% o
36 asty, validated at pre- and postoperative MR aortography with renal contrast enhancement was performe
37 the extent of arterial flow to the uterus at aortography with selective ovarian arteriography, to est