ライフサイエンスコーパス: attending physician

1 cal trainees and 7038 of 11 186 [62.9%] were attending physicians).

2 by the intensive care unit team plus another attending physician.

3 rction varied according to the race of their attending physician.

4 pared with patients with access to a private attending physician.

5 es before death than patients with a private attending physician.

6 tion was initiated, at the discretion of the attending physician.

7 e patients in the study was conducted by the attending physician.

8 rventions were left to the discretion of the attending physician.

9 erall grading of competence as judged by the attending physician.

10 ges compared with patients without a private attending physician.

11 275 (27.4%) gave birth in years 1 to 5 as an attending physician.

12 Case management decisions were left to the attending physician.

13 cteristics, health system parameters, and ED attending physician.

14 of referring diagnoses were answered by the attending physician.

15 te perceptions of overwork and stress in the attending physician.

16 of pre-ESRD nephrology care, as reported by attending physicians.

17 ction with quality of care (p=.005) than did attending physicians.

18 ulating pharmaceutical salesperson visits to attending physicians.

19 required by protocol but was selected by the attending physicians.

20 eplacement was left to the discretion of the attending physicians.

21 ot protocol mandated but was selected by the attending physicians.

22 receiving routine care were managed by their attending physicians.

23 nue mechanical ventilation, were made by the attending physicians.

24 6 vitreoretinal fellows, and 4 vitreoretinal attending physicians.

25 dents or fellows, and 14 were consultants or attending physicians.

26 mance among a national cohort of experienced attending physicians.

27 The palliative care specialists were all attending physicians.

28 ubset analyses revealed similar findings for attending physicians.

29 efined as visits involving both resident and attending physicians.

30 xaminations should be performed by different attending physicians.

31 d performance was poor because only 12 of 67 attending physicians (17.9%) met or exceeded the minimum

32 -in-training (27.2%) and intensive care unit attending physicians (2.6%).

33 interviewed included 11 residents (68.8%), 5 attending physicians (31.2%), and 8 women (50.0%).

34 , 2260 usual care arm) under the care of 599 attending physicians (340 intervention arm, 259 usual ca

35 Residents (63%) and attending physicians (36%) were more likely to worry abo

36 chnicians (62%) and nurses (60%) followed by attending physicians (44%) and trainees (19%; p < 0.001)

37 clinicians, there were 57 (71.3%) women, 38 attending physicians (47.5%), 32 fellows (40.0%), and 10

38 injury, that person was most frequently the attending physician (51%) and least frequently a "signif

39 37 [32-46] years; 1791 female [55.3%]; 1680 attending physicians [51.2%], 560 trainee physicians [17

40 The 73 respondents included attending physicians (53 [73%]) and resident physicians

41 f whom 874 met study inclusion criteria (190 attending physicians, 576 nurses, and 110 residents).

42 Four attending physicians (6.2%) initiated low tidal volume v

43 ose surveyed, we received responses from 280 attending physicians (61.0%) and 256 APCs (54.5%).

44 Respondents were attending physicians (63%), nurses (13%), trainee physic

45 38 respondents: 87 (36.6%) residents and 151 attending physicians (63.4%).

46 Ninety-seven attending physicians, 63 resident physicians, and 162 st

47 were surveyed across level of training (714 attending physicians [67.6%] and 283 residents or fellow

48 r 13% (n = 8) of cases, often involving male attending physicians (75%), Veterans Affairs settings (6

49 opportunity to discuss the incident with an attending physician (76 of 78 respondents [97.4%]).

50 sts, 89.3% [134 of 150; 95% CI: 83.4, 93.3]; attending physicians, 80.0% [120 of 150; 95% CI: 72.9, 8

51 Most respondents were attending physicians (82%) at teaching hospitals (76%) w

52 ormed from January 1999 through June 2008 by attending physicians (86 surgeons and 134 obstetricians/

53 131 primary care practitioners (49.7%), 232 attending physicians (88.2%), and 168 academic faculty (

54 The intensivist group consisted of 11 attending physicians, 9 pulmonary and critical care fell

55 Fewer residents (52%) than nurses (73%) or attending physicians (95%; p < 0.001) reported feeling c

56 r among residents (86%) than nurses (91%) or attending physicians (96%; p = 0.008).

57 ations recorded at hospital admission by the attending physician (according to the hospital standard

58 emonstrated that lack of access to a private attending physician (adjusted odds ratio = 23.10; 95% co

59 = 5.6 to 15.6; p < .001); lack of a private attending physician (adjusted odds ratio = 4.4; 95% conf

60 Among 89 ED attending physicians, adjusted ED discharge probability

61 Attending physicians (adult, pediatric; intensivist, non

62 All attending physicians, advanced practice practitioners, c

63 Participants included attending physicians, advanced practice providers (APPs)

64 ellows were not significantly different from attending physicians after case-mix adjustment according

65 Esther Obeng is an attending physician and associate professor at Emory Uni

66 to evaluate the association between treating attending physician and door-to-antimicrobial time after

67 related distressing events and their role in attending physician and resident physician emotions and

68 A total of 108 experienced attending physicians and 143 internal medicine and emerg

69 Four raters (2 attending physicians and 2 senior resident physicians) w

70 of which 220 of 300 (73%) self-identified as attending physicians and 47 of 300 (16%) as fellows.

71 The survey was administered to 459 attending physicians and 470 APCs, including certified r

72 Little is known about the reasons why attending physicians and advanced practice clinicians (A

73 Attending physicians and APCs frequently work while sick

74 respondents revealed additional reasons why attending physicians and APCs work while sick, including

75 These patients' attending physicians and bedside nurses were also enroll

76 Participants were oncology clinicians (attending physicians and fellows or nurse practitioners)

77 rds; for fatal events, it was collected from attending physicians and next of kin.

78 Primary care teams comprising 28 attending physicians and nurse practitioners, residents,

79 e annotated by a cohort of radiologists, two attending physicians and three residents, to establish a

80 mographic characteristics and 24 physicians (attending physicians and trainees) purposively sampled f

81 questions on SGM status, was administered to attending physicians and trainees.

82 y improved in 10 of 16 comparisons among two attending physicians and two trainees for all tissues.

83 Ten radiologists (eight radiology attending physicians and two trainees) evaluated 140 che

84 minary reports (following joint readout with attending physicians) and faculty-reviewed final reports

85 ness were conducted with residents, faculty (attending physicians), and staff (program administrators

86 pp; P < .001) to receive a response from an attending physician, and 3.01 pp more likely (95% CI, 1.

87 the supervision of a pediatric critical care attending physician, and a 1-month formal curriculum.

88 of invasive procedures, the specialty of the attending physician, and the area of residence of the pa

89 ation discrepancies were communicated to the attending physician, and, when necessary, medications pr

90 ate), including 288 resident physicians, 202 attending physicians, and 61 advanced practice clinician

91 A total of 553 (290 resident physicians, 202 attending physicians, and 61 nurse practitioners and phy

92 Resident physicians, attending physicians, and graduate medical education (GM

93 y of discharge by interns, senior residents, attending physicians, and nurses was 4.0 (0.75-6.0), 1.0

94 x radiologists (two senior radiologists, two attending physicians, and two residents) and GPT-4 were

95 were length of stay; trainee evaluations of attending physicians; and attending physician reports of

96 ical ICU setting without access to a private attending physician are more likely to undergo the activ

97 edical ICU, those patients without a private attending physician are more likely to undergo the activ

98 Attending physicians are only required to provide in-hos

99 percent of family members singled out their attending physician as the preferred source of informati

100 domized crossover noninferiority trial, with attending physicians as the unit of crossover randomizat

101 es for benign thyroid nodules performed by 2 attending physicians at a single academic referral cente

102 and Methods Between July 2014 and June 2018, attending physicians at one tertiary care institution re

103 n between January 2006 and June 2012 by 2126 attending physicians at the 19 intervention group AMCs a

104 ation hospital (VAH) and private patients of attending physicians ("attendings") who underwent primar

105 d so much that teaching was ineffective, and attending physicians being rushed and/or eager to finish

106 Critical care attending physicians, bereaved parents, and meeting gues

107 ssociated with better self-rated measures of attending physician burnout and emotional exhaustion but

108 ent levels of training (including cardiology attending physicians, cardiology fellows, internal medic

109 ICU staffing model to increase continuity of attending physician care for patients while also decreas

110 Attending physicians' central venous catheter insertion

111 n 61 (76%) of these events, discussions with attending physicians changed management in 33% (18/54) o

112 in antimicrobial timing was explained by the attending physician compared with 4% attributable to ill

113 Attending physicians completed a questionnaire about the

114 Attending physicians completed a questionnaire about the

115 ry 1, 1996, from an open unit, where private attending physicians contributed and controlled the care

116 In- hospital attending physician coverage attenuated this discrepancy

117 om 12-hr in-hospital pediatric critical care attending physician coverage model in January 2004.

118 Attending physicians deemed LLM HCs to be more complete

119 in death, and 212 (43.1%) stipulated that an attending physician determine brain death; 150 policies

120 ciency were direct observation of surgery by attending physician, discussions about fellow performanc

121 sand five hundred forty-one respondents were attending physicians during their most recent pregnancy

122 Distractions from attending physicians, electronics, nursing, consults, an

123 TPN intakes were prescribed by rotating attending physicians, enabling assessment of protein met

124 med did not correlate with how critical care attending physicians evaluated overall performances of i

125 Critical care attending physician evaluations of residents placed resi

126 nty percent of the variance in critical care attending physician evaluations of the residents during

127 between handoffs and patient outcomes among attending physicians, even though similar concerns apply

128 In an experimental setting, attending physicians exposed to videos of good medical t

129 Attending physicians face malpractice exposure not only

130 t (including stent-graft costs and excluding attending physician fees) and mean postoperative length

131 nts, on each medical ICU day, we asked their attending physician, fellow, resident, and primary nurse

132 n-hours), while the new process required two attending physicians for an average of 121 mins (4.03 at

133 The previous process required three attending physicians for an average of 157 mins (7.55 at

134 hey are in focus and reviewed by experienced attending physicians for wound surveillance, but dermato

135 Once involved, attending physicians frequently modify resident's manage

136 Participants were 41 attending physicians from England and Wales experienced

137 evidence-based literature by the attending, attending physicians giving spontaneous or unplanned pre

138 ied as treatment failure, at which point the attending physician gradually stopped the study drug and

139 bility was observed between the resident and attending physician groups across the 3 classification s

140 s dying in the medical ICU without a private attending physician had statistically shorter hospital a

141 Patients with private attending physicians had significantly greater medical c

142 Sleep loss in attending physicians has an unclear effect on patient ou

143 T included a pediatric ICU-trained fellow or attending physician, ICU nurse, ICU respiratory therapis

144 The primary surgeon was an attending physician in 474 cases and a senior resident p

145 clinical certainty of CHF determined by the attending physician in the emergency department.

146 ttended a 3-hour training session held by an attending physician in the hospital eye clinic and took

147 tical care fellows in 41%, and critical care attending physicians in 13%: first attempt success rate

148 ion reduced the number of rA TTEs ordered by attending physicians in a variety of ambulatory care env

149 on breakdowns between surgical residents and attending physicians in the pre- and postoperative setti

150 nerally held to the same standard of care as attending physicians in their respective specialties.

151 elpful to HIV-positive individuals and their attending physicians in understanding disease progressio

152 Twenty-seven hospital-based attending physicians, including 6 emergency physicians,

153 ity of care as measured by the Continuity of Attending Physician Index increased by 9% with the share

154 ers, when formal criteria were used, and the attending physicians' intuitive clinical impressions in

155 7%]) or death (91 [1%] vs 102 [1%]) based on attending physician involvement.

156 senior-level trainees in such a way that the attending physician is not scrubbed into the case are be

157 ces are implemented at the discretion of the attending physician, lack the ability to redefine the st

158 o determine whether physical findings by the attending physician led to important changes in clinical

159 Once the costs were identified, attending physician-led teams were designed to reduce co

160 Eight attending physician-led teams were observed for 11 round

161 physicians for an average of 157 mins (7.55 attending physician man-hours), while the new process re

162 physicians for an average of 121 mins (4.03 attending physician man-hours).

163 tisfaction, improved throughput, and reduced attending physician man-hours.

164 Understaffing intensive care units with attending physicians may have a negative impact on teach

165 separating changeover days for resident and attending physicians may not significantly change these

166 hr in-hospital pediatric intensive care unit attending physician model.

167 The MCS faculty served as attending physicians more often and were required to pro

168 Chief residents and attending physicians most frequently identified problem

169 rning in academic intensive care units where attending physicians must couple teaching duties with pa

170 in the medical ICU, those without a private attending physician (n = 26) were statistically more lik

171 ining therapies than patients with a private attending physician (n = 87) (80.8% vs. 29.9%; relative

172 k or African American (146 [90.1%]), whereas attending physicians (n = 21) were predominantly female

173 surgical residents (n = 59), general surgery attending physicians (n = 36), and surgical nurses (n =

174 Most were attending physicians (n = 76 [48.1%]).

175 Professions most involved were attending physicians (n=531, 89.5%), followed by nurses

176 After covariate adjustment, attending physicians' (n = 40) median door-to-antimicrob

177 ology reports and a pneumonia diagnosis from attending physician notes, using interpretable classifie

178 ions compared with patients having a private attending physician (odds ratio = 2.5; 95% confidence in

179 ing and conducting rounds when serving as an attending physician (odds ratio, 2.48; 95 percent confid

180 om 113 (40%) identified as women, and 277 EM attending physicians, of whom 95 (34%) identified as wom

181 of 30-day unplanned revisits for patients of attending physicians on 2-week rotations was 21.2% compa

182 frequently discussed patient management with attending physicians on randomly selected weekends, they

183 A critical care attending physician or fellow and an experienced respira

184 atient ordering errors was observed only for attending physicians (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.02-1.42) and A

185 ation training was significantly higher than attending physician performance (internal jugular: media

186 Attending physician performance was compared to resident

187 Attending physicians performed higher on the internal ju

188 ing the patients into five groups based upon attending physician practice, we observed patients in th

189 , ventilator decisions made primarily by the attending physician, pre-ICU cardiopulmonary resuscitati

190 , myelosuppression (n=2), seizure (n=2), and attending physician preference (n=1).

191 OS is the practice of an attending physician providing supervision to 2 surgeries

192 Finally, 78.3% have witnessed attending physicians purposefully disregarding required

193 The median (interquartile range) patient-to-attending physician ratio was 13 (10-16).

194 residents' perception of necessity than from attending physicians' receptiveness or interest in being

195 The attending physician recommended transfer to the intensiv

196 nee evaluations of attending physicians; and attending physician reports of burnout, stress, and work

197 tients were entered into the study after the attending physician requested assistance in tube placeme

198 Nonstudy attending physicians requested GA if pulmonary tuberculo

199 Clinicians from a diversity of role groups (attending physician, resident, and nurse) were eligible

200 , and western regions of the US and included attending physicians, resident physicians, and advanced

201 All attending physicians, residents, and nurses in a multile

202 ddition, matching for treatment facility and attending physician revealed similar associations betwee

203 Six masked attending physician reviewers (3 per site) viewed random

204 The use of 2-week inpatient attending physician rotations compared with 4-week rotat

205 patients discharged from 2- vs 4-week within-attending-physician rotations.

206 Zealand) supportive therapy according to the attending physician's criteria.

207 -making autonomy needs and the critical care attending physician's desire to provide consistent bedsi

208 tal changed substantially as a result of the attending physician's physical examination.

209 ) on the basis of serial blood tests and the attending physician's report.

210 on educational investment, the critical care attending physician's return on resident investment, and

211 Attending physicians, selected for their teaching prowes

212 Attending physicians should be more encouraged to use a

213 we compared Veterans Affairs Medical Centers attending physicians' simulated central venous catheter

214 We aimed to compare attending physicians' simulated central venous catheteri

215 Critical care attending physicians spent a minimum of 12.6 hrs/wk invo

216 Studies examined ICU attending physician staffing strategies and the outcomes

217 eceive usual care (n=102), prescribed by the attending physician; standard low-intensity intervention

218 sion of private health insurance and private attending physician status (r2 = .39, p < .001).

219 oximating that of unaided fellowship-trained attending physicians.Supplemental material is available

220 Attending physician surgical quality outcomes at a singl

221 fined as attempted CCCs that resulted in the attending physician taking over, radialization of the CC

222 the part of supervising senior residents or attending physicians, the results suggest that concerns

223 Attending physicians thought that protease inhibitors we

224 rs at date of diagnosis, and permission from attending physician to contact.

225 ars, and for whom we had permission from the attending physician to contact.

226 te of diagnosis; and (3) permission from the attending physician to contact.

227 ng migrants or refugees, it is important for attending physicians to consider the burden of endemic d

228 The opportunity cost for using critical care attending physicians to provide 12.6 resident teaching h

229 resident physicians to seek supervision and attending physicians to provide the same.

230 e study of narrative comments provided by EM attending physicians to residents, multiple modifiable c

231 IPANTS: This cohort study included inpatient attending physicians, trainee physicians, and advanced p

232 two teams, with each team consisting of two attending physicians, two residents, and three interns.

233 first Monday of month) for both resident and attending physicians until June 30, 2013 (preseparation

234 Residents and attending physicians use drugs of abuse for performance

235 When attending physicians visited patients, however, resident

236 owledge test scores higher among fellows and attending physicians vs. residents.

237 f varying the durations of internal medicine attending physician ward rotations.

238 n 10 min additional medication chosen by the attending physician was administered.

239 The primary attending physician was an FP in 1019 cases, an IM in 25

240 of these 18 patients, the opinion of another attending physician was obtained; for 33% (6 of 18), the

241 white patients, regardless of whether their attending physician was white (rate of catheterization,

242 inee workload and increased participation of attending physicians was associated with higher trainee

243 The editorial fellowship for radiology attending physicians was renamed the RSNA William R.

244 Patient volumes per attending physician were higher at academic hospitals (m

245 Patients without a private attending physician were significantly more likely to un

246 A sample of 29 nurses, residents, and attending physicians were interviewed regarding their at

247 Attending physicians were more likely to score lower in

248 Adult, pediatric, and neonatal critical care attending physicians were randomly selected to participa

249 Residents reported that, when contacted, all attending physicians were receptive to communication, wh

250 Dermatology patients and their attending physicians were recruited by convenience sampl

251 ulitis, with FPs, IMs, or GIs as the primary attending physician, were included in the study.

252 cy department arrival, or were treated by an attending physician who cared for less than five study p

253 ion, 59.7% of residents work with at least 1 attending physician who intimidates the residents, reduc

254 Of 2,375 U.S. critical care attending physicians who responded to the initial survey

255 Of the 341 attending physicians who responded, 144 (42 percent) had

256 Participants were 62 attending physicians who staffed at least 6 weeks of inp

257 t and two interns, plus multiple supervising attending physicians who volunteered to participate.

258 reted independently by two abdominal imaging attending physicians who were blinded to the final resul

259 an alert from a hospital staff member to the attending physician will reduce the rate of symptomatic

260 ly-reported needs over time and provided ICU attending physicians with automated timeline-driven comm

261 for stroke risk reduction in AF by supplying attending physicians with reports about patients risk fa

262 aduate year 4 residents worked with multiple attending physicians with varying teaching styles to a s

263 Overall, procedures performed the day after attending physicians worked overnight were not associate

264 Physicians included resident physicians and attending physicians working in the emergency department

265 iversity hospitals, whereas private oncology attending physicians write them in most community hospit