ライフサイエンスコーパス: arterial graft

1 or foreign-body reaction, such as synthetic arterial graft.

2 er than 10% of cases receiving more than one arterial graft.

3 w be treated by endovascular placement of an arterial graft.

4 ement, and particularly when using composite arterial grafts.

5 Only 14 patients (21%) had received previous arterial grafts.

6 ingle-graft procedure, and cases without any arterial grafts.

7 /-0.9 vs 3.3+/-0.9; P<0.001), but more total arterial grafting (45.9% vs 8.4%; P<0.001).

8 matched patients (2-arterial graft: 5346; 3-arterial graft: 4941) were selected for final comparison

9 dies reporting on 10 287 matched patients (2-arterial graft: 5346; 3-arterial graft: 4941) were selec

10 atient was 3.27 +/- 0.93, with 2.76 +/- 0.97 arterial grafts; a mean of 1.53 +/- 0.68 grafts were per

11 ong-term mortality risk compared with single arterial grafting across the spectrum of preoperative le

12 Multiple arterial grafting [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.66, 95%

13 ts may result in longer survival than single arterial grafts after coronary-artery bypass grafting (C

14 terogeneity and worse clinical outcomes than arterial grafts (AGs), we examined oxidative stress and

15 in all-cause mortality compared with single arterial grafting among patients with a normal left vent

16 Five year arterial graft and patient survival for patients who hav

17 e number of myocardial territories receiving arterial grafts and survival (Ptrend = 0.003).

18 nt died of an infected pseudoaneurysm of the arterial graft, and the pediatric patient required repea

19 d admission, number of bypass grafts, use of arterial graft, and year of surgery.

20 consider lowering their threshold for using arterial grafts, and the radial artery may be the prefer

21 (n=3), ACR with severe infection (n=1), and arterial graft aneurysm (n=1).

22 Arterial grafts are prone to vasospasm subsequent to sur

23 In contrast, arterial grafts are relatively resistant to these proces

24 Arterial grafts are thought to be better conduits than s

25 ost-CABG risk factor reduction and extensive arterial grafting at primary operation should decrease c

26 ow a survival benefit from a third or fourth arterial graft, but we believe that complete arterial re

27 roved survival in patients undergoing single arterial graft CABG (SAG-CABG).

28 Multiple arterial grafting confers superior long-term outcomes in

29 ary surgery practice continues to use single arterial grafting, consideration to alter grafting strat

30 on at the time of LTx, and use of infrarenal arterial graft contribute to development of PTAP in chil

31 The use of off-pump surgery and multiple arterial grafting did not modify the difference between

32 Although placement of at least 1 arterial graft during coronary artery bypass grafting (C

33 he thrombus, first to the venous then to the arterial graft end.

34 he radial artery is often used as the second arterial graft for coronary artery bypass grafting.

35 Arterial grafts for CABG have been used increasingly, an

36 All patients required interposition arterial grafts from the aorta and hepatojejunostomy for

37 Uncertainty exists over whether multiple arterial grafting has a sex-related association with sur

38 rvational and randomized evidence shows that arterial grafts have better patency rates than saphenous

39 A large randomized trial testing the arterial grafts hypothesis (ROMA [Randomized Comparison

40 data for the long-term outcomes of multiple arterial grafting in terms of patient selection, conduit

41 using multiple arterial grafting vs. single arterial grafting in women and men undergoing coronary a

42 superior outcomes compared with the use of 2 arterial grafts in patients undergoing coronary artery b

43 VG) was traditionally the most-used conduit, arterial grafts (including the left and right internal t

44 Patients were stratified by number of arterial grafts into the LIMA plus saphenous veins (LIMA

45 nal studies suggest that the use of multiple arterial grafts is associated with longer postoperative

46 e Clinical Outcome of Single Versus Multiple Arterial Grafts]) is underway and will report the result

47 the long-term survival advantage of multiple arterial grafting (MAG) vs the standard use of left inte

48 To evaluate the impact of multiple arterial grafting (MAG) vs. single arterial grafting (SA

49 de practice variation in the use of multiple arterial grafts (MAGs) versus single arterial grafts (SA

50 Multiple arterial grafts may result in longer survival than singl

51 benefit of long-term patency associated with arterial grafts, minimal morbidity and mortality associa

52 Compared to single arterial grafting, multiple arterial revascularization i

53 re detected and included complete or partial arterial graft occlusion, stenosis of the arterial Y-gra

54 ith LIMA to left anterior descending artery, arterial grafting of the non-left anterior descending ve

55 f CABG with particular reference to multiple arterial grafts, off-pump and less invasive CABG, graft

56 Multiple arterial grafting or LITA+SVG.

57 Left and right internal thoracic artery (arterial) graft patency has been shown to be superior to

58 verage grafts per patient were 3.8, with 2.4 arterial grafts per patient.

59 Increasing extent of arterial grafting performed at primary operation decreas

60 The use of composite arterial grafts performed on the beating heart may be th

61 female patients and 29 711 (54.7%) multiple arterial grafting procedures.

62 vascularization (UR), using an interposition arterial graft procured from the cadaveric liver donor,

63 ies are needed to determine whether multiple arterial grafts provide better outcomes than a single in

64 Little evidence shows whether a third arterial graft provides superior outcomes compared with

65 s and in the analysis based on the number of arterial grafts received.

66 ntation survived, including 14 controls with arterial grafts receiving no PBMC.

67 Multiple arterial grafting remains poorly utilized, with fewer th

68 ffer an effective rescue option when regular arterial graft revascularization is not feasible.

69 multiple arterial grafting (MAG) vs. single arterial grafting (SAG) in a post hoc analysis of 10-yea

70 afting (CABG) using multiple (MAG) or single arterial grafting (SAG).

71 ultiple arterial grafts (MAGs) versus single arterial grafts (SAGs) for patients with multivessel dis

72 Patients underwent either multiple or single arterial grafting, stratified by their preoperative left

73 ater propensity for intimal hyperplasia than arterial grafts; the human radial artery behaves similar

74 bypass because of the relative resistance of arterial grafts to atherosclerosis compared with autogen

75 he well-documented increased patency rate of arterial grafts translates into clinical benefits in the

76 of transplant arteriosclerosis (TA) in human arterial grafts transplanted into immunodeficient BALB/c

77 dothelial cells control the vascular tone of arterial grafts used for coronary artery bypass surgery

78 are the long-term survival of using multiple arterial grafting vs. single arterial grafting in women

79 ly, however, the positive effect of a second arterial graft was confirmed.

80 Multiple arterial grafting was not associated with increased morb

81 The use of 3 arterial grafts was associated with statistically signif

82 The use of 3 arterial grafts was not statistically associated with ea

83 grafting with the use of 2-arterial versus 3-arterial grafts was performed.

84 e the feasibility of transgene expression in arterial grafts, we performed such permeabilization-assi

85 e survival benefits associated with multiple arterial grafting were consistent across all sex-stratif

86 use in California is low and declining, but arterial grafts were associated with significantly lower

87 In 7 patients, pulmonary arterial grafts were used; in 3 patients, monocusp pulmo

88 d-term patency rates between vein grafts and arterial grafts when veins are used as a composite graft

89 s in a patient who demonstrated infra-aortic arterial graft, which clotted by the gravid uterus durin

90 roved clinical outcomes compared with single arterial grafting with supplementary saphenous vein graf