ライフサイエンスコーパス: auditory

1 of different sensory modalities (visual and auditory).

2 tween severity of visual loss and changes in auditory abilities is proportional and systematic.

3 e visual losses need to be before changes in auditory abilities occur, or whether the relationship be

4 ss leads to substantial enhancements in many auditory abilities, and deficits in others.

5 se across-brain registration to characterize auditory activity throughout the entire central brain of

6 ting PHA-L into the visual, but not into the auditory AI, revealed a massive projection to tectal lay

7 lineage can compromise viability and impede auditory analyses.

8 hat oculomotor centers keep track of visual, auditory and audiovisual objects by remapping their eye-

9 r emergence in an ascending series of ferret auditory and frontal cortical fields, and the dynamics o

10 r innervation, as did thalamic and hindbrain auditory and lateral line areas and vocal-acoustic integ

11 duced early beta power (18-26 Hz, ~70 ms) in auditory and motor areas, presumably reflecting an early

12 lves anatomical and functional links between auditory and motor brain regions.

13 rtical region (NIf) at the interface between auditory and motor systems.

14 n the neural dynamics that potentially shape auditory and speech processing at different levels of th

15 In this study, we compared auditory and tactile BCIs, regarding training effects an

16 omotor networks, the DMN and visual, limbic, auditory and ventral attention networks, and between the

17 rthermore, extant pan-otic CREs recombine in auditory and vestibular brain nuclei, making it difficul

18 Improvements in auditory and vestibular function were sustained well int

19 ts in the formation of significantly smaller auditory and vestibular sensory epithelia, while conditi

20 combines electrophysiological assessments of auditory and visual function with diffusion MRI in aged

21 ch perception uses information from both the auditory and visual modalities.

22 lts indicate that age-associated deficits in auditory and visual processing emerge in part from micro

23 le and male) were presented with synchronous auditory and visual signals at the same location (i.e.,

24 structure, the FEF-IPS circuitry integrates auditory and visual spatial signals into representations

25 etal sulcus form a circuitry that integrates auditory and visual spatial signals into representations

26 ), that suggest the evolution of some unique auditory and visual specializations in relation to their

27 and the mechanisms by which the brain merges auditory and visual speech into a unitary perception.

28 circuitry that concurrently encodes spatial (auditory and visual stimulus locations), decisional (cau

29 articular, the fractional anisotropy (FA) of auditory and visual system thalamocortical and interhemi

30 er the structure and function of the central auditory and visual systems follow similar trajectories

31 the response properties of receptors in the auditory and visual systems, we have only a limited unde

32 e identified a key forebrain node that links auditory and vocal production circuits to match socially

33 vature following the presentation of visual, auditory, and audiovisual distractors in a double-step s

34 treatable condition characterized by ocular, auditory, and cutaneous abnormalities, with major compli

35 ruct involving linguistic as well as visual, auditory, and motor processes.

36 r 13 and other tectal related areas, sparing auditory, and trigeminal ones.

37 h prevalence of musculoskeletal, neurologic, auditory, and visual complications among Ebola virus dis

38 in the caudal mesopallium, a cortical-level auditory area implicated in discriminating and learning

39 re, the structural properties of a secondary auditory area in the left hemisphere, are capable to pre

40 ophysiology in awake behaving mice following auditory associative training.

41 nitive centers of the brain, focusing on the auditory/associative forebrain of the highly social zebr

42 results in a more accurate cytoarchitectonic auditory atlas.

43 Here we examined the use of auditory biofeedback to improve accommodative responses

44 Short periods of auditory biofeedback training to improve the response (r

45 development and ion channel deregulation of auditory brainstem circuits, to impaired neuronal plasti

46 enhanced spontaneous glutamate release in an auditory brainstem nucleus, while suppressing evoked rel

47 there are no significant differences in the auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds between mut

48 at 4 weeks of age as measured by tone burst auditory brainstem responses.

49 ENT In the neocortex, limbic structures, and auditory brainstem, glutamatergic nerve terminals corele

50 uch as the neocortex, limbic structures, and auditory brainstem, synaptic zinc is released from presy

51 ike activity drive the maturation of central auditory circuits.

52 h unselective neurons.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Auditory coding and perception are critical for vocal co

53 Auditory cognition and perception were tested using audi

54 into the role of the medial temporal lobe in auditory cognition.

55 stic prediction are fundamental processes in auditory cognition.

56 days old) mice to express, but not form, an auditory conditioned fear memory.

57 tones pyramidal (Pyr) neurons in male mouse auditory cortex (A1) exhibit facilitating and stable res

58 al layers L4 and L2/3 of awake mouse primary auditory cortex (A1) to characterize the populations of

59 g of Ntsr1-Cre+ L6 CT neurons in the primary auditory cortex (A1) while mice were engaged in an activ

60 ant cortical source of inputs is the primary auditory cortex (A1), suggesting strong A1-to-TeA connec

61 ease of ACh onto auditory neurons in primary auditory cortex (A1).

62 right primary, secondary, and/or association auditory cortex (AAC).

63 e comparable across wakefulness and sleep in auditory cortex (AC), neuronal activity in downstream re

64 poral adaptation and network dynamics in the auditory cortex (AC).

65 ed spiking activity from single units in the auditory cortex (fields A1, R and RT) and auditory thala

66 euronal spiking and LFP responses in primary auditory cortex (PAC) persisted after LOC, while respons

67 rior colliculus, medial geniculate body, and auditory cortex all being in their expected locations, a

68 ed that the focal intervention over the left auditory cortex also decreased 30-Hz activity in the rig

69 Auditory cortex also had robust delay period activity.

70 t a hierarchical process, present in primary auditory cortex and refined in secondary auditory cortex

71 her post-stimulatory activity is observed in auditory cortex and the medial geniculate body of the th

72 critically involve inhibitory neurons in the auditory cortex called parvalbumin neurons.

73 neurons, our results demonstrate that mouse auditory cortex can track fine frequency changes, which

74 Therefore, we found that auditory cortex could support the neural computations th

75 -dependent changes have been demonstrated in auditory cortex for a number of behavioral paradigms and

76 ly distinct neuronal subtypes in the primary auditory cortex have different contributions to the inte

77 tion of the main GABAergic drug effects from auditory cortex in standard trials to prefrontal cortex

78 We identify a distinct population of auditory cortex neurons in which response selectivity pa

79 Auditory cortex neurons nonlinearly integrate synaptic i

80 analyzed neural population activity from the auditory cortex of anesthetized rats while the brain spo

81 btle variations in frequency trajectories in auditory cortex of female mice.

82 Responses in auditory cortex only showed modest changes during sleep,

83 a specific population of neurons in primary auditory cortex that are sensitive to the spectral resol

84 nthesize neuroestrogens, remains high in the auditory cortex throughout development.

85 -INs and principal neurons of layer 4 in the auditory cortex was absent, concomitant with a decreased

86 sequently flowed downstream to the secondary auditory cortex, followed by the primary auditory cortex

87 tion using acute multiunit recordings in the auditory cortex, in combination with behavioral readouts

88 ary auditory cortex and refined in secondary auditory cortex, in which sound repetition facilitates s

89 In primary auditory cortex, slowly repeated acoustic events are rep

90 g age, we here show that in older listeners' auditory cortex, the key feature of temporal rate is rep

91 ession (13-22 Hz, ~350 ms) in prefrontal and auditory cortex.

92 am governs this window for patterning of the auditory cortex.

93 oing debate on the parcellation of the human auditory cortex.

94 in phonetically-tuned neural populations in auditory cortex.

95 ary auditory cortex, followed by the primary auditory cortex.

96 sticity and network hyperexcitability in the auditory cortex.

97 pressing inhibitory interneurons (PV) in the auditory cortex.

98 ndent transformation patterns in the primary auditory cortex.

99 al inputs can operate by directly activating auditory cortical areas, and also indirectly by modulati

100 time, and that this response in a secondary auditory cortical field changes with experience to acqui

101 ies of multiple functional regions along the auditory cortical hierarchy.

102 f global integration is commonly observed in auditory cortical neurons, and potentially used by the n

103 s of excitatory-inhibitory inputs onto mouse auditory cortical pyramidal neurons.

104 erception is mediated by both left and right auditory cortices but with differential sensitivity to s

105 ined auditory speech representation in early auditory cortices.

106 s in the brain, it is unclear how visual and auditory cues are combined to improve speech perception.

107 hat integration can occur as both visual and auditory cues arise from a common generator: the vocal t

108 by avian predators and that detecting these auditory cues may aid in anti-predator behavior.

109 We exposed human participants to auditory cues that predicted the likely direction of vis

110 icipants (N = 21; 18 female) used predictive auditory cues to anticipate the timing of low-contrast v

111 tic users must rely on incidental visual and auditory cues.

112 ars) completed a listening task to determine auditory discrimination abilities to vocal fundamental f

113 ine modestly enhanced functional measures of auditory discrimination in both schizophrenia patients (

114 We trained gerbils to perform an auditory discrimination task and obtained measures of in

115 calcium dynamics as mice learned a go/no-go auditory discrimination task.

116 ly developing (TD) participants completed an auditory discrimination task.

117 We also show that auditory discrimination thresholds in human listeners co

118 Auditory distractions occurred a median of 138 times per

119 Here we combined a conflict task in the auditory domain with EEG neurodynamics to test how neura

120 ing of USV-responsive neurons in TeA impairs auditory-driven maternal preference in a pup-retrieval a

121 erties of Hensen's cells have been linked to auditory dysfunction and hearing loss.

122 ing underlying mechanisms of hyperacusis and auditory dysfunction in ASD.

123 findings provide further evidence of central auditory dysfunction in posterior cortical atrophy, with

124 play, they may not interact with the games' auditory environment.

125 hypothesize that this activity preceding the auditory-evoked activity in the male HVC represents a ne

126 In a social context, HVC neurons displayed auditory-evoked activity to hearing of female calls only

127 Early auditory experience is critical to the development of th

128 recovery from surgery, underwent a standard auditory fear conditioning procedure.

129 ch discrimination abilities may rely more on auditory feedback and thus may be less adept at updating

130 hus, visual imagery is not a prerequisite of auditory feedback to early visual cortex.

131 ntricity of early visual cortex develops for auditory feedback, even in the lifelong absence of visio

132 singing while exposed to abnormal (delayed) auditory feedback.

133 pathways (neural gain) after damage of slow auditory fibers.

134 By bisulfite sequencing analysis of auditory forebrain DNA, isolation caused changes in meth

135 t a physiological level when presented in an auditory format.

136 OHC power output at auditory frequencies is revealed by emergence of an imag

137 (WIN) and HS (WIN and QuickSIN), as well as auditory frequency modulation learning in schizophrenia

138 memantine can enhance a range of metrics of auditory function.

139 Ferrets were trained on two auditory Go-NoGo categorization tasks to discriminate tw

140 Auditory hair cells receive olivocochlear efferent inner

141 el of vesicle release.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Auditory information is encoded by action potentials (AP

142 al coding in the midbrain areas that provide auditory information to cortex.

143 wever, it is unclear whether the transfer of auditory information to early visual areas is an epiphen

144 y system, and by extension the processing of auditory information, within the brain of the African wi

145 at auditory working memory similarly retains auditory information.

146 In contrast, periodic auditory input at the same ultralow frequency did not en

147 amplitude of evoked responses to concomitant auditory input.

148 lating the strength of cortical responses to auditory input.

149 nnervated by somatosensory structures, while auditory inputs to the LCIC target the surrounding extra

150 erventions preferring practical training and auditory interactive alerts.

151 of visual loss is associated with increased auditory judgments of distance and room size.

152 bundle of cochlear hair cells is the site of auditory mechanoelectrical transduction.

153 All sounds activated auditory midbrain and cortex, but listening to the seque

154 d the neural representation of speech in the auditory midbrain of gerbils with "hidden hearing loss"

155 ndividual differences in the strength of the auditory-motor connection.

156 protocol that captures the existence of such auditory-motor interactions.

157 al cortex predicting conscious perception of auditory near-threshold stimulation).

158 They were activated by auditory nerve and T-stellate cells, and made local inhi

159 Solution effects on inner hair cells reduced auditory nerve compound action potentials (CAPs) and pro

160 Single-unit auditory nerve fiber recordings were obtained from 41 Mo

161 tense noise can destroy the synapses between auditory nerve fibers and their hair cell targets withou

162 are not apparent in responses of single-unit auditory nerve fibers of quiet-aged gerbils.

163 ssibly due to a reduced population of active auditory nerve fibers, which will be of importance for t

164 To address this issue, we studied auditory nerve synapses onto bushy cells in the cochlear

165 ing deficits may develop more central to the auditory nerve, possibly due to a reduced population of

166 formation to the brain via synapses with the auditory nerve.

167 aused by SNHL.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Loss of auditory-nerve (AN) cochlear innervation is a common pro

168 ormal positions at the basolateral pole, and auditory-nerve terminals extend towards the hair cell's

169 ANFs.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Phase locking of auditory-nerve-fiber responses to the temporal fine stru

170 The vpoDNs receive excitatory input from auditory neurons (vpoENs), which are tuned to specific f

171 ation of homeostatic regulators in the fly's auditory neurons accelerated - or protected against - AR

172 ew pathway of connectivity between brainstem auditory neurons and indicates that MOC neurons are both

173 ns may trigger increased release of ACh onto auditory neurons in primary auditory cortex (A1).

174 anges in spontaneous firing rates of central auditory neurons resulting from modification of neural g

175 us (IC) integrates information from numerous auditory nuclei and is an important hub for sound proces

176 e brain, including well-delineated vocal and auditory nuclei.

177 sion of adrenergic receptors in the midbrain auditory nucleus, the inferior colliculus (IC), but have

178 compared with their corresponding visual and auditory objects.

179 ifficult or impossible to comprehend, unlike auditory-only and audiovisual speech.

180 ovisual speech were weaker than responses to auditory-only speech, demonstrating a subadditive multis

181 -only speech and larger, phasic responses to auditory-only speech.

182 tological properties between the cochlea and auditory ossicles, we evaluate the ossicles as an altern

183 e a common pathology affecting the ascending auditory pathway and multimodal cortex, depletion of cog

184 e high information transfer fails to predict auditory pathway organization and has substantially poor

185 rior colliculus (IC), the hub of the central auditory pathway, molecular markers for distinct classes

186 resentations of resolved harmonics along the auditory pathway.

187 ts organizational hierarchy of the ascending auditory pathway.

188 place coding of resolved harmonics along the auditory pathway.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Harmonic complex

189 ugmentation of auditory responses in central auditory pathways (neural gain) after damage of slow aud

190 uracy that is similar to the accuracy of the auditory perception of whispered sounds, and in congruen

191 n about how sensorimotor integration affects auditory perception.

192 on to the most frequent noise level and that auditory peripheral compression, rather than the medial

193 ur findings imply that the properties of the auditory periphery and central pathway may together resu

194 e detailed biological complexity seen in the auditory periphery does not appear to be important for u

195 forming biophysically detailed models of the auditory periphery, and more consistently well over dive

196 Children with less sensitive auditory pitch discrimination abilities may rely more on

197 crimination abilities and vocal responses to auditory pitch-shifts.

198 g = -0.40, 95% CI (-0.50, -0.29), automatic auditory processing (mismatch negativity), g = -0.44, 95

199 e-induced neuroinflammation is implicated in auditory processing deficits such as impairment in gap d

200 extracting the neural dynamics that underlie auditory processing from magnetoencephalography (MEG) da

201 ned and nuanced characterization of cortical auditory processing in the 2 hemispheres, shedding light

202 This discovery establishes a primate auditory prototype for the arcuate fasciculus, reveals a

203 y cognition and perception were tested using auditory reaction time and two speech-in-noise tasks.

204 tibility to misinformation, whereas stronger auditory reactivation was associated with increased susc

205 gregaria) to characterize a decrease in the auditory receptor's ability to respond to sound after no

206 hearing research is that vertebrate primary auditory receptors are surprisingly robust, something th

207 ysiological function of the upstream primary auditory receptors is warranted to understand how noise

208 us is one such modular structure, containing auditory-recipient matrix regions and GABA-rich modules

209 We found that, in a secondary auditory region of a songbird, these patterns reflected

210 information as well as decreased activity in auditory regions associated with the misleading source o

211 d after LOC, while responses in higher-order auditory regions were variable, with neuronal spiking la

212 Auditory responses are stereotyped across trials and ani

213 en contrast improvement, and augmentation of auditory responses in central auditory pathways (neural

214 We also observe concomitant disinhibition of auditory responses in deep-layer pyramidal neurons that

215 an ethologically inspired paradigm to drive auditory responses in higher-order neurons, our results

216 in the sensory-motor, lateral sensory-motor, auditory, salience, and subcortical networks in particip

217 adaptations for non-musical functions (e.g., auditory scene analysis).

218 wo generic cognitive operations underpinning auditory scene analysis-sound source segregation and sou

219 forelegs, which demonstrate a broad range of auditory sensitivity (100-10,000 Hz).

220 iatum dopamine with aberrant iFC between the auditory-sensorimotor network and thalamus.

221 In the auditory-sensorimotor network-centred system, patients h

222 , which correlated positively with increased auditory-sensorimotor network-ventrolateral-thalamus iFC

223 e about age-related changes occurring in the auditory sensory cells, including those associated with

224 ation of Six1 binding at different stages of auditory sensory epithelium development and find that Si

225 In the auditory sensory epithelium-the organ of Corti-progenito

226 ay musical instruments, our actions generate auditory sensory input.

227 itive processes that do not directly rely on auditory sensory input.

228 raded the spectral or temporal dimensions of auditory sentence spectrograms to assess how well visual

229 Here we report on auditory space encoding in the mouse superior colliculus

230 ive rise to the topographic map of azimuthal auditory space.

231 al cues contribute to the neural encoding of auditory space.

232 Human auditory spatial perception showed correlation with natu

233 Although vision is important for calibrating auditory spatial perception, it only provides informatio

234 y adult humans (17 females) entrained to the auditory speech envelope and lip movements (mouth openin

235 Auditory speech perception enables listeners to access p

236 ich visual speech enhances the efficiency of auditory speech processing in pSTG.

237 temporal gyrus, enhancing the efficiency of auditory speech processing.

238 p-read signal to synthesize a coarse-grained auditory speech representation in early auditory cortice

239 ion effect driven by cross-modal recovery of auditory speech spectra.

240 Lip-reading is known to improve auditory speech understanding, especially when speech is

241 s the cortical representation of concomitant auditory speech.

242 engagement measured by gamma-frequency band auditory steady-state response (40 Hz ASSR) and resting

243 sensory-evoked oscillations, as measured by auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) at 40 Hz, are ro

244 tinuity should be a primary consideration if auditory stimulation is used to enhance slow-wave activi

245 ulation, such as training-associated cues or auditory stimulation, during sleep can augment consolida

246 ertness and neuronal response to tactile and auditory stimulation.

247 ted by footshocks, and acquire a response to auditory stimuli during fear learning.

248 ng subjective reports of tactile, visual, or auditory stimuli during the same magnetoencephalography

249 e, we measured BOLD responses to tactile and auditory stimuli for both JMD patients and control parti

250 casting spider, Deinopis spinosa, can detect auditory stimuli from at least 2 m from the sound source

251 rned sensory epithelium that acts to convert auditory stimuli into neural impulses.

252 differentiated between visual, tactile, and auditory stimuli suggesting the presence of functionally

253 pofol infusion was gradually increased while auditory stimuli were presented and patients responded t

254 gamma band oscillations induced by trains of auditory stimuli, or exposure to novel objects, were imp

255 separable responses to visual, tactile, and auditory stimuli.

256 ousal produced by exposure to hypercarbia or auditory stimuli.

257 trate that it reflects fast synthesis of the auditory stimulus rather than mental imagery of unrelate

258 , A and B, is a valued paradigm for studying auditory stream formation and the cocktail party problem

259 eplicate two hallmarks of bistability during auditory streaming: the selectivity of bistability to sp

260 scrimination of neuronal populations in each auditory structure, but collicular and thalamic populati

261 In contrast, in each auditory structure, discrimination by neuronal populatio

262 f vascular loops is not associated with most auditory symptoms.

263 We show that the auditory synapse of GLAST KO mice is more vulnerable to

264 stage of descending control of the mammalian auditory system and exert influence on cochlear mechanic

265 findings inform the understanding of how the auditory system encodes socially-relevant signals via de

266 f neuronal populations at five levels of the auditory system in response to conspecific vocalizations

267 ening in challenging situations, or when the auditory system is damaged, strains cortical resources,

268 The left auditory system is specialized for processing of phoneme

269 Where and how the auditory system might encode these summary statistics to

270 ficantly reduced only in white matter of the auditory system of aged monkeys, while thalamocortical F

271 n pictus) has led to the assumption that the auditory system of this unique canid may be specialized.

272 show that, from birth to hearing onset, the auditory system relies on a consistent mechanism to elic

273 scending control of the mammalian peripheral auditory system through axon projections to the cochlea.

274 Thus, the auditory system uses a consistent mechanism involving AT

275 ic neurons of the calyx of Held in the mouse auditory system, a model synapse that allows precise bio

276 y speaking, the systems-level anatomy of the auditory system, and by extension the processing of audi

277 In the auditory system, FMRP deficiency alters neuronal functio

278 rated, occurs beyond the classically defined auditory system, in limbic or association neocortical re

279 In the auditory system, intrinsically generated activity arises

280 deficiency of HGF expression limited to the auditory system, or an overexpression of HGF, causes neu

281 between sounds-a striking capability of the auditory system-plays an essential role in animals' surv

282 affect asymmetry of speech processing in the auditory system.

283 Here, auditory-tactile multisensory neurons were predominant a

284 time to build prediction models of a moving auditory target's trajectory and enable prey capture und

285 w that oculomotor inhibition occurs prior to auditory targets.

286 ior to predictable relative to unpredictable auditory targets.

287 to anticipate the future location of moving auditory targets.

288 ements are also inhibited before predictable auditory targets.

289 Here, rats perform an auditory task where the probability to repeat the previo

290 between action video game play and untrained auditory tasks, which would speak to the possible utilit

291 he auditory cortex (fields A1, R and RT) and auditory thalamus of awake, passively-listening marmoset

292 vity is observed mainly in matrix regions of auditory thalamus, MMN generators are most prominent in

293 signaling to regulate activity in the IC and auditory thalamus.

294 her in the absence or presence of distractor auditory tones.

295 ponents of the fly's molecular machinery for auditory transduction and amplification.

296 rrent depression, performed worse on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task (p < 0.05), and had a mark

297 ne learning to study how the brain processes auditory, visual, and audiovisual objects.

298 rticipants (both sexes) completed visual and auditory WM tasks while electroencephalography was recor

299 Here, we show that auditory working memory similarly retains auditory infor

300 ps compensatory neural dynamics, sub-serving auditory working memory, remains largely unexplored.