コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 matured in vitro to produce spermatozoa for assisted reproductive technology.
2 ryo vitrification is a standard procedure in assisted reproductive technology.
3 ility as time to pregnancy >=12 mo or use of assisted reproductive technology.
4 rance coverage of fertility preservation and assisted reproductive technology.
5 rance coverage of fertility preservation and assisted reproductive technology.
6 maintenance of anisogamy and for outcomes of assisted reproductive technology.
7 e potential or decrease the need for complex assisted reproductive technology.
8 physiology may affect the outcomes of modern assisted reproductive technology.
9 ultiple gestations resulting from the use of assisted reproductive technology.
10 ce patterns and in outcomes after the use of assisted reproductive technology.
11 ul genetic counseling of couples who opt for assisted reproductive technology.
12 en a growing focus on spermatozoa sorting in assisted reproductive technology.
13 man fertility and infertility, and improving assisted reproductive technologies.
14 eing developed to increase the efficiency of assisted reproductive technologies.
15 interactions, with potential applications in assisted reproductive technologies.
16 ese associations were modified by the use of assisted reproductive technologies.
17 his period and could lead to improvements in assisted reproductive technologies.
18 labour induction and caesarean delivery and assisted reproductive technologies.
19 rity, fluidity, and stability to advance the assisted reproductive technologies.
20 le throughout the world are permitted to use assisted reproductive technologies.
21 problem during infertility treatments using assisted reproductive technologies.
22 decreasing multiple embryo transfers during assisted reproductive technologies (0.06), cervical cerc
23 .7%]; P < .001), and were more likely to use assisted reproductive technology (172 of 692 [24.9%] vs
26 maternal age, BMI, gravidity, parity, use of assisted reproductive technology, adverse obstetric hist
27 ected prevalence of monozygotic twinning, of assisted reproductive technology among parents, and of d
28 tation development is a gateway to improving assisted reproductive technologies and stem cell researc
29 0, to August 23, 2021, using the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and BabyCenter, an onli
30 o evaluate whether pregnancies conceived via assisted reproductive technology and exposed to Hurrican
31 authors conducted a validation study of the assisted reproductive technology and infertility drug us
32 ere born in 1996 and 1997 and conceived with assisted reproductive technology and used as a compariso
33 ts in normal imprinting are found in cancer, assisted reproductive technologies, and several human sy
34 rine surgery, induction of pregnancy through assisted reproductive technology, and any concurrently o
35 on delayed childbearing, infertility, use of assisted reproductive technology, and career alterations
36 record of infertility but no treatment with assisted reproductive technology, and pregnancies in wom
37 g pregnancy of more than 12 months or use of assisted reproductive technology; and miscarriage, defin
38 g pregnancy of more than 12 months or use of assisted reproductive technology; and miscarriage, defin
39 lications of this observation for the use of assisted reproductive technologies are especially releva
45 tter that is of utmost concern for improving assisted reproductive technologies (ART) because low-fit
49 number of children born since the origin of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) exceeds 5 milli
52 both intrauterine insemination and in vitro assisted reproductive technologies (ART) procedures perf
53 conservation breeding programs often rely on assisted reproductive technologies (ART) to produce offs
56 ugh their infertility is often bypassed with assisted reproductive technologies (ART), some accompani
58 this method holds significant potential for assisted reproductive technologies (ART), where metaboli
63 Given the relatively low success rates of assisted reproductive technologies (ART; ~25%), additive
64 recent observations suggests a link between assisted reproductive technology (ART) and epigenetic er
65 n development has important implications for assisted reproductive technology (ART) and for human emb
66 sing percentage of births are conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART) and other inferti
68 The methods of gamete manipulation used in assisted reproductive technology (ART) are rapidly proli
72 le partners (median age: 35 y) underwent 437 assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles for infert
73 e that endogenously elevated estrogen during assisted reproductive technology (ART) exhibits little a
74 ernal age (AMA, >=35 years) women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) face reduced live
76 e number of children born through the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) has been increasi
79 s known about the outcomes of pregnancy with assisted reproductive technology (ART) in women with kid
84 cent data in humans and animals suggest that assisted reproductive technology (ART) might affect the
89 to investigate 1) whether the association of assisted reproductive technology (ART) with preterm birt
90 ytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), a type of assisted reproductive technology (ART), can induce epimu
91 rm injection (ICSI), the most common type of assisted reproductive technology (ART), might damage the
93 tational diabetes, gestational hypertension, assisted reproductive technology (ART), rates of materna
94 men with obesity are also more likely to use assisted reproductive technology (ART), which frequently
96 years of fertility and may begin to turn to assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) and egg donati
97 nts that include ovulation stimulation, both assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) and non-ART ov
100 rm cells directly from raw semen samples for assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) as an alternat
106 inting disorders in children conceived using assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), and aberrant
107 vel, at high-throughput, would be useful for assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), as it can all
108 embryo transfers reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology between 2014 and 2016.
109 enesis, hormonal cycles and the way in which assisted reproductive technologies can be applied, and k
110 d reproductive technology in the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reportin
111 oocytes at member clinics of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Report
112 data from member clinics of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinical Outcomes Repor
113 ly validated by linkage with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology-Clinical Outcome Report
114 S region, state FP mandate status, number of assisted reproductive technology cycles performed, and n
115 older, low oocyte yield, and 2 or more prior assisted reproductive technology cycles; reproductive ou
116 ty treatment (ie, intrauterine insemination, assisted reproductive technology, fertility preservation
117 edical indications and ethical acceptance of assisted reproductive technologies for adult-onset cance
118 e optimization of semen cryopreservation and assisted reproductive technologies for the critically en
119 national data collected from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology for 33 863 recipients u
120 ten million babies conceived globally, using assisted reproductive technologies, fundamental question
121 of gestation or later, those conceived with assisted reproductive technology had a risk of low birth
122 known, although recently an association with assisted reproductive technologies has been described.
123 low birth weight associated with the use of assisted reproductive technology has been attributed lar
124 of the few species, beside humans, in which assisted reproductive technology has important clinical
127 a novel means to improve the success rate of assisted reproductive technologies in fertility clinics.
130 [n = 41 628], and estrogen [n = 16 948]) and assisted reproductive technology (in vitro fertilization
131 ss other states and to understand why use of assisted reproductive technology is not a risk factor fo
132 iving versus deceased donation, (iii) use of assisted reproductive technologies, (iv) informed consen
133 singleton infants conceived with the use of assisted reproductive technology may also have a higher
134 e otherwise infertile men conceived using an assisted reproductive technology needs further evaluatio
135 d infertility, secondary infertility despite assisted reproductive technology, negative self-image, a
136 e differences in risk factors such as use of assisted reproductive technologies, obesity, smoking, an
137 mproved semen parameters, DNA integrity, and assisted reproductive technology outcomes after varicoce
138 tibodies are associated with infertility and assisted reproductive technology outcomes is unclear; al
139 ncluding the safety of contraception, use of assisted reproductive technology, preservation of fertil
141 PGT-M for monogenic PKD, like other forms of assisted reproductive technology, raises important ethic
143 d data from the databases of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) in the US and th
144 These findings, captured by Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) national data, u
146 nancies in women who received treatment with assisted reproductive technology, spontaneous pregnancie
147 causes of infertility have been overcome by assisted reproductive technologies such as in vitro fert
148 n, and absence of sperm fertilising ability, assisted reproductive technologies, such as in-vitro fer
149 and ICSI cycles reported to the US National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System dur
151 ertility is a significant health problem and assisted reproductive technologies to treat infertility.
152 We also profiled 25 healthy women undergoing assisted reproductive technology to monitor transcriptio
153 he rate of low birth weight after the use of assisted reproductive technology to the rate in the gene
158 care, multiple pregnancy, placenta praevia, assisted reproductive technology use, macrosomia with a
159 of pregnancies occurred spontaneously, with assisted reproductive technologies used in the remaining
160 vitro fertilization (IVF) is the most common assisted reproductive technology used to treat infertili
161 al for in vitro gametogenesis to be used for assisted reproductive technologies using NWR iPSCs.
162 s data to evaluate trends in infertility and assisted reproductive technology utilization rates, incl
168 atural fecundity can be achieved by means of assisted reproductive technology when there are favorabl
169 igher levels of CCNA2 in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology who had successful preg
170 es are more common among children born after assisted reproductive technology with fresh embryo trans
171 eight (<1500 g) among infants conceived with assisted reproductive technology with the rates in the g
172 antation remains a significant challenge for assisted reproductive technology, with implantation fail
173 infertility causes, childbearing decisions, assisted reproductive technology, workplace support, and