コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 rogressive nonfluent aphasia and progressive apraxia.
2 in motion perception and its relationship to apraxia.
3 al and temporal features of movement in limb apraxia.
4 ming and response implementation deficits in apraxia.
5 rom neuropsychological studies of upper limb apraxia.
6 -use difficulties experienced by people with apraxia.
7 profound ataxia, camptocormia and oculomotor apraxia.
8 erentiated from bvFTD, svPPA and SCI by limb apraxia.
9 t may also be impaired in some patients with apraxia.
10 l as asymmetrical limb-kinetic and ideomotor apraxia.
11 both asymmetrical limb-kinetic and ideomotor apraxia.
12 specific deficits in patients suffering from apraxia.
13 hat they shed light on the human syndrome of apraxia.
14 enable us to advance traditional accounts of apraxia.
15 Daily Living Scale as well as recovery from apraxia.
16 s underlying right-hemisphere constructional apraxia.
17 sorders, particularly ataxia with oculomotor apraxia 1 (AOA1) and spinocerebellar ataxia with axonal
19 ical disease known as ataxia with oculomotor apraxia 1 is caused by mutations in the APTX gene that e
20 europathological diseases: ataxia oculomotor apraxia 1, spinocerebellar ataxia with neuronal neuropat
25 degenerative disorder ataxia with oculomotor apraxia 2 (AOA-2) is caused by defects in senataxin, a p
26 degenerative diseases ataxia with oculomotor apraxia 2 (AOA2) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 4 (AL
28 rological disorders: AOA2 (ataxia oculomotor apraxia 2) and ALS4 (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 4).
29 f mutated, results in ataxia with oculomotor apraxia 4 (AOA4) and microcephaly with early-onset seizu
30 Z) to neurodegeneration in ataxia oculomotor apraxia-4 (AOA4) and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT2B2
31 ered symptoms; whereas, syndromes 4 ("phobia-apraxia"), 5 ("fever-adenopathy"), and 6 ("weakness-inco
32 cessing deficits constitute a key symptom of apraxia, a disorder of motor cognition frequently observ
33 utants are reminiscent of human ocular motor apraxia, a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by
36 phere-damaged patients with and without limb apraxia and a normal control group to examine preprogram
38 ure suggests that the presence or absence of apraxia and associated parietal deficits may be clinical
40 eral presentation, clumsy useless limb, limb apraxia and myoclonus, four had cortical sensory impairm
45 ling, extended lifespan, and rescued ataxia, apraxia, and social abnormalities but did not rescue tre
49 The clinical features of interest were: limb apraxia, apraxia of speech (AOS), and left parietal symp
50 The volitional impairments of alien limb and apraxia are a defining feature of the corticobasal syndr
52 XRCC1 gene are associated with ocular motor apraxia, axonal neuropathy, and progressive cerebellar a
53 motor articulatory planning deficit (speech apraxia) combined with a variable degree of agrammatism.
54 on, characterized by asymmetric rigidity and apraxia, cortical sensory deficits, dystonia and myoclon
59 cerebellar dysfunction, oromotor/oculomotor apraxia, emotional lability and mutism in patients after
60 ations associated with ataxia and oculomotor apraxia encode proteins with huge losses in protein stab
61 Q, associated with ataxia but not oculomotor apraxia, encodes a protein with a mild defect in stabili
62 ith congruent tools in individuals with limb apraxia following left hemisphere stroke (LCVA), a disor
68 rlapping cognitive symptoms, and measures of apraxia, in particular, appear to be a promising discrim
69 rain and cerebellar malformation, oculomotor apraxia, irregular breathing, developmental delay, and a
71 This finding suggests that ideomotor limb apraxia is associated with disruption of the neural repr
72 bellar vermis, ataxia, hypotonia, oculomotor apraxia, neonatal breathing abnormalities, and mental re
76 yndrome primarily defined by the presence of apraxia of speech (AoS) and/or expressive agrammatism.
77 cal features of interest were: limb apraxia, apraxia of speech (AOS), and left parietal symptoms of d
81 It is debated whether primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS) and progressive agrammatic aph
82 hildren presented with features of childhood apraxia of speech (the same speech disorder associated w
83 When compared to the patients with mixed apraxia of speech and agrammatism, the patients with pro
87 patterns emerged: (1) NFPA, characterized by apraxia of speech and deficits in processing complex syn
88 rtant papers pertaining to acquired aphasia, apraxia of speech and dysarthria with special attention
89 is approach, we found no association between apraxia of speech and lesions of the left insula, anteri
91 help define the pathobiology of progressive apraxia of speech and may have consequences for developm
92 ove our understanding of primary progressive apraxia of speech and provide some important prognostic
93 r in which patients present with an isolated apraxia of speech and show focal degeneration of superio
94 bility, we examined the relationship between apraxia of speech and the insula in three unique ways: (
95 e aim of this study was to determine whether apraxia of speech can present as an isolated sign of neu
96 A syndrome characterized by progressive pure apraxia of speech clearly exists, with a neuroanatomic c
97 Others have confirmed that patients with apraxia of speech commonly have damage to the anterior i
102 nt studies have established that progressive apraxia of speech is not a homogenous disease but rather
103 gopaenic progressive aphasia and progressive apraxia of speech may be seen as points in a space of co
108 Thirteen subjects with primary progressive apraxia of speech underwent two serial comprehensive cli
110 n patients with and without insular lesions, apraxia of speech was associated with structural damage
112 that some subjects with primary progressive apraxia of speech will rapidly evolve and develop a deva
113 Twelve subjects were identified as having apraxia of speech without any signs of aphasia based on
114 rate clinical entities: 'primary progressive apraxia of speech' when AoS occurs in the absence of exp
115 a of damage in chronic stroke patients with 'apraxia of speech', a disorder of motor planning and pro
116 related individuals diagnosed with childhood apraxia of speech, a rare disorder enriched for causativ
117 ent in the subjects with primary progressive apraxia of speech, but there was individual variability.
118 rain injury can lead to a condition known as apraxia of speech, in which patients are impaired in the
119 SP) can sometimes present with a progressive apraxia of speech, nonfluent aphasia, or a combination o
120 with CBD and PSP present with a progressive apraxia of speech, nonfluent aphasia, or a combination o
122 temporal dementia, corticobasal syndrome and apraxia of speech, there is greater cortical pathology t
124 t present with agrammatism in the absence of apraxia of speech, which we will refer to as progressive
132 fixations, presumably due to constructional apraxia patients' damage to the right-hemisphere regions
134 elopmental delay, typical facies, oculomotor apraxia, polydactyly, and subtle posterior fossa abnorma
135 d ubiquitinated inclusions, parkinsonism and apraxia predicted corticobasal pathology, and nonfluent
136 ,000 population), and ataxia with oculomotor apraxia (prevalence, 0.4 per 100,000 population) were th
137 ith speech may reflect motor coordination or apraxia, problems with processing language may reflect a
143 a coherent interpretation of the results of apraxia studies remains hampered by the lack of a standa
145 e gyrus may play a role in the mutism/speech apraxia syndrome seen with cyclosporine/tacrolimus neuro
147 iabilities and correlations between the BCoS apraxia tasks and counterpart tests from the literature.
148 dity and functional predictive values of the apraxia tests in the Birmingham Cognitive Screen (BCoS)
149 elopment with mild epilepsy and speech delay/apraxia to severe developmental and epileptic encephalop
151 ent cell lines, human Ataxia with Oculomotor Apraxia Type 1 (AOA1) and DT40 chicken B cell, we found
152 Telangiectasia (A-T) and Ataxia with Ocular Apraxia Type 1 (AOA1) are devastating neurological disor
155 he recessive disorder ataxia with oculomotor apraxia type 2 (AOA2) and a dominant juvenile form of am
156 generative disorders: ataxia with oculomotor apraxia type 2 (AOA2) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
157 h's ataxia (FRDA) and ataxia with oculomotor apraxia type 2 (AOA2) are the two most frequent forms of
159 d cells from patients with ataxia oculomotor apraxia type 2 (ref. (9)) and in BRCA1-mutated cancer ce
160 in the neurological disorders ataxia-ocular apraxia type 2 and juvenile amyotrophic lateral sclerosi
161 axia: 0.55 points/yr, ataxia with oculomotor apraxia type 2: 1.14 points/yr, POLG-ataxia: 1.56 points
162 P leads to late-onset ataxia with oculomotor apraxia type 4 (AOA4) in humans and embryonic lethality
164 f these remapping deficits in constructional apraxia was confirmed through a highly significant corre
168 misphere stroke patients with constructional apraxia were compared to patients without constructional
170 pansion carriers, nonfluent aphasia and limb apraxia were significantly more common in GRN mutation c
171 rrelated with the severity of alien limb and apraxia, which we suggest share a core deficit in motor
172 by progressive asymmetric limb rigidity and apraxia with dystonia, myoclonus, cortical sensory loss