ライフサイエンスコーパス: attentional bias

1 reasingly recognized as a distinct source of attentional bias.

2 ry assessments of opioid craving, and opioid attentional bias.

3 images, emphasizing the specificity of their attentional bias.

4 drift-diffusion model with a fixation-based attentional bias.

5 sk, which provides a quantitative measure of attentional bias.

6 ing electrooculography (EOG) in a measure of attentional bias.

7 ersus neutral words was used as a measure of attentional bias.

8 correlates of cocStroop- or eStroop-related attentional bias.

9 metabolism of the lateral PPC causes spatial attentional bias.

10 ns underlying a preparatory coding model for attentional bias.

11 ty patterns to support relatively persistent attentional biases.

12 Reward learning gives rise to strong attentional biases.

13 f WM and priming states in visual cortex for attentional biasing.

14 ween the stimuli affect the strength of this attentional bias?

15 als who abuse alcohol often show exaggerated attentional bias (AB) towards alcohol-related cues, whic

16 affective information processing (including attentional bias [AB], a putative cognitive mechanism of

17 isorders typically manifest as problems with attentional biases, aberrant learning, dysfunctional rew

18 ctive stimulation showed greater evidence of attentional bias acquisition in the targeted direction (

19 Importantly, across visual cortex, the attentional biases (activity for attended versus unatten

20 Smokers with the greatest attentional bias also experienced more negative affect d

21 Negative attentional bias and alterations in positive affect dyna

22 trol is necessary for an association between attentional bias and catastrophizing to be observed, whi

23 sults were compared between groups to assess attentional bias and cognitive effort to resist salient

24 a, pain catastrophizing, craving, and opioid attentional bias and increased positive affect to a grea

25 ay explain the lack of relationships between attentional bias and individual characteristics, such as

26 states and compromised executive control and attentional bias and motivation toward external food cue

27 done by the pursuit system in the absence of attentional bias and that vector averaging is normally u

28 l effects of target-distractor similarity on attentional biases and suggest tuning sharpening as the

29 t selective attention to pain-related faces (attentional bias); and (b) to determine whether attentio

30 vention on self-reported high trait anxiety, attentional bias, and bacterial abundance, suggesting th

31 de sensory dysfunctions like hypervigilance, attentional bias, and impaired sensory gating.

32 Influential theories suggest that attentional biases are mediated via preparatory activati

33 Negative attentional biases are thought to increase the risk of r

34 The signals that control this attentional biasing are thought to arise in a frontopari

35 ntrolateral prefrontal cortex activation and attentional bias away from angry faces than healthy adol

36 previously investigated the neural basis of attentional bias, but the lack of animal models preclude

37 eral prefrontal areas in the modification of attentional bias by delivering targeted cortical stimula

38 ver, neuroscientific studies have shown that attentional biases can emerge in parallel but in a spati

39 s study has tested whether reducing negative attentional bias causally affects risk factors for depre

40 training to assess the consequent effects on attentional bias change.

41 we demonstrate that exogenous and endogenous attentional biases change linearly as a function of time

42 Such an attentional bias contributes to nonadaptive reward proce

43 tation of individual differences in the drug attentional bias effect associated with cocaine dependen

44 The attentional bias effect for cocaine stimuli and for nega

45 ed the significant correlation of individual attentional bias effect for cocaine stimuli with distrib

46 Variation in the attentional bias effect for cocaine use stimuli among co

47 Greater attentional bias for and greater prefrontal activation b

48 dependencies are associated with significant attentional bias for drug use stimuli that represents a

49 Drug users demonstrated significant attentional bias for drug-related words, which was corre

50 nse time of patients with MDD, indicating an attentional bias for emotional stimuli.

51 Attentional bias for stimulant-related words was measure

52 he neurologic underpinnings of change in the attentional bias for threat have implicated, but not con

53 A pattern of attentional bias for threatening information is thought

54 tive tasks designed to assess visual-spatial attentional biases have shown mixed results.

55 target template variation or consistency on attentional bias in location probability learning.

56 Previous studies raise the hypothesis that attentional bias in the phase of neocortical excitabilit

57 learning in the expression of threat-related attentional biases in anxiety.

58 ct may be different from those that generate attentional biases in anxious individuals.

59 ined the effect of monocular eye patching on attentional biases in normal subjects.

60 These findings suggest that attentional biases in PTSD are linked to deficits in ver

61 A newer proposal suggests that attentional bias is not a static phenomenon, but rather

62 A likely source of this attentional bias is the frontal eye field (FEF), an area

63 mulant dependence had significant effects on attentional bias, its brain functional representation, a

64 teral intraparietal area (LIP) encoded these attentional biases, maintaining sustained excitation at

65 On the EOG measure of attentional bias, MDMA, but not MA, increased attention

66 reported 'liking', emotional reactivity, and attentional bias measures, both before and after the con

67 ines using both eyes, they demonstrate a far attentional bias, misbisecting lines away from their bod

68 Attentional bias modification (ABM) aims to reduce emoti

69 study reports the effects of a computerized attentional bias modification (ABM) procedure on interme

70 oriented, which limits the effectiveness of attentional bias modification techniques that utilize in

71 l is thought to resolve conflict through the attentional biasing of perceptual processing, emphasizin

72 Nine patients had significant spatial attentional bias on the left side and two patients on th

73 Textual NSSI content did not provoke an attentional bias or heighten NSSI urges in either group.

74 iscovered relationship between dACC GABA and attentional bias provides evidence for a neurochemical t

75 ognition-for example, worry, rumination, and attentional bias-rather than the content, and aimed to c

76 es at the retinal level but potentially from attentional biases, reflected in eye movement patterns.

77 er pathways that are ideally suited to carry attentional biasing signals in visuotopic coordinates fr

78 ' processing: the Concurrent Flanker/Alcohol-Attentional bias task (CFAAT).

79 rs with cocaine or water reward performed an attentional bias task, in which those colors served as i

80 s are coded asymmetrically, with a rightward attentional bias that reflects spatial attention in visi

81 ed here likely plays a role in mediating the attentional biases that emerge in these circumstances.Si

82 ta suggest that alcohol at a low dose primes attentional bias to alcohol-associated stimuli, an effec

83 Acute alcohol ingestion increases attentional bias to alcohol-related stimuli; however, th

84 ool, to derive a latent behavioral metric of attentional bias to angry faces in youth with varying le

85 e have employed a non-human primate model of attentional bias to cocaine cues while simultaneously re

86 orbitofrontal cortex, are likely involved in attentional bias to cocaine-associated environmental cue

87 Attentional bias to drug-associated cues correlates with

88 modulation by valence and delay suggests an attentional bias to immediate rewards, which may drive s

89 l control moderated the relationship between attentional bias to pain faces and pain catastrophizing.

90 the critical role of pain catastrophizing in attentional bias to pain-related stimuli.

91 ant relationship between catastrophizing and attentional bias to pain.

92 These findings demonstrate an early attentional bias to reward that potentially drives risk

93 Recreational users did not exhibit attentional bias to the cocaine words and did not differ

94 ation when cued to the left, resulting in an attentional bias to the right visual hemifield.

95 e results suggest that acute stress disrupts attentional bias to threat including a reduction in earl

96 Attentional bias to threat is a key endophenotype that c

97 A mediation analysis further suggested that attentional bias to threat mediated the relationship bet

98 y investigated the effect of acute stress on attentional bias to threat using behavioral and ERP meth

99 a, and performance on a dot-probe measure of attentional bias to threat, and clinician interview-base

100 n the amygdala was associated with increased attentional bias to threat, as well as increased severit

101 ine the impact of stress-induced cortisol on attentional bias to threat, participants in the stress g

102 damide levels were associated with decreased attentional bias to threat.

103 Quantifying relationships between attentional biases to drug cues and dACC neurochemistry

104 suggest that the brain uses a linear sum of attentional biases to guide visual selection.

105 sensitized sensory-perceptual processes and attentional biases to potential danger cues in the envir

106 whether bonobos, similar to humans, have an attentional bias toward emotional scenes compared with c

107 ot-probe task, only the NSSI group showed an attentional bias toward NSSI images but not toward traum

108 ose without a history of NSSI-showed a clear attentional bias toward NSSI-related images during eye-t

109 adolescents, results highlighted a specific attentional bias toward NSSI-related pictorial stimuli i

110 A limited attentional bias toward people early in development is l

111 al responses to affective touch and increase attentional bias toward positive facial expressions.

112 his case, pleasantness of physical touch and attentional bias toward positive facial expressions.

113 f cholinergic neuromodulation can mediate an attentional bias toward reward-related cues, thereby all

114 oking paradigm revealed that monkeys show an attentional bias toward rising versus falling frequency

115 eatures, whereas the FEF provides a top-down attentional bias toward target features that modulates s

116 eference, positive emotional reactivity, and attentional bias toward the methamphetamine-associated c

117 We demonstrated that the strength of the attentional bias toward the target is not fixed but decr

118 Behavioral results showed a pattern of attentional bias toward threat in the Control group but

119 dence for source monitoring difficulties and attentional biases toward trauma-relevant information in

120 on, dwelled for longer durations on, and had attentional biases towards images that contain boundary

121 the dACC would be associated with increased attentional biases towards smoking-related cues.

122 This 'attentional bias' towards drug cues translates into an i

123 in the stress group, suggesting a suppressed attentional bias under stress.

124 se results, such as oculomotor confounds and attentional biases unrelated to error.

125 rom threat, but PTSD patients showed greater attentional bias variability (ABV), which correlated wit

126 Specifically in subjects with MDD, the attentional bias was completely abolished by anodal tDCS

127 Attentional bias was greater in people with highly compu

128 As in clinical studies, attentional bias was indicated by elongated response tim

129 However, no prior studies have compared attentional bias with cocaine cues between these groups

130 y combining an offline behavioral measure of attentional bias with magnetic resonance spectroscopy.