戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 y in articulatory regions to increase (i.e., auditory feedback).
2  imitation that requires the availability of auditory feedback.
3 utor song that they then vocally mimic using auditory feedback.
4 ortance to song perception and processing of auditory feedback.
5 bra finches maintain highly stable songs via auditory feedback.
6 s in perception, such as masking or altering auditory feedback.
7 th respect to a moment-by-moment reliance on auditory feedback.
8 pond rapidly to shifts of the pitch in their auditory feedback.
9 ium (LMAN) mediates song plasticity based on auditory feedback.
10 patterns are insensitive to manipulations of auditory feedback.
11 nals that generate the song rather than from auditory feedback.
12 on signals are reproduced from memory, using auditory feedback.
13  of call frequencies in response to changing auditory feedback.
14    This process requires control of voice by auditory feedback.
15 in response to inconsistent perturbations of auditory feedback.
16  maintenance of song, processes dependent on auditory feedback.
17 h, is a learned vocal behavior that requires auditory feedback.
18  providing a mechanism for context-dependent auditory feedback.
19  in response to a consistent perturbation of auditory feedback.
20 may actually rely on subtle cues provided by auditory feedback.
21              Adult song maintenance requires auditory feedback.
22  singing while exposed to abnormal (delayed) auditory feedback.
23 can nevertheless be reshaped dramatically by auditory feedback.
24 tian fruit bat vocal repertoire necessitates auditory feedback.
25 ements on a digital piano with corresponding auditory feedback.
26 he cortex and peaked at the time of expected auditory feedback.
27  the intended vocal output and the resulting auditory feedback.
28 rolled perceived song quality with distorted auditory feedback.
29 differences between vocal output and altered auditory feedback.
30 nsory feedback, also process this descending auditory feedback.
31 s) pitch perturbations at 100 Cents in their auditory feedback.
32 vocalizations and pitch perturbations in the auditory feedback.
33  correct for systematic real-time changes to auditory feedback.
34 vowels using somatosensory feedback, without auditory feedback.
35 l of vocalization is critically dependent on auditory feedback.
36 ze neural responses to unexpected changes in auditory feedback.
37  based on somatosensory feedback rather than auditory feedback.
38 urbed the pitch (100 cents, 400 ms) of their auditory feedback.
39  Reinforcement involved the use of real-time auditory feedback about step length asymmetry.
40 to deteriorate, but how vocalization-related auditory feedback acts on neural circuits that control v
41   These findings shed light on where and how auditory feedback acts within sensorimotor circuits to s
42 ocal learning and maintenance, where and how auditory feedback affects neural circuits important to v
43 itory association cortex, which responded to auditory feedback alone, and from that within a left lat
44                Reliance of song structure on auditory feedback also wanes with age.
45  the suppressed sites were also sensitive to auditory feedback alterations.
46 different conditions they experienced normal auditory feedback, altered auditory feedback (asynchrono
47 sensorimotor adaptation of speech to altered auditory feedback, an entirely implicit adaptation task.
48 ur experiments undergo adaptation to altered auditory feedback, an experimental model of speech motor
49 tient modulated neural firing rates based on auditory feedback and he used this strategy to select le
50       HVC is a premotor area that integrates auditory feedback and is necessary for song production.
51 aking in a non-native language involves more auditory feedback and less auditory suppression than spe
52 during which vocalizations are evaluated via auditory feedback and progressively refined to achieve a
53 y are rapidly influenced by perturbations of auditory feedback and support the possibility that feedb
54 earning task involving adaptation to altered auditory feedback and they were subsequently tested for
55 ch discrimination abilities may rely more on auditory feedback and thus may be less adept at updating
56 onding vocal tract configuration with masked auditory feedback and to identify the vowel associated w
57 important clues to how sensitive periods for auditory feedback and vocal plasticity are regulated dur
58 nsights into mirror neurons, the function of auditory feedback, and genes underlying social communica
59 parator circuits in which efferent commands, auditory feedback, and the memory of the tutor song are
60 ined on paths by using prosthetic vision and auditory feedback, and then were tested without auditory
61 ience with an adult (tutor) song pattern and auditory feedback are essential to vocal learning, close
62 btle deviations between predicted and actual auditory feedback as they moved their fingertip through
63 xperienced normal auditory feedback, altered auditory feedback (asynchronous delays or altered pitche
64 rimotor cortical network appears to underlie auditory feedback-based control of vocal pitch in humans
65 es real-time operator dose reporting through auditory feedback (Bleeper Sv; Vertec Scientific Ltd; Be
66 requency of their echolocation calls through auditory feedback both when the bat is at rest [resting
67 hways, is relatively unaffected by a loss of auditory feedback but is more significantly impacted by
68 ning and maintenance of song is dependent on auditory feedback, but little is known about the presenc
69  adult zebra finches temporarily deprived of auditory feedback by chronic exposure to loud white nois
70  in both songbirds and humans the removal of auditory feedback by deafening leads to a gradual deteri
71 s mechanism in Bengalese finches: removal of auditory feedback by deafening reduces syllable repetiti
72  for days or months after the elimination of auditory feedback by deafening.
73  especially crucial in vocal control because auditory feedback can be contaminated by environmental n
74 me radiation monitoring device that provides auditory feedback can significantly reduce operator radi
75 d in human joint tapping with bi-directional auditory feedback compared to joint tapping without feed
76 ry responses to pitch perturbations in their auditory feedback, compared to typical speakers, but thi
77 in whispering and articulating under altered auditory feedback conditions, exhibited delayed speech o
78 hmically repeating syllables under different auditory feedback conditions.
79                            We use disruptive auditory feedback, contingent on song pitch, to induce l
80             Evidence strongly indicates that auditory feedback contributes in real time to human spee
81                            Here we study how auditory feedback contributes to generating repetitive s
82                   This behavior known as the auditory feedback control of speech is impaired in vario
83     Together, these results demonstrate that auditory feedback control of speech is sensitive to ling
84 ever, neuronal substrates and mechanisms for auditory feedback control of vocalizations are still mos
85  either unexpected, providing information on auditory feedback control, or sustained, providing infor
86  neurosurgical participants during a delayed auditory feedback (DAF) paradigm.
87                 Next, we performed a delayed auditory feedback (DAF) task to determine whether the su
88 tput of HVCX cells is unaltered by distorted auditory feedback (DAF), deafening gradually weakens syn
89 tship vocalizations are not acquired through auditory feedback-dependent learning.
90                      Paradoxically, although auditory-feedback-dependent vocal plasticity has been sh
91      The hearing effect was dependent on the auditory feedback derived from the animal's own actions,
92 bird sings the same sequence, and disrupting auditory feedback does not alter this singing-related ac
93 ng, detection, and processing of errors when auditory feedback does not correspond to the intended mo
94 orrespondence between vocal-motor output and auditory feedback during development.
95 ing time-varying, focal perturbations in the auditory feedback during multisyllabic, connected speech
96 ord to rely more or less on somatosensory or auditory feedback during naming.
97                               Alterations of auditory feedback during piano performance can be profou
98 e neural mechanisms underlying processing of auditory feedback during self-vocalization are poorly un
99 that song premotor circuitry is sensitive to auditory feedback during singing and suggest that feedba
100                     We found that perturbing auditory feedback during singing in adult zebra finches
101 avior to allow sensorimotor feedback such as auditory feedback during singing.
102 of HVc neurons after singing and could shape auditory feedback during song learning.
103 uires mechanisms for continuously monitoring auditory feedback during speaking.
104 hin the auditory cortex, and is activated by auditory feedback during speech production.
105 table preference for either somatosensory or auditory feedback during speech.
106 hanisms that contribute to the processing of auditory feedback during the maintenance of song in adul
107 onkeys (Callithrix jacchus) are sensitive to auditory feedback during vocal production, and that chan
108 t were differentially sensitive to distorted auditory feedback during vocalization, compared with dur
109                        This ability requires auditory feedback during vocalization, which allows for
110  systematically altered by variations in the auditory feedback elicited by the brushing action.
111 is that suppression increases sensitivity to auditory feedback, enabling the detection of vocalizatio
112                                       Masked auditory feedback ensured that vowel categorization was
113 ntricity of early visual cortex develops for auditory feedback, even in the lifelong absence of visio
114 er, Bengalese finches, depends critically on auditory feedback for adult song maintenance.
115 ehavior requiring early sensory exposure and auditory feedback for its development and maintenance.
116 well into adulthood, including a reliance on auditory feedback for song maintenance.
117 arest relatives--non-human primates--require auditory feedback for the development of species-typical
118 t age-limited song learners do not depend on auditory feedback for the maintenance of adult song.
119                  Speech and birdsong require auditory feedback for their development and maintenance,
120 , within non-native speakers, there was less auditory feedback for those with better verbal fluency.
121 tect temporal and spectral variations in the auditory feedback for vocal pitch control.
122        These factors include the presence of auditory feedback from one's own taps, the presence of a
123 hought to compute the difference between the auditory feedback from the bird's vocalizations and an i
124 the underlying mechanisms are linked, and if auditory feedback from the changing vocal output is need
125                              Interruption of auditory feedback greatly reduced sleep bursting and pre
126 m single LMAN neurons while manipulating the auditory feedback heard by singing birds.
127 isely to the bird's song, independent of the auditory feedback heard by the bird.
128 ion of self-produced motor acts, such as the auditory feedback heard while speaking.
129 sponses, two processes that could facilitate auditory feedback important to song learning.
130 itude of vocal learning driven by disruptive auditory feedback in a negative reinforcement task.
131 rturbed the pitch (fundamental frequency) of auditory feedback in adult Bengalese finches using custo
132 pulated the fundamental frequency (pitch) of auditory feedback in Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata
133 echnical challenges involved in manipulating auditory feedback in precisely controlled ways during ru
134 ms to simultaneously alter somatosensory and auditory feedback in real time as subjects spoke.
135 this hypothesis, we manipulated the pitch of auditory feedback in singing Bengalese finches.
136                            The importance of auditory feedback in the development of spoken language
137 se results highlight the systematic roles of auditory feedback in the online control of a highly over
138  during singing did not completely depend on auditory feedback in the short term, because neither the
139                  Despite the central role of auditory feedback in vocal learning and maintenance, whe
140                      Given the importance of auditory feedback in vocal production, how can deaf indi
141                            Although abnormal auditory feedback integration during speech production a
142      One technique used to study the role of auditory feedback involves shifting the pitch of the fee
143    These findings indicate that a responsive auditory feedback involving surprises introduced by huma
144                Here we present evidence that auditory feedback is actively used in adulthood to maint
145 ult songbirds change their vocal output when auditory feedback is altered or absent.
146         But this view neglects the fact that auditory feedback is highly correlated with somatosensor
147                                              Auditory feedback is instrumental in the online control
148 e during the period of song development when auditory feedback is most crucial.
149  exists among species in the extent to which auditory feedback is necessary for song maintenance.
150 rs (Melopsittacus undulatus) to determine if auditory feedback is necessary for the production of nes
151 e regardless of exposure to other birds, but auditory feedback is required for the maintenance of sta
152 tain accurate speech by carefully monitoring auditory feedback is widely held.
153 cal premotor activity after perturbations of auditory feedback, leading to the hypothesis that contri
154      The results suggest that the removal of auditory feedback leads to the generation of an instruct
155 speech perception when adaptation to altered auditory feedback led to speech production that fell int
156 cts later heard the same recordings of their auditory feedback (listen condition).
157   Together, our results implicate a positive auditory-feedback loop with adaptation in generating rep
158                                     In part, auditory feedback may restore song by strengthening the
159 tive sculpting of the RA network, supporting auditory feedback-mediated song maintenance.
160 Here, we sought to determine how the loss of auditory feedback modifies gene expression and its coord
161                       How does the brain use auditory feedback, namely the self-perception of produce
162 ously with their partner, either with normal auditory feedback (normal feedback) or randomly placed d
163   In both these vocal learners, however, how auditory feedback of self is processed in these brain ar
164 ocalizations of adult "tutors", and then use auditory feedback of self-produced vocalizations to grad
165 n response to +200 cents pitch shifts in the auditory feedback of self-vocalizations and complex tone
166 ration times are likely necessary to process auditory feedback of the bird's own vocalizations.
167 rom premotor areas and could be modulated by auditory feedback of the bird's own voice.
168    Here, we assessed real-time influences of auditory feedback on Bengalese finch song using a comput
169 eafening, indicating an ongoing influence of auditory feedback on learned song.
170      In a 2 x 2 factorial design, visual and auditory feedback on one's own body were varied across c
171 wo acoustically different types of distorted auditory feedback or unaltered feedback while human part
172 nement, decreases in the reliance of song on auditory feedback, or both.
173 s model directly, the authors used a delayed auditory feedback paradigm in which the subject hears hi
174 and 20 controls were tested under an altered auditory feedback paradigm in which they received + 30%
175 ., reflexive) and long-term (i.e., adaptive) auditory feedback paradigms, to generating prosodic cont
176 controversial due to the long latency of the auditory feedback pathway and technical challenges invol
177 ehavioral vocal compensations in response to auditory feedback pitch perturbations.
178                    Our results indicate that auditory feedback plays a crucial role in shaping the co
179 dies have focused primarily on the role that auditory feedback plays in shaping vocal output througho
180 rticipants produced speech with simultaneous auditory feedback, posterior STG was selectively activat
181 neurons exhibit fast responses to disruptive auditory feedback presented during singing, but not duri
182                                     Where is auditory feedback processed in the brain, and how does i
183 G), a region that has not been implicated in auditory feedback processing before, exhibited a markedl
184          Together, our findings suggest that auditory feedback processing during speech motor control
185 to the stationary index or ring finger, with auditory feedback provided to signal correct and incorre
186 that increased attentional load can modulate auditory feedback sensitivity.
187 ed the perceived song quality with distorted auditory feedback-showed that dopamine in Area X, the si
188 ntrol system may be essential for regulating auditory feedback signals necessary for song learning an
189 vocal system, it requires the integration of auditory feedback signals with vocal motor commands.
190            This induction was independent of auditory feedback, since it occurred in deafened birds t
191 tor-driven gene expression is independent of auditory feedback, since it occurs in deafened birds whe
192 00 cents) pitch perturbations in their voice auditory feedback (speaking task).
193          After prolonged exposure to delayed auditory feedback, subjects recalibrate their behavioral
194 oup showed a greater relative sensitivity to auditory feedback than the control group.
195  feedback and receiving endpoint vowel sound auditory feedback that depended continuously on touch lo
196 ange in perception was not observed when the auditory feedback that subjects' received during learnin
197 peech production, irrespective of fluency or auditory feedback, the people who stuttered showed overa
198 dult birds correct vocal errors by comparing auditory feedback to a sensory target and suggest that l
199           Young birds learn to sing by using auditory feedback to compare their own vocalizations to
200  learn to sing, and as adults, songbirds use auditory feedback to compare their own vocalizations wit
201     However, although humans continue to use auditory feedback to correct vocal errors in adulthood,
202 hus, visual imagery is not a prerequisite of auditory feedback to early visual cortex.
203 lated activity in these cells is compared to auditory feedback to guide vocal learning.
204  an instructive/learning mechanism that uses auditory feedback to guide vocal recovery, at least in t
205 zebra finch, a small songbird that relies on auditory feedback to learn and maintain its species-typi
206                                Songbirds use auditory feedback to learn and maintain their songs, but
207 re one of the few non-human animals that use auditory feedback to learn their vocalizations, thus aud
208  deafened adult zebra finches, which rely on auditory feedback to maintain their learned songs, to te
209                  Adult zebra finches require auditory feedback to maintain their songs.
210 s sensorimotor learning, the young bird uses auditory feedback to perfect his motor performance, crea
211 stricted developmental period and then using auditory feedback to practice their own vocalizations.
212 ong, like human speech, relies critically on auditory feedback to provide information about the quali
213  microlesions, indicating that birds require auditory feedback to restore/relearn their vocal pattern
214                   Although the importance of auditory feedback to vocal learning is well established,
215 perturbations that manipulated the timing of auditory feedback trajectory (slow-down or speed-up), si
216                                              Auditory feedback was binary, signaling whether steps we
217                                              Auditory feedback was manipulated by changing the freque
218 t for at least one of the perturbations, but auditory feedback was not dominant.
219 ttered after noise onset, suggesting that no auditory feedback was required.
220                                         When auditory feedback was restored by discontinuing WN, bird
221 tions corresponding to speech production and auditory feedback were observed, but also sustained neur
222 nitoring where speakers consistently compare auditory feedback (what we hear ourselves say) with what
223               Similarly, young birds rely on auditory feedback when learning to imitate the songs of
224                        Thus, motor access to auditory feedback, which zebra finches require for song
225 itory feedback, and then were tested without auditory feedback, with and without prosthetic vision.
226 ion of the song model (sensory template) and auditory feedback, with changes in night-time activity p

 
Page Top