戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 paired auditory stimulus paradigm to measure auditory evoked response.
2 nd have been demonstrated mostly in averaged auditory evoked responses.
3 ent-current dipole models in localisation of auditory evoked responses.
4                     Moreover, no significant auditory-evoked responses accompanied this prethreshold
5 uced dysbindin-1 in mice yielded deficits in auditory-evoked response adaptation, prepulse inhibition
6 e used a longitudinal design to examine late auditory evoked responses and mismatch responses to nons
7 te hearing loss or less had normal brainstem auditory evoked responses and MRI, but it was not possib
8  result corroborates attention modulation of auditory evoked responses and shows that such modulation
9 [MRI], visual evoked response, and brainstem auditory evoked response [BAER] of cranial neuropathy.
10 recovery with time as reflected by brainstem auditory evoked responses (BAERs).
11  this algorithm on realistic simulations and auditory evoked response data, and show that thalamic an
12                                        These auditory-evoked responses, distinguished by robust, broa
13 ssociated with attenuation of the N1 wave of auditory evoked responses elicited by self-generated sou
14  was not possible to interpret the brainstem auditory evoked responses in 13 patients with severe hea
15 re progressive hearing loss, as confirmed by auditory evoked responses in Dusp1(-/)(-) mice.
16 llations, while simultaneously decreasing LC auditory-evoked responses in both age groups.
17 ceptor type, the 5-HT 1A receptor, depresses auditory-evoked responses in many neurons.
18 required for the long-lasting enhancement of auditory-evoked responses in the awake brain.
19  in schizophrenia include suppression of P50 auditory evoked responses, inhibition of leading (small
20         Notably, JB2 rescued deficits in the auditory evoked response latency, alpha peak frequency,
21 the hypothesis that inhibitory gating of the auditory-evoked response originates in the non-lemniscal
22 w poor P50 suppression during a paired-click auditory evoked response paradigm.
23 he listening phase confirmed the presence of auditory-evoked response patterns in putative inhibitory
24 hat the subjective sense of meter influences auditory evoked responses phase locked to the stimulus.
25 rms for auditory cortex regions of interest, auditory evoked response showed peaks at 37 and 90 ms an
26 nd frequencies (40 Hz) elicited steady-state auditory evoked responses (SSAERs) bilaterally over prim
27 simultaneous load effects on both visual and auditory evoked responses suggest shared audiovisual pro
28 n were recruited and screened with brainstem auditory evoked response testing to select dogs without
29 aft, differentiate and significantly improve auditory-evoked response thresholds.
30 h 199 had been diagnosed using the brainstem auditory evoked response to determine auditory status.
31 a systematic amplitude increase of the early auditory evoked responses to trained stimuli, as measure
32 decrease in the normal inhibition of the P50 auditory-evoked response to the second of paired stimuli
33    Neurophysiological testing for visual and auditory evoked responses was accomplished 37-52 weeks a
34                                              Auditory evoked responses were not altered by social sti