コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ted willingness to prescribe antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria.
2 encourage more testing for and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria.
3 ion; for UTI, 43.9% were due to treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria.
4 s on the benefits and harms of screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria.
5 ould not undergo screening and treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria.
6 heir approach to a hypothetical patient with asymptomatic bacteriuria.
7 on; for UTIs, 43.9% were due to treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria.
8 likely to prescribe antibiotic treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria.
9 chronic colonization that is associated with asymptomatic bacteriuria.
10 ere less likely to prescribe antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria.
11 onephritis strains (53% of isolates) than in asymptomatic bacteriuria (32%) or fecal/commensal (12.5%
12 (57 human commensal, 32 animal commensal, 54 asymptomatic bacteriuria, 45 complicated UTI, 38 uncompl
13 confirmed urinary tract infection (UTI) and asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) in relation to diabetes me
14 the prevalence and clinical significance of asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) in women with autoimmune r
16 infections (rUTIs) are routinely treated for asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB), but the consequences of t
17 s after human inoculation with the prototype asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU) strain E. coli 83972, and
18 ttle is known about bacteria associated with asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU) with regard to urinary tr
20 lactiae causes both symptomatic cystitis and asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU); however, growth characte
21 e unnecessary screening for and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria aid in antibiotic stewardship.
22 oss all ages) have the highest prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria, although rates increase with a
23 urious, reflect confounding due to untreated asymptomatic bacteriuria among women who were not given
24 r catheterized patients: catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria and catheter-associated urinary
26 The survey described a male patient with asymptomatic bacteriuria and changes in urine character.
27 lts are caused by an increased prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria and frequent use of urinary cat
29 o evaluate the prevalence and persistence of asymptomatic bacteriuria and pyuria in women at high ris
31 cessation, malaria prevention, treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria, and treatment of syphilis), if
33 chronic colonization, which is analogous to asymptomatic bacteriuria, are independent events that re
34 rcent of occasions on which a culture showed asymptomatic bacteriuria, as compared with 1 percent of
35 he microbiologic evaluation of patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria, as well as indications for ant
36 s to antibiotic overuse through treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) and long durations of the
38 surgical site contamination, but the role of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) before elective surgery a
39 itive impairment, and the high prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) complicate the diagnosis
45 ith FT as initial treatment for lower UTI or asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) or as stepdown treatment
46 he difference was driven by a higher rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) post-treatment in patient
47 ably contrast with the clinical condition of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB), characterized by signifi
48 delines recommend withholding antibiotics in asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB), including among patients
50 ation of the human bladder with a prototypic asymptomatic bacteriuria-associated bacterium, Escherich
52 tcomes and that treatment of screen-detected asymptomatic bacteriuria can reduce the incidence of pye
53 oli strain, whereas recurrent infections and asymptomatic bacteriuria commonly result from urinary tr
54 a period of six months for the occurrence of asymptomatic bacteriuria (defined as at least 10(5) colo
60 s and prescribe antibiotics for treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in an effort to reduce infectio
62 ertainty that screening for and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in nonpregnant adults has no ne
66 ertainty that screening for and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant persons has moderat
67 evidence continues to support screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women, but not in o
68 hey would prescribe antibiotic treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria in the absence of an indication
69 cribe inappropriate antibiotic treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria in the absence of risk factors.
70 The difference was driven by a lower rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria in the subgroup of ertapenem-tr
72 reatment of cUTIs, driven by a lower rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria in those who received ciproflox
74 adverse outcomes in the setting of untreated asymptomatic bacteriuria include pregnant women and pati
75 idence of harms associated with treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (including adverse effects of a
84 h risk of recurrent urinary tract infection, asymptomatic bacteriuria is uncommon and, when present,
85 creening nonpregnant women with diabetes for asymptomatic bacteriuria is unlikely to produce benefits
86 e pyelonephritis), lower UTI (cystitis), and asymptomatic bacteriuria, is useful for numerous reasons
88 ive care unit setting, is very difficult, as asymptomatic bacteriuria may be difficult to differentia
90 ve UPEC, defined as isolates associated with asymptomatic bacteriuria or bladder infection (cystitis)
92 t recommendations not to screen for or treat asymptomatic bacteriuria or pyuria in healthy, nonpregna
93 causing acute cystitis, recurrent cystitis, asymptomatic bacteriuria, or pyelonephritis could progre
97 ormalities, whereas in cases of cystitis and asymptomatic bacteriuria the focus should be on bladder
99 The clinical spectrum of UTIs ranges from asymptomatic bacteriuria, to symptomatic and recurrent U
107 reduce unnecessary antimicrobial therapy for asymptomatic bacteriuria without significant additional
108 ordered and antimicrobial prescriptions for asymptomatic bacteriuria, without any significant impact