ライフサイエンスコーパス: appraise

1 atalytic applications are also presented and appraised.

2 tudies, each of which needs to be critically appraised.

3 rapyramidal presentations will be critically appraised.

4 nce for its use has not been comprehensively appraised.

5 are effective on the method efficiency, were appraised.

6 nguages between 1990 and 2009 was critically appraised.

7 iological aging in divers were specified and appraised.

8 ge of device architectures are presented and appraised.

9 and identification of candidate foulants is appraised.

10 e and locus of the threat can be consciously appraised.

11 and mRNA changes has not been systematically appraised.

12 Ts with nonsignificant primary outcomes were appraised.

13 ilt an epidemiological mathematical model to appraise 18 pricing policies, with English data from the

14 dataset of 4 multicenter randomized trials (APPRAISE-2 [Apixaban for Prevention of Acute Ischemic Ev

15 n for Prevention of Acute Ischemic Events 2 (APPRAISE-2), Study of Platelet Inhibition and Patient Ou

16 A total of 385 papers were critically appraised; 53 studies reported on the prevalence and inc

17 Two investigators appraised 6498 abstracts and 648 articles.

18 In this Review, we appraise a decade of advances that define near-term (imm

19 Here, we re-appraise a large-scale meta-analysis of coronary disease

20 gorous methodological criteria to critically appraise a surgical preventative technique for breast ca

21 This review critically appraises a range of models, including genetic mutations

22 Studies were scrutinized and critically appraised according to agreed exclusion and inclusion cr

23 viewers-studies were classified, graded, and appraised according to standardized algorithms and check

24 Mobile technology has been used to appraise allergic rhinitis control, but more data are ne

25 We aimed to develop and critically appraise an approach to doing so, applying it to the sub

26 o be aware of this variability and carefully appraise and select the guidelines that they apply to pa

27 Here we appraise and summarize past and current literature on th

28 To identify, critically appraise and synthesise primary research exploring adole

29 The aim of this study was to appraise and synthesise the evidence for topical applica

30 ct aims to systematically review, critically appraise and synthesise the published evidence in order

31 The purpose of this integrative review is to appraise and synthesize the current literature on barrie

32 This study aimed to appraise and to evaluate the current evidence on minimal

33 udies were screened, data extracted, quality appraised and analysed by two independent reviewers, usi

34 Study findings were critically appraised and analyzed using critical interpretive synth

35 All studies were critically appraised and data were extracted and meta-analyzed usin

36 These QIs were appraised and prioritized by a multidisciplinary panel o

37 multidisciplinary expert panel of 17 experts appraised and prioritized these potential QIs.

38 Risk of bias of included studies was appraised and random-effects model meta-analyses were pe

39 At least 2 independent reviewers critically appraised and rated the quality of studies and used stan

40 The evidence was appraised and recommendations were formulated using the

41 ments, is enacted and contextualised, and is appraised and reconfigured.

42 not know how incoming sensory information is appraised and routed through the CeA to the different ou

43 These three guidelines were appraised and selected for adaptation.

44 The included studies were critically appraised and statistically evaluated.

45 Existing evidence was appraised and summarized, and then salient knowledge gap

46 st and background explanation for critically appraising and extracting data from systematic reviews o

47 activation in prefrontal regions involved in appraising and regulating responses to social signals of

48 ystematic reviews (SRs) aimed to synthesize, appraise, and present all SR evidence on the efficacy an

49 his review aimed to systematically identify, appraise, and synthesize qualitative research evidence o

50 We aimed to identify, appraise, and synthesize the current evidence comparing

51 Two reviewers independently selected, appraised, and extracted articles using predefined field

52 base has not been systematically identified, appraised, and integrated.

53 t questions were posed, related evidence was appraised, and questions were answered with evidence-bas

54 Two investigators abstracted, critically appraised, and synthesized 33 articles that met inclusio

55 studies were extracted into evidence tables, appraised, and synthesized.

56 ht to intercommissural diameter ratio, which appraises annular saddle-shape depth) were measured thro

57 lar maze and the nano-bubble state have been appraised as essentially distinct.

58 Each one was appraised as suitable for inclusion using a published ap

59 We aimed to critically appraise asthma predictive tools which have been validat

60 group of experts was convened to review and appraise available evidence and practice-based opinion,

61 Each study was appraised based on 4 quality indicators adapted from the

62 frequency cholesteric liquid-crystal host to appraise both their compatibility with the host and the

63 iver surgery for CRLMs has been continuously appraised, but R1 risk factors have not been clearly def

64 Study quality was critically appraised by 2 reviewers using established criteria.

65 ibility criteria, data extracted and quality appraised by at least one reviewer and checked by a seco

66 Published clinical studies were appraised by category of evidence and used to document t

67 Adherence to MD was appraised by either the MD Score (MDS) or the Italian Me

68 e FDA and EMA between 2003 and 2013, 53 were appraised by English, French, or Australian HTA agencies

69 s associated with overweight or obesity were appraised by principal component analyses.

70 Each study was appraised by using design-specific quality criteria.

71 od type diets were identified and critically appraised by using the Grading of Recommendations, Asses

72 Quality was appraised by using the Strengthening Reporting of Observ

73 n (MR) is an increasingly important tool for appraising causality in observational epidemiology.

74 ess must have sound statistical knowledge to appraise critically the articles submitted for publicati

75 However, the evidence has not been appraised critically.

76 This review seeks to critically appraise current volatile use in critical care medicine

77 In this Series paper, we appraise currently available and emerging therapies for

78 s subcortical structures critical to rapidly appraise danger.

79 interference (RNAi) in Schistosoma mansoni, appraises delivery systems for transgenesis and stable g

80 fter elaborative encoding, future events are appraised differently and result in a redirected emotion

81 dence that the way psychotic experiences are appraised differs between individuals with and without a

82 tool was used by 2 independent reviewers to appraise each guideline.

83 Two reviewers independently appraised each selected article using a validated, stand

84 mit contributing to its growth by critically appraising each publisher and journal prior to submittin

85 tracted cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs) and appraised economic assessments for their methodological

86 medical education requires rigorous studies appraising educational efficacy.

87 We critically appraise evidence for associations between retina and br

88 Here we appraise evidence for SCIT versus SLIT based on indirect

89 nt of atopic dermatitis (AD)," we critically appraised evidence on systemic treatments for moderate-t

90 highlight the challenges individuals face in appraising evidence quality, particularly that of their

91 iews offer a systematic method to critically appraise existing research and to identify unaddressed c

92 Here, we summarise and critically appraise experimental studies of emotional processing in

93 (n = 4449) were reviewed for eligibility and appraised for evidence levels.

94 ns, and morning BP surge) is then critically appraised for its elements of strength and weakness.

95 elected according to predefined criteria and appraised for methodologic quality using the Assessment

96 Data were appraised for quality and content.

97 wo investigators independently, and data was appraised for quality and content.

98 Data were appraised for quality; reduced through sub-categorizatio

99 The aim of this integrative review is to appraise healthcare professionals' management of childho

100 This review appraises healthcare professionals' perceptions of the v

101 anic and inorganic MV systems are critically appraised here in view of these prerequisites.

102 ticipants undergoing fMRI were instructed to appraise how much they liked a set of products (Like) or

103 ed cytokine effects on outflow facility were appraised in perfused anterior segment organ culture.

104 ficacy of such interactions have rarely been appraised in plants.

105 lgorithms described above were comparatively appraised in terms of both functional cohesion and intra

106 labeled standard (SIL) for normalization was appraised in terms of its potential to improve precision

107 carbon quantum dots (CQDs), are also briefly appraised in view of their special role in special selec

108 The quality of the included studies was appraised independently by 2 authors who used the Effect

109 In this Review, we appraise innovative point-of-care devices that enable th

110 e seismicity is crucial to understanding and appraising intraplate seismic hazard.

111 In this review we critically appraise key studies on NAFLD-associated extrahepatic di

112 This review critically appraises key articles in the field, detailing the spect

113 We systematically identified and appraised meta-analyses of observational studies examini

114 In this critical review, the authors appraise neuroimaging findings in bipolar disorder in em

115 at a cellular level, also points to ways of appraising new therapeutic avenues focused on synaptic i

116 Herein, we appraise novel strategies that exploit the patient's imm

117 Selected studies were critically appraised on 50 study criteria, in accordance with the r

118 We present a biosensing method capable of appraising, on a short time scale and with exquisite sen

119 Population are required to appraise our model.

120 Retrospective medical record review appraising outcomes of 6 consecutive patients with third

121 Then, we present how we appraise PaperBrowser's navigational functionalities in

122 We also appraise potential future therapeutic strategies to limi

123 We provide these tools that appraise protein structures in the form of a web server

124 Citation metrics are increasingly used to appraise published research.

125 irmatory trials, clinicians should carefully appraise published studies and decide whether the result

126 We comprehensively sought and critically appraised published studies of associations between any

127 velopment and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria to appraise quality of evidence.

128 ment, Development and Evaluation criteria to appraise quality of evidence.

129 We used the GRADE criteria to appraise quality of evidence.

130 dently selected studies, extracted data, and appraised quality.

131 this review was to summarize and critically appraise randomized trials in mechanically ventilated pa

132 Therapeutic strategies in the pipeline are appraised, ranging from SMN1 gene replacement to modulat

133 The evidence was appraised, rated, and graded, and recommendations were f

134 kinase A (PKA) versatility inside the cell, appraise recent advances in exploiting AKAPs as platform

135 To critically appraise recent research into associations between perio

136 This review appraises recent articles that discuss the need for nati

137 This review appraises recent developments in the use of OCT for asse

138 to systematically identify, synthesize, and appraise relevant evidence and then to formulate evidenc

139 The authors independently selected and appraised relevant literature.

140 concepts for clinicians to be aware of when appraising research that uses machine learning.

141 reened in duplicate, then extracted data and appraised risk of bias in duplicate with a pre-tested fo

142 y screened the studies, abstracted data, and appraised risk of bias.

143 ss wearing cochlear implants or hearing aids appraise self-esteem.

144 These beers were appraised sensorially to determine the impacts of varyin

145 observing the biosensor's performance whilst appraising several labelled antibody and glass slide con

146 This review appraised speckle-tracking echocardiography in a clinica

147 Here, we critically appraise strategies available to generate imaging biomar

148 ience results from a generalized tendency to appraise stressful circumstances positively.

149 Multiple reviewers appraised studies for inclusion or exclusion using a pri

150 Our multidisciplinary team appraised studies published or presented up to December

151 We appraised studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and m

152 rched MEDLINE and EMBASE (to February 2014), appraised studies, and calculated risk differences and r

153 We critically appraised study quality using a mixed methods appraisal

154 We extracted data, appraised study quality using a published quality assess

155 wo authors independently identified studies, appraised study quality, and extracted data on the patie

156 Two authors independently appraised study quality, extracted relevant data, and re

157 xt papers, extracted data, and independently appraised study quality.

158 gy was used while reviewing publications: 1) appraising study quality, and 2) classifying study findi

159 cant confounding influences (ie, metastases, appraised support, and grief), alliance remained signifi

160 The purpose of this Perspective is to appraise synthetic access to complex peptides, particula

161 Studies were appraised systematically using a bespoke risk of bias (R

162 sed the AGREE II guideline appraisal tool to appraise ten GRC-approved guidelines from nine WHO depar

163 discuss the limitations of present CPGs and appraise the advantages of analog over digital circuits

164 ese new guidelines, and we aim to critically appraise the applicability of the risk assessment tools

165 s study on sarcomas with complex genetics to appraise the association between CINSARC profile, genomi

166 rlying inherited aortopathies and critically appraise the available blood biomarkers, imaging techniq

167 The aim of this study was to appraise the available evidence by systematically review

168 Furthermore, we identify knowledge gaps, appraise the available experimental models and propose f

169 In this review article, we critically appraise the background developments that have led to ou

170 for preventing unwanted effects, critical to appraise the benefit or risk associated with the use of

171 ummarize recent epilepsy-related studies and appraise the clinical and scientific value of EEG/fMRI.

172 eed to be combined across multiple papers to appraise the corpus of scientists, institutions, journal

173 studies on genome evolution, or as a tool to appraise the cost of whole-genome sequencing programs.

174 Finally, we appraise the costs and benefits of regulation at the tra

175 draws together a wide range of expertise to appraise the current global situation and to identify pr

176 In this Review, we appraise the current knowledge of blood pressure genomic

177 To critically appraise the current literature on the benefits of lymph

178 iew of the current state of cancer genomics, appraise the current portals and tools for accessing and

179 Herein, the authors critically appraise the current state of data and offer potential f

180 To report and critically appraise the current state of managing chronic (and suba

181 hip, to understand, interpret and critically appraise the design and risk of bias for a planned clini

182 al of this consensus report is to critically appraise the evidence and to subsequently present interp

183 l of this consensus report was to critically appraise the evidence for the available approaches for p

184 The aim of this study was to appraise the evidence for the currently available preser

185 This review aims to appraise the evidence for tight glycaemic control in pat

186 In this Review, we summarize and critically appraise the evidence linking various types of ICR to ad

187 unds are implemented in critical care and to appraise the evidence on outcomes for patients, family m

188 The aim of this review was to critically appraise the evidence on the impact of periodontal treat

189 ific goals of this Research Statement are to appraise the evidence regarding whether long-term advers

190 erest, or fail to employ rigorous methods to appraise the evidence.

191 The aim of this study was to systematically appraise the existing literature on the yet-unclear heri

192 In this Review we appraise the existing literature on Wolman's disease and

193 We will then critically appraise the existing literature, and discuss suggestion

194 erably.In this review, we seek to critically appraise the literature and evaluate the levels of evide

195 PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The review will appraise the literature concerning ABL kinase domain mut

196 To critically appraise the literature related to the pathophysiology o

197 ols with which to ask a question, search and appraise the literature, and then apply best current evi

198 In this Seminar we critically appraise the management of Hodgkin's lymphoma in early-s

199 Here we critically appraise the most promising preclinical developments, pl

200 iterature review was performed to critically appraise the ocular safety and efficacy of aqueous chlor

201 pletely ICU interprofessional rounding teams appraise the patient data set that informs clinical deci

202 offspring, these data emphasize the need to appraise the potential ecotoxicological consequences of

203 study (MR-pheWAS) approach to systematically appraise the potential functions of SHBG while reducing

204 The aim of this study was to appraise the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disea

205 hip, to understand, interpret and critically appraise the quality of clinical trial design and risk o

206 lopment and Evaluation) approach was used to appraise the quality of evidence and rate the strength o

207 , and to ensure that surgeons can critically appraise the quality of published clinical decision mode

208 raisal Program (CASP) was used to critically appraise the quality of sixteen selected quantitative an

209 The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to appraise the quality of the studies.

210 Appraise the rates of success, outcomes used, statistica

211 To appraise the recent literature dealing with important ad

212 also developed a robustness score to further appraise the robustness of the evidence supporting each

213 Here we appraise the role of adult hippocampal neurogenesis in m

214 They critically appraise the scientific background of the instantaneous

215 The authors appraise the study generating this interest and highligh

216 helminth therapy for allergy and critically appraise the trials already completed.

217 Two reviewers independently appraised the articles and extracted relevant study data

218 eviously travelled almost exclusively by car appraised the busway positively and perceived it to be a

219 The methodologists appraised the certainty in the evidence (i.e., the quali

220 We appraised the current status of proteomic investigations

221 The writing group appraised the evidence behind AHA's policies to determin

222 rature review, developed evidence summaries, appraised the evidence, and updated recommendations on t

223 We appraised the feasibility of perfusion reserve estimatio

224 We critically appraised the literature and conducted meta-analyses to

225 One reviewer appraised the methodological quality of the included rev

226 Three authors independently appraised the methodological quality of the included stu

227 g this action has not been identified, we re-appraised the potential interaction of UAG with GHS-R in

228 h, we systematically reviewed and critically appraised the published literature according to QUADAS,

229 istics, outcomes, assessed risk of bias, and appraised the quality of evidence using the Grading of R

230 endently screened papers for eligibility and appraised the quality of included studies.

231 August 2013 to July 2014 and systematically appraised the quality of reporting and potential bias of

232 Two independent reviewers appraised the quality of the selected reviews using AMST

233 Two independent reviewers appraised the quality of the selected reviews using AMST

234 Three reviewers appraised the quality of the selected studies.

235 We did an umbrella review and systematically appraised the relevant meta-analyses of observational st

236 Two independent reviewers appraised the studies and extracted the estimates of int

237 Two independent reviewers appraised the studies and qualified the risk of bias usi

238 Two reviewers appraised the studies using appropriate tools.

239 Two reviewers critically appraised the studies using the appropriate tools.

240 This review critically appraises the advances of machine learning related to th

241 atically collates, summarizes and critically appraises the available evidence.

242 This review critically appraises the current clinical evidence regarding glutam

243 This review appraises the current literature to define the clinical

244 This review appraises the current methods of measurement of osteoart

245 This review appraises the evidence from studies that have employed t

246 This report critically appraises the guideline and provides our view of what wa

247 This review critically appraises the preclinical published data with regard to

248 during enteral nutrition and then critically appraises the recent and emerging evidence for the preve

249 This essay, which appraises the scientific and philosophical contributions

250 Because the rACC has been implicated in appraising the affective and motivational significance o

251 performed for each question, which included appraising the certainty in the evidence (i.e., the qual

252 blishes the basis for further work aiming at appraising the dynamics between size and stochasticity i

253 essment (LCA) is a reference methodology for appraising the environmental impacts of products along t

254 By systematically appraising the evidence and providing transparent recomm

255 apy against respiratory distress syndrome by appraising the evidence produced from published trials a

256 pes and their microflora could contribute to appraising the impact that modified landscapes have on r

257 ptile using the most up-to-date IPCC models, appraising the impacts of temperature and SLR, integrate

258 This article focuses on appraising the literature and applying retrieved results

259 the foundation for future functional studies appraising the role of the murine BNST RXFP3 system in m

260 re, we review the oral mycobiome, critically appraising the significance of such large fungal diversi

261 Secondary outcomes were (1) appraising the utility of adjustable positioning, (2) de

262 sked to report on their emotional states and appraise their feelings throughout the experiment, where

263 rent clinical practice guidelines worldwide, appraise their methodological quality, and discuss varia

264 efine our current understanding of mtROS and appraise their potential influence on cellular function

265 The clinical group also appraised their psychotic experiences as being more nega

266 r the site-specific construction of ADCs and appraises their merits and disadvantages.

267 ve acquired complex signalling mechanisms to appraise themselves of the environmental milieu in the o

268 ribute to the requirements of the regulators appraising these devices.

269 ifficult threat-safety discriminations while appraising threat and explicit memory of the CS+.

270 n in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex when appraising threat, whereas anxious adolescents exhibited

271 heir healthy counterparts, specifically when appraising threat.

272 nimally processed cilantro leaves (MPCL) was appraised through analysis of their sensory attributes,

273 While an expert can qualitatively appraise tissues, these challenges leave researchers wit

274 Trials were independently critically appraised to include only good- or fair-quality trials;

275 opulation surveys across countries is key to appraising trends in population health.

276 als from a patient selection perspective and appraise trial patient selection methodologies in relati

277 the Cochrane Neonatal Group to identify and appraise trials and extract and synthesise data.

278 f risk of performance bias is important when appraising trials investigating an interventional techni

279 e included references (n=42) were critically appraised using a modified version of Downs and Black ch

280 Full text articles were systematically appraised using a standardised data extraction instrumen

281 Methodologic quality of each study was appraised using adapted criteria for systematic reviews

282 s were independently screened and critically appraised using established instruments.

283 histological parameters and probe type were appraised using multivariable analysis.

284 Methodological quality was appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research

285 Selected articles were appraised using the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination

286 Studies were appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme

287 The evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessme

288 Quality of evidence was critically appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessme

289 Quality of included studies appraised using the QUADAS-2 tool.

290 Studies were critically appraised using the quality assessment tool for quantita

291 vention of Acute Ischemic and Safety Events (APPRAISE) was a phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlle

292 After consensus was appraised, we drafted the manuscript in sections during

293 ting challenges that have been overcome, and appraise what has and has not been learned.

294 are attractive alternatives; however, can we appraise whether an experimental result is particular to

295 prevention of cardiovascular disease and to appraise whether the new evidence is likely to enable th

296 The purpose of this review is to appraise which interventions for children with intellect

297 efine the value of oncology treatments, were appraised with a focus on their methods and definition o

298 Selected studies were critically appraised with a modified CASP tool.

299 y for wait-listed patients in both eras were appraised with competing outcomes analysis.

300 o develop controlled release therapeutics is appraised, with commentary on current success/failures i