戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1           In addition to sophisticated phono-articulatory abilities, speech acquisition requires neur
2 features such as speech rate, phrase length, articulatory agility and syntactic structure, which are
3 nding speaker prosody, temporally align with articulatory and body gestures and both provide compleme
4 d by the coordinated activity of vocal-tract articulatory and motor-planning cortical representations
5 pectral and articulatory in STG, mixtures of articulatory and semantic in STS, and semantic in STS an
6 ect-directed actions in a similar way to how articulatory and voicing features combine to form phonol
7  words emerges from the linkage of auditory, articulatory, and conceptual systems.
8  feature spaces that represent the spectral, articulatory, and semantic properties of speech.
9 ng activations of bilateral visuo-cognitive, articulatory, attention, and language areas due to thera
10 related to the dependence on lip-reading and articulatory-based (rather than auditory-based) represen
11 man primates, thousands of bird species have articulatory capabilities that equal or surpass those of
12 role, Broca's area formulates an appropriate articulatory code to be implemented by motor cortex.
13 an interface between auditory speech and the articulatory code.
14  in particular, indicate the availability of articulatory codes during passive speech perception.
15 ible role of translating speech signals into articulatory codes.
16  correlation was found between the vocal and articulatory compensatory responses to pitch and formant
17 to controls suggests greater reliance on the articulatory component of speech during phonological pro
18    We addressed this issue by asking whether articulatory configurations can influence infants' speec
19  are likely to reflect underlying neural and articulatory constraints on the production and imitation
20 r HVIIA activation represents input from the articulatory control system of working memory from the f
21 , the critical neural evidence for tuning of articulatory control to a spontaneous rate of speech has
22                            Both the task and articulatory controllers rely on an internal estimate of
23 errors(9)(,)(13)(,)(20)(,)(21) but not gross articulatory deficits, which instead resulted from DES o
24                                         This articulatory distinction between the two contrasts plaus
25                                 Intermediate articulatory dynamics enhanced performance even with lim
26 system, we show that transitions measure the articulatory effort required to produce the CCVs.
27  the CCVs require a greater laryngeal and/or articulatory effort to be pronounced.
28 resented the specific order and structure of articulatory events before utterance and reflected the s
29 tion derived from observation of a speaker's articulatory facial gestures.
30 e investigated brain-based generalization of articulatory features (place and manner of articulation,
31 imilar to auditory cortex, rather than along articulatory features as during speaking.
32 ave long postulated that knowledge about the articulatory features of individual phonemes has an impo
33                           Decoding of manual articulatory features revealed a clear functional organi
34  speech representations (e.g. spectrogram or articulatory features).
35  demonstrating encoding of language-relevant articulatory features.
36 ts of each language while maintaining shared articulatory features.
37 s that these regions serve word-retrieval or articulatory functions in the undamaged brain.
38  in both acoustic-phonetic feature-based and articulatory-gestural domains.
39 ds in temporal cortex to their corresponding articulatory gestures in motor cortex.
40              Moreover, when novel strings of articulatory gestures must be produced in response to no
41 arer might perceive speech by simulating the articulatory gestures of the speaker [5, 6].
42 in learning to make coordinated sequences of articulatory gestures that underlie speech.
43 evidence that speech sounds are processed as articulatory gestures.
44 onversion requires activation of these motor-articulatory gestures.
45 eurological speech disorder characterized by articulatory impairment due to muscle weakness.
46  in the core of A1, mixtures of spectral and articulatory in STG, mixtures of articulatory and semant
47 ovides temporal cues to auditory cortex, and articulatory information from the speaker's mouth can ai
48 on of multiple conceptual, phonological, and articulatory information in the language system.
49 gions to lexical semantic, phonological, and articulatory information.
50                                     The same articulatory inhibition had contrasting effects on the p
51 ilateral laryngeal motor cortex (LMC) encode articulatory kinematic information to generate the pitch
52  between lexical and sublexical codes at the articulatory level.
53 ly visual cortices at frequencies that match articulatory lip movements; the right angular gyrus then
54 sed hyperarticulation in that differences in articulatory magnitude are not vowel-specific in their p
55  with unfamiliar words relying especially on articulatory mapping.
56 ly based ("echoic") memory from phonological-articulatory memory.
57                           With the aid of an articulatory model of the vocal system, we show that tra
58 ween speaker and listener than syntactic and articulatory models.
59                   The findings indicate that articulatory motor cortex can contribute to auditory pro
60 tudies have provided evidence that the human articulatory motor cortex contributes also to speech pro
61  to manipulate stored phonological input for articulatory motor output in vWM.
62     We conclude that, despite the paucity of articulatory motor plans and speech production skills, p
63 that contained both phonological sensory and articulatory motor representations.
64        These findings suggest that vocal and articulatory motor speech control are regulated via inde
65 ain's speech perception system actively uses articulatory (motor), in addition to acoustic/phonetic,
66  stages of lexical access to later stages of articulatory-motor encoding may constitute a progression
67 apable of generating extraordinarily diverse articulatory movement combinations to produce meaningful
68             In speech, speakers adjust their articulatory movement magnitude according to the movemen
69 ed cortical activity into representations of articulatory movement, and then transformed these repres
70 speech is improved when the speaker's facial articulatory movements are visible.
71  sensorimotor influences to the infant's own articulatory movements impact auditory speech perception
72 exposure to altered feedback), adaptation of articulatory movements in speech has only been observed
73 r regions in the precentral gyrus sparked by articulatory movements of the lips and tongue were also
74 sound generated by the larynx is modified by articulatory movements of the upper vocal tract, which a
75 nts with a disorder in the motor planning of articulatory movements were compared with lesions of 19
76 ical sites from regions encoding vocal tract articulatory movements.
77 ibutes to greater temporal stability of oral articulatory movements.
78 el encoding reflects the anatomical basis of articulatory movements.
79 y motor cortex, a substrate for execution of articulatory movements.
80 s often thought to be limited to lower-level articulatory muscle control.
81 ral data, which recapitulated the underlying articulatory nature of speech motor control.
82 shed and provides a mechanism for preserving articulatory organization upon extensive bending and twi
83 ns on how a preverbal message is mapped onto articulatory output during the language planning.
84 organized by phonetic features(1,2), such as articulatory parameters(3,4) and vocal pitch(5,6).
85 ped to study the acquisition of auditory and articulatory patterns during infancy and the ways in whi
86 deling the effects of prosodic prominence on articulatory patterns.
87  performance to discriminate speech items in articulatory, phonetic, and vocalic representation space
88  identify ICNs anchored in regions known for articulatory, phonological, and semantic processes in he
89 insic left-dominant networks associated with articulatory, phonological, semantic, and multimodal ort
90        The identified ICNs included a dorsal articulatory-phonological network involving inferior fro
91                        The formulation of an articulatory plan is a function of the left anterior ins
92 x provide a substrate for the integration of articulatory planning and sensory feedback, and via conn
93 t the breakdown in fluency is due to a motor articulatory planning deficit (speech apraxia) combined
94                            All patients with articulatory planning deficits had lesions that included
95 onclusion that the insula does not serve pre-articulatory preparatory roles.
96 nditions were used to control for visual and articulatory processes.
97 t tongue postures within the /e, epsilon, a/ articulatory range, in a procedure that was totally nons
98         We found that (1) higher activity in articulatory regions caused activity in auditory regions
99 ivity in auditory regions caused activity in articulatory regions to increase (i.e., auditory feedbac
100 that captures sound-based information and an articulatory rehearsal system that controls speech motor
101 comprehension, verbal working memory and pre-articulatory rehearsal) and a number of task-specific pr
102 g memory, consistent with a putative role in articulatory rehearsal.
103 ther than by fundamentally subserving covert articulatory rehearsal.
104 nly a small region of cortex, and a detailed articulatory representation of phonemes that persists ye
105 Decoding models relied on shared vocal-tract articulatory representations across languages, which all
106        In this study, we examine the role of articulatory representations during passive listening us
107                Motor cortex does not contain articulatory representations of perceived actions in spe
108 verall, our findings suggest shared cortical articulatory representations that persist after paralysi
109                                      Decoded articulatory representations were highly conserved acros
110  perisylvian network supporting auditory and articulatory representations, with unfamiliar words rely
111 eption and production draw upon common motor-articulatory representations.
112 n of sequential movement occurring among the articulatory, respiratory, and resonance systems, all wi
113 lso found that the magnitude of compensatory articulatory responses to formant-shifted vowels during
114 ry strategy involving sublexical assembly of articulatory routines.
115 0 ms), consistent with a direct influence of articulatory somatomotor areas on phonemic perception.
116                   In particular, it revealed articulatory-specific brain responses of speech at multi
117 ement of neural responses to acoustic versus articulatory speech features.
118  disentangle brain responses to acoustic and articulatory speech properties.
119 al (i.e., phonemes/visemes) or amodal (e.g., articulatory) speech representations, but require lossy
120 r, networks active during the perceptual and articulatory stages of turn-taking consisted of structur
121  tract constrictions) as well as lower-level articulatory state representations.
122 ance, and interference with this network via articulatory suppression (AS; i.e., producing irrelevant
123 d markers of rehearsal (i.e. word-length and articulatory suppression effects) in an immediate serial
124 nition scores after 5-min delays filled with articulatory-suppression tasks were relatively high (75-
125                   To investigate the role of articulatory systems in the maintenance of verbal inform
126 o the movement distance required to reach an articulatory target for intelligible speech.
127 sent only when prediction errors updated the articulatory-to-task state transformation.

 
Page Top