戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 pproach to respond to requests for physician-assisted suicide.
2 ds are the result of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide.
3 in order to determine their attitudes toward assisted suicide.
4 rs and patients had the same attitude toward assisted suicide.
5  principles alone does not include physician-assisted suicide.
6 ion in which they would desire euthanasia or assisted suicide.
7 nts have a constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide.
8 udes and practices related to euthanasia and assisted suicide.
9 ists had carried out euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide.
10 eceived requests for euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide.
11 who express interest in or request physician-assisted suicide.
12 ia, and 13 percent would participate only in assisted suicide.
13 n evaluation of a competent patient desiring assisted suicide.
14 ractices of Oregon physicians in relation to assisted suicide.
15 o evaluate a terminally ill patient desiring assisted suicide.
16 pairing the judgment of a patient requesting assisted suicide.
17 ve faced the prospect of legalized physician-assisted suicide.
18 nces in relation to euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide.
19 7 Death with Dignity Act legalizes physician-assisted suicide.
20 e after learning the physician's position on assisted suicide.
21 y have had conversations with patients about assisted suicide.
22 es not support the legalization of physician-assisted suicide.
23 are and the debate regarding legalization of assisted suicide.
24 7 Supreme Court decisions outlawed physician-assisted suicide.
25 s regarding patient competence to consent to assisted suicide.
26 cians to use when responding to requests for assisted suicide.
27 ss likely to support euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide.
28 ent consideration of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide.
29 ot all--patients to change their minds about assisted suicide.
30          In 1997, Oregon legalized physician-assisted suicide.
31 ne between relief of suffering and physician-assisted suicide.
32 P does not support legalization of physician-assisted suicide.
33 e used to determine competence to consent to assisted suicide.
34 ly to have performed euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide.
35 euthanasia and 10.8% had performed physician-assisted suicide.
36 nicians who are morally opposed to physician-assisted suicide.
37 he ongoing debates regarding legalization of assisted suicide.
38 October 27, 1997, Oregon legalized physician-assisted suicide.
39 on of referendums and requests for physician-assisted suicide.
40 ons with ALS whom we surveyed would consider assisted suicide.
41 nt, 46% for withdrawal of treatment, 23% for assisted suicide, 32% for active euthanasia, and 41% for
42      Of 156 patients who requested physician-assisted suicide, 38 (24%) received prescriptions, and 2
43 older than 55 patients who died by physician-assisted suicide (74 vs. 64 years of age, P<0.001), less
44 nd the public found euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide acceptable for patients with unremittin
45 or themselves, 85.8% found euthanasia and/or assisted suicide acceptable for their patients.
46     Psychiatrists with ethical objections to assisted suicide advocated a higher threshold for compet
47  have moved toward legalizing euthanasia and assisted suicide, alongside a near-universal increase in
48  to choose between legalization of physician-assisted suicide and an explicit ban, 56 percent of phys
49 tself, 2) the relationship between physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia and withholding or withd
50                                    Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia are complex moral issues
51                Patient request for physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia are not rare.
52                                    Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia are topics that engender
53 ore core ethical issues related to physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia from the perspective of
54 creasingly common debate regarding physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia holds implications for t
55 ical tension central to evaluating physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in medical practice: 1)
56 conscientious objection related to physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the critical care set
57 gh there have been many studies of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the United States, na
58 ort that they receive requests for physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia, and about 7 percent of
59 t of respondents did not distinguish between assisted suicide and euthanasia.
60 onscientious objections related to physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia.
61 nfected patients' attitudes toward physician-assisted suicide and examined the relationship between i
62  would agree to evaluate patients requesting assisted suicide and how they would follow up an evaluat
63 iously thought about euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide and nearly 12 percent had seriously dis
64 e relationship between interest in physician-assisted suicide and physical and psychosocial variables
65 on that there is a valid distinction between assisted suicide and refusal of treatment.
66 resolve a majority of requests for physician-assisted suicide and should be tested further for clinic
67 re has been a continuing public debate about assisted suicide and the proper role, if any, of physici
68 nically more complex and closer to physician-assisted suicide and voluntary active euthanasia than is
69 roversy about the acceptability of physician-assisted suicide and voluntary active euthanasia, volunt
70 ther a valid distinction can be made between assisted suicide and withdrawal of treatment.
71 t after learning the physician's position on assisted suicide, and 2% reported that 1 or more patient
72  one or more explicit requests for physician-assisted suicide, and 4% received one or more requests f
73 tients (56 percent) said they would consider assisted suicide, and 44 of the 56 agreed with the state
74 eceived requests for euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide, and 5% or less have complied.
75 tients supported policies favoring physician-assisted suicide, and 55% acknowledged considering physi
76 ndents have previously received requests for assisted suicide, and 7 percent have complied.
77 ility, responding to a request for physician-assisted suicide, and guiding patients and families thro
78  and performance of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, and sociodemographic characteristics.
79 r belief about the ethical permissibility of assisted suicide, and their moral beliefs influence how
80              Patients' interest in physician-assisted suicide appeared to be more a function of psych
81                     Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are important issues in the care of ter
82                     Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are increasingly being legalized, remai
83        Requests for euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are likely to decrease as training in e
84                       Requests for physician-assisted suicide are not a new phenomenon, and many phys
85                     Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are pressing public issues.
86 avorable attitude toward legalized physician-assisted suicide, are more willing to participate, and a
87 , and 55% acknowledged considering physician-assisted suicide as an option for themselves.
88 ventions were made changed their minds about assisted suicide, as compared with 15 percent of those f
89 tes), or physicians to perform euthanasia or assisted suicide, as well as their own practices.
90 tients' motivations for requesting physician-assisted suicide, assessing mental status, diagnosing an
91 tients supported policies favoring physician-assisted suicide at rates comparable to those in the gen
92  have been receiving euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide at rates higher than those in the gener
93 isted suicide by asking the question: Should assisted suicide be only physician assisted?
94  paper explores these questions as physician-assisted suicide becomes legal.
95  that only competent patients have access to assisted suicide, but the process might burden terminall
96 ty and the limits of the physician's role in assisted suicide by asking the question: Should assisted
97                      The first case involves assisted suicide by ingestion of prescribed barbiturates
98           Currently, euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide can be legally practiced in the Netherl
99 t would find state legalization of physician-assisted suicide constitutional, invited the nation to p
100  advance directives and legalizing physician-assisted suicide depends on patients' understanding thei
101                                Euthanasia or assisted suicide (EAS) of psychiatric patients is increa
102  number of cases of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (EAS) requested by older people with mu
103  of oncologists find euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide ethically acceptable.
104 actable end-of-life suffering than physician-assisted suicide (even if it were legal) and can also pr
105                                    Physician-assisted suicide, excluding euthanasia, is legal in 5 US
106 on attitudes toward euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide for a terminally ill patient with prost
107 rveyed, 22.5% supported the use of physician-assisted suicide for a terminally ill patient with unrem
108 enacted in October 1997, legalized physician-assisted suicide for competent, terminally ill Oregonian
109 been proposed as an alternative to physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill patients who wish to
110 Oregon's ballot measure legalizing physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill persons, the authors
111 ion in which they might desire euthanasia or assisted suicide for themselves but found these interven
112 ion in which they might desire euthanasia or assisted suicide for themselves, 41.7% still found these
113 ion in which they might desire euthanasia or assisted suicide for themselves, 85.8% found euthanasia
114         When physicians desire euthanasia or assisted suicide for themselves, they are willing to pro
115 ion in which they might desire euthanasia or assisted suicide for themselves.
116  in 1995 said they had granted a request for assisted suicide from a patient with AIDS at least once.
117  the deeply controversial issue of physician-assisted suicide has been complicated by confusion about
118  public support for euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide has been reported; in Central and Easte
119                               Euthanasia and assisted suicide has received considerable attention rec
120                           Although physician-assisted suicide has received the most attention as a po
121                  Calls to legalize physician-assisted suicide have increased and public interest in t
122 were considered to be willing to contemplate assisted suicide if they agreed with the statement, "Und
123 iative care interventions and from physician-assisted suicide, illustrate them with a real clinical s
124 aths are reported as euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide in jurisdictions where they are legal.
125 arge portion of patients receiving physician-assisted suicide in Oregon and Washington reported being
126 During the first year of legalized physician-assisted suicide in Oregon, the decision to request and
127 d with the first year of legalized physician-assisted suicide in Oregon, the number of patients who d
128  Public support for euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in the United States has plateaued sinc
129 ess of the controversy surrounding physician-assisted suicide in the United States, the need for qual
130 patients with HIV disease, the acceptance of assisted suicide increased between 1990 and 1995.
131   Psychiatrists' position on legalization of assisted suicide influenced the likelihood that they wou
132                   Over half favored Oregon's assisted suicide initiative becoming law.
133 uthority in this area suggest that physician-assisted suicide is a far too narrow construct of the ta
134                                 As physician-assisted suicide is debated, a need for standardized mea
135    It is also one of the few countries where assisted suicide is decriminalized in some circumstances
136                                 If physician-assisted suicide is legalized, physicians will need to g
137 upreme Court unanimously held that physician-assisted suicide is not a fundamental liberty interest p
138                                    Physician-assisted suicide is prominent among the issues that defi
139 rposes of PRPA are to override the physician-assisted suicide law currently in effect in Oregon and p
140 nd the public found euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide least acceptable in vignettes involving
141 ich the physician's response to requests for assisted suicide may change in an era of legalization, a
142  of a policy change with regard to physician-assisted suicide must be carefully considered.
143        The physician's position on physician-assisted suicide must be open to discussion between prac
144  prefer either the legalization of physician-assisted suicide or no law at all; fewer than one fifth
145 sted--22 percent would participate in either assisted suicide or voluntary euthanasia, and 13 percent
146 e likely to consider euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide (P = 0.001).
147 e death penalty (P < 0.001), and approval of assisted suicide (P = 0.015) correlated with increased w
148  Attitudes regarding the ethics of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and euthanasia have been examined
149                                    Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and euthanasia have been increasi
150            Although euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) are controversial issues, the vie
151                     Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) are highly controversial issues.
152 ame the first US state to legalize physician-assisted suicide (PAS) as an option for end-of-life care
153 e details of actual euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) cases in the United States.
154 bout half would like the option of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) to be available for possible futu
155 physicians write prescriptions for physician-assisted suicide per year.
156            The routine practice of physician-assisted suicide raises serious ethical and other concer
157 ufficient to ensure that patients requesting assisted suicide receive the best care.
158    The practices of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide remain controversial.
159 hical arguments against legalizing physician-assisted suicide remain the most compelling.
160                                              Assisted suicide requires physician involvement, but phy
161 ly, on the basis of autonomy, that physician-assisted suicide should be a legal option at the end of
162 h included questions about whether physician-assisted suicide should be banned in Michigan or legaliz
163  is critical to meet society's interest that assisted suicide should be humane, effective, and confin
164 percent of the respondents thought physician-assisted suicide should be legal in some cases, and near
165 how they might evaluate a patient requesting assisted suicide, should this practice be legalized.
166 public debate continues about euthanasia and assisted suicide, some critical care nurses in the Unite
167 n Oregon to determine their attitudes toward assisted suicide, the factors influencing these attitude
168 ues it is commonly referred to as "physician-assisted suicide." This paper defines both the necessity
169 mpared with the patients who were opposed to assisted suicide, those who would consider it were more
170  more likely to find euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide unacceptable.
171 experience of efforts to implement physician-assisted suicide using consensus guidelines?
172                                    Physician-assisted suicide was defined as "a physician providing a
173              Sixty-six percent believed that assisted suicide was ethical in at least some circumstan
174                                    Physician-assisted suicide was legalized in Oregon in October 1997
175                                        Since assisted suicide was legalized in Oregon, many hospice n
176 pairing the judgment of a patient requesting assisted suicide was low.
177                        Support for physician-assisted suicide was lowest among the strongly religious
178 ition, we found that the choice of physician-assisted suicide was not associated with level of educat
179                        Interest in physician-assisted suicide was not related to severity of pain, pa
180  with Dignity Act, which legalized physician-assisted suicide, was approved by Oregon voters in 1994
181 Attitudes toward, and interest in, physician-assisted suicide were assessed through responses to a qu
182 ercent of the 91 Oregonians who have died by assisted suicide were enrolled in hospice programs, ther
183 trongest predictors of interest in physician-assisted suicide were high scores on measures of psychol
184                                 If physician-assisted suicide were legal, 35 percent of physicians sa
185  56 agreed with the statement, "If physician-assisted suicide were legal, I would request a lethal pr
186 egon has legalized and implemented physician-assisted suicide, while observers argue about the moral
187 ing legalization of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide worldwide makes it important to underst
188  important safeguard for patients requesting assisted suicide, yet mental health professionals have n

 
Page Top