ライフサイエンスコーパス: astigmatism

1 he horizontal optical defocus induced by WTR astigmatism.

2 o improvements in the surgical correction of astigmatism.

3 flatter and have a higher degree of corneal astigmatism.

4 (p = 0.02) are significantly associated with astigmatism.

5 de during cataract surgery to reduce corneal astigmatism.

6 The visual symptoms are more correlated with astigmatism.

7 with scleral-buckle-induced regular corneal astigmatism.

8 nses (pIOLs) for the treatment of myopia and astigmatism.

9 surgery option for those with high myopia or astigmatism.

10 raLase femtosecond laser in moderate to high astigmatism.

11 uated as surgical complications and residual astigmatism.

12 predict posterior astigmatism from anterior astigmatism.

13 or vision and visual function improvement in astigmatism.

14 er and measuring posterior corneal power and astigmatism.

15 treatment for cataract patients with corneal astigmatism.

16 patients received LASIK for myopia or myopic astigmatism.

17 and predictability for correction of myopic astigmatism.

18 values ranged from 7% for myopia to 56% for astigmatism.

19 ovement and the redundancy introduced by the astigmatism.

20 of 55 patients with myopia with and without astigmatism.

21 gmatism caused amblyopia than did orthogonal astigmatism.

22 ia or overestimated myopia and overestimated astigmatism.

23 ely and effectively in eyes with and without astigmatism.

24 g perceptual elongation of objects caused by astigmatism.

25 visit because of blurred vision or residual astigmatism.

26 ate to high regular preoperative topographic astigmatism.

27 ributed to minimizing postoperative residual astigmatism.

28 e found in the tHOA, SA, horizontal coma and astigmatism.

29 when comparing surgically induced and target astigmatism.

30 reduction in myopia was more remarkable than astigmatism.

31 but no differences were found for myopia and astigmatism.

32 ouble-stranded DNA intercalators and optical astigmatism.

33 orrected visual acuity (BCVA), postoperative astigmatism.

34 n in the contralateral eye to correct myopic astigmatism.

35 e history of surgical management options for astigmatism.

36 ted for the 307 eyes treated for myopia with astigmatism.

37 apparent for higher attempted corrections of astigmatism.

38 d after compensation for graft thickness and astigmatism.

39 nses are deployed to correct the defocus and astigmatism.

40 oing LASIK surgery for myopia, hyperopia, or astigmatism.

41 LASIK surgery for myopia, hyperopia, and/or astigmatism.

42 d Plusoptix, respectively) and overestimated astigmatism (0.36 D and 0.32 D, Spot and Plusoptix, resp

43 Mean change in astigmatism 1 year from baseline was 0.75 D; at 2 years

44 nd among the most dominant 5.47% followed by astigmatism 1.9% and hyperopia 1.4% in both sexes.

45 opters (D), hypermetropia greater than +3 D, astigmatism 2 D or more, and/or anisometropia 2 D or mor

46 0.001, ICC = -0.207, LoA = -0.15+/-0.48) and Astigmatism (2,2) (P = 0.003, ICC = -0.965, LoA = 0.2+/-

47 herical aberration (SA), horizontal coma and astigmatism (2,2).

48 an US natives had myopia (18.8% vs 30.7%) or astigmatism (22.0% vs 30.9%).

49 t, and higher prevalence of parental oblique astigmatism (29% vs 5.5%; P < .01) than did Group 2.

50 mean keratometry 60.7 +/- 6.1 D, topographic astigmatism 4.7 +/- 2.6 D.

51 tion were amblyopia (32%), myopia (40%), and astigmatism (52%).

52 the highest rates of high myopia (11.8%) and astigmatism (53.4%).

53 0.27 +/- 0.29 logMAR; P <.001), and corneal astigmatism (8.69 +/- 2.72 to 3.92 +/- 2.13 diopter [D];

54 ith post-refractive surgery corneas, and (2) astigmatism accuracy within 0.5 D is achieved in only 80

55 Although the children with oblique astigmatism achieved equal resolution rates after treatm

56 n has been used to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism, although corneal decompensation can occur a

57 Astigmatism as calculated by vector astigmatism analysis stayed stable at 1 month, 3 months,

58 with scleral-buckle-induced regular corneal astigmatism and a patient with keratoconus following par

59 g incision) in patients with regular corneal astigmatism and age-related cataracts.

60 ion to maximize efficacy in reducing induced astigmatism and amblyopia associated with periocular hem

61 on-Hispanic whites, and the highest rates of astigmatism and anisometropia in Hispanics.

62 TECNIS toric IOLs successfully reduce ocular astigmatism and are a safe and effective treatment for c

63 Bilateral astigmatism and bilateral hyperopia were risk factors fo

64 For eyes with astigmatism and cataracts, both peripheral corneal-relax

65 in popularity due to its lower postoperative astigmatism and endothelial loss.

66 Upon three-year follow-up, low astigmatism and favorable cosmetics results were achieve

67 red in patients older than 5 years to reduce astigmatism and for aesthetic purposes.

68 ive for correcting low-to-moderate levels of astigmatism and may be the best option for the younger p

69 Worse astigmatism and nonwhite recipient race were associated

70 ed by central corneal thinning that leads to astigmatism and reduced visual acuity.

71 ns surgery on anterior and posterior corneal astigmatism and total corneal refractive power (TCRP) as

72 nges were determined and correlated with the astigmatism and vision.

73 Normal eyes without astigmatism and with 0.75, 1.75, and 2.75 diopters (D) o

74 Latino children had higher rates of astigmatism and worse visual acuity compared to all othe

75 der HOAs (spherical aberration and secondary astigmatism) and the HOA root mean square (RMS) increase

76 n spherical equivalent (SEQ), anisometropia, astigmatism, and age (corrected for gestation).

77 t refractive errors, specifically hyperopia, astigmatism, and anisometropia, varied by group, with th

78 ficant refractive errors (myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and anisometropia; P<0.00001 for each) were

79 t refraction, mean keratometry, keratometric astigmatism, and complications, were analyzed and compar

80 distance visual acuity, pachymetry, manifest astigmatism, and endothelial cell density after 1, 3, 6,

81 t-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refractive astigmatism, and endothelial cell loss (ECL) at 5 years.

82 Individuals with anisometropia, astigmatism, and hyperopia are more likely to have strab

83 me, sleep apnea, depression, hyperlipidemia, astigmatism, and myopia.

84 -disc ratio, axial length, refractive error, astigmatism, and posterior corneal elevation.

85 e mean spherical equivalent refraction, mean astigmatism, and postoperative CCT were tested.

86 isual acuity improvement, surgically induced astigmatism, and postsurgical complications.

87 EK results in better BCVA, lower astigmatism, and similar long-term ECD compared with PK

88 rations, trefoil, coma, tetrafoil, secondary astigmatism, and spherical aberration were evaluated.

89 es, including mean keratometry, keratometric astigmatism, and spherical equivalent refraction.

90 SNPs linked previously to corneal diseases, astigmatism, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome fall within co

91 er preoperative myopia, greater preoperative astigmatism, and the occurrence of intraoperative suctio

92 ual loss due to increasing irregular corneal astigmatism, and the quality of life declines in patient

93 Analyses compare myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and visual acuity between noncitizens, natu

94 </=1.0 D) or emmetropia (hyperopia </=1.0 D; astigmatism, anisometropia, and myopia <1.0 D).

95 tion, lipid deposition, and against-the-rule astigmatism are classic signs.

96 fallacy promulgates another fallacy--that of astigmatism as a source of a constant perceptual error.

97 Astigmatism as calculated by vector astigmatism analysis

98 up were within 1 D of postoperative manifest astigmatism as predicted or better.

99 view of the most salient topics on assessing astigmatism as well as a discussion of the latest develo

100 fety, predictability, and surgically induced astigmatism) as well as higher-order aberrations were an

101 more attention to children with mild oblique astigmatism, as they are more likely to develop oblique

102 requency of <0.25 diopters (D) of refractive astigmatism at 12 months (82.5%; 95% CI, 75.0-90.0; vs 7

103 Not correcting corneal astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery will fail to

104 nt standard of care is to offer treatment of astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery.

105 ric IOLs may correct for preexisting corneal astigmatism at the time of surgery.

106 -fixated pIOL for the treatment of myopia or astigmatism at the University Eye Clinic Maastricht as o

107 ondition observed twice is rapid progressive astigmatism attributable to corneoscleral pigment accumu

108 We adjust fast astigmatism-based three-dimensional single-particle trac

109 eyes) who were treated for myopia or myopic astigmatism between January 2011 and March 2013 at the D

110 In patients with cataract and corneal astigmatism, bilateral toric IOL implantation results in

111 hyperopic refractive error (>/= 3 dioptres), astigmatism, birth weight percentile, gestational age, r

112 ICRS produced a decrease in astigmatism, but on average did not produce a consistent

113 a-Blockers were consistently shown to reduce astigmatism, but this reduction was shown to be statisti

114 ICRS decreased corneal astigmatism by 27% and corneal coma by 5%, but on averag

115 sm and total corneal refractive power (TCRP) astigmatism (CAant, CApost, CATCRP) measured with Scheim

116 eratoconus or scleral-buckle-induced regular astigmatisms can be equally well corrected with the use

117 sex, race, visual acuity, refractive error, astigmatism, cataract status, glaucoma staging, visual f

118 A smaller degree of initial oblique astigmatism caused amblyopia than did orthogonal astigma

119 Astigmatism changed more than 0.5 diopters in 13.2% of n

120 ificant differences in contrast sensitivity, astigmatism, coma, or higher-order root mean square erro

121 ly flatter and with higher degree of corneal astigmatism compared to patients without EL (Kmed of 40.

122 corrected distance visual acuity, refractive astigmatism, contrast sensitivity, wavefront aberrations

123 Search words included astigmatism, corneal astigmatism, toric IOLs, alignment,

124 t-corrected visual acuities, power vector of astigmatism, corneal curvature, and lens replacement fre

125 The astigmatism correction index was 0.95 +/- 0.33.

126 Increasing levels of induced WTR astigmatism correlated with globally diminishing VD and

127 An astigmatism cutoff of >=1.50 diopters (D) in either eye

128 ectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) with astigmatism (cylinder) and spherical equivalent (SE) ove

129 To compare corneal astigmatism derived from total corneal refractive power

130 subgroup (excluding 1 outlier whose corneal astigmatism doubled after surgery) than in the T4-T6 sub

131 Consecutive myopic and myopic-astigmatism eyes with spherical equivalent (SEQ) ranging

132 Postoperative keratometric astigmatism failed to demonstrate any significant correl

133 ents with keratoconus who underwent FSAK for astigmatism following penetrating (PKP) or deep anterior

134 Refractive astigmatism following suture removal (all visits later t

135 an automated Snellen chart and induction of astigmatism for eyes with at least 6 months of follow-up

136 to measure J0 and J45 vectoral components of astigmatism for SimK 2.0 mm and IOLMaster keratometry va

137 not possible to accurately predict posterior astigmatism from anterior astigmatism.

138 who demonstrated central haze and irregular astigmatism from anterior stromal scarring during that p

139 ia (Group 1) and 82 children with orthogonal astigmatism (Group 2) were chosen.

140 a </=-3.0 diopters (D), hyperopia >/= 4.5 D, astigmatism >/= 2.0 D, and anisometropia >/= 2.0 D.

141 A total of 69% had astigmatism >/=1.50 D, mean of 1.97 D (range 0-5.75).

142 of other ocular pathologies or preoperative astigmatism >1.5 diopters (D).

143 Prevalence of astigmatism >1.50 D varied (P=0.01), with the lowest rat

144 Myopia and high astigmatism (>2.5 diopter) were caused by previous scler

145 Astigmatism (>=1 D) was the most common refractive error

146 ; >2.0 D: OR, 6.93 [4.23-11.35], P < 0.001); astigmatism (>=1.0 D: OR, 2.09 [1.42-3.08], P < 0.001; >

147 ncluding the quality and quantity of corneal astigmatism, health of the ocular surface, and other ocu

148 Astigmatism imaging approach has been widely used to enc

149 Using astigmatism imaging, these structures can also be resolv

150 f cases after wound revision for high-degree astigmatism in 7 cases.

151 und in 61% (4018), myopia in 20% (1336), and astigmatism in 93% (6122) of children.

152 fe method for the correction of high corneal astigmatism in complicated cases with different origins.

153 Corneal astigmatism in eyes with childhood glaucoma was signific

154 Irregular corneal astigmatism in keratoconus or scleral-buckle-induced reg

155 e an effective method for correcting corneal astigmatism in patients with vitreoretinal diseases and

156 The mean amount of surgically induced astigmatism in the overall cohort was 0.77+/-0.65 D.

157 ith motor-less electrical controllability of astigmatism in the visible range.

158 ractive astigmatism must equal total corneal astigmatism in these patients, accuracy of the corneal a

159 igmatism may therefore decrease the residual astigmatism in toric IOL implantation.

160 The cylinder power of astigmatism (in D) causing amblyopia in Group 1 of 2.48

161 an Kmax by +0.87 D (P < .05), and refractive astigmatism increased (P < .0005).

162 clera in chickens developing high myopia and astigmatism induced by form deprivation.

163 Astigmatism is a common refractive error that affects a

164 Postoperative astigmatism is an important cause of suboptimal UCDVA an

165 Corneal astigmatism is common.

166 Corneal astigmatism J0 was different (p = 0.01) for the second t

167 l relaxing incisions (PCRI) for keratometric astigmatism (KA) between 0.75 and 2.5 diopters (D) durin

168 in eyes with low myopia and compound myopic astigmatism </= 0.75 diopter (D).

169 n most hyperopic meridian of at least 1 eye, astigmatism </=1.5 D, anisometropia </=1.0 D) or emmetro

170 to </=6.0 D in the most hyperopic meridian; astigmatism </=1.50 D; anisometropia </=1.0 D) and emmet

171 ommodation (AC/A ratio), horizontal/vertical astigmatism magnitude, and visual activity.

172 <1 D in 22% of cases and underestimated the astigmatism magnitude, on average, by -0.15 +/- 0.34 D.

173 Measuring total instead of anterior corneal astigmatism may therefore decrease the residual astigmat

174 ee eyes of 15 patients with moderate to high astigmatism (mean cylinder, -3.22 +/- 0.59 dioptres) age

175 Keratometric astigmatism, mean keratometry value (K-mean), highest ke

176 showed no significant difference for corneal astigmatism measurements (P = .84).

177 m in these patients, accuracy of the corneal astigmatism measurements was defined as the vectorial di

178 with Cassini, the accuracy of total corneal astigmatism measurements was higher than that of anterio

179 nts was higher than that of anterior corneal astigmatism measurements.

180 Improved assessment of astigmatism, methods to select more accurate lens power,

181 rative myopia more than 6.00 D, preoperative astigmatism more than 3.00 D, and intraoperative suction

182 Under the assumption that refractive astigmatism must equal total corneal astigmatism in thes

183 ariate analysis revealed that Down syndrome, astigmatism, myopia, allergic rhinitis, and asthma were

184 and patients with asthma, allergic rhinitis, astigmatism, myopia, or Down syndrome had higher odds ra

185 eria were previous ocular surgeries, corneal astigmatism of >1.5 diopter (D), ocular pathologies, or

186 refractive lens exchange, irregular corneal astigmatism of >1.5 diopter, and ocular pathologies or c

187 ange, -1.17 to +1.2 D), with minimal induced astigmatism of +0.03 D (range, -0.03 to +1.11 D).

188 f eyes, respectively, achieved postoperative astigmatism of 0.50 D or less.

189 tion of -1.08 +/- 2.62 diopters (D) and mean astigmatism of 0.52 +/- 0.42 D.

190 Bilateral hyperopia of 3.0 D or more or astigmatism of 1.0 D or more were present in 76% of chil

191 smus, hyperopia of 2.0 diopters (D) or more, astigmatism of 1.0 D or more, or anisometropia of 0.5 D

192 tients with age-related cataract and corneal astigmatism of 1.0 to 3.0 diopters measured with the IOL

193 ometropia of 1.0 D or more, and 19.5% showed astigmatism of 1.5 D or more.

194 1 D vs 41.75 +/- 0.28 D, P < .01 and corneal astigmatism of 1.68 +/- 0.16 D vs 1.13 +/- 0.14 D, P = .

195 ith bilateral cataract and bilateral corneal astigmatism of at least 1.25 diopters (D) who were rando

196 TR and posterior WTR, and decreasing oblique astigmatism on both corneal surfaces by increasing the K

197 However, an analysis of the effects of astigmatism on the retinal image suggests that this "log

198 nses, the combined treatment of cataract and astigmatism or presbyopia, or both, is possible.

199 refractive error (OR = 4.22; p = 0.002) and astigmatism (OR = 1.68; p = 0.02).

200 confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.20), as was astigmatism (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.00-2.16), but not myopi

201 c refractive criteria for myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, or anisometropia.

202 On average, the defocus term (Z2(0)), astigmatism, or higher-order aberrations did not change

203 The mean ocular residual astigmatism (ORA) was 0.53 +/- 0.5 diopters.

204 The dominant astigmatism orientation of the ACA was ATR in KC patient

205 36 patients (21-53 years) with primary mixed astigmatism over 3.0 diopters (D) were included.

206 (P < .0005), coma (P < .0005), and secondary astigmatism (P < .005) lessened.

207 Posterior trefoil (P <= 0.034), secondary astigmatism (P <= 0.042), and tetrafoil (P <= 0.045) wer

208 ring led to worsening haze (P = .0001), more astigmatism (P = .002), more central corneal thinning (P

209 nt correlations were observed between CT and astigmatism (P = .02-.049) and FSSC and BSSC and gender

210 mean keratometry (P = .09), and keratometric astigmatism (P = .14) among the groups.

211 evalence was lower with older age groups for astigmatism (P = 0.0002), but not for myopia (P = 0.82)

212 re were no differences in levels of residual astigmatism (P = 0.798) or in higher order aberrations (

213 Greater magnitude of astigmatism (P<0.0001) and bilateral hyperopia (P<0.0001

214 We found little change in astigmatism postoperatively (mean change, -0.1 [95% CI,

215 Initial higher astigmatism power was found to be associated with increa

216 astigmatism was greatest in infants, and WTR astigmatism predominated at all ages.

217 traocular lens for the treatment of post PKP astigmatism, presented for the treatment of graft endoth

218 ameters had a negative correlation with age: astigmatism (r = -0.09; P < 0.001), best-correct visual

219 For hyperopic patients, astigmatism (r = 0.35; P < 0.001), BCVA (r = 0.11; P < 0

220 -corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refractive astigmatism (RA), and topographic astigmatism (TA), cent

221 -corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refractive astigmatism (RA), endothelial cell density, immunologic

222 -related senile cataract and regular corneal astigmatism ranging from 1.50 to 3.00 diopters, enrolled

223 -six patients with high myopia and/or myopic astigmatism received randomized treatment with LASIK Xtr

224 , as they are more likely to develop oblique astigmatism-related amblyopia.

225 Seventy-two children with oblique astigmatism-related refractive amblyopia (Group 1) and 8

226 wed by AS-OCT stage, pachymetry, K-mean, and astigmatism (respectively, AUC = 0.861, 0.779, 0.748, 0.

227 r, Pentacam total, and Cassini total corneal astigmatism, respectively.

228 ative manifest sphere, spherical equivalent, astigmatism, safety indices nor ocular aberrations.

229 There was no significant change in astigmatism secondary to the surgery.

230 Careful assessment and surgical planning of astigmatism should not be an option, but essential compo

231 The mean-K, max-K, UCVA, and astigmatism showed no change over time during these 5 ye

232 particular, maximal keratometry and anterior astigmatism showed significantly worse repeatability in

233 Mean surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was 0.35 +/- 0.67 D and 0.901 +/- 0.88

234 The surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), changes in corneal aberrations and in

235 hod was used to calculate surgically induced astigmatism (SIA).

236 Several subjects showed changes in astigmatism, spherical aberration, trefoil, and coma wit

237 eight, maternal age at birth, anisometropia, astigmatism, spherical equivalent, low visual acuity in

238 s in childhood, including amblyopia, myopia, astigmatism, strabismus, limited ocular motility, promin

239 refractive astigmatism (RA), and topographic astigmatism (TA), central corneal thickness (CCT) and en

240 independence, and lower amounts of residual astigmatism than non-toric IOLs even when relaxing incis

241 gnificantly better long-term BSCVA and lower astigmatism than PK over 5 years of follow-up.

242 nt is evidently clearer in the estimation of astigmatism than spherical curvature.

243 articles regarding the origin and history of astigmatism, the diagnosis and management of the disease

244 For every 1-D increase in induced astigmatism, the resulting decrease in the inner ring su

245 ratometry to 44.4 +/- 2.2 D, and topographic astigmatism to 2.9 +/- 1.3 D.

246 red with the actual postoperative refractive astigmatism to give the prediction error.

247 Search words included astigmatism, corneal astigmatism, toric IOLs, alignment, and IOL calculation.

248 Myopia and astigmatism, two common refractive errors frequently co-

249 100 patients with myopia or compound myopic astigmatism undergoing bilateral LASIK between October 2

250 N: Two patients with myopia and high corneal astigmatism underwent cataract operation with toric IOL

251 Both spherical myopia and astigmatism underwent reduction, but the reduction in my

252 ectable directions, so as to tune defocus or astigmatism, up to about 3 wavelengths.

253 LASIK for primary high mixed astigmatism using optimized aspherical profiles and a fa

254 The astigmatism vectors along the 45-degree (J45) and 0-dreg

255 mographics, location of disease, topographic astigmatism, visual acuity, coexisting ocular disease, a

256 lassified as moderate astigmatism while high astigmatism was >/=3.00 D.

257 Mean refractive astigmatism was -0.77 (0.52) D and -1.89 D (1.00) D, res

258 The absolute residual refractive astigmatism was 1.0 and 0.75 Diopters, respectively.

259 Mean postoperative astigmatism was 1.27 +/- 1.02 Dcyl.

260 Postoperative manifest refraction astigmatism was 1.58 +/- 1.25 D overall, but lower (0.75

261 Preoperatively, mean (SD) corneal astigmatism was 2.02 (0.95) D and 2.00 (0.84) D in the t

262 Astigmatism was 2.03 +/- 1.11 mum preoperatively and 1.6

263 -4.72 +/- 3.32 diopters (D), and refractive astigmatism was 3.69 +/- 3.09 D.

264 en, the prevalence of myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism was 3.98% (95% CI, 3.11%-5.09%), 13.47% (95%

265 Mean topographic astigmatism was 4.02 diopters (D) at 5 degrees.

266 Preoperative topographic astigmatism was 4.57 +/- 2.05 diopters (D).

267 The prevalence of WTR, ATR, and OBL astigmatism was 6.50%, 0.80%, and 1.00% respectively.

268 Every 1-D increase in induced WTR astigmatism was associated with a statistically signific

269 tion, the predicted postoperative refractive astigmatism was calculated for each formula.

270 lysis results of GEE model, greater power of astigmatism was found to be associated with increased ch

271 The prevalence of astigmatism was greatest in infants, and WTR astigmatism

272 Astigmatism was lower 1 year after EK vs PK (-1.69 vs -3

273 Residual astigmatism was lower in the toric IOL group than in the

274 Refractive astigmatism was measured with the ARK-530A autorefractor

275 ly, if the total instead of anterior corneal astigmatism was measured.

276 In 4 cases, amblyogenic astigmatism was present and decreased from 1.25 +/- 0.5

277 e extraction for the treatment of myopia and astigmatism was safe and effective, and the reported AEs

278 Refractive astigmatism was significantly lower in the study group (

279 mpairment (95%, 95% CI = 76.2, 98.8); myopic astigmatism was the commonest type of refractive error (

280 ting visual acuity (n = 7), while refractive astigmatism was within 4 diopter (D) in all but 1 eye (a

281 The overall rates of high myopia and astigmatism were 4.6% and 45.0%, respectively, with Chin

282 erical component myopia and less than 1.00 D astigmatism were enrolled between September 22, 2014, an

283 of spherical myopia and less than 3.00 D of astigmatism were enrolled consecutively.

284 and 2.75 diopters (D) of with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism were imaged using a 3 x 3-mm scan pattern SD

285 Anterior and total corneal astigmatism were measured with the Pentacam HR (Oculus,

286 Myopia and astigmatism were most prevalent in the Chinese populatio

287 J0 and J45 vectoral components of astigmatism were obtained using power vector analysis.

288 ariate analysis, myopic refractive error and astigmatism were significantly associated with laser the

289 The mean DeltaSEQ and induced astigmatism were similar between IOL models.

290 tients with co-existing cataract and corneal astigmatism were studied before and after simultaneous c

291 Mean manifest and topographic postoperative astigmatism were: 3.6 +/- 2.5 diopters (D) and 4.65 +/-

292 ients between anterior and posterior corneal astigmatisms were associated with Blur, being 0.93 for K

293 in posterior corneal elevation and irregular astigmatism, which contribute to visual disability in su

294 surgery have 1 diopter (D) power or more of astigmatism, which left untreated is visually significan

295 .5 and </=2.75 D were classified as moderate astigmatism while high astigmatism was >/=3.00 D.

296 Achieving minimal induced astigmatism with excellent visual acuity remains a chall

297 retain correspondence of the anterior cornea astigmatism with the toric IOL astigmatic power.

298 the vectorial difference with the refractive astigmatism, with lower vector differences denoting high

299 Greco might have experienced as a result of astigmatism would have caused not only his subjects to b

300 )), vertical trefoil (Z3(-3)), and secondary astigmatism (Z4(4)).