ライフサイエンスコーパス: appendectomy

1 ove recovery in pediatric acute laparoscopic appendectomy.

2 me from emergency department presentation to appendectomy.

3 eporting on the incidence of appendicitis or appendectomy.

4 management was defined as not undergoing an appendectomy.

5 cute appendicitis was treated with emergency appendectomy.

6 ed to NHS-England hospitals for an emergency appendectomy.

7 e between nonoperative management and urgent appendectomy.

8 by all reviews was lower after laparoscopic appendectomy.

9 laparoscopic cholecystectomy, colectomy, and appendectomy.

10 d criterion for noninferiority compared with appendectomy.

11 group were assigned to undergo standard open appendectomy.

12 bowel resection and 13% risk for incomplete appendectomy.

13 rvention was the successful completion of an appendectomy.

14 of 2 videos discussing open and laparoscopic appendectomy.

15 repair, pancreatic resection, colectomy, and appendectomy.

16 ation when considering timing of nonelective appendectomy.

17 e prior to surgery among adults treated with appendectomy.

18 on was an intra-abdominal abscess after a TV appendectomy.

19 re common after abdominal surgery, including appendectomy.

20 d clinical behavior related to the timing of appendectomy.

21 ation of appendicitis in patients undergoing appendectomy.

22 , 1953, and December 31, 2010, who underwent appendectomy.

23 ractices to diagnose suspected OSI following appendectomy.

24 ble alternative to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.

25 5 of 17 patients (29.4%) undergoing interval appendectomy.

26 seen as a feasible technique for performing appendectomy.

27 th those of controls undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy.

28 factor for postoperative complications after appendectomy.

29 itis on the histopathological specimen after appendectomy.

30 pendicitis and 4108 (91%) patients underwent appendectomy.

31 saline, or suction only during laparoscopic appendectomy.

32 o 1.27 (95% CI 1.14-1.42), P < 0.0001] after appendectomy.

33 ter or comparable clinical benefit than open appendectomy.

34 H(4) >= 10 ppm, and 193 (3.9%) had undergone appendectomy.

35 18,927 patients, with 20.6% undergoing late appendectomy.

36 the need for a right hemicolectomy following appendectomy.

37 tis is an acceptable alternative to surgical appendectomy.

38 s reporting the incidence of appendicitis or appendectomy.

39 on of safety-net burden with the outcomes of appendectomy.

40 pendicitis is one reason to perform interval appendectomies.

41 ing the study period, 376 patients underwent appendectomies.

42 uding all neoplasms associated with interval appendectomies.

43 d the percentage of negative and complicated appendectomies.

44 partial colectomy 5.5% vs. 2.8%, P < 0.001; appendectomy 0.58% vs. 0.35%, P < 0.001; and hysterectom

45 (IQR 2.8-19.9), 2.2 per 1000 operations for appendectomy (0.0-17.2), and 4.9 per 1000 operations for

46 appendectomies in DGHs had 28% more negative appendectomies, 11% more complications, and 11% more rea

47 e overall 30-day rates of SSIs were 5.4% for appendectomy, 12.1% for colectomy, 2.8% for hysterectomy

48 A total of 9048 adults underwent appendectomy (15.8% perforated).

49 5 most common were cholecystectomy (48.5%), appendectomy (16.2%), groin hernia repair (10.0%), abdom

50 ory who underwent uncomplicated laparoscopic appendectomy (2006-2014).

51 ed a history of abdominal surgery, including appendectomy (23%), cholecystectomy (16.4%), and hystere

52 urred in patients who had undergone interval appendectomy (29.4%).

53 tients undergoing MIS vs open procedures for appendectomy (3.8% vs 7.0%; P < .001), colectomy (9.3% v

54 r 1 of 4 common types of surgical procedures-appendectomy, 3467 for critical access and 151,867 for n

55 Laparoscopic appendectomy (35.2%) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1

56 ures in the matched cohort (n = 83,790) were appendectomy (39.9%), exploratory laparotomy (8.8%), and

57 For 5097 children undergoing appendectomy, 4514 surgical procedures (88.6%) were perf

58 = 0.36), and similar times from admission to appendectomy (5.5 hours (1.9-10.2) versus 4.3 hours (1.4

59 19,327 patients (47.9% female) who underwent appendectomy, 5.4% had NA.

60 res analyzed were increasingly regionalized: appendectomy (52% in HVCs in 2000 to 60% in 2009, P < 0.

61 ibiotic treatment who subsequently underwent appendectomy, 58 (82.9%; 95% CI, 72.0% to 90.8%) had unc

62 for the index treatment) and 776 to undergo appendectomy (96% of whom underwent a laparoscopic proce

63 (CT) imaging, 91% were initially treated by appendectomy (98% laparoscopic), and median hospital sta

64 (CT) scans performed for patients undergoing appendectomy across a diverse group of hospitals.

65 We compared the incidence of appendicitis or appendectomy across the world and evaluated temporal tre

66 health, readmission, reoperation, unplanned appendectomy, adverse events related to treatment, major

67 her current practice where residents perform appendectomies affects quality of care.

68 The role of interval appendectomy after conservative management of perforated

69 king, lifestyle choices, enteric infections, appendectomy, air pollution, and the use of medications,

70 nonperforated appendicitis had undergone an appendectomy, although acute appendicitis was only histo

71 in a patient who had undergone laparoscopic appendectomy, an occurrence not previously described in

72 The TV appendectomies and ventral hernia repairs were pure NOTE

73 icitis, including 2 diagnosed at the time of appendectomy and 1 case diagnosed by rereview of the app

74 A total of 9047 adults underwent appendectomy and 8089 (89.4%) underwent CT, 54.1% of the

75 it to children undergoing acute laparoscopic appendectomy and cannot be recommended in this setting.

76 ctors for adverse obstetrical outcomes after appendectomy and cholecystectomy during pregnancy and st

77 ctors for adverse obstetrical outcomes after appendectomy and cholecystectomy during pregnancy is nec

78 h an appendicolith were at a higher risk for appendectomy and for complications than those without an

79 iation between resident participation during appendectomy and postoperative complication rates.

80 The third patient underwent an open appendectomy and recovered.

81 sed to evaluate associations between time to appendectomy and SSI.

82 d conflicting relationships between delaying appendectomy and the risk of increasing surgical site in

83 However, the type of operation (open appendectomy) and average duration of stay are not consi

84 o 54.0 (Central sub-Saharan Africa) per 1000 appendectomies, and 0.3 (Andean Latin America) to 25.5 (

85 to 6.4 (central sub-Saharan Africa) per 1000 appendectomies, and 3.5 (tropical Latin America) to 33.9

86 es, including 72 TV cholecystectomies, 24 TV appendectomies, and 6 TV ventral hernia repairs, were pe

87 mon surgical procedures--caesarean delivery, appendectomy, and groin (inguinal and femoral) hernia re

88 ly performed operations: caesarean delivery, appendectomy, and groin hernia repair.

89 (RYGB), cholecystectomy, partial colectomy, appendectomy, and hysterectomy.

90 nts undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and inguinal/femoral hernia repair between

91 lcer disease, lysis of peritoneal adhesions, appendectomy, and laparotomy.

92 tis receive CT imaging, undergo laparoscopic appendectomy, and stay in the hospital for 1 day.

93 fice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) appendectomy, and to analyze separately the transvaginal

94 rom a predominantly open to MIS approach for appendectomy, antireflux procedures, thoracic wedge rese

95 ectomy was performed with low variation; MIS appendectomy, antireflux, and bariatric operations with

96 r trends and their association with negative appendectomy, appendiceal perforation, and 3-day ED revi

97 Laparoscopic and open appendectomy are both safe and effective procedures for

98 erformed to determine whether outcomes after appendectomy are influenced by the postgraduate training

99 clinical benefits and disadvantages of LESS appendectomy are uncertain.

100 for adult patients who underwent nonelective appendectomy at 56 hospitals over a 2-year period.

101 with acute appendicitis and later underwent appendectomy at our hospital between 1996 and 2014.

102 treated as acute appendicitis, undergoing an appendectomy but following a recurrence in his symptoms

103 y managed nonoperatively who did not undergo appendectomy by 1 year (lowest acceptable success rate,

104 In the antibiotics group, 29% had undergone appendectomy by 90 days, including 41% of those with an

105 p, nearly 3 in 10 participants had undergone appendectomy by 90 days.

106 Patients undergoing appendectomy by surgeons, supervised residents, and unsu

107 These results support the premise that appendectomy can be safely performed as an urgent rather

108 Recent studies have shown that laparoscopic appendectomy can be safely performed by residents.

109 BD: smoking (CD), urban living (CD and IBD), appendectomy (CD), tonsillectomy (CD), antibiotic exposu

110 For 8 common procedures examined (appendectomy, cholecystectomy, colorectal cancer resecti

111 open or MIS were selected: cholecystectomy, appendectomy, colectomy, antireflux, and bariatric.

112 ational Surgical Quality Improvement Program Appendectomy Collaborative Pilot database merged with an

113 a national annual increased risk of negative appendectomy, complication, reintervention, and readmiss

114 to determine whether elective risk-reduction appendectomy could reduce the incidence of intraperitone

115 ality Improvement Program Procedure Targeted Appendectomy database from 2016 to 2018.

116 The proportion of negative appendectomy declined during the 4-year study period fro

117 ained stable, and the proportion of negative appendectomy declined slightly.

118 In this series, appendectomy delay did not increase the risk of perforat

119 The rate of negative appendectomies descended to 5%.

120 ear follow-up period, and those who required appendectomy did not experience significant complication

121 Another 6 patients have had an appendectomy due to recurrent abdominal pain (n = 5) or

122 treated with antibiotics, 35 (16%) required appendectomy during index hospitalization and 12 (5%) un

123 r uncomplicated appendicitis did not require appendectomy during the 1-year follow-up period, and tho

124 Overall, 62% of patients have not had an appendectomy during the follow-up period.

125 ted appendicitis who were treated with early appendectomy during the study period were included in th

126 Current practice where residents perform appendectomies either unsupervised or supervised by an e

127 hese patients had uncomplicated laparoscopic appendectomies for histologically confirmed acute append

128 wabs were collected from children undergoing appendectomy for AA (n = 60), incidental appendectomy fo

129 ospitals; 1901 (96.3%) of these underwent an appendectomy for acute appendicitis and laparoscopy was

130 of SDD on 30-day readmission rates following appendectomy for acute appendicitis in pediatric patient

131 to 18 years undergoing open or laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis were selected from t

132 to reduce infectious complications after an appendectomy for acute complicated appendicitis remains

133 es among pediatric patients who underwent an appendectomy for acute, nonperforated appendicitis.

134 ween January 2010 and June 2012 for cases of appendectomy for appendicitis at 6 institutions (preoper

135 ed natural experiment of patients undergoing appendectomy for appendicitis versus control patients wi

136 y (RHC) with lymph node (LN) resection after appendectomy for appendix neuroendocrine tumor (A-NET) r

137 dy of children ages 3 to 18 years undergoing appendectomy for complicated appendicitis from January 2

138 ospective analysis of children who underwent appendectomy for complicated appendicitis using data fro

139 d all patients aged 3 to 18 years undergoing appendectomy for complicated appendicitis, who received

140 Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated or perforated appendicitis

141 y of irrigating the peritoneal cavity during appendectomy for perforated appendicitis has been debate

142 avity over suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

143 ing appendectomy for AA (n = 60), incidental appendectomy for reasons other than appendicitis (n = 18

144 All children undergoing acute appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis at Karolin

145 spective study compared adults who underwent appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis at our ter

146 on between in-hospital surgical delay before appendectomy for suspected appendicitis and the finding

147 5.9%) did not have appendicitis but received appendectomy for suspected recurrence.

148 re between ages 0 and 17 years and underwent appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis between Janu

149 Laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis resulted in

150 rnia state inpatient database that performed appendectomies from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 201

151 n among patients (>/=18 years) who underwent appendectomy from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2011.

152 of patients ages 3 to 18 years who underwent appendectomy from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2014 a

153 There were no failures in the appendectomy group (0/26) and 11 failures in the nonoper

154 common in the antibiotics group than in the appendectomy group (8.1 vs. 3.5 per 100 participants; ra

155 cs group and 3.0 per 100 participants in the appendectomy group (rate ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.67 to 2.

156 or developing ADRD or death was lower in the Appendectomy group than controls: HR = 0.96 (95% CI 0.94

157 significantly elevated rates of ADRD in the Appendectomy group.

158 as co-morbidities, smoking, and ED triage to appendectomy >6 hours or >12 hours were not.

159 estigated whether patients who had undergone appendectomies had decreased levels of exhaled methane (

160 pected organ space infection (OSI) following appendectomy has not been characterized.

161 Laparoscopic appendectomy has rare but relevant complications, namely

162 ls (RCTs) comparing laparoscopic versus open appendectomy have been published, but there has been no

163 , laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic appendectomy, hemorrhoidectomy, thyroidectomy, transuret

164 0.001; partial colectomy HR 1.49, P < 0.001; appendectomy HR 1.45, P < 0.001; and hysterectomy HR 1.1

165 Children who had appendectomies in DGHs had 28% more negative appendectom

166 uctions in the number of pediatric emergency appendectomies in England over the past decade were asso

167 nown whether these results are applicable on appendectomies in general.

168 Although 88% of appendectomies in this population were performed laparos

169 iagnosis of appendicitis or who underwent an appendectomy in 35 US pediatric institutions from Januar

170 In-hospital delay of acute appendectomy in children was not associated with an incr

171 igation to suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy in children.

172 ated with prolonged in-hospital delay before appendectomy in children.

173 etic (IPLA) on pain after acute laparoscopic appendectomy in children.

174 aparoscopic cholecystectomy, or laparoscopic appendectomy in either the inpatient or ambulatory care

175 All patients undergoing appendectomy in our hospital between January 1, 2000, an

176 major complications associated with delayed appendectomy in patients randomized to antibiotic treatm

177 ring antibiotic therapy (10-day course) with appendectomy in patients with appendicitis at 25 U.S. ce

178 pendectomy is superior or comparable to open appendectomy in terms of several surgical outcome measur

179 han 18 years coded for nonincidental, urgent appendectomy in the 2006 and 2009 Kids' Inpatient Databa

180 Secondary outcomes included appendectomy in the antibiotics group and complications

181 toperative day were lower after laparoscopic appendectomy in two out of three reviews.

182 tury the pooled incidence of appendicitis or appendectomy (in per 100,000 person-years) was 100 (95%

183 33) reduced the risk, whereas having a prior appendectomy increased the risk (OR: 5.048; 95% CI: 1.63

184 very (IQR 3-14), 4.0 per 1000 operations for appendectomy (IQR 0-17), and 4.7 per 1000 operations for

185 ollective so far indicates that hybrid NOTES appendectomy is a safe procedure, with advantages for th

186 This is the first study to report that appendectomy is associated with decreased exhaled CH(4).

187 st century, the incidence of appendicitis or appendectomy is high in newly industrialized countries i

188 In-hospital delay to appendectomy is not a risk factor for "complicated" appe

189 uggested that same-day discharge (SDD) after appendectomy is safe and does not result in higher-than-

190 Laparoscopic appendectomy is superior or comparable to open appendect

191 Appendectomy is the most common abdominal operation perf

192 Appendectomy is the treatment of choice for most patient

193 Ambulatory laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for AA has not been yet reported.

194 fter open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) over the last 21 years.

195 all open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) procedures from 2006 to 2008 in adult

196 es (TVAs) to traditional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomies (LAs).

197 SSI had similar times between ED triage and appendectomy (median (interquartile range) 11.5 hours (6

198 ts were enrolled; 65 patients/families chose appendectomy (median age, 12 years; interquartile range

199 Rates of laparoscopy, perforation, negative appendectomy, morbidity, length of stay, and cost.

200 h December 31, 2011, for patients undergoing appendectomy (n = 97,780), colectomy (n = 118,407), hyst

201 e out appendicitis, safely reducing negative appendectomies (NAs); however, some within the surgical

202 Although this does not indicate appendectomy needs to be done emergently, prolonged in-h

203 ss changes in therapy and outcome after open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) ove

204 A 3-year discharge data of all open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) pro

205 lower odds of SSIs in patients treated with appendectomy (odds ratio [OR], 0.52 [95% CI, 0.48-0.58];

206 analysis to examine the effects of delaying appendectomy on surgical site infections.

207 Antibiotics were noninferior to appendectomy on the basis of 30-day EQ-5D scores (mean d

208 ppendicitis, antibiotics were noninferior to appendectomy on the basis of results of a standard healt

209 Patients were randomly assigned to early appendectomy or antibiotic treatment with a 1-year follo

210 mes was performed for 19926 women undergoing appendectomy or cholecystectomy during pregnancy and a s

211 xperience adverse obstetrical outcomes after appendectomy or cholecystectomy during pregnancy.

212 of the utilization measures for laparoscopic appendectomy or cholecystectomy.

213 Same-day discharge after appendectomy or discharge 1 or 2 days after surgery.

214 Urgent appendectomy or nonoperative management entailing at lea

215 were collected prospectively for consecutive appendectomy patients (age > 15 years) at nearly 60 hosp

216 The cohort study compared appendectomies performed by SGSs and GSRs in the general

217 To compare the outcomes of appendectomies performed by SGSs with those performed by

218 incidence of complications and mortality in appendectomies performed by surgeons (S), supervised res

219 erature of reports comparing the outcomes of appendectomies performed by unsupervised general surgery

220 Fowler was a pioneer who refined the appendectomy, performed the first lung decortication, ad

221 spitals participating in the NSQIP-Pediatric Appendectomy Pilot Collaborative (n = 711).

222 ndicitis using data from the NSQIP-Pediatric Appendectomy Pilot Collaborative.

223 rgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric Appendectomy Pilot Database were merged with cost data f

224 ational Surgical Quality Improvement Program appendectomy pilot database, 2429 children younger than

225 Among 1649 appendectomy procedures (mean [SD] patient age, 33.7 [13

226 A total of 40,337 appendectomy procedures performed during 2006 to 2008 in

227 A total of 54,467 appendectomy procedures were included in our analysis.

228 ngle site umbilical laparoscopic approach to appendectomy produces longer operative times resulting i

229 Main outcomes were annual age-sex adjusted appendectomy rates and postoperative risk of readmission

230 Annual age-sex standardized appendectomy rates fell from 87 to 68 per 100,000 popula

231 reinterventions, complications, and negative appendectomy rates than those operated in SPCs.

232 mized controlled trial in acute laparoscopic appendectomy recruited children aged 8 to 14 years to re

233 safe and effective and may avoid unnecessary appendectomy, reducing operation rate, surgical risks, a

234 On multivariate analysis, late appendectomy remained a predictor of complicated disease

235 sterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, appendectomy, resection of pelvic tumor, omentectomy, an

236 and uncomplicated appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy resulted in a greater or comparable clinica

237 LESS and conventional appendectomy resulted in similar perioperative outcomes.

238 However, LESS appendectomy resulted in worst pain scores upon exertion

239 rgical group, all but 1 underwent successful appendectomy, resulting in a success rate of 99.6% (95%

240 To date, tonsillectomy and appendectomy samples have been used in population preval

241 patients with acute appendicitis undergoing appendectomy, SDD is not associated with an increase in

242 Interval appendectomies should be considered in all adult patient

243 Gastrostomy, fundoplication, and appendectomy should be considered high-priority targets

244 rgan space infection (OSI) in children after appendectomy, specifically focusing on the role of opera

245 rtification group for Nissen fundoplication, appendectomy, splenectomy, gastrostomy/jejunostomy, orch

246 antibiotic therapy (AT) and surgical therapy-appendectomy (ST) for uncomplicated appendicitis.

247 In Western countries, the incidence of appendectomy steadily decreased since 1990 (APC after 19

248 ent, with the greatest heterogeneity seen in appendectomy studies.

249 olving 329,976 elderly patients, exposure to appendectomy surgery and anesthesia did not increase the

250 rgent (<=12 hours of admission) laparoscopic appendectomy (surgery group, n = 698).

251 h antibiotics may prevent some patients from appendectomies, surgery represents the definitive, one-t

252 nal appendectomy (TVAE) and the transgastric appendectomy (TGAE) procedures.

253 en ages 68 through 77 years and underwent an appendectomy (the "Appendectomy" treated group), matchin

254 ETs are usually diagnosed accidentally after appendectomy; the indications for right hemicolectomy ar

255 ntra-abdominal infections after laparoscopic appendectomy, this approach has been largely adopted in

256 nts with CT confirmed appendicitis underwent appendectomy to obtain histopathology.

257 Immediate appendectomy to prevent perforation has been challenged

258 versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TPLA).

259 77 years and underwent an appendectomy (the "Appendectomy" treated group), matching them 5:1 to 274,9

260 To examine the association between time to appendectomy (TTA) and risk of complicated appendicitis

261 , and to analyze separately the transvaginal appendectomy (TVAE) and the transgastric appendectomy (T

262 rst cohort study comparing pure transvaginal appendectomies (TVAs) to traditional 3-port laparoscopic

263 between patients who did and did not undergo appendectomy using a multivariable model adjusted for ag

264 ecystectomy, inguinal/femoral hernia repair, appendectomy, ventral hernia repair, and partial colecto

265 6 (95% CI 0.94, 0.98), P < 0.0001, (28.2% in Appendectomy versus 29.1% in controls, at 7.5 years).

266 was 0.89 (0.86, 0.92), P < 0.0001, (7.6% in Appendectomy versus 8.6% in controls, at 7.5 years).

267 cluded in the study, of whom, 91 received an appendectomy via a single umbilical incision and 93 via

268 l characteristics such as community type and appendectomy volume.

269 The overall rate of negative findings at appendectomy was 7.5% (CI, 5.8% to 9.7%) (54 of 716 pati

270 Appendectomy was associated with decreased odds of CH(4)

271 r a 12-hour delay from hospital admission to appendectomy was not associated with an increased risk f

272 Delay to appendectomy was not associated with higher perforation

273 Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed and diagnosed as MAA.

274 An appendectomy was performed at the same time due to a pri

275 Interval appendectomy was performed in 17 patients (4.5%).

276 nical evidence of acute appendicitis, and an appendectomy was performed.

277 An appendectomy was the most commonly performed procedure (

278 A total of 83,679 emergency pediatric appendectomies were performed in 21 SPCs and 183 DGHs in

279 Appendectomies were performed in 57 patients with acute

280 reated at the National Institutes of Health, appendectomies were performed on 31 patients, 2 of whom

281 49 hospitals performing 274405 nonincidental appendectomies were stratified based on safety-net burde

282 bulatory versus inpatient-based laparoscopic appendectomy were comparable (OR 0.63, 95% CI, 0.31-1.26

283 The highest and lowest rates of negative appendectomy were encountered in the second and the thir

284 icitis who would normally have had emergency appendectomy were randomized either to treatment with an

285 perience prolonged in-hospital delays before appendectomy, which are associated with modestly increas

286 is obligatory in every procedure, including appendectomy, while in others it is not.

287 Hence, adoption of the technique for appendectomy will depend on patient preferences and the

288 o nonoperative treatment with antibiotics or appendectomy with 1-year follow-up previously reported.

289 Use of risk-reduction appendectomy with RRBSO in younger BRCA1/2 carriers may

290 rvised surgical residents may safely perform appendectomies, with no difference in postoperative earl

291 ly, practice patterns have shifted to urgent appendectomy, with acceptable in-hospital delays of up t

292 ts (27.3%; 95% CI, 22.0% to 33.2%) underwent appendectomy within 1 year of initial presentation for a

293 of patients in the conservative group needed appendectomy within 1 year, resulting in treatment effec

294 Appendectomy within 16 hours of presentation was conside

295 Data from patients who underwent appendectomy within 24 hours of hospital presentation we

296 children younger than 18 years who underwent appendectomy within 24 hours of presentation at 23 child

297 Delay of appendectomy within 24 hours of presentation was not ass

298 index hospitalization and 12 (5%) underwent appendectomy within 30 days, for a cumulative failure ra

299 or initial non-operative management required appendectomy within 30 days.

300 ents in the nonoperative treatment group had appendectomy within the time of primary antibiotic treat