戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 and mediate the segregation of bacterial and archaeal DNA.
2                                The conserved archaeal DNA binding protein Alba (formerly Sso10b) inte
3 a collection of representative bacterial and archaeal DNA-binding proteins that introduce distinct DN
4                                 As the first archaeal DNA-binding proteins with clearly defined speci
5  that are among the most widely disseminated archaeal DNA-binding proteins, has been shown to activat
6                                              Archaeal DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit E" is shown
7 m, we describe the first genetic analysis of archaeal DNA ligase function.
8                                          All archaeal DNA ligases characterized to date have ATP-depe
9                 We have learnt that although archaeal DNA metabolic processes (replication, recombina
10 e, we report the genetic modification of the archaeal DNA polymerase 9 degrees N in which two biotiny
11  latest example of a split hyperthermophilic archaeal DNA polymerase further illustrates the modular
12 erved domain, found in the small subunits of archaeal DNA polymerase II and eukaryotic DNA polymerase
13 nt amino acids are also conserved across the archaeal DNA polymerase II DP1 protein family.
14  phospho-esterase activity are intact in the archaeal DNA polymerase subunits, but are disrupted in t
15  nascent-strand, steric control 'gate' in an archaeal DNA polymerase.
16 overhangs, are extended using a thermostable archaeal DNA polymerase.
17 P, and acyNTP selection by hyperthermophilic archaeal DNA polymerases to rationalize structural and f
18  in DNA can lead to inhibition of the PCR by archaeal DNA polymerases, an important consideration for
19 icing elements (inteins) are present in many archaeal DNA polymerases, but only the DNA polymerase fr
20 which is missing for all naturally occurring archaeal DNA polymerases, provides a framework for engin
21 higher efficiencies than Taq, Pfu, and other archaeal DNA polymerases.
22 avenge deoxyuridine nucleotides that inhibit archaeal DNA polymerases.
23 f P410 and A485 to ddNTP/dNTP selectivity in archaeal DNA polymerases.
24 imit the efficiency of PCRs carried out with archaeal DNA polymerases.
25 etal mechanism and a fold similar to that of archaeal DNA primase.
26 rt on the biochemical characterisation of an archaeal DNA primase.
27 meric structure and greater similarity to an archaeal DNA protection in starved cells (DPS)-like prot
28                                              Archaeal DNA repair pathways are not well defined; in pa
29             FANCM is a human ortholog of the archaeal DNA repair protein Hef, and it contains a DEAH
30  studies of the proteins that participate in archaeal DNA replication and repair have increased our u
31  of these observations for the initiation of archaeal DNA replication are discussed.
32 hat the process and the proteins involved in archaeal DNA replication are more similar to those in eu
33 al characterization of the association of an archaeal DNA replication initiator with its origin.
34 elements required for in vivo function of an archaeal DNA replication origin.
35 rformed on the structure and function of the archaeal DNA replication origins, the proteins that defi
36 bacterial-like DnaG primase participating in archaeal DNA replication, we have detected an interactio
37 lable, there has been a burst of research on archaeal DNA replication.
38 ome Reviews, a new database of bacterial and archaeal DNA sequences in which annotation has been upgr
39 in Arabidopsis requires a plant homologue of archaeal DNA topoisomerase (topo) VI.
40 o11 protein is a eukaryotic homologue of the archaeal DNA topoisomerase VIA subunit (topo VIA).
41 ng the genomes of Archaea, the mechanisms of archaeal DNA transport have remained a puzzling and unde
42 the first time to our knowledge described an archaeal DNA transporter.