ライフサイエンスコーパス: audiologic

1 ring loss (SSNHL) is commonly encountered in audiologic and otolaryngologic practice.

2 , fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, and audiologic and vestibular assessments.

3 pedic, cardiac, respiratory, ophthalmologic, audiologic, and endocrinologic outcomes.

4 Demographic, audiologic, and surgical factors demonstrated weak corre

5 sectional study consisted of a comprehensive audiologic assessment on 2 occasions separated by 1 to 2

6 en VHL, 17 at risk for VHL) received MRI and audiologic assessment.

7 graphic (CT) scan of the posterior fossa and audiologic assessment.

8 line and at least 3.5 years from their first audiologic assessment.

9 nitive impairment does not preclude accurate audiologic assessment.

10 lt-onset cancer survivors with comprehensive audiologic assessments (eg, Words-in-Noise [WIN] tests,

11 Longitudinal comprehensive audiologic assessments at Indiana University and Memoria

12 asuring HRQoL, specifically as it applies to audiologic care.

13 nt report examines current issues related to audiologic, clinical, engineering, anatomic, and physiol

14 We collected audiologic data on females of Northern European ancestry

15 Audiologic data was analyzed to determine time to hearin

16 Audiologic data were analyzed to determine the incidence

17 Clinical findings and audiologic data were correlated with serial magnetic res

18 Of 489 eligible patients, 333 had evaluable audiologic data.

19 trospective chart review was conducted using audiologic, demographic, and clinical data from 134 chil

20 acilities that can provide the full range of audiologic, diagnostic, and management services to this

21 ) children were referred for full medical or audiologic evaluation after 2-tiered CPA/OAE screening.

22 Audiologic evaluation and MRI should allow early detecti

23 ring loss as documented at their most recent audiologic evaluation.

24 s on the procedures that make up the Level 2 Audiologic Evaluation.

25 s five levels of management: (a) triage; (b) audiologic evaluation; (c) group education; (d) tinnitus

26 Serial audiologic evaluations were conducted for 67 patients ag

27 vertigo underwent additional radiologic and audiologic evaluations.

28 Audiologic examination of carriers of the mutant alleles

29 imaging (MRI) brain scanning, ophthalmic and audiologic exams, and CSF parameters including cellular

30 e scores, MRI brain scanning, ophthalmic and audiologic exams, CSF parameters including cellular and

31 Long-term audiologic follow-up for a minimum of 10 years post-RT i

32 function, and assessment of tinnitus at each audiologic follow-up.

33 ed to assess the potential need for medical, audiologic (hearing loss, tinnitus, hyperacusis), and/or

34 ce receiver, and their interest in receiving audiologic information and services through the Internet

35 Chang grade 2a or higher predicted audiologic intervention.

36 e validity for use as an outcome measure for audiologic intervention.

37 lting grades were then compared with charted audiologic interventions and a number of clinical parame

38 ent, and, when applicable, the timely use of audiologic interventions.

39 uditory functions not tested by conventional audiologic methods.

40 Audiologic monitoring recommendations are presented that

41 of Aging and are the basis for the proposed audiologic monitoring recommendations.

42 should routinely undergo thorough, long-term audiologic monitoring.

43 clovir for 6 weeks has been shown to improve audiologic outcomes at 6 months, but the benefits wane o

44 Apulia Study (Southern Italy) who underwent audiologic, physical, and neuropsychological assessment.

45 iential learning; and to put them to work in audiologic practices and other hearing-health care setti

46 ntial hearing disorders, which should prompt audiologic referral to confirm the diagnosis with audiom

47 Yet, the literature on the efficacy of group audiologic rehabilitation has produced equivocal results

48 the current state of the science related to audiologic rehabilitation of individuals with dual senso

49 ramework and/or the content covered in group audiologic rehabilitation programs influences the psycho

50 Participation in group audiologic rehabilitation programs is a straightforward

51 to assess the psychosocial benefits of group audiologic rehabilitation programs, (4) the participant

52 o measure the psychosocial benefits of group audiologic rehabilitation programs, and offer suggestion

53 d to evaluate a central review mechanism for audiologic results for cisplatin-treated children in the

54 Audiologic results were assessed and graded by the testi

55 Audiologic surveillance during therapy as part of the su

56 vent reporting, posttreatment follow-up, and audiologic testing for potentially ototoxic investigatio

57 Audiologic testing was completed after administration of

58 Serial audiologic testing was conducted on 235 pediatric patien

59 Audiologic testing was performed on day 1.7 +/- 3.0 and

60 bular function assessment as a complement to audiologic testing.

61 d progression of hearing loss as measured by audiologic testing; and cochlear implant success as meas

62 Progressive Audiologic Tinnitus Management (PATM) is based on the pr

63 erent combinations are used with Progressive Audiologic Tinnitus Management.

64 n models were used to assess associations of audiologic variables with frailty phenotype.