コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
4 in predicting successful sperm retrieval and assisted reproductive technique (ART) outcome is unknown
5 roviding data on parenthood rates and use of assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs) after contempora
9 such genetic defects to offspring born from assisted reproductive techniques is increasingly becomin
12 decreasing multiple embryo transfers during assisted reproductive technologies (0.06), cervical cerc
17 tter that is of utmost concern for improving assisted reproductive technologies (ART) because low-fit
21 number of children born since the origin of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) exceeds 5 milli
24 both intrauterine insemination and in vitro assisted reproductive technologies (ART) procedures perf
25 conservation breeding programs often rely on assisted reproductive technologies (ART) to produce offs
28 ugh their infertility is often bypassed with assisted reproductive technologies (ART), some accompani
30 this method holds significant potential for assisted reproductive technologies (ART), where metaboli
35 Given the relatively low success rates of assisted reproductive technologies (ART; ~25%), additive
36 years of fertility and may begin to turn to assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) and egg donati
37 nts that include ovulation stimulation, both assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) and non-ART ov
40 rm cells directly from raw semen samples for assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) as an alternat
46 inting disorders in children conceived using assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), and aberrant
47 vel, at high-throughput, would be useful for assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), as it can all
48 tation development is a gateway to improving assisted reproductive technologies and stem cell researc
49 lications of this observation for the use of assisted reproductive technologies are especially releva
50 enesis, hormonal cycles and the way in which assisted reproductive technologies can be applied, and k
51 edical indications and ethical acceptance of assisted reproductive technologies for adult-onset cance
52 e optimization of semen cryopreservation and assisted reproductive technologies for the critically en
53 known, although recently an association with assisted reproductive technologies has been described.
55 a novel means to improve the success rate of assisted reproductive technologies in fertility clinics.
56 causes of infertility have been overcome by assisted reproductive technologies such as in vitro fert
58 ertility is a significant health problem and assisted reproductive technologies to treat infertility.
59 of pregnancies occurred spontaneously, with assisted reproductive technologies used in the remaining
61 iving versus deceased donation, (iii) use of assisted reproductive technologies, (iv) informed consen
62 ts in normal imprinting are found in cancer, assisted reproductive technologies, and several human sy
63 ten million babies conceived globally, using assisted reproductive technologies, fundamental question
64 e differences in risk factors such as use of assisted reproductive technologies, obesity, smoking, an
65 n, and absence of sperm fertilising ability, assisted reproductive technologies, such as in-vitro fer
76 .7%]; P < .001), and were more likely to use assisted reproductive technology (172 of 692 [24.9%] vs
77 recent observations suggests a link between assisted reproductive technology (ART) and epigenetic er
78 n development has important implications for assisted reproductive technology (ART) and for human emb
79 sing percentage of births are conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART) and other inferti
81 The methods of gamete manipulation used in assisted reproductive technology (ART) are rapidly proli
85 le partners (median age: 35 y) underwent 437 assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles for infert
86 e that endogenously elevated estrogen during assisted reproductive technology (ART) exhibits little a
87 ernal age (AMA, >=35 years) women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) face reduced live
89 e number of children born through the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) has been increasi
92 s known about the outcomes of pregnancy with assisted reproductive technology (ART) in women with kid
97 cent data in humans and animals suggest that assisted reproductive technology (ART) might affect the
102 to investigate 1) whether the association of assisted reproductive technology (ART) with preterm birt
103 ytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), a type of assisted reproductive technology (ART), can induce epimu
104 rm injection (ICSI), the most common type of assisted reproductive technology (ART), might damage the
106 tational diabetes, gestational hypertension, assisted reproductive technology (ART), rates of materna
107 men with obesity are also more likely to use assisted reproductive technology (ART), which frequently
109 [n = 41 628], and estrogen [n = 16 948]) and assisted reproductive technology (in vitro fertilization
110 d data from the databases of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) in the US and th
111 These findings, captured by Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) national data, u
115 ected prevalence of monozygotic twinning, of assisted reproductive technology among parents, and of d
116 0, to August 23, 2021, using the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and BabyCenter, an onli
117 o evaluate whether pregnancies conceived via assisted reproductive technology and exposed to Hurrican
118 authors conducted a validation study of the assisted reproductive technology and infertility drug us
119 ere born in 1996 and 1997 and conceived with assisted reproductive technology and used as a compariso
121 embryo transfers reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology between 2014 and 2016.
122 d reproductive technology in the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reportin
123 oocytes at member clinics of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Report
124 data from member clinics of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinical Outcomes Repor
125 S region, state FP mandate status, number of assisted reproductive technology cycles performed, and n
126 older, low oocyte yield, and 2 or more prior assisted reproductive technology cycles; reproductive ou
127 national data collected from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology for 33 863 recipients u
128 of gestation or later, those conceived with assisted reproductive technology had a risk of low birth
129 low birth weight associated with the use of assisted reproductive technology has been attributed lar
130 of the few species, beside humans, in which assisted reproductive technology has important clinical
134 ss other states and to understand why use of assisted reproductive technology is not a risk factor fo
135 singleton infants conceived with the use of assisted reproductive technology may also have a higher
136 e otherwise infertile men conceived using an assisted reproductive technology needs further evaluatio
137 mproved semen parameters, DNA integrity, and assisted reproductive technology outcomes after varicoce
138 tibodies are associated with infertility and assisted reproductive technology outcomes is unclear; al
141 and ICSI cycles reported to the US National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System dur
142 We also profiled 25 healthy women undergoing assisted reproductive technology to monitor transcriptio
143 he rate of low birth weight after the use of assisted reproductive technology to the rate in the gene
147 care, multiple pregnancy, placenta praevia, assisted reproductive technology use, macrosomia with a
148 vitro fertilization (IVF) is the most common assisted reproductive technology used to treat infertili
149 s data to evaluate trends in infertility and assisted reproductive technology utilization rates, incl
155 atural fecundity can be achieved by means of assisted reproductive technology when there are favorabl
156 igher levels of CCNA2 in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology who had successful preg
157 es are more common among children born after assisted reproductive technology with fresh embryo trans
158 eight (<1500 g) among infants conceived with assisted reproductive technology with the rates in the g
159 maternal age, BMI, gravidity, parity, use of assisted reproductive technology, adverse obstetric hist
160 rine surgery, induction of pregnancy through assisted reproductive technology, and any concurrently o
161 on delayed childbearing, infertility, use of assisted reproductive technology, and career alterations
162 record of infertility but no treatment with assisted reproductive technology, and pregnancies in wom
163 ty treatment (ie, intrauterine insemination, assisted reproductive technology, fertility preservation
164 d infertility, secondary infertility despite assisted reproductive technology, negative self-image, a
165 ncluding the safety of contraception, use of assisted reproductive technology, preservation of fertil
166 PGT-M for monogenic PKD, like other forms of assisted reproductive technology, raises important ethic
167 nancies in women who received treatment with assisted reproductive technology, spontaneous pregnancie
168 antation remains a significant challenge for assisted reproductive technology, with implantation fail
169 infertility causes, childbearing decisions, assisted reproductive technology, workplace support, and
170 ly validated by linkage with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology-Clinical Outcome Report
183 g pregnancy of more than 12 months or use of assisted reproductive technology; and miscarriage, defin
184 g pregnancy of more than 12 months or use of assisted reproductive technology; and miscarriage, defin
187 PTRX3 are reflective of treatment outcome in assisted reproductive therapy (ART) couples treated by i
188 males, offering new possibilities to improve assisted reproductive therapy in women with compromised
189 or the benefit of human reproductive health, assisted reproductive therapy, and contraception, as wel
191 Boston, Massachusetts, clinics who underwent assisted reproductive treatments between 1994 and 2003,