ライフサイエンスコーパス: audit

1 e Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT).

2 on-based database (Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit).

3 urveillance, or quality improvement [QI] and audit).

4 should be carefully monitored and subject to audit.

5 to an externally validated national outcome audit.

6 ely 3% of the time required by the in-person audit.

7 from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit.

8 015, registered in the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit.

9 quality by independent assessors and routine audit.

10 national Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit.

11 surveillance, and 4) quality improvement and audit.

12 edure details collected in the retrospective audit.

13 three concepts) were selected for a detailed audit.

14 n procedure (144 997; 20%) identified in the audit.

15 dited and included in the UK National Stroke Audit.

16 e derived from the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit.

17 tionwide prospective Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit.

18 e extracted from the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit.

19 from the Dutch Upper gastrointestinal Cancer Audit.

20 e retrieved from the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit.

21 rtance of using these indicators in clinical audits.

22 expensive in-person systematic neighborhood audits.

23 he time and resources required for in-person audits.

24 fold when compared to information from chart audits.

25 sicians who completed the survey matched the audits.

26 ated to physiologic needs and organizational audits.

27 lization, and in maintaining long-term QA/QC audits.

28 records abstraction and/or drug prescription audits.

29 obtained from electronic databases and chart audits.

30 (May 2012-December 2013) were prospectively audited.

31 in 2 databases: the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit (18 centers) and the University Hospital Southampt

32 tained from the English National Lung Cancer Audit, 2007 to 2011.

33 Data from the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit (2010-2013) were used.

34 Data from the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit (2011-2012) were used.

35 a from the English National Cancer Diagnosis Audit 2014 for patients aged 25 years and older with one

36 8.5% for having an EGS registry to 86.2% for auditing 30-day postoperative readmissions.

37 igned for clinical care, surveillance and QI/audit among 396,241 patients admitted to 12 academic and

38 rs for each mouse welfare scenario (half day audit and daily welfare assessment) were identified and

39 dose to the patient through a retrospective audit and directly measure the exposure to staff members

40 data to compare the impact of individualised audit and feedback (A&F) interventions on dentists' anti

41 We randomly assigned ICUs to either audit and feedback (intervention group) or participation

42 ing fluoroquinolone prescribing: prospective audit and feedback (PAF), restrictive policies (RP), and

43 let (SMD = 0.47; 95% CI, -0.11 to 1.05), and audit and feedback (SMD = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.10-1.07) had m

44 estigate whether the content and delivery of audit and feedback affects its effectiveness in the cont

45 Audit and feedback and educational outreach visits were

46 The strategies of audit and feedback and educational outreach visits were

47 Interventions using physician audit and feedback are associated with lower odds of ina

48 These results increase our confidence that audit and feedback can be safely implemented in this set

49 w strong conclusions on the effectiveness of audit and feedback in dementia care, the large interquar

50 Published studies of audit and feedback in dementia rarely described more tha

51 ted a systematic review and meta-analysis of audit and feedback in the ICU setting, using mortality a

52 ociated with antimicrobial stewardship using audit and feedback in the ICU setting.

53 imicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) using audit and feedback in the intensive care unit (ICU) sett

54 obial stewardship in ICUs with coaching plus audit and feedback is associated with sustained improvem

55 To investigate whether audit and feedback is effective for improving health pro

56 ported with templated comments and real-time audit and feedback of antimicrobial orders by an antimic

57 ive surveillance cultures (80%), monitoring, audit and feedback of measures (80%), patient isolation

58 pital-based ASP that included pharmacist-led audit and feedback on institutional AMR.

59 implemented a pharmacist-driven, prospective audit and feedback strategy for antimicrobial stewardshi

60 Five studies directed audit and feedback to all or most ICU patients receiving

61 pre-prescription approval and/or prospective audit and feedback to target fluoroquinolone prescribing

62 use pre-prescription approval or prospective audit and feedback to target fluoroquinolone prescribing

63 pre-prescription approval and/or prospective audit and feedback to target fluoroquinolone prescribing

64 Interventions that employed physician audit and feedback were associated with significantly lo

65 n = 7), physician-focused interventions (eg, audit and feedback) (n = 6), school-based programs (n =

66 (health coaching, home BP monitoring, and BP audit and feedback), a physician intervention, and a tex

67 Audit and feedback, also known as clinical audit, is an

68 inders, (2) educational outreach visits, (3) audit and feedback, and (4) provider incentives.

69 vement program including provider education, audit and feedback, and unit-based provider financial in

70 embedded behaviour change techniques within audit and feedback, educational outreach, and computeris

71 tion Index were searched combining terms for audit and feedback, health personnel, and dementia.

72 ated large variation in the effectiveness of audit and feedback.

73 st explained by the utilization of physician audit and feedback.

74 nt, and 5 included a mechanism for physician audit and feedback.

75 onal tools, and clinical pathways as well as audit and feedback.

76 training were trained to conduct prospective audit and feedback.

77 e identified in the National Prostate Cancer Audit and mailed a questionnaire at least 18 months afte

78 cted within the U.K. Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Case Mix Programme database.

79 The Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Case Mix Programme is the nati

80 ough the European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration registry platform.

81 to sulfonylureas in the Genetics of Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland (GoDARTS) study (

82 The Genetics of Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Study study holds data for

83 UK Biobank and GoDARTS [Genetics of Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside]) to assess the impact of

84 Using the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) database, we analyzed

85 typed patients from the Genetics of Diabetes Audit and Research Tayside Scotland (GoDARTS) study, a l

86 rive hospital reimbursement and are used for audit and research, and benchmarking and outcomes manage

87 tudinal cohort GoDARTS (Genetics of Diabetes Audit and Research, Tayside Scotland), minor allele freq

88 nd governance controls which are effectively audited and are viewed as trustworthy by diverse stakeho

89 of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest calls were audited and linked with emergency medical services and h

90 HAI prevention activities, such as improved auditing and feedback practices and inclusion of environ

91 , a national hand-hygiene campaign, national auditing and inspections of hospital environment cleanli

92 ction, academic detailing visits, reminders, audits and feedback, and supportive supervision) plus su

93 trictions, such as through regular training, audits and staff updates.

94 e, Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT), and self-reported help-seeking from clinical and

95 669, and 585 were recruited in the baseline, audit, and intervention periods, respectively.

96 y creating country buy-in, reducing costs of audits, and institutionalizing program management.

97 ing fluoroquinolone-prescribing: prospective audit-and-feedback (PAF), restrictive policies (RP), and

98 e the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship audit-and-feedback intervention, via a stepped-wedge ran

99 pital-based ASP that included pharmacist-led audit-and-feedback on institutional AMR.

100 An effective intensive care unit (ICU) audit-and-feedback program was rolled out to 6 non-ICU s

101 Virtual audits appear to be a viable and much less expensive alt

102 We introduce an automated auditing approach for suggesting potentially missing is-

103 mpare institutional performance via practice audit are needed.

104 Nationwide mortality audits are a useful and worthwhile exercise.

105 validation, centralized quality control and audits are emphasized.

106 ized definitions of comorbidity and periodic audits are necessary to ensure data accuracy and minimiz

107 ation of electronic reports to support order auditing, assessment of blood product utilization and co

108 We compared 2 audit-based measures of neighborhood physical disorder i

109 The virtual audit-based physical disorder measure could substitute f

110 r, registered in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit between 2014 and 2015 were included.

111 We collected audited budget statements, annual reports, and project-l

112 dependently by three of the four authors and audited by an independent researcher.

113 sociated with both traits, 8 associated with AUDIT-C only, and 5 associated with AUD diagnosis only.

114 male hazardous drinking (as measured by the AUDIT-C scale) was also associated with worse sleep prof

115 An AUDIT-C score >=3, versus other thresholds, had the high

116 hyperactivity disorder (r(g)=0.23), whereas AUDIT-C score was significantly negatively genetically c

117 AUDIT-P and AUDIT-C scores showed significantly different patterns o

118 e Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C) in both primary and secondary care to detect al

119 e Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) questionnaire and alcohol-related diagnoses and

120 The AUDIT-Consumption (AUDIT-C) score was determined from the first 3 AUDIT ite

121 se Disorder Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) scores and AUD diagnoses in a multi-ancestry Mi

122 e Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) screening test were e-mailed to 14,991 students

123 es on items 1-3, which focus on consumption (AUDIT-C), and for scores on items 4-10, which focus on t

124 The Australian DonateLife Audit captures information on all deaths which occur in

125 We aimed to audit clinical practices before and after introduction o

126 ollected data from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit combined with survival data of the Dutch medical i

127 The AUDIT-Consumption (AUDIT-C) score was determined from th

128 QI/audit criteria, which emphasized reliability and criteri

129 This study also used the AUDIT data in the UK Biobank to identify thresholds for

130 The authors reviewed screening mammography audit data obtained from 2009 to 2014, during which 108

131 Using more detailed audit data on 1033 SME, we show that the 2014 data are f

132 ssion model parameterised with national MRSA audit data to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiv

133 nal Audit Programme postacute organizational audit data) were categorized with a 17-item score, refle

134 is a prospectively collected and clinically audited database in the state of Michigan.

135 Eighty-six percent of the audited deaths occurred in patients requiring an emergen

136 as launched in 6 MOH laboratories, and final audits demonstrated improvements across the 13 quality s

137 hood stigma hypothesis, this study adopts an audit design in a locally organized, online classified m

138 16 registered in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) were included.

139 d, registered in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA).

140 s, using data from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (DUCA) for transthoracic esophagectomy.

141 In the UK, audit evidence suggests that the quality of these judgem

142 inical performance studies and manufacturing audits, facilitate information sharing through trust and

143 peated intervention comprising reminders and audit feedback and targeting of local opinion leaders ca

144 ntion (education, pathways, local champions, audit-feedback).

145 oviding site-specific interventions, monthly audit-feedback, network educational events, internet blo

146 on comprising computerized decision support, audit/feedback tools, and staff training improved (1) gu

147 ng for women and partners, although clinical audits, financial penalties and rewards to efficient mat

148 Case Mix Programme is the national clinical audit for adult critical care in England, Wales, and Nor

149 ted commentary, I welcome the use of virtual audits for advancing the study of neighborhoods and outl

150 much less expensive alternative to in-person audits for assessing neighborhood conditions.

151 w innovations can advance the use of virtual audits for furthering understanding of neighborhood envi

152 ampaign, researchers completed leak and loss audits for methane emissions at three natural gas compre

153 e Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) from two population-based cohorts of European anc

154 10) from the Scottish Intensive Care Society Audit Group database, which we linked to hospital Scotti

155 ied from the Scottish Intensive Care Society Audit Group registry, matched (1:1) with similar hospita

156 The audit has demonstrated changes in clinical practice and

157 We retrospectively audited hospital occupational exposure events over a 10-

158 This study aims to bridge this gap by auditing hospital claims from the Rajiv Aarogyasri Commu

159 Through the template matching audit, hospitals and stakeholders can better understand

160 oS post VD (LoS > ED) should be reviewed and audited if need be.

161 resections in the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit in 2011 were extended with additional treatment an

162 EUROPAIN (EUROpean Pain Audit In Neonates) was a prospective cohort study of the

163 rmance scheme in primary care and a national audit in secondary care started in 2004 and 2007, respec

164 Mooney et al. compare in-person and virtual audits in Detroit, Michigan, and demonstrate that virtua

165 eighborhood physical disorder over in-person audits, including substantial reductions in time and res

166 ith sufficient sensitivity such that further auditing is not required.

167 Audit and feedback, also known as clinical audit, is an extensively-used intervention to improve ca

168 s, which are less costly than medical record audits, is a reasonable approach for observational compa

169 DIT-C) score was determined from the first 3 AUDIT items.

170 ion (mean, 6.3 per patient) and 38.9% of all audited laboratory data were inaccurately communicated.

171 served patient presentations including 4,945 audited laboratory results, presenters used a paper prer

172 The audit log can also be uploaded and viewed in Panorama, a

173 EHR audit log data can provide insights into strategies for

174 Time stamps from the medical record and EHR audit log were analyzed to measure the length of time re

175 igured to only accept documents with a valid audit log, based on embedded hashes to protect log integ

176 esent an object comparison-based approach to audit logging for Skyline that is extensible to other GU

177 er actions challenging and is the reason why audit logging of every change is not common in GUI tools

178 The new audit logging system keeps track of all document modific

179 with each individual office visit using EHR audit logs and determined chart closure times and progre

180 ly collected by the Pediatric Intensive Care Audit Network over 8 years (2007-2014).

181 , parents, and the Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network).

182 An audit of 157 patient presentations including 6,055 data

183 ana national meningitis survey, a nationwide audit of all cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) laboratory record

184 A retrospective audit of all DALK cases performed from 2004 to 2015 in a

185 t was established by comparison to a 6-month audit of clinical C. trachomatis TMA (12,999 specimens)

186 We undertook a 2-center audit of coding accuracy across surgery.

187 sponsors is needed; until then, open public audit of compliance for each individual sponsor may help

188 Documentation and regular audit of donor outcomes is important to help improve the

189 fined clinical samples, and (iii) a 12-month audit of DS2 GM-EIA performance.

190 The surveys included an audit of facility infrastructure and direct observation

191 improved cleaning technique, product use and audit of frequent touch point cleaning.

192 mproved cleaning technique, product use, and audit of frequent touch-point cleaning.

193 cohort study, we used data from the Scottish Audit of Intracranial Vascular Malformations, which pros

194 An audit of intravitreal injections performed by retinal sp

195 ment with data from the National Comparative Audit of Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding from 143 hospit

196 Responses to a routine audit of mood obtained from clinical records.

197 This was a prospective data audit of our first 221 SSIPK+ patients, who were compare

198 A retrospective audit of patients undergoing Permcath and Hickman line i

199 lation.Methods: An international multicenter audit of patients with a prior diagnosis of ILD admitted

200 Audit of process compliance and patient outcomes are imp

201 formation of the Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality (ANZASM) and describes its o

202 A nationwide audit of surgical mortality provides an overview of the

203 An audit of the colonoscopy database at The Queen Elizabeth

204 rgan Donation (ACCORD)-Spain consisted of an audit of the donation pathway from patients who died as

205 c review of the literature and international audit of trauma center quality improvement practices.

206 A recent audit of unplanned hospital admissions for neuromuscular

207 t 68 hospitals were listed on the DonateLife Audit of whom 553 (8.1%) were organ donors.

208 , but most endoscopists will require ongoing auditing of performance.

209 e analysis, including parameter adjustments, auditing of results and necessary annotations, should be

210 by international standards, further clinical auditing of the reasons for offer decline may help to op

211 Audits of indications for cesarean delivery, feedback fo

212 The intervention involved audits of indications for cesarean delivery, provision o

213 total); observations of the context of care; audits of patient hospital records; documentary analysis

214 Advice 3: Expert pathologists should report audits of their diagnosed cases of LGD, such as the freq

215 endoscopic eradication therapy should report audits of their rates of complete eradication of dysplas

216 roit, Michigan, and demonstrate that virtual audits offer key advantages to measuring neighborhood ph

217 We determined whether an audit on the adherence to guidelines for hospital-acquir

218 ber of donors using data from the DonateLife Audit on the basis of baseline patient characteristics a

219 by the dissemination of recommendations, an audit on the compliance to recommendations (audit period

220 nd practicability for either a half-day unit audit or a daily welfare assessment and for each scenari

221 AUDIT-P and AUDIT-C scores showed significantly differen

222 AUDIT-P score was significantly positively genetically c

223 on the problematic consequences of drinking (AUDIT-P).

224 From this audit, participating UK centers identified infants <30 d

225 used for analyzing the big data on doses for auditing patient safety, scanner utilization, and produc

226 audit on the compliance to recommendations (audit period) was followed by a three-month cluster-rand

227 tings), the IMS Health National Prescription Audit (pharmacy sales), and the MarketScan Commercial Cl

228 Criteria for surveillance or QI/audit place greater emphasis on reliability across indiv

229 cted estimates using validation studies that audited prescriptions against tuberculosis diagnosis, an

230 standardizing data, and supporting eventual audit procedures.

231 Western Australia, which first began the audit process, has shown a 30% reduction in surgical dea

232 ntation phase was initiated directed towards auditing process measures to reduce consumption of antib

233 Adherence with the auditing process was 80%.

234 the United Kingdom Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (January 1, 2016-December 31, 2016), mea

235 btained from the Stroke Improvement National Audit Programme (SINAP) database.

236 and and Wales using Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme data.

237 characteristics and Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme hospital score, a 1-unit increase in ESD

238 odels (derived from Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme postacute organizational audit data) wer

239 1994, and July 31, 2018, to the primary care audit programme, the Diabetes Care Support Service (DCSS

240 using data from the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme.

241 National perinatal mortality audit programmes need to be implemented in all high-inco

242 ained from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project between January 1, 2003, and June 30, 2013

243 data from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project for patients presenting with NSTE-ACS to E

244 oyal College of Anaesthetists 6(th) National Audit Project.

245 data from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project.

246 erved human GAL5.1 enhancer, alcohol intake (AUDIT questionnaire scores) and anxiety in men.

247 her for practices not restricted to EGS (eg, auditing readmissions) compared to EGS-specific practice

248 Recommendations identified in the audit reports direct educational workshops and seminars

249 In total, the virtual audit required approximately 3% of the time required by

250 Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre Case Mix Programme Database incl

251 study) and England (Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre Case Mix Programme).

252 (odds ratio, 1.90), Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre Physiology Score (odds ratio, 1.

253 (odds ratio, 1.63), Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre Physiology score (odds ratio, 1.

254 rvice Support Costs, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre.

255 rvice Support Costs, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre.

256 e with MND (pwMND) on the Scottish Clinical, Audit, Research and Evaluation of MND (CARE-MND) registe

257 etwork guidelines; reversing anticoagulants; auditing returns to intensive care, time to evaluation,

258 The initial audit revealed there was greater than 75% compliance in

259 ge in Epilepsy12 performance between the two audit rounds was associated with changes in the standard

260 er on secondary outcomes including recovery (AUDIT score < 8 at 3 and 12 months: 27.4% versus 15.1%;

261 llow-up, with the proportion with remission (AUDIT score < 8: 54.3% versus 31.9%; adjusted prevalence

262 Similarly, mean reduction in AUDIT score at 12 months post-baseline was statistically

263 Primary outcomes were remission (AUDIT score of <8) and mean daily alcohol consumed in th

264 n Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score of 12-19 who were aged 18-65 years from ten

265 AUDIT scores ascertained in population-based cohorts can

266 nal GWAS analyses were performed, a GWAS for AUDIT scores on items 1-3, which focus on consumption (A

267 lly significant effect was found in the mean AUDIT scores over time (F=8.96, p=0.004) but not for gro

268 We audited seizure outcome of 693 adults who had resective

269 The dimensions of AUDIT showed positive genetic correlations with alcohol

270 Auditing socioeconomic and demographic patterns traditio

271 Yet a number of recent audits suggest that large numbers of patients are failin

272 ance in physician self-reports and objective audits suggest that pain management optimization studies

273 e use of guidelines; education and training; auditing; surveillance and feedback; multimodal and mult

274 rigins have different functional properties, auditing the cargo derived from cell type-specific EVs i

275 This included an initial audit to identify gaps and interviews to assess barriers

276 However, the realization of an audit to improve their application did not further impro

277 other countries planning to set up their own audits to follow a similar concept.

278 laborative effort at developing standardized audit tools for assessing the quality of antimicrobial p

279 The GWAS meta-analysis of AUDIT total score identified 10 associated risk loci.

280 ank to identify thresholds for dichotomizing AUDIT total score that optimize genetic correlations wit

281 Coding individuals with AUDIT total scores <=4 as control subjects and those wit

282 oading and rerunning code and can provide an audit trail for analyses of data that cannot be shared.

283 A full audit trail is maintained to secure data provenance, gov

284 Furthermore, OMeta maintains a complete audit trail of all changes made by users and allows meta

285 prospects to provide a traceable and useful audit trail of trial data for regulators, and a flexible

286 uisition and data analysis, process control, audit trails and automation.

287 ty analysis of overall survival based on the audited treatment-free interval stratification data gave

288 s of the Dutch Upper gastrointestinal Cancer Audit was estimated at 99.8%.

289 data from the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit was performed.

290 he Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) was acquired at three measurement occasions acros

291 d in the Dutch Upper gastrointestinal Cancer Audit were included.

292 fection rates, self-reported compliance, and audits were analyzed by Pearson correlation.

293 ata entry validation was conducted, and data audits were conducted.

294 ed data to the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit) were organised into 15 geographical clusters and

295 e Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) were randomised to either CAP plus enhanced usual

296 em Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT), which assesses past-year frequency and quantity

297 ents registered in the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit who underwent potentially curative esophageal carc

298 tients recorded in the National Bowel Cancer Audit who underwent urgent or emergency colorectal cance

299 ods as formulary restriction and prospective audit with feedback; however, engagement of prescribers

300 2013-14) of the Epilepsy12 national clinical audit, with death registrations from the UK Office for N