コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 re included, including 3,237 (34%) receiving aspirin.
2 let and non-platelet eicosanoids affected by aspirin.
3 mg twice daily) plus aspirin or placebo plus aspirin.
4 iratory disease-like (ptges1(-/-)) mice with aspirin.
5 mg aspirin daily or rivaroxaban placebo plus aspirin.
6 min K antagonist (VKA) and with placebo than aspirin.
7 riptions for 90 or more consecutive doses of aspirin.
8 dopt preventive strategies, such as low-dose aspirin.
9 l patients were on clopidogrel 75 mg/day and aspirin.
10 REDS2 participants, 1198 (49.9%) were taking aspirin.
11 asurably lower in cardiology patients taking aspirin.
12 These patients are generally treated with aspirin.
13 75 to 100 mg daily) or matching placebo plus aspirin.
14 most famous being salicin, the progenitor of aspirin.
15 them to anti- and pro-thrombotic effects of aspirin.
16 (2001-2020) that studied discontinuation of aspirin 1 to 3 months after PCI with continued P2Y(12) i
18 eeding was observed for recent initiators of aspirin (1.40; 1.13-1.72;p = 0.002) but not for those co
19 with GFR >=60 ml/min (2.9% rivaroxaban plus aspirin, 1.6% aspirin alone, HR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.44 to 2
20 daily plus aspirin 100 mg once daily versus aspirin 100 mg once daily reduced the primary major adve
21 PI) with rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg once daily versus aspirin 100 mg once dai
22 cts of rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (100 mg daily) versus placebo plus aspirin in pa
24 Patients who were starting to take low-dose aspirin (14,205 patients) were identified by their first
25 e with GFR <60 ml/min (3.9% rivaroxaban plus aspirin, 2.7% aspirin alone, HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.05 to 2
26 initial concentration 70 mg/L, using 2000 mg aspirin, (2) carbamazepine, initial concentration 35 mg/
27 2016, respectively, from 57.3% to 64.3% for aspirin, 3.6% to 24.8% for clopidogrel, and 36.2% to 77.
28 ing dose followed by 90 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (300 to 325 mg on the first day followed by 75 t
30 significantly between users and nonusers of aspirin (7.8% and 6.9%, respectively; difference, 0.9 pe
31 de, and 10 mg of ramipril) or placebo daily, aspirin (75 mg) or placebo daily, and vitamin D or place
32 hrombotic strategy (rivaroxaban [10 mg] plus aspirin [75 to 100 mg] once daily) or an antiplatelet-ba
35 masked, placebo-controlled trial of low-dose aspirin (81 mg daily) initiated between 6 weeks and 0 da
36 naproxen (95% CI: 0.85, 1.35), and 1.05 for aspirin (95% CI: 0.81, 1.35), as compared with nonuse of
37 telet activation as an efficacious target of aspirin, a widely available and affordable host-directed
38 ntieth century, coincident with marketing of aspirin-a signature event in the history of modern drug
39 whether the anti-inflammatory activities of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]) could protect again
40 lts explain why increasing aspirin dosage or aspirin addition to other drugs may lessen antithromboti
41 oronary syndrome, in whom discontinuation of aspirin after 1 to 3 months reduced bleeding by 50% (1.7
42 n making on the ideal duration of the use of aspirin after an acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous
44 data support the addition of rivaroxaban to aspirin after lower extremity revascularization regardle
45 ge >40 years, coronary artery bypass, and no aspirin after LT as independent risk factors for early o
46 of coronary artery calcium (CAC) for guiding aspirin allocation for primary prevention by using 2019
47 e cardiovascular events (MACE) compared with aspirin alone after percutaneous coronary intervention (
48 tal of 331 patients were assigned to receive aspirin alone and 334 were assigned to receive aspirin p
49 nt occurred in 76 patients (23.0%) receiving aspirin alone and in 104 (31.1%) receiving aspirin plus
50 nt occurred in 50 patients (15.1%) receiving aspirin alone and in 89 (26.6%) receiving aspirin plus c
51 in resistance than all patients treated with aspirin alone and TCT decreased the frequency of aspirin
52 alone as compared with matching placebo, for aspirin alone as compared with matching placebo, and for
54 with rivaroxaban 2.5 mg plus aspirin versus aspirin alone in those with GFR >=60 ml/min (2.9% rivaro
55 anticoagulation, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive aspirin alone or aspirin plus clopidogrel for 3 months.
56 was lower with ticagrelor-aspirin than with aspirin alone, but the incidence of disability did not d
58 ml/min (2.9% rivaroxaban plus aspirin, 1.6% aspirin alone, HR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.44 to 2.28) and simil
62 coronary intervention and the withholding of aspirin among patients with both CCS and atrial fibrilla
65 ccurred in 668 (11.6%) of the women who took aspirin and 754 (13.1%) of those who took placebo (RR 0.
72 utcome except for reduced co-prescription of aspirin and clopidogrel without gastro-protection in pat
75 tion, such that a strong association between aspirin and major bleeding was observed for recent initi
78 develop bronchospasm after the ingestion of aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs,
79 us triple therapy (vitamin K antagonist plus aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor) in patients with nonvalvula
80 events during the intervention phase between aspirin and placebo groups were similar, and no signific
82 ll surgical patients may receive concomitant aspirin and therapeutic anticoagulation postoperatively,
83 , all 3 of our patients were taking low-dose aspirin and/or clopidogrel as secondary cardiovascular p
85 relor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin), and FOURIER (Further Cardiovascular Outcomes R
86 AREDS participants, 1049 (28.1%) were taking aspirin, and of the 2403 eligible AREDS2 participants, 1
87 ry syndrome were randomly assigned to DPI or aspirin, and, of these, 9862 (59.6%) had previous PCI (m
88 ose tissue of OSA patients receiving statin, aspirin, and/or RAS inhibitors was comparable to non-OSA
89 cent studies have highlighted the utility of aspirin as a host-directed therapy modulating the inflam
91 ated fatty acids (omega-3 PUFA) and low-dose aspirin (ASA) have been proposed as a host modulation re
92 .5 mg twice daily plus acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin; ASA) 100 mg reduced the risk of cardiovascular
93 r the first 3 months) (rivaroxaban group) or aspirin at a dose of 75 to 100 mg daily (with clopidogre
94 e rivaroxaban at a dose of 10 mg daily (with aspirin at a dose of 75 to 100 mg daily for the first 3
96 afety of a four-component polypill including aspirin, atorvastatin, hydrochlorothiazide, and either e
97 linical benefit of low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin, but at the expense of increased bleeding risk i
101 203769 attenuated AHR induced by allergen or aspirin challenge of wild-type or ptges1(-/-) mice, resp
102 Although it cannot replace the gold-standard aspirin challenge test, the implementation of the ANN mi
103 up Report provides a comprehensive review of aspirin challenges, aspirin desensitizations, and mainte
104 tality through colonoscopic surveillance and aspirin chemoprevention; it also enables cascade testing
105 We examined temporal changes in the use of aspirin, clopidogrel, and statins and 1-year cause-speci
106 ) inhibitor), dual antiplatelet therapy (eg, aspirin combined with a P2Y(12) inhibitor), and dual-pat
107 rs (n=14 005) who were discharged alive with aspirin combined with either clopidogrel (60.2%) or tica
108 inhibitor), and dual-pathway inhibition (eg, aspirin combined with the vascular dose of the direct or
110 The primary outcome for the polypill-plus-aspirin comparison occurred in 59 participants (4.1%) in
112 For the polypill-alone and polypill-plus-aspirin comparisons, the primary outcome was death from
113 rios, including early discontinuation of the aspirin component of dual antiplatelet therapy after per
114 ly 5% of MESA participants would qualify for aspirin consideration for primary prevention according t
118 comprehensive review of aspirin challenges, aspirin desensitizations, and maintenance aspirin therap
119 40 (9%) of 427 participants who received aspirin developed colorectal cancer compared with 58 (13
122 rial, the addition of ticagrelor to standard aspirin did not reduce SVG occlusion at 1 year after CAB
123 ong aspirin users and 8.3% among nonusers of aspirin (difference, -4.3 percentage points; 95% confide
127 tion of a computable phenotype in ADAPTABLE (Aspirin Dosing: a Patient-Centric Trial Assessing Benefi
133 enhanced LTC(4) synthesis similar to that in aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, completely bloc
134 ssociated bronchoconstriction by challenging aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease-like (ptges1(-/-
137 ), a similar trial treating with clopidogrel-aspirin for 21 days and showing no increase in major hem
138 n in acute stroke; early or first aid use of aspirin for chest pain; control of life-threatening blee
140 vascular disease, the efficacy and safety of aspirin for primary prevention has become uncertain.
142 l clinical trial testing the optimal dose of aspirin for secondary prevention of atherosclerotic card
143 tor targets, indicating that the efficacy of aspirin for secondary prevention of CCS may similarly ha
144 raise some uncertainty as to the primacy of aspirin for the lifelong management of all patients with
146 irin group and in 345 patients (6.3%) in the aspirin group (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.93;
147 irin group and in 362 patients (6.6%) in the aspirin group (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interv
152 n occurred in 116 participants (4.1%) in the aspirin group and in 134 (4.7%) in the placebo group (ha
153 red in 276 patients (5.0%) in the ticagrelor-aspirin group and in 345 patients (6.3%) in the aspirin
154 red in 303 patients (5.5%) in the ticagrelor-aspirin group and in 362 patients (6.6%) in the aspirin
155 rred in 28 patients (0.5%) in the ticagrelor-aspirin group and in 7 patients (0.1%) in the aspirin gr
156 om 861 agreed to be randomly assigned to the aspirin group or placebo; 427 (50%) participants receive
158 multiple blood-pressure-lowering drugs, and aspirin has been proposed to reduce the risk of cardiova
163 therapeutic properties of desensitization to aspirin in aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease.
164 llenging the previously unquestioned role of aspirin in CCS have come from recent trials where aspiri
167 ase for prevention of colorectal cancer with aspirin in Lynch syndrome is supported by our results.
168 to consistently demonstrate net benefit for aspirin in patients treated to optimal contemporary card
169 s aspirin (100 mg daily) versus placebo plus aspirin in patients with diabetes mellitus versus withou
170 evious trial, ticagrelor was not better than aspirin in preventing vascular events or death after str
174 her study of the universal need for lifelong aspirin in secondary prevention for all adults with CCS,
175 rials: the NAVIGATE ESUS (Rivaroxaban Versus Aspirin in Secondary Prevention of Stroke and Prevention
178 e the first trial suggesting the efficacy of aspirin in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarc
180 CE was not observed after discontinuation of aspirin, including in patients with acute coronary syndr
184 prostaglandin D(2) metabolite levels during aspirin-induced reactions in the study population as a w
186 he physiologic response to subsequent lysine-aspirin inhalation challenges, as well as increases in l
187 income and middle-income countries, low-dose aspirin initiated between 6 weeks and 0 days of gestatio
188 out established CAD, primary prevention with aspirin is not routinely advocated because of its increa
190 estigated the possibility that the effect of aspirin is related to an antiplatelet mode of action.
193 Combined treatment with a polypill plus aspirin led to a lower incidence of cardiovascular event
195 use of preventive pharmacotherapies, such as aspirin, lipid-lowering mediations, and cardiometabolic
196 eded about the long-term effects of low-dose aspirin (<=160 mg) on incident hepatocellular carcinoma,
197 ocation for primary prevention by using 2019 aspirin meta-analysis data on cardiovascular disease rel
198 0.45-0.83]), and short-term DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy (absolute risk difference, -6.1 inci
199 on to conventional 12-month DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy in the reduction of the primary comp
200 with midterm or short-term DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy, with the exception that short-term
201 olled trials including 165,502 participants (aspirin n = 83,529, control n = 81,973) were available f
202 Patients on chronic once-daily low-dose aspirin (n = 245) were randomized (1:1:1) to receive 100
203 an plus aspirin (n=9152) versus placebo plus aspirin (n=9126) in patients both with (n=6922) and with
204 ion was seen for benefit of rivaroxaban plus aspirin (n=9152) versus placebo plus aspirin (n=9126) in
205 Benefit/harm calculations were restricted to aspirin-naive participants <70 years of age not at high
206 ention agents that have been studied include aspirin, nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
207 s related to the following variables: use of aspirin/NSAIDs/anti-coagulants/anti-platelets, pathologi
208 of ticagrelor monotherapy vs ticagrelor with aspirin on major bleeding and cardiovascular events in p
209 effect of the combination of ticagrelor and aspirin on prevention of stroke has not been well studie
211 nclude single antiplatelet therapy (eg, with aspirin or a P2Y(12) inhibitor), dual antiplatelet thera
212 ubstudy within the TWILIGHT (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients After Coronary In
214 tening bleeding compared with treatment with aspirin or clopidogrel alone in patients at high risk fo
217 pared short-term (<6-month) DAPT followed by aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy; midterm (6-month
218 P2Y(12) inhibitor were randomized to blinded aspirin or placebo and to open-label apixaban or VKA for
221 ssigned (1:1, stratified by site) to receive aspirin or placebo tablets of identical appearance, via
222 deline-directed medical therapies, including aspirin (p < 0.001), statin (p < 0.001), and beta-blocke
223 icoagulation for atrial fibrillation, use of aspirin, perimenopausal hormone therapy, and psychosocia
224 xaban vs Vitamin K Antagonist and Aspirin vs Aspirin Placebo in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and
225 g aspirin alone and in 104 (31.1%) receiving aspirin plus clopidogrel (difference, -8.2 percentage po
226 ng aspirin alone and in 89 (26.6%) receiving aspirin plus clopidogrel (risk ratio, 0.57; 95% confiden
227 icantly less frequent with aspirin than with aspirin plus clopidogrel administered for 3 months.
230 n stable atherosclerosis, the combination of aspirin plus rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily provided a s
233 nsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use except aspirin prescribed for secondary prevention of cardiovas
235 n those with previous PCI, DPI compared with aspirin produced consistent (robust) reductions in MACE
238 In the VOYAGER PAD trial, rivaroxaban plus aspirin reduced the risk of adverse cardiovascular and l
239 In conclusion, the currently recommended aspirin regimen of 75 to 100 once daily for cardiovascul
240 blind trial to investigate the efficacy of 3 aspirin regimens in optimizing platelet COX-1 inhibition
243 in and clopidogrel had a higher incidence of aspirin resistance than all patients treated with aspiri
244 ng aspirin and clopidogrel, the incidence of aspirin resistance was significantly decreased from 40%
247 the risk of severe bleeding was higher with aspirin than placebo (absolute risk difference, 1.25% [9
248 ath within 30 days was lower with ticagrelor-aspirin than with aspirin alone, but the incidence of di
250 1 year were significantly less frequent with aspirin than with aspirin plus clopidogrel administered
252 studies evaluating the clinical efficacy of aspirin therapy after desensitization as well as a discu
253 ization, and recommendations for maintenance aspirin therapy following desensitization are reviewed.
256 Guidelines recommended considering low-dose aspirin therapy only among adults 40 to 70 years of age
257 ernal care and possible chemoprevention (eg, aspirin therapy) to prevent preeclampsia, a disease that
262 ls have evaluated the use of clopidogrel and aspirin to prevent stroke after an ischemic stroke or tr
263 periority of rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus aspirin to reduce major cardiac and ischemic limb events
264 atabase of patients with N-ERD (n = 121) and aspirin-tolerant (n = 82) who underwent aspirin challeng
266 ly different profile from global-COX-1-ko or aspirin-treated control mice, notably significantly high
269 le Haemophilus influenzae, using 17-HDHA and aspirin-triggered-resolvin D1 (AT-RvD1) as adjuvants.
271 ciated with increased risk of EOCRC, whereas aspirin use and being overweight or obese (relative to n
272 uggested a differential relationship between aspirin use and major bleeding based on aspirin use in t
273 ween aspirin use and major bleeding based on aspirin use in the 7 days prior to anticoagulation, such
275 se results suggest that limiting clopidogrel-aspirin use to 21 days may maximize benefit and reduce r
276 associated with increased risk of EOCRC, and aspirin use to be significantly associated with decrease
284 ical prosthesis, bridging therapies, role of aspirin, use of fibrinolytic therapy for prosthetic valv
285 year liver-related mortality was 11.0% among aspirin users and 17.9% among nonusers (difference, -6.9
286 e of hepatocellular carcinoma was 4.0% among aspirin users and 8.3% among nonusers of aspirin (differ
287 s more frequent with rivaroxaban 2.5 mg plus aspirin versus aspirin alone in those with GFR >=60 ml/m
288 demonstrated superiority of rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus aspirin to reduce major cardiac and ische
292 fety of Apixaban vs Vitamin K Antagonist and Aspirin vs Aspirin Placebo in Patients With Atrial Fibri
294 roxaban at a dose of 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin was associated with a significantly lower incide
295 c viral hepatitis in Sweden, use of low-dose aspirin was associated with a significantly lower risk o
296 in in CCS have come from recent trials where aspirin was discontinued in specific clinical scenarios,
300 lower liver-related mortality than no use of aspirin, without a significantly higher risk of gastroin