ライフサイエンスコーパス: arthroscopy

1 tor cuff repair, wrist arthroscopy, or ankle arthroscopy.

2 ery, and potential reluctance to undergo hip arthroscopy.

3 ohort of 255 patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy.

4 Each articular surface was then evaluated at arthroscopy.

5 There were 28 pulley lesions noted at arthroscopy.

6 ge defect was seen at the site of the SAF at arthroscopy.

7 degeneration scores (0-4 scale) assigned at arthroscopy.

8 ients had been evaluated with MR imaging and arthroscopy.

9 54 articular cartilage defects identified at arthroscopy.

10 8 articular surfaces that appeared normal at arthroscopy.

11 face of the tibiofemoral joint was graded at arthroscopy.

12 of their knee performed immediately prior to arthroscopy.

13 and had undergone total joint replacement or arthroscopy.

14 and compared the results with those of wrist arthroscopy.

15 triquetral ligament tears were identified at arthroscopy.

16 of these 100 patients underwent second-look arthroscopy.

17 = 20) or an anterior labral tear (n = 38) at arthroscopy.

18 ith a sublabral foramen or Buford complex at arthroscopy.

19 were correlated with results from subsequent arthroscopy.

20 s who underwent both MR imaging and shoulder arthroscopy.

21 m laterally without meniscocapsular tears at arthroscopy.

22 3D FLASH sequence and subsequently underwent arthroscopy.

23 me visible with structural MRI sequences and arthroscopy.

24 ing of gross changes in the unstable knee at arthroscopy 16 weeks after cruciate ligament transection

25 5% CI 0.5-5.2], p=0.0186; mean difference vs arthroscopy 4.2 [1.8-6.6], p=0.0014) but these differenc

26 years 16; 24 men) in the 3.0-T arm underwent arthroscopy a mean of 45 days 31 and 45 days 22 after MR

27 rcondylar notch, in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy (ACL injury) or arthroplasty (late-stage pri

28 , 13-74 years; mean, 38 years) who underwent arthroscopy after MR imaging, knee MR images that showed

29 A-compliant study, 21 patients who underwent arthroscopy and 24 patients who did not, all of whom wer

30 patients with a type 2, 3, or 4 SLAP tear at arthroscopy and 31 age-matched control patients with an

31 e, by comparing US findings with findings of arthroscopy and clinical examination.

32 MR arthrograms in 80 patients who underwent arthroscopy and MR arthrography during a 54-month period

33 ients; age range, 13-57 years) who underwent arthroscopy and MR imaging within 4 weeks of surgery wer

34 management of elderly outpatients undergoing arthroscopy and other procedures, reconsideration of the

35 th PsA (median duration 18 months) underwent arthroscopy and synovial biopsy of an inflamed knee befo

36 g hospitals (ie, <10), particularly for knee arthroscopy and vertebroplasty, with higher numerical ra

37 90 patients assigned to decompression, 94 to arthroscopy, and 90 to no treatment.

38 e subjects completing preoperative 3.0T MRI, arthroscopy, and intraoperative OCT comprised the study

39 of patients with ACL injury was assessed at arthroscopy, and the knee function of patients with prim

40 Nineteen patients underwent arthroscopy, and the peripheral capsular attachment, deg

41 ial, which included patients undergoing knee arthroscopy, and the POT-CAST trial, which included pati

42 challenging and surgical indications for hip arthroscopy are still evolving.

43 the knee with a reference standard, such as arthroscopy, arthrotomy, or magnetic resonance imaging.

44 We included studies that used arthroscopy as the gold standard for measuring the accur

45 With the use of arthroscopy as the gold standard, US had a higher sensit

46 By using arthroscopy as the reference standard, the sensitivity a

47 By using arthroscopy as the reference standard, the sensitivity a

48 By using arthroscopy as the reference standard, the sensitivity,

49 g cartilage lesions were determined by using arthroscopy as the reference standard.

50 iewed to identify patients who underwent hip arthroscopy between January 2017 and May 2023.

51 ted DL super-resolution 3-T shoulder MRI and arthroscopy between March and November 2023 were include

52 diagnostic journeys of patients prior to hip arthroscopy by analyzing recurring hip-related hospital

53 in MR imaging being preferred to diagnostic arthroscopy by most leading orthopedic surgeons.

54 All articular surfaces were graded at arthroscopy by using the Noyes classification system.

55 s (joint injection, aspiration, lithotripsy; arthroscopy, carpal tunnel; or cataract; 2.02 million) i

56 This can be helpful during elbow arthroscopy; clinical validation is yet to be performed.

57 In contrast, FLS from arthroscopy controls lack adhesive or T cell growth-prom

58 er with superficial fibrillation observed at arthroscopy demonstrated marked spatial heterogeneity an

59 adout for early stage OA in combination with arthroscopy devices.

60 At the time of arthroscopy, each articular cartilage lesion was graded

61 ly 30 of the 81 provinces of Turkiye had hip arthroscopy entries (37.0%).

62 Patients undergoing arthroscopy for degenerative meniscal tears were recruit

63 injections as alternative treatments to knee arthroscopy for osteoarthritis of the knee.

64 controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopy for osteoarthritis of the knee.

65 Elbow arthroscopy has been especially helpful in the managemen

66 Ankle arthroscopy has been especially helpful with soft tissue

67 Wrist arthroscopy has provided novel approaches to ligament te

68 R arthrography were compared with those from arthroscopy in four hip joints with SAF type 1 and 13 wi

69 lecular-weight heparin (for the 8 days after arthroscopy in the POT-KAST trial or during the full per

70 10 (45%) and enabled confirmation of SLI via arthroscopy in three (14%).

71 s (median of 2) in the 2 years preceding hip arthroscopy in Turkiye.

72 ion, and the absence of cartilage defects at arthroscopy indicate that the SAF of the acetabulum like

73 Although arthroscopy is considered the standard of reference for

74 Hip arthroscopy is permitting novel, minimally invasive appr

75 evaluated in 31 patients who underwent wrist arthroscopy less than 6 months after MR imaging.

76 (decompression mean 32.7 points [SD 11.6] vs arthroscopy mean 34.2 points [9.2]; mean difference -1.3

77 f total MMEs [5 885 305 of 60 591 564 MMEs]; arthroscopy of knee, 6.5% [3 912 616 MMEs]).

78 s report symptomatic relief after undergoing arthroscopy of the knee for osteoarthritis, but it is un

79 , respectively) who underwent MR imaging and arthroscopy of the knee joint.

80 Thirty-four patients underwent needle arthroscopy of the knee joint; 12 had early rheumatoid a

81 Arthroscopy only was a placebo as the essential surgical

82 groups (106 to decompression surgery, 103 to arthroscopy only, and 104 to no treatment).

83 43 [42%], and 12 [12%] of the decompression, arthroscopy only, and no treatment groups, respectively,

84 c subacromial decompression, investigational arthroscopy only, or no treatment (attendance of one rea

85 sion appeared to offer no extra benefit over arthroscopy only.

86 y apparent venous thromboembolism after knee arthroscopy or casting of the lower leg is disputed.

87 lar-weight heparin for the 8 days after knee arthroscopy or during the full period of immobilization

88 Fifty-two patients underwent arthroscopy or open surgery 12 days to 5 months after MR

89 The increased number of patients undergoing arthroscopy or surgery of the knee for sports medicine i

90 cectomy, shoulder rotator cuff repair, wrist arthroscopy, or ankle arthroscopy.

91 Virtually all the literature on arthroscopy outcomes comes from small uncontrolled studi

92 Arthroscopy, performed within 1 month of the imaging, wa

93 verse events associated with common shoulder arthroscopy procedures are low.

94 Arthroscopy provides a safe alternative to arthrotomy in

95 Arthroscopy provides exciting direct visual information

96 uantitative OCT strongly correlated with the arthroscopy results (P = 0.004 and P = 0.0002, respectiv

97 ppa value for intrareader reproducibility of arthroscopy results was 0.88.

98 gnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2 values and arthroscopy results.

99 ge degeneration that strongly correlate with arthroscopy results.

100 deep cartilage T2 values correlated with the arthroscopy results.

101 Arthroscopy revealed 21 full-thickness tears, five bursa

102 of several treatment options, including hip arthroscopy, safe surgical dislocation of the hip and pe

103 iple and often invasive procedures including arthroscopy/synovial biopsy (18 [11.8%] of 152), but non

104 With the increasing use of elbow arthroscopy, there is a growing concern about the risk o

105 At arthroscopy, there were 25 SLAP tears: type II (n = 22),

106 Arthroscopy-validated abnormalities were detected with g

107 shoulder MRI than conventional methods, but arthroscopy-validated evidence of good diagnostic perfor

108 adiography served as a comparison, and wrist arthroscopy was the reference standard.

109 RA) with knee synovitis who were undergoing arthroscopy were assessed.

110 e presence of LHBT pathology, as assessed at arthroscopy, were correlated.

111 +/- 14 [SD]; 75 male) who underwent MRI and arthroscopy within a median of 39 days (range, 1-90 days