ライフサイエンスコーパス: auditory evoked potential

1 ry gating assessed by P50 suppression of the auditory evoked potential.

2 tory percept, evidenced by changes in the N1 auditory evoked potential.

3 iated with diminished suppression of the P50 auditory evoked potential.

4 chizophrenia-like decreases in amplitudes of auditory evoked potentials.

5 sound sensitivity, and specific patterns of auditory evoked potentials.

6 he attack and strong intensity dependence of auditory evoked potentials.

7 al auditory brainstem responses and cortical auditory-evoked potentials.

8 lity as measured by electroencephalogram and auditory-evoked potentials.

9 tory brainstem in the guinea pig by tracking auditory evoked potentials across development.

10 The auditory evoked potential (AEP) is a high-amplitude sens

11 ained to respond to an audible signal,(2) or auditory evoked potential (AEP) methods, where the neura

12 peritoneal epinephrine enhances the cerebral auditory evoked potential (AEP), an effect that is depen

13 le responses in A1 of the awake monkey using auditory evoked potential (AEP), multiple-unit activity

14 e detection has been associated with a human auditory-evoked potential (AEP), the mismatch negativity

15 We compared averaged auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) associated with 1-stre

16 ditory processing capabilities, long-latency auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) were recorded to synth

17 To test this hypothesis, we analysed auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) which were recorded fr

18 evaluate the added prognostic value of late auditory evoked potentials (AEPs): mismatch negativity (

19 Auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) have become a widely u

20 The amplitude of auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) in the hippocampus inc

21 ve-language experience on sensory-obligatory auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) was investigated in na

22 Local field and auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) were recorded from pri

23 Auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) were triggered in real

24 The effects of gender on auditory evoked potential amplitude suggest dimorphic si

25 ared to the hearing threshold obtained using Auditory Evoked Potential and particle acceleration thre

26 The human P1/P50 midlatency auditory evoked potential and the startle response (SR)

27 These results suggest that gating of auditory evoked potentials and PPI of startle measure di

28 lay in the FIV-induced effects on brain stem auditory evoked potentials, and demonstrated a trend tow

29 its, altered gait and equilibrium, brainstem auditory evoked potentials, and sleep disorders.

30 Brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) abnormalities occur in

31 tatus, along with measurements of brain stem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) changes.

32 Our objective was to examine brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) in rat CS as a measur

33 auditory system, as assessed with brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs).

34 Recording of free-field cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) responses to speech tok

35 Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP) throughout a language

36 uces changes in the latency of both cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) and VEPs and a decrea

37 o study the N1 and P2 components of cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) evoked by 70, 80, 90,

38 easure, the electrically-stimulated cortical auditory evoked potential (eCAEP), non-invasively using

39 esthetic depth using the bispectral index or auditory evoked potentials has greatly improved feedback

40 c rats to directly record inferior colliculi auditory-evoked potentials (ICEPs).

41 ectrophysiological recordings of the P20-N40 auditory evoked potential in anesthetized DBA/2 mice, wh

42 , the amplitude of the N100 component of the auditory evoked potential in response to the target tone

43 We recorded cortical auditory evoked potentials in normal hearing children an

44 rug reversed disrupted latent inhibition and auditory-evoked potential in mice and rats, respectively

45 Human studies with auditory evoked potentials indicate that FXS is associat

46 Diminished suppression of the P50 auditory evoked potential is a phenotype used in studies

47 The N1 peak in the late auditory evoked potential (LAEP) decreases in amplitude

48 EEG auditory-evoked potentials likely representing stimulus-

49 on of temporal components of the mid-latency auditory evoked potential (MAEP) recorded with a multich

50 of hearing loss and hearing aids on cortical auditory evoked potential measurements in response to sp

51 Data from our laboratory suggest that auditory evoked potentials of DBA/2J mice differ from th

52 ear electrode array in human subjects, using auditory evoked potentials originating from different br

53 We simultaneously measured auditory evoked potentials over a large swath of primary

54 ition") were the most impaired on brain stem auditory evoked potentials (P=.005); those (n=13) with s

55 to wave III interpeak latency of brain stem auditory evoked potentials (P=.02), greater interocular

56 Intracortical auditory evoked potentials paralleled noninvasive neurop

57 vealed distinct infection-induced changes in auditory-evoked potential peak latencies that persisted

58 ng inbred mouse strains in sensory gating of auditory evoked potentials, prepulse inhibition (PPI) of

59 easured at the output of the hearing aid and auditory evoked potentials recorded while the listener w

60 vidence of current or past psychosis and had auditory evoked potentials recorded.

61 Mice lacking NeuroD protein exhibit no auditory evoked potentials, reflecting a profound deafne

62 The P50 auditory evoked potential response to paired stimuli was

63 s associated with failure to inhibit the P50 auditory evoked potential response.

64 ial magnetic resonance imaging and brainstem auditory evoked potential results have improved dramatic

65 This study addresses whether diminished P50 auditory evoked potential suppression represents a pheno

66 izophrenia patients do not inhibit their P50 auditory evoked potential to the second of duplicate aud

67 Auditory evoked potential topics include an overview of

68 ngs from each wire were made while the local auditory-evoked potential was also recorded.

69 The P20, N40, and P80 components of the auditory evoked potential were examined in male and fema

70 ia Rating Scale, and the latency of the P300 auditory evoked potential were used as indices of prefro

71 Auditory evoked potentials were similar in OSAS and cont

72 Auditory evoked potentials were used to investigate brai

73 Auditory-evoked potentials were recorded at all sites.

74 ntrast, FIV-associated changes in brain stem auditory-evoked potentials were slow to develop in the m

75 Indeed, we found an enlarged N1 auditory evoked potential when subjects perceived illusi

76 neurons showed the greatest gating of local auditory-evoked potentials, while the auditory cortex sh