戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 al ligaments were slightly better seen on MR arthrograms.
2  inconclusive findings on radiographs and CT arthrograms.
3              The high frequency of SAF on MR arthrograms (10.5%), the absence of subchondral reaction
4 s indicate that initial and reconstructed MR arthrograms along and perpendicular to the ligament axes
5 ated further on initial and reconstructed MR arthrograms along and perpendicular to their axes.
6 luation of both initial and reconstructed MR arthrograms and confirmed with pathologic correlation.
7 edic surgeon and three radiologists reviewed arthrograms and in consensus classified glenohumeral joi
8  were compared with standard arthrograms, MR arthrograms, and anatomic slices by consensus reading of
9 hich was filled with contrast material on MR arthrograms, and type 2, which was filled with cartilage
10                              Criterion on MR arthrograms for a retear was abnormal tracking of an int
11 or radiologists reviewed 1002 consecutive MR arthrograms for the presence of an accessory bony fossa
12                                       The MR arthrograms in 80 patients who underwent arthroscopy and
13    These results were compared with standard arthrograms, MR arthrograms, and anatomic slices by cons
14                                 Forty-two MR arthrograms obtained in 40 patients with clinical femoro
15                   One hundred consecutive MR arthrograms obtained in patients who had previous knee s
16                                           MR arthrograms of 80 consecutive patients (mean age, 34.2 y
17                                           MR arthrograms showing SAF were evaluated for subchondral r
18          Fifty-five (78%) of the 70 clinical arthrograms unequivocally demonstrated the radioscaphoca
19                                    In 326 MR arthrograms we investigated the incidence of LHB anatomi
20                Conventional MR images and MR arthrograms were evaluated, with differences in interpre
21                                           MR arthrograms were independently scored by three observers
22                                        Eight arthrograms were obtained with intraarticular administra
23                                           MR arthrograms were rated superior to standard MR images in
24                      Paired MR images and MR arthrograms were rated with a three-point scale.
25     Seventy contrast material-enhanced wrist arthrograms were retrospectively reviewed for visualizat
26 review board approval, 67 consecutive hip MR arthrograms were retrospectively reviewed independently
27 MR images and six indirect and six direct MR arthrograms were retrospectively reviewed with consensus
28                              Bilateral wrist arthrograms were reviewed for 30 consecutive patients wi