戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ng strategies: ophthalmoscopy, telemedicine, assistive AI with telemedicine review, and autonomous AI
2  good social support, positivity, and use of assistive aids.
3 OP screening was cost-effective up to $7 for assistive and $34 for autonomous screening compared with
4 t reaching task while the robot applied both assistive and resistive moments on the head during the t
5 ension of AI in health care, emphasizing its assistive and supplementary role to medical professional
6                dbGaPCheckup is an innovative assistive and timesaving tool that fills an important ga
7 le neuromarkers for sight rehabilitation and assistive approaches.
8                                        While assistive apps as a whole received positive feedback fro
9 sion impairments, either released as special assistive apps claiming to help in tasks such as text or
10 nce that spinal cord stimulation could be an assistive as well as a restorative approach for upper-li
11 artificial intelligence (AI) technology, the assistive chatbot ChatGPT, in the context of midlevel pr
12 s the potential utility of iBCIs as powerful assistive communication devices for people with limited
13 ing neural activity into control signals for assistive communication devices.
14 onmental conditions and its applicability in assistive communication technologies.
15 rpass communication rates offered by current assistive-communication technology.
16 linicians, who were randomized to one of two assistive conditions: assistance from search engines and
17 d biomechanical impacts of a SLACK suit (non-assistive) controller versus three controllers with vary
18 and motion and optimized the stiffness of an assistive device placed at the knee.
19 m that decodes the intended movement, and an assistive device such as a robot limb or computer that i
20 .7] vs 4.3 [20.8]; Cohen d = 0.7), increased assistive device utilization (20.8% [104 of 500] vs 3.0%
21 e greater than or equal to 3 (i.e., need for assistive device) defined mobility impairment.
22 e, seeing far, speaking, hearing, and use of assistive devices (gait, vision, and hearing aids).
23  information that can be used to personalize assistive devices and enhance performance.
24  measure of functioning for RA, include only assistive devices and personal assistance, which were no
25 interfaces (BCIs) can decode SMRs to control assistive devices and promote functional recovery.
26  help individuals with disability to control assistive devices and reanimate paralyzed limbs.
27 revalence of activity limitations and use of assistive devices and the association of limitations wit
28 r building comfortable robotic wearables and assistive devices at low cost.
29  the probability of activity limitations and assistive devices by age, sex, and country income.
30                              Fourth, robotic assistive devices can be used to guide the kinematics of
31 earing device options, cochlear implant, and assistive devices can help direct management of the pati
32                    In addition, such robotic assistive devices can provide immediate quantification o
33     Recent research has focused on designing assistive devices capable of performing mechanical work
34 e useful control signals for neuroprosthetic assistive devices designed to interact with objects in a
35       Male gender, depression, or the use of assistive devices for ambulation predicted poorer outcom
36 computer interfaces (BCIs) enable control of assistive devices in individuals with severe motor impai
37                                 Conventional assistive devices lack adaptability in complex environme
38                             Users of hearing-assistive devices often struggle to locate and segregate
39 rio, Canada, HAD costs are subsidized by the Assistive Devices Program (ADP).
40 ive participants were more likely to require assistive devices such as a walker or wheelchair for mob
41 d soon be an important supplement to hearing-assistive devices such as CIs or offer an alternative fo
42 r implants, bone anchored devices, or use of assistive devices such as frequency modulating systems.
43 y related to audiologist recommendations for assistive devices such as hearing aids and/or frequency
44 dge could be useful to develop therapies and assistive devices that target the least metabolically ec
45 ow people with paralysis to directly control assistive devices using neural activity associated with
46 ility of people with tetraplegia controlling assistive devices using their cortical signals.
47  participants could hear soft speech without assistive devices, and 3 had average normal hearing sens
48 odifying the built environment and providing assistive devices, and for persons with more serious dis
49     The use of supplemental oxygen, need for assistive devices, and job loss were more common in lowe
50 elf-reported activity limitations and use of assistive devices, and prevalence standardised by age an
51 t rely on body movements to control external assistive devices, have been proposed as a safe and robu
52                 LTSS utilization encompassed assistive devices, home modifications, transportation se
53 italizations, diagnostic tests, medications, assistive devices, nonallopathic treatments, travel to v
54 Nonoperative-intervention strategies such as assistive devices, orthoses, and viscosupplements are fr
55 king related to nonoperative choices such as assistive devices, orthoses, and viscosupplements.
56  using 4 specific behavioral accommodations (assistive devices, personal assistance, limits on the am
57 S) level of II or III (walks with or without assistive devices, respectively).
58 n, hearing, rehospitalizations, and need for assistive devices.
59 making noise robustness critical for hearing-assistive devices.
60 ribing individual-specific CoM dynamics with assistive devices.
61 rs and assist those unable to access hearing-assistive devices.
62 te movement restoration when integrated with assistive devices.
63 o physical therapy strategies and preventive assistive devices.
64 ving signal-processing algorithms in hearing-assistive devices.
65 ine interfaces can allow neural control over assistive devices.
66 computer cursors, prosthetic arms, and other assistive devices.
67 l activity directly into control signals for assistive devices.
68 ability and pain, and general perceptions of assistive devices.
69  for physical or occupational therapy or for assistive devices.
70 ing systems fail to leverage such factors in assistive driving technologies adequately.
71 ients included driving (27.8%), using visual assistive equipment (17.5%), mobility (16.3%), performin
72 ission dependency, were discharged with more assistive equipment and supplemental oxygen, spent more
73 nowledge of the functional status, discharge assistive equipment, and follow-up medical recommendatio
74 pre-COVID-19 admission dependency, discharge assistive equipment, discharge medical follow-up recomme
75 grated with various devices, such as medical-assistive exoskeletons and smart protective suit.
76 can be sorted in multifactorial manner using assistive filters.
77 r passive, depending on whether there was an assistive force provided by the apparatus), and (c) the
78 lds of use for imperceptible therapeutic and assistive haptic technologies supporting care and diseas
79 ess of current speech separation methods for assistive hearing devices as well as neuroprosthetic dev
80 pact on speech and language and the need for assistive hearing devices.
81 velopment of age-specific rehabilitative and assistive interventions.
82                       The reaching task with assistive limb dynamics was associated with the most mus
83 their interest in the concept of a universal assistive listening device receiver, and their interest
84                                              Assistive listening devices (classroom FM systems) may r
85 and made many suggestions for both improving assistive listening devices and for improving informatio
86                                              Assistive listening devices can improve the neural repre
87 loss was conducted to determine their use of assistive listening devices for face-to-face conversatio
88                 The 423 respondents who used assistive listening devices found them to be of signific
89 t communication effectiveness, hearing aids, assistive listening devices, and cochlear implants for s
90 plification devices, such as hearing aids or assistive listening devices, cochlear implants, aural re
91 part of an audience, their satisfaction with assistive listening devices, their interest in the conce
92 de that the amnioserosa must play a key, but assistive, mechanical role that aids uncurling of the ge
93 rt the comparative transcriptome atlas as an assistive modality for complex classification of rare ki
94 of the comparative transcriptome atlas as an assistive modality for complex classification of rare ki
95 ble-driven actuators and sensors, generating assistive moments in concert with biological muscles.
96           Monkeys rapidly adapted to a novel assistive or resistive perturbation along the direction
97 ether passive forces in each movement played assistive or resistive roles in limb dynamics.
98 lation, constraint-induced movement therapy, assistive orthoses, noninvasive brain stimulation, virtu
99 ons and aligned ventilatory transitions with assistive phases of the step.
100                                              Assistive powered wheelchairs will bring patients and el
101 e suggests that access to essential mobility assistive products (MAPs) might be dependent on non-clin
102  support efforts towards expanding access to assistive products and identifying groups that could par
103                                     Wearable assistive, rehabilitative, and augmentative devices curr
104 intervention, painting and singing, personal assistive robot, cognitive-behavioral therapy, play acti
105 r the use of brain-evoked potential to train assistive robotic devices through the use of neuroprosth
106 t difference between the effects of socially assistive robots and a plush toy, and there was no effec
107 However, before recommendations for socially assistive robots can be made, a cost-effectiveness analy
108 ment and widespread adoption of a variety of assistive robots for both able-bodied and mobility-impai
109                                     Socially assistive robots may help to improve loneliness, social
110                                     Socially assistive robots offer an alternate source of connection
111 ic reviews including the effects of socially assistive robots on health outcomes were included and a
112 ush toy, and there was no effect of socially assistive robots on psychiatric outcomes including agita
113 eta-analysis indicated no effect of socially assistive robots on quality of life (standard mean diffe
114 ted spontaneously while users merely observe assistive robots performing tasks.
115                                     Socially assistive robots show promise for improving non-psychiat
116 e, a cost-effectiveness analysis of socially assistive robots to improve mood across the lifespan, an
117 or reports that contain errors we develop an assistive setting, a demonstration of clinician-AI colla
118 resent a further step toward everyday use of assistive, soft, robotic wearables for the upper limbs.
119            Use of icobrain aria, an AI-based assistive software for ARIA detection and quantification
120          This report describes a pathologist-assistive software tool that reduces these user limitati
121 significantly better when using the AI-based assistive software.
122 sing decisions and might be improved through assistive software.
123 rain-machine interfaces (BMIs) provide a new assistive strategy aimed at restoring mobility in severe
124 t and blocked force, applicable for wearable assistive tasks.
125                                              Assistive techniques such as white canes, guide dogs, an
126 , cyber-attack detection relies on reactive, assistive techniques, where pattern-matching algorithms
127 tion with potential applications in auditory assistive technologies aimed at enhancing speech recogni
128 otential for various applications, including assistive technologies and cognitive enhancements, to fu
129 ers is crucial for enhancing the adoption of assistive technologies and ultimately improving the qual
130                    The importance of hearing assistive technologies in the management of adults with
131                                      Hearing assistive technologies include listening, alerting, and/
132                            However, existing assistive technologies often fail to integrate seamlessl
133 d to allow persons with paralysis to operate assistive technologies or to reanimate muscles based upo
134                                              Assistive technologies such as artificial intelligence-b
135 e the sensation of touch and pain, and (iii) assistive technologies to enable disabled people to oper
136 gaps, ultimately rehabilitation programs and assistive technologies will need to fit the specific dem
137       To develop advanced rehabilitation and assistive technologies, accurate estimation/prediction o
138 rontiers in computer vision, particularly in assistive technologies, augmented reality, and human-com
139 and little capacity to manufacture essential assistive technologies, including prostheses and wheelch
140 pplications in entertainment, education, and assistive technologies.
141 n relying on multiple sensory modalities and assistive technologies.
142  future development of control paradigms for assistive technologies.
143  hearing aids, cochlear implants, or hearing assistive technologies; and rehabilitation service provi
144 ed for the purpose of placing or maintaining assistive technology (696 interventions [21.0%]) or for
145 g pHRI at the hand that may be applicable to assistive technology and physical rehabilitation, human-
146                 The use of centrifugation as assistive technology appears to be necessary for the pol
147 rations for provision of appropriate hearing assistive technology for this population.
148 f appropriate and carefully selected hearing assistive technology may contribute dramatically to the
149                                      Hearing assistive technology may improve not only their speech p
150 almic treatment, rehabilitation programs, or assistive technology on reading accessibility.
151  recommendation of specific interventions or assistive technology than is currently possible in stand
152 erations in providing hearing aids and other assistive technology to individuals with dual sensory im
153 culture emergence and recent trends in using assistive technology to reduce the burden of Alzheimer's
154 ost currently available evidence for hearing assistive technology use by adults focuses on frequency-
155 ified schedule, transfer to different tasks, assistive technology, and coaching offered during the fi
156 or applications in HCI, such as prosthetics, assistive technology, rehabilitation, and human-robot co
157 sition-specific control models into mobility-assistive technology.
158  further research in neurorehabilitation and assistive technology.
159 Together, these advances pave the way for an assistive therapy that could benefit all ALS patients.
160  into clinical workflows, offers a promising assistive tool for clinicians, which could enable earlie
161                                  An AI-based assistive tool for interpreting clinical images and asso
162 ve design framework can be implemented as an assistive tool in exploring design-feature trade-offs of
163 ould also be developed into a rehabilitative/assistive tool that can result in flexible movements of
164                       TOAD can be used as an assistive tool to assign a differential diagnosis to com
165 mingly sentient and intelligent robots as an assistive tool within and beyond education settings.
166    Multi-modal imaging such as OCT can be an assistive tool.
167                                              Assistive tools and algorithms that can work with static
168 g, training new sonographers, more effective assistive tools for human experts, and enhancement of th
169 rently being evaluated in the development of assistive tools for the determination of transfer order
170 ss, highlighting the necessity for essential assistive tools tailored for this purpose.
171 ative approaches to education, guidance, and assistive tools.
172 tial diagnosis prior to using the respective assistive tools.
173 d new contexts using exoskeletons that apply assistive torques to each ankle at each walking step.
174  are a last resort, and limited awareness of assistive training programs.
175  be addressed long before enteral feeding or assistive ventilatory support might be considered.
176                                              Assistive wearable soft robotic systems have recently ma

 
Page Top